NATION

PASSWORD

NSG Senate Chamber [NSG Senate]

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Venaleria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 616
Founded: Nov 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Venaleria » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:12 pm

I move to omnibus the "Free School Meals Act" with the "Governmental Services Act" as it falls in line with public education, clearly stated there.
Vice President of Aurentina, representing Lüsen, District 375
Election Commissioner for the Red-Greens Party
NSG Senate Administrator
Ambassador to the Totally Rad Party
Join Sirius. Siriusly.
If you're going to spell my name, spell it correctly. Or you can just call me Ven or Venny.
"Is it behind the bunny?" "It IS the bunny!" -MP

User avatar
Welsh Cowboy
Minister
 
Posts: 2340
Founded: Dec 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Welsh Cowboy » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:17 pm

Anyone wish to debate the Criminal Code?

If not, I move to begin voting.
Champions, 53rd Baptism of Fire

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:17 pm

Welsh Cowboy wrote:Anyone wish to debate the Criminal Code?

If not, I move to begin voting.

It's not at the top of the queue yet.

We need an admin.
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Welsh Cowboy
Minister
 
Posts: 2340
Founded: Dec 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Welsh Cowboy » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:18 pm

Ainin wrote:
Welsh Cowboy wrote:Anyone wish to debate the Criminal Code?

If not, I move to begin voting.

It's not at the top of the queue yet.

We need an admin.

Oops...
Champions, 53rd Baptism of Fire

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:25 pm

Welsh Cowboy wrote:Anyone wish to debate the Criminal Code?

If not, I move to begin voting.

I'm a bit confused about the wording for arson. Does the bill state that arson must be combined with murder, assault, or manslaughter if these offenses occur as a result, or is it stating that those guilty of arson will be charged with murder, manslaughter, and assault regardless of whether or not anyone is actually directly harmed by the act? Despite making no sense, it sounds as though the latter is the case.
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15140
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:27 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Welsh Cowboy wrote:Anyone wish to debate the Criminal Code?

If not, I move to begin voting.

I'm a bit confused about the wording for arson. Does the bill state that arson must be combined with murder, assault, or manslaughter if these offenses occur as a result, or is it stating that those guilty of arson will be charged with murder, manslaughter, and assault regardless of whether or not anyone is actually directly harmed by the act? Despite making no sense, it sounds as though the latter is the case.

I'll correct it, but it says the former.

Change wrote:It is a Delict, and must be combined with Vandalism, Assault, Murder, Manslaughter or Attempted thereof if that crime occurs in the process of Arsoning.
Last edited by Kouralia on Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kouralia:

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:35 pm

Kouralia wrote:I'll correct it, but it says the former.

Change wrote:It is a Delict, and must be combined with Vandalism, Assault, Murder, Manslaughter or Attempted thereof if that crime occurs in the process of Arsoning.

Thank you for the clarification. There are a few aspects of the bill I still oppose, though the revisions I would like to see would be unlikely to pass, and we desperately need a criminal code right now. I'll almost certainly vote in favor of it when it is time.
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15140
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:37 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Kouralia wrote:I'll correct it, but it says the former.


Thank you for the clarification. There are a few aspects of the bill I still oppose, though the revisions I would like to see would be unlikely to pass, and we desperately need a criminal code right now. I'll almost certainly vote in favor of it when it is time.

What are your revisions? When it comes up to debate we can decide if they should be added or not.
Kouralia:

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Wed Jul 03, 2013 3:04 pm

Kouralia wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:Thank you for the clarification. There are a few aspects of the bill I still oppose, though the revisions I would like to see would be unlikely to pass, and we desperately need a criminal code right now. I'll almost certainly vote in favor of it when it is time.

What are your revisions? When it comes up to debate we can decide if they should be added or not.
With the exception of Blackmail, most of the crimes related to communication are extremely vague and can easily be abused. I do not want someone arrested for language liable to cause affray for simply calling someone something insulting. Repeated use of derogatory terms to the point of verbal abuse is acceptable grounds for criminal charges, but calling someone an asshole is not. Libel and slander also deliver great concern. There are few cases in which I honestly would feel it is appropriate to actually consider such acts worthy of criminal offense. I also have some reservations about arresting others simply for belonging to an organization.

The two revisions I would like to see that are unlikely to pass deal with stuatory rape and possession of child pornography. If an individual below the age of consent can be proven to have given consent, then I believe the charges should be dropped. When a couple that was formed when all involved were below the age of consent has one member age past the age of consent, then I feel it is absolutely ridiculous to force them to cease any activities they may have previously engaged in simply because one is older than they used to be.

As for child pornography, I am concerned about what may fall under the classification. I have seen a photographer held in interrogation rooms after taking a picture of children nude in a bathtub full of water that had turned orange from mountain runoff to illustrate the degree to which mining had polluted the water. It should be noted that not all photographs featuring nudity are pornographic, which is something many child pornography laws often fail to acknowledge.
Last edited by Threlizdun on Wed Jul 03, 2013 3:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Maklohi Vai
Minister
 
Posts: 2959
Founded: Jan 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Maklohi Vai » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:27 pm

Ainin wrote:
Welsh Cowboy wrote:Anyone wish to debate the Criminal Code?

If not, I move to begin voting.

It's not at the top of the queue yet.

We need an admin.

Pardon?

Oh, yeah, that's good. It's ok at the top of the queue, but I would highly recommend not voting yet, as many people haven't seen the bill. (Yes, bold, underline, and italics. It's serious).
"For the glory of our people, we govern our nation freely. For the glory of Polynesia, we help and strengthen our friends. For the glory of the earth, we do not destroy what it has bestowed upon us."
Demonym: Vaian
-Kamanakai Oa'a Pani, first president of Maklohi Vai
-6.13/-8.51 - as of 7/18
Hosted: MVBT 1; WBC 27; Friendly Cups 7, 9; (co-) NSCAA 5
Former President, WBC; WBC Councillor
Senator Giandomenico Abruzzi, Workers Party of Galatea
Administrator
Former:
Head Administrator
Beto Goncalves, Chair, CTA
Abraham Kamassi, Chair, Labour Party of Elizia
President of Calaverde Eduardo Bustamante; Leader, LDP
President of Baltonia Dovydas Kanarigis; Leader, LDP
President of Aurentina Wulukuno Porunalakai; Leader, Progress Coa.

User avatar
Yanalia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1197
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Yanalia » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:29 pm

Maklohi Vai wrote:
Ainin wrote:It's not at the top of the queue yet.

We need an admin.

Pardon?

Oh, yeah, that's good. It's ok at the top of the queue, but I would highly recommend not voting yet, as many people haven't seen the bill. (Yes, bold, underline, and italics. It's serious).


I move to close debate, begin voting, and ignore this motion. :P
Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33

Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.


User avatar
Venaleria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 616
Founded: Nov 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Venaleria » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:36 pm

Yanalia wrote:
Maklohi Vai wrote:Pardon?

Oh, yeah, that's good. It's ok at the top of the queue, but I would highly recommend not voting yet, as many people haven't seen the bill. (Yes, bold, underline, and italics. It's serious).


I move to close debate, begin voting, and ignore this motion. :P


Heck, seconded. :p
Vice President of Aurentina, representing Lüsen, District 375
Election Commissioner for the Red-Greens Party
NSG Senate Administrator
Ambassador to the Totally Rad Party
Join Sirius. Siriusly.
If you're going to spell my name, spell it correctly. Or you can just call me Ven or Venny.
"Is it behind the bunny?" "It IS the bunny!" -MP

User avatar
Maklohi Vai
Minister
 
Posts: 2959
Founded: Jan 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Maklohi Vai » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:37 pm

Venaleria wrote:
Yanalia wrote:
I move to close debate, begin voting, and ignore this motion. :P


Heck, seconded. :p

This is all very fun :p

... but no, seriously. Don't motion for voting, please.
"For the glory of our people, we govern our nation freely. For the glory of Polynesia, we help and strengthen our friends. For the glory of the earth, we do not destroy what it has bestowed upon us."
Demonym: Vaian
-Kamanakai Oa'a Pani, first president of Maklohi Vai
-6.13/-8.51 - as of 7/18
Hosted: MVBT 1; WBC 27; Friendly Cups 7, 9; (co-) NSCAA 5
Former President, WBC; WBC Councillor
Senator Giandomenico Abruzzi, Workers Party of Galatea
Administrator
Former:
Head Administrator
Beto Goncalves, Chair, CTA
Abraham Kamassi, Chair, Labour Party of Elizia
President of Calaverde Eduardo Bustamante; Leader, LDP
President of Baltonia Dovydas Kanarigis; Leader, LDP
President of Aurentina Wulukuno Porunalakai; Leader, Progress Coa.

User avatar
German-Spanish Empire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 865
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby German-Spanish Empire » Wed Jul 03, 2013 5:02 pm

I am going to firmly say no to that meal act.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Jul 03, 2013 5:21 pm

Venaleria wrote:
Yanalia wrote:
I move to close debate, begin voting, and ignore this motion. :P


Heck, seconded. :p

It's a big list, we should have more people look through it to see if all the definitions are clear enough.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
The Zeonic States
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12078
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Zeonic States » Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:18 pm

Are Certain Senators again pushing for debate to be closed when other Senators wish to continue to speak of the issue?

Hardly Surprising given the interests that are served here.
National Imperialist-Freedom Party

Proud member of the stone wall alliance

Agent Maine: of NSG's Official Project Freelancer

[Fires of the Old Republic Role Play]http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=239203

User avatar
Yanalia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1197
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Yanalia » Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:22 pm

The Zeonic States wrote:Are Certain Senators again pushing for debate to be closed when other Senators wish to continue to speak of the issue?

Hardly Surprising given the interests that are served here.


It was a joke...
Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33

Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.

User avatar
Welsh Cowboy
Minister
 
Posts: 2340
Founded: Dec 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Welsh Cowboy » Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:22 pm

Yanalia wrote:
The Zeonic States wrote:Are Certain Senators again pushing for debate to be closed when other Senators wish to continue to speak of the issue?

Hardly Surprising given the interests that are served here.


It was a joke...

And I would note that the actual debate has been lacking.
Champions, 53rd Baptism of Fire

User avatar
Free South Califas
Senator
 
Posts: 4213
Founded: May 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free South Califas » Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:39 pm

How do I replace a bill in the queue which already has the original author's sponsorship? Do I just need a fifth sponsor?

If so, this is one sponsor away from replacing the Public Education Act, second in the queue. It's really urgent for the sake of equality in Aurentina's schools, and I hope we can get the sponsorship we need to help the author finish the bill.
Free South Califas wrote:
Free South Califas wrote:Friendly Amendments to Public Education Act for Students with Disabilities and Different Needs
...


These have been added to the following draft, which I move to replace the current Public Education Act in the omnibus immediately, please fifth this if you agree with the Friendly Amendments for disabled students, as the author does:

Public Education Act


Proposed by: Greater Pokarnia (C)
Original co-sponsors: Costa Algeria (PC), The Realm of God (PC), Geilinor (LD), Zweite Alaje (NI)

Author and current sponsor: Greater Pokarnia (C)
Current co-sponsors: Saul Califas (C), Wulukuno Maklohi Porunalakai (LD), Pesda (RG)

1. A public educational system will be formed under the supervision of the Ministry of Education, which will provide free enrollment to people between the age of 5-18.

2. It will mandatory for children to attend at least 10,500 instructional hours of school, be it at either public, private, or home school. Parents who knowingly prevent their children from meeting this requirement may be subject to fines of up to $10,000 for each 1,500 hours of school missed, and either 3,000 hours of community service to begin as soon as feasible or 3 months of jail to begin as soon as the parent's obligation to directly care for, support the care of, or raise funds for the child has ended or as soon as it becomes impossible for the parent to reasonably provide same for each 1,500 hours of school missed.

2a. The minimum number of hours required for each particular student may be reduced by consensus of at least two professionals, currently licensed in fields relevant to evaluating that student's individual medical or ability-related needs, who have a substantial history of working directly with the student, as necessary to prevent the student's needless suffering. To the greatest legally and medically possible extent, the same minimum standards of academic achievement must be retained in any case.

3. Private schools and home schools must register with the Ministry of Education.

4. Public schools will be funded by the state, and it's employees are to be considered state employees.

5. The Ministry of Education shall be in charge of deciding the curriculum of all public schools.

6. A minimum curriculum shall be drafted by the Ministry of Education for private schools and home schools. Private schools and home schools may teach whatever they want so long as they teach the minimum curriculum. Subdistricts may expand upon this minimum curriculum.

7. The Ministry of Education shall monitor private schools to ensure they are teaching the minimum curriculum. If they fail to do so they will lose recognition by the Ministry of Education and students may not meet their mandatory number of instructional by attending that school.

8. Employees of the Ministry of Education shall administer tests to home-schooled children every 3 months to ensure that they are being taught the minimum curriculum sufficiently. If they fail to pass these tests the home school will lose recognition from the Ministry of Education and student may not meet their mandatory number of instructional hours from that home school.

9. Nobody above the age of 20 may attend a public school described as such in this Act.

10. Students attending public schools must enroll with the public education system before age 8.

11. No age restrictions are to be placed by the state onto private or home schools.

12. All recognized schools, be they public, private, or home schools, shall have 10 grade levels comprised of at least 1,050 instructional hours.

13. The Ministry of Education shall administer a Grade Advancement Test (GAT) at all recognized schools based on the minimum curriculum, which a student must pass before advancing to the next grade level.

14. The Ministry of Education shall provide funding to to public schools as they see fit, but there may never be larger than a 15% funding gap per student enrolled at public schools.

15. There shall be 5 days in the school week, each comprising of 7 hours of instruction per day. Lunch and recess don't count towards this number of hours. Schools must have at least 30 school weeks per year. This shall only be enforced at public schools.

15a. The following exceptions shall be provided on an individual basis as necessary to prevent that student's needless suffering, by consensus of at least two professionals currently licensed in fields relevant to evaluating that student's individual medical- or ability-related needs who have a significant history of working directly with the student. To the greatest legally and medically possible extent, the same minimum standards of academic achievement must be retained in any case.

15a1. The minimum number of days attended in each week may be reduced to no fewer than three (3).

15a2. The minimum number of instruction hours attended in each week may be reduced as little as required to achieve this goal.

15a3. More frequent breaks may be allowed which might not be subtracted from the number of instruction hours reported, although it is recommended that this only be used in cases of autism, developmental disorders, attentional or post-traumatic stress conditions being treated, chronic pain conditions, emotional dysfunctions which could otherwise disrupt the learning environment, etc.

16. Hereby allows students to avoid attending school for national and religious holidays that will not be counted against a students attendance. This shall only be enforced at public schools.

17. Hereby places a 3 month interval between schooling years to occur at the beginning of June, to carry through the end of August. This shall only be enforced at public schools.

18. Subdistricts may enforce their own educational standards so long as they do not conflict with the national standards and the minimum curriculum is still taught.

19. Subdistricts may enforce their own restrictions on private or home schools.
[/quote]
FSC Government
Senate: Saul Califas; First Deputy Leader of the Opposition
Senior Whip, Communist Party (Meiderup)

WA: Califan WA Detachment (CWAD).
Justice
On Autism/"R-word"
(Lir. apologized, so ignore that part.)
Anarchy Works/Open Borders
Flag
.
.
.
I'm autistic and (proud, but) thus not a "social detective", so be warned: I might misread or accidentally offend you.
'Obvious' implications, tones, cues etc. may also be missed.
SELF MANAGEMENT ✯ DIRECT ACTION ✯ WORKER SOLIDARITY
Libertarian Communist

.
COMINTERN/Stonewall/TRC

User avatar
Beta Test
Minister
 
Posts: 2639
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Beta Test » Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:42 pm

Free South Califas wrote:How do I replace a bill in the queue which already has the original author's sponsorship? Do I just need a fifth sponsor?

If so, this is one sponsor away from replacing the Public Education Act, second in the queue. It's really urgent for the sake of equality in Aurentina's schools, and I hope we can get the sponsorship we need to help the author finish the bill.
Free South Califas wrote:
These have been added to the following draft, which I move to replace the current Public Education Act in the omnibus immediately, please fifth this if you agree with the Friendly Amendments for disabled students, as the author does:

Public Education Act


Proposed by: Greater Pokarnia (C)
Original co-sponsors: Costa Algeria (PC), The Realm of God (PC), Geilinor (LD), Zweite Alaje (NI)

Author and current sponsor: Greater Pokarnia (C)
Current co-sponsors: Saul Califas (C), Wulukuno Maklohi Porunalakai (LD), Pesda (RG)

1. A public educational system will be formed under the supervision of the Ministry of Education, which will provide free enrollment to people between the age of 5-18.

2. It will mandatory for children to attend at least 10,500 instructional hours of school, be it at either public, private, or home school. Parents who knowingly prevent their children from meeting this requirement may be subject to fines of up to $10,000 for each 1,500 hours of school missed, and either 3,000 hours of community service to begin as soon as feasible or 3 months of jail to begin as soon as the parent's obligation to directly care for, support the care of, or raise funds for the child has ended or as soon as it becomes impossible for the parent to reasonably provide same for each 1,500 hours of school missed.

2a. The minimum number of hours required for each particular student may be reduced by consensus of at least two professionals, currently licensed in fields relevant to evaluating that student's individual medical or ability-related needs, who have a substantial history of working directly with the student, as necessary to prevent the student's needless suffering. To the greatest legally and medically possible extent, the same minimum standards of academic achievement must be retained in any case.

3. Private schools and home schools must register with the Ministry of Education.

4. Public schools will be funded by the state, and it's employees are to be considered state employees.

5. The Ministry of Education shall be in charge of deciding the curriculum of all public schools.

6. A minimum curriculum shall be drafted by the Ministry of Education for private schools and home schools. Private schools and home schools may teach whatever they want so long as they teach the minimum curriculum. Subdistricts may expand upon this minimum curriculum.

7. The Ministry of Education shall monitor private schools to ensure they are teaching the minimum curriculum. If they fail to do so they will lose recognition by the Ministry of Education and students may not meet their mandatory number of instructional by attending that school.

8. Employees of the Ministry of Education shall administer tests to home-schooled children every 3 months to ensure that they are being taught the minimum curriculum sufficiently. If they fail to pass these tests the home school will lose recognition from the Ministry of Education and student may not meet their mandatory number of instructional hours from that home school.

9. Nobody above the age of 20 may attend a public school described as such in this Act.

10. Students attending public schools must enroll with the public education system before age 8.

11. No age restrictions are to be placed by the state onto private or home schools.

12. All recognized schools, be they public, private, or home schools, shall have 10 grade levels comprised of at least 1,050 instructional hours.

13. The Ministry of Education shall administer a Grade Advancement Test (GAT) at all recognized schools based on the minimum curriculum, which a student must pass before advancing to the next grade level.

14. The Ministry of Education shall provide funding to to public schools as they see fit, but there may never be larger than a 15% funding gap per student enrolled at public schools.

15. There shall be 5 days in the school week, each comprising of 7 hours of instruction per day. Lunch and recess don't count towards this number of hours. Schools must have at least 30 school weeks per year. This shall only be enforced at public schools.

15a. The following exceptions shall be provided on an individual basis as necessary to prevent that student's needless suffering, by consensus of at least two professionals currently licensed in fields relevant to evaluating that student's individual medical- or ability-related needs who have a significant history of working directly with the student. To the greatest legally and medically possible extent, the same minimum standards of academic achievement must be retained in any case.

15a1. The minimum number of days attended in each week may be reduced to no fewer than three (3).

15a2. The minimum number of instruction hours attended in each week may be reduced as little as required to achieve this goal.

15a3. More frequent breaks may be allowed which might not be subtracted from the number of instruction hours reported, although it is recommended that this only be used in cases of autism, developmental disorders, attentional or post-traumatic stress conditions being treated, chronic pain conditions, emotional dysfunctions which could otherwise disrupt the learning environment, etc.

16. Hereby allows students to avoid attending school for national and religious holidays that will not be counted against a students attendance. This shall only be enforced at public schools.

17. Hereby places a 3 month interval between schooling years to occur at the beginning of June, to carry through the end of August. This shall only be enforced at public schools.

18. Subdistricts may enforce their own educational standards so long as they do not conflict with the national standards and the minimum curriculum is still taught.

19. Subdistricts may enforce their own restrictions on private or home schools.
[/quote]

Amend it to allow the government to offer financial assistance to private schools, to help reduce the burden on parents and caregivers.
Member of the Coalition of Workers and Farmers
Michael Ferreira: President of the Senate
Philip Awad: Former Secretary of Rural Development

User avatar
Slazliyka
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 117
Founded: Jun 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Slazliyka » Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:45 pm

Beta Test wrote:
Free South Califas wrote:How do I replace a bill in the queue which already has the original author's sponsorship? Do I just need a fifth sponsor?

If so, this is one sponsor away from replacing the Public Education Act, second in the queue. It's really urgent for the sake of equality in Aurentina's schools, and I hope we can get the sponsorship we need to help the author finish the bill.


Amend it to allow the government to offer financial assistance to private schools, to help reduce the burden on parents and caregivers.[/quote]
Nothing in the bill prohibits that so it's not necessary.

User avatar
Beta Test
Minister
 
Posts: 2639
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Beta Test » Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:46 pm

Slazliyka wrote:
Beta Test wrote:


Amend it to allow the government to offer financial assistance to private schools, to help reduce the burden on parents and caregivers.

Nothing in the bill prohibits that so it's not necessary.[/quote]

Fair enough. In that case I would like to sponsor the bill.
Member of the Coalition of Workers and Farmers
Michael Ferreira: President of the Senate
Philip Awad: Former Secretary of Rural Development

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:48 pm

Beta Test wrote:
Free South Califas wrote:How do I replace a bill in the queue which already has the original author's sponsorship? Do I just need a fifth sponsor?

If so, this is one sponsor away from replacing the Public Education Act, second in the queue. It's really urgent for the sake of equality in Aurentina's schools, and I hope we can get the sponsorship we need to help the author finish the bill.


Amend it to allow the government to offer financial assistance to private schools, to help reduce the burden on parents and caregivers.


I am a firm supporter and believer in private schools but seriously, WTF. That would be so unbelievably morally wrong.
Last edited by The Nihilistic view on Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Free South Califas
Senator
 
Posts: 4213
Founded: May 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free South Califas » Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Beta Test wrote:
Slazliyka wrote:Nothing in the bill prohibits that so it's not necessary.


Fair enough. In that case I would like to sponsor the bill.

Many thanks, Senator :) Updated version below:

Free South Califas wrote:How do I replace a bill in the queue which already has the original author's sponsorship? Do I just need a fifth sponsor?


Free South Califas wrote:
These have been added to the following draft, which I move to replace the current Public Education Act in the omnibus immediately, you may wish to sixth this if you agree with the Friendly Amendments for disabled students, as the author does:

Public Education Act


Proposed by: Greater Pokarnia (C)
Original co-sponsors: Costa Algeria (PC), The Realm of God (PC), Geilinor (LD), Zweite Alaje (NI)

Author and current sponsor: Greater Pokarnia (C)
Current co-sponsors: Saul Califas (C), Wulukuno Maklohi Porunalakai (LD), Pesda (RG), Rupert Weinthal (LD)

1. A public educational system will be formed under the supervision of the Ministry of Education, which will provide free enrollment to people between the age of 5-18.

2. It will mandatory for children to attend at least 10,500 instructional hours of school, be it at either public, private, or home school. Parents who knowingly prevent their children from meeting this requirement may be subject to fines of up to $10,000 for each 1,500 hours of school missed, and either 3,000 hours of community service to begin as soon as feasible or 3 months of jail to begin as soon as the parent's obligation to directly care for, support the care of, or raise funds for the child has ended or as soon as it becomes impossible for the parent to reasonably provide same for each 1,500 hours of school missed.

2a. The minimum number of hours required for each particular student may be reduced by consensus of at least two professionals, currently licensed in fields relevant to evaluating that student's individual medical or ability-related needs, who have a substantial history of working directly with the student, as necessary to prevent the student's needless suffering. To the greatest legally and medically possible extent, the same minimum standards of academic achievement must be retained in any case.

3. Private schools and home schools must register with the Ministry of Education.

4. Public schools will be funded by the state, and it's employees are to be considered state employees.

5. The Ministry of Education shall be in charge of deciding the curriculum of all public schools.

6. A minimum curriculum shall be drafted by the Ministry of Education for private schools and home schools. Private schools and home schools may teach whatever they want so long as they teach the minimum curriculum. Subdistricts may expand upon this minimum curriculum.

7. The Ministry of Education shall monitor private schools to ensure they are teaching the minimum curriculum. If they fail to do so they will lose recognition by the Ministry of Education and students may not meet their mandatory number of instructional by attending that school.

8. Employees of the Ministry of Education shall administer tests to home-schooled children every 3 months to ensure that they are being taught the minimum curriculum sufficiently. If they fail to pass these tests the home school will lose recognition from the Ministry of Education and student may not meet their mandatory number of instructional hours from that home school.

9. Nobody above the age of 20 may attend a public school described as such in this Act.

10. Students attending public schools must enroll with the public education system before age 8.

11. No age restrictions are to be placed by the state onto private or home schools.

12. All recognized schools, be they public, private, or home schools, shall have 10 grade levels comprised of at least 1,050 instructional hours.

13. The Ministry of Education shall administer a Grade Advancement Test (GAT) at all recognized schools based on the minimum curriculum, which a student must pass before advancing to the next grade level.

14. The Ministry of Education shall provide funding to to public schools as they see fit, but there may never be larger than a 15% funding gap per student enrolled at public schools.

15. There shall be 5 days in the school week, each comprising of 7 hours of instruction per day. Lunch and recess don't count towards this number of hours. Schools must have at least 30 school weeks per year. This shall only be enforced at public schools.

15a. The following exceptions shall be provided on an individual basis as necessary to prevent that student's needless suffering, by consensus of at least two professionals currently licensed in fields relevant to evaluating that student's individual medical- or ability-related needs who have a significant history of working directly with the student. To the greatest legally and medically possible extent, the same minimum standards of academic achievement must be retained in any case.

15a1. The minimum number of days attended in each week may be reduced to no fewer than three (3).

15a2. The minimum number of instruction hours attended in each week may be reduced as little as required to achieve this goal.

15a3. More frequent breaks may be allowed which might not be subtracted from the number of instruction hours reported, although it is recommended that this only be used in cases of autism, developmental disorders, attentional or post-traumatic stress conditions being treated, chronic pain conditions, emotional dysfunctions which could otherwise disrupt the learning environment, etc.

16. Hereby allows students to avoid attending school for national and religious holidays that will not be counted against a students attendance. This shall only be enforced at public schools.

17. Hereby places a 3 month interval between schooling years to occur at the beginning of June, to carry through the end of August. This shall only be enforced at public schools.

18. Subdistricts may enforce their own educational standards so long as they do not conflict with the national standards and the minimum curriculum is still taught.

19. Subdistricts may enforce their own restrictions on private or home schools.
Last edited by Free South Califas on Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads