EDIT: Irrefutable Proof of God's Existence!

[Caninope]

TOP 5 REASONS

1. God wrote the Bible. Therefore, God exists.
2. I also know that God exists because, well, I can feel that he exists.
3. Everything must have a fundamental. That fundamental being God of course.
4. Even though there has been no miracles happen recently to prove Gods existence, they have happened in the past. It's in the Bible.
5. Though scientists have proven that the universe does not necessarily need a creator to exist, I know that God created everything. Why? Because it's written in the holy book itself.

1. no
2. that does not prove it for me
3. it is more likely the universe
4. the bible is a lie
5. se above

Your gonna have to prove the Bible is a lie.

Claiming that certain parts of the Bible (*cough OLD TESTAMENT cough*) are mean and show what seems like a heartless God, I can live with that. but the Bible, itself, isn't a lie. There have been certain parts of it that have a true historical basis.

[Blouman Empire]

So, who wants to take bets on how long this anti-religion circle jerk will last before the lock?

Who knows if it will but poor satire is poor.

[Concordant America]

TOP 5 REASONS

1. God wrote the Bible. Therefore, God exists.
2. I also know that God exists because, well, I can feel that he exists.
3. Everything must have a fundamental. That fundamental being God of course.
4. Even though there has been no miracles happen recently to prove Gods existence, they have happened in the past. It's in the Bible.
5. Though scientists have proven that the universe does not necessarily need a creator to exist, I know that God created everything. Why? Because it's written in the holy book itself.

1. People wrote the Bible, God did not. Period!
2. No, you can't
3. Things exist because of many, many different reasons. They don't exist because of god!
4. Yet again, Bible written by people and people make mistakes.
5. Yet again, just look at the above.

Overall, your theory is terrible. Really terrible.

[Acycia]

this makes me a believer!!!
I BELIEVE!!!

[Mandalyrria]

Oh... you're NOT joking.... [blush]

I see no proof there.

1. God didn't write the Bible. Human beings did. Human beings have never seen God or truly heard His voice, because he does not exist. The Bible was written to control the thought of primitive desert dwellers. Therefore, God does not exist.
2. I also know that God does not exist because, well, I can't feel that he exists, and I've never felt that he exists.
3. Everything comes from something, but that something doesn't have to be a god of course.
4. David Copperfield, David Blaine and any other magician you can name are miracle workers by the standard kept in the Bible. Every modern attempt to assert a recent miracle has proven that the Church is trying to drum up interest in an increasingly uninterested populace, a natural phenomenon such as rusty water dripping down the face of a statue from a leaky roof, a case of mental illness, or a childish prank. Just because something was written down over 2000 years ago in a foreign language you can't read, doesn't make it true. Take Harry Potter and lock the books up for 2000 years. Will they then become true?
5. If you are a modern scientist and try to explain to a group of primitive desert dwellers how science believe the universe was created, what are they going to understand? The Big Bang theory and all its logical repurcussions? How celestial mechanics work? What the Bible says about Creation is that this happened, then that happened, and by and large, it is a logical progression of what needed to happen before human life could arise. Any early explanation that came close to explaining the light being separated from the darkness, ie the primordial soup of the early universe transforming into clumps that became bright stars, and spaces that became the dark void, is either luck, or evidence of contact with a more advanced civilization. Scientists are fairly certain that the universe is expanding, and yet there are several theories as to how it all began. Big Bang even ALLOWS the existence of a creator god, because no known process could have done the job. But even THIS most pro-religion position of science is not proof of god, only proof of our ignorance. I don't believe what is written in holy books can be interpreted as fact BECAUSE they are written in holy books, and serve to guide and control the thought and belief of those reading them, rather than to enlighten or educate the reader. Therefore I know that God didn't create everything. Why? Because it's written in the holy book itself!

Please forgive any humourous use of circular reasoning - I hope you can see that this is an allusion to the style of the original post. My arguments are otherwise sound.

And, just to reiterate, there is no proof of god here.

[Nobel Hobos]

Tower of Babel. Jahweh doesn't want us to communicate with each other. Behold His work: the Internet.

No no no, the Internet is the work of Satan!!

Totally bogus.

1. Spelling.
2. Grammar.
3. Typesetting.
4. A2 printer.
5. No attempt to fake any of the above.

Conclusion: Atheist nerd. Quite possibly a librarian.

[Concordant America]

Oh... you're NOT joking.... [blush]

I see no proof there.

1. God didn't write the Bible. Human beings did. Human beings have never seen God or truly heard His voice, because he does not exist. The Bible was written to control the thought of primitive desert dwellers. Therefore, God does not exist.
2. I also know that God does not exist because, well, I can't feel that he exists, and I've never felt that he exists.
3. Everything comes from something, but that something doesn't have to be a god of course.
4. David Copperfield, David Blaine and any other magician you can name are miracle workers by the standard kept in the Bible. Every modern attempt to assert a recent miracle has proven that the Church is trying to drum up interest in an increasingly uninterested populace, a natural phenomenon such as rusty water dripping down the face of a statue from a leaky roof, a case of mental illness, or a childish prank. Just because something was written down over 2000 years ago in a foreign language you can't read, doesn't make it true. Take Harry Potter and lock the books up for 2000 years. Will they then become true?
5. If you are a modern scientist and try to explain to a group of primitive desert dwellers how science believe the universe was created, what are they going to understand? The Big Bang theory and all its logical repurcussions? How celestial mechanics work? What the Bible says about Creation is that this happened, then that happened, and by and large, it is a logical progression of what needed to happen before human life could arise. Any early explanation that came close to explaining the light being separated from the darkness, ie the primordial soup of the early universe transforming into clumps that became bright stars, and spaces that became the dark void, is either luck, or evidence of contact with a more advanced civilization. Scientists are fairly certain that the universe is expanding, and yet there are several theories as to how it all began. Big Bang even ALLOWS the existence of a creator god, because no known process could have done the job. But even THIS most pro-religion position of science is not proof of god, only proof of our ignorance. I don't believe what is written in holy books can be interpreted as fact BECAUSE they are written in holy books, and serve to guide and control the thought and belief of those reading them, rather than to enlighten or educate the reader. Therefore I know that God didn't create everything. Why? Because it's written in the holy book itself!

Please forgive any humourous use of circular reasoning - I hope you can see that this is an allusion to the style of the original post. My arguments are otherwise sound.

And, just to reiterate, there is no proof of god here.

Yes, not a single bit or scrap of it.

[Risottia]

Why? WHY did you make a total fool of yourself! As much I respect preachers like you, this is just embarrassing.

Is this going to end well, I wonder.

[Risottia]

Tower of Babel. Jahweh doesn't want us to communicate with each other. Behold His work: the Internet.

No no no, the Internet is the work of Satan!!

No no no, the Internet is the work of Al "Librul Messiah" Gore!

[Risottia]

There have been certain parts of it that have a true historical basis.

This makes it at best partially true. Hence, also partially false.
That is, at best not reliable.

[The chrisman union]

TOP 5 REASONS

1. God wrote the Bible. Therefore, God exists.
2. I also know that God exists because, well, I can feel that he exists.
3. Everything must have a fundamental. That fundamental being God of course.
4. Even though there has been no miracles happen recently to prove Gods existence, they have happened in the past. It's in the Bible.
5. Though scientists have proven that the universe does not necessarily need a creator to exist, I know that God created everything. Why? Because it's written in the holy book itself.

Obvious sarcasm is obvious.

[Kreigan]

Tower of Babel. Jahweh doesn't want us to communicate with each other. Behold His work: the Internet.

What did God do in response to the Tower of Babel? Made people incapable of understanding each other. In that light, consider 1337 and txtspk.

He did that so people couldnt unite together and build a tower to heaven

[Caninope]

There have been certain parts of it that have a true historical basis.

This makes it at best partially true. Hence, also partially false.
That is, at best not reliable.

You can't disprove a religious work.

[Farnhamia]

There have been certain parts of it that have a true historical basis.

This makes it at best partially true. Hence, also partially false.
That is, at best not reliable.

Certainly not very reliable, but the history parts of the Old Testament have value as a point of view on the politics of the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age Middle East. The Assyrians, Egyptians, Babylonians, Persians all get mentioned an no one disputes their existence. But the mythological parts, such as the creation of the world and of early people, are just that, mythology.

[Risottia]

There have been certain parts of it that have a true historical basis.

This makes it at best partially true. Hence, also partially false.
That is, at best not reliable.

You can't disprove a religious work.

I don't need to disprove a claim. The burden of proof lies on those who make the claim.

[Zeetopolis]

TOP 5 REASONS

1. God wrote the Bible. Therefore, God exists.
2. I also know that God exists because, well, I can feel that he exists.
3. Everything must have a fundamental. That fundamental being God of course.
4. Even though there has been no miracles happen recently to prove Gods existence, they have happened in the past. It's in the Bible.
5. Though scientists have proven that the universe does not necessarily need a creator to exist, I know that God created everything. Why? Because it's written in the holy book itself.

[Buffett and Colbert]

So, who wants to take bets on how long this anti-religion circle jerk will last before the lock?

Who knows if it will but poor satire is poor.

You know, I'd appreciate Hammurab satirising atheists. He hasn't done that yet, as far as I can remember.

[Caninope]

There have been certain parts of it that have a true historical basis.

This makes it at best partially true. Hence, also partially false.
That is, at best not reliable.

You can't disprove a religious work.

I don't need to disprove a claim. The burden of proof lies on those who make the claim.

He claimed the Bible was false. He made the claim.

[Risottia]

There have been certain parts of it that have a true historical basis.

This makes it at best partially true. Hence, also partially false.
That is, at best not reliable.

You can't disprove a religious work.

I don't need to disprove a claim. The burden of proof lies on those who make the claim.

He claimed the Bible was false. He made the claim.

No.
The Bible makes some claims - without supporting it with facts or peer review.
Some of these claims have been ALREADY shown to be false. Hence, some parts of the Bible are false. Hence it's not reliable.

Prove that the Bible is true. Because you're claiming that.

[Dvardis]

I accidentally God. Is this dangerous?

[Zeetopolis]

There have been certain parts of it that have a true historical basis.

This makes it at best partially true. Hence, also partially false.
That is, at best not reliable.

You can't disprove a religious work.

I don't need to disprove a claim. The burden of proof lies on those who make the claim.

He claimed the Bible was false. He made the claim.

Unfortunately, it also appears that...


So to all my fellow Christians and theists, I implore you:

[EvilDarkMagicians]

[EvilDarkMagicians]

[Dyakovo]

So, who wants to take bets on how long this anti-religion circle jerk will last before the lock?

20 bucks 10 more minutes.

You owe Iffy $20.

[Dyakovo]

There have been certain parts of it that have a true historical basis.

And certain parts of Harry Potter have true historical basis... It would be the same parts by the way... They both use real place names...