REPORT: Trolling in Discussion Thread about AA

by **Stormopolis** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:42 am

by **Alvecia** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 9:15 am

Trolling/Baiting/Gloating: Trolling is defined as posts that are made with the aim of angering people. (like 'ALL JEWS ARE [insert vile comment here]' for example). Someone disagreeing with you does not equate to trolling.

I don't think my nor any of the other comments noted were posted with intent to anger.
Last I checked this forum allows for joking and humorous posts so long as they don't take up the entire thread, which no one person did here.

by **Dakini** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 10:21 am

Stormopolis wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=28929584#p28929584

(here's hoping I quoted the one where you linked my post)

Telling you that your theory is stupid or that you're saying stupid things is not the same as telling you that you are stupid. Furthermore, if I were to tell you that you're stupid (which I'm not), that would not be trolling, it would be flaming.

edit to add: And reporting everyone who disagrees with your easily debunked argument is not conducive to discussion.

by **Dakini** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 10:46 am

I suspect that this is actually flaming:

Stormopolis wrote:Edit: I'm serious. All will (and have) been reported. As for saying I'm nuts, why is this more nuts than believing in any religion that says something was made by an almighty deity who apparently is as bipolar as some users here seem to be.

by **The Greater Ohio Valley** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:08 am

None of that looks even remotely actionable.

by **Reploid Productions** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:14 am

Aaaand addressed.

The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:None of that looks even remotely actionable.

You are not a mod to be making that sort of call. You are not adding any relevant new information to the report. Your opinion is not necessary nor is it welcome since it serves only to clutter the report thread. Do not spam Moderation.

by **Stormopolis** » Sat Jun 04, 2016 7:21 am

Same thread, so refreshing this one.

Apparently, me saying that people are crazy, gets me banned for a day.

But apparently Vassenor saying -I- am crazy is fine.

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=28928659#p28928659

What is this double standard?

Also, I would like to point out that it is strange how okay you mods are with off-topic posts.

Pretty sure the only God are Hendrix, Clapton and Santana. And though you may have different names for them. They don't appear to be dragons.

This gets modded...a little.

Aliens and potential contact with ancient cultures are the topic, not dragons or musicians. As poorly-argued as it may be, stay on topic.

But this is okay?

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=28939751#p28939751

I find this mod is just picking and choosing, and questionably at that.

Edit:

If you cannot take the heat of a debate, then don't post a controversial and largely unsupported by actual sources opinion. NSG will tear it to ribbons. If having your ideas argued against and contradicted by those who do not agree with you is more than you can handle, this probably isn't the place to be posting about your belief regarding ancient peoples and aliens.

Sooooo people going off topic is disagreeing with me? You can disagree and post that. Fine, I can take that. This has nothing to do with being argued against and contradicted, however. At all.

by **Wrapper** » Sat Jun 04, 2016 7:33 am

He's not calling you crazy. He's making a Stargate reference that only people who watched the original movie would understand.

by **Stormopolis** » Sat Jun 04, 2016 7:56 am

Wrapper wrote:He's not calling you crazy. He's making a Stargate reference that only people who watched the original movie would understand.

Well obviously I didn't and understood it to be offense.

by **Stormopolis** » Sat Jun 04, 2016 8:07 am

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=28948182#p28948182
And here, since he doesn't even care he is going off topic even though he knows it:
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=28948276#p28948276

Seriously, why are you not doing anything about this guy who does nothing but go off topic? Don't we have another place to do it? If he doesn't think the theory is feasible, fine, but that doesn't mean he can just go posting this random jank without consequence, does it?

Here's another:

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=28948275#p28948275
And we even have a threat:
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=28948283#p28948283

by **Ethel mermania** » Sat Jun 04, 2016 8:30 am

As I am mentioned in one of your reports.

When you make a report thread, it helps monderation, Wade through the issue, when you specify who you are reporting in each post.

by **Stormopolis** » Sat Jun 04, 2016 9:25 am

Ethel mermania wrote:As I am mentioned in one of your reports.

When you make a report thread, it helps monderation, Wade through the issue, when you specify who you are reporting in each post.

It also helps to know that whenever you provide a link to a post, the referred-to post will be the one at the top of the page.

by **Ethel mermania** » Sat Jun 04, 2016 10:38 am

Stormopolis wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:As I am mentioned in one of your reports.

When you make a report thread, it helps monderation, Wade through the issue, when you specify who you are reporting in each post.

It also helps to know that whenever you provide a link to a post, the referred-to post will be the one at the top of the page.

Except you are reporting so many, it gets confusing.

REPORT: Trolling in Discussion Thread about AA

REPORT: Trolling in Discussion Thread about AA

Who is online