Insaanistan wrote:Phoenicaea wrote:^_Instaniistan, you have to be comprensive media approach does not follow a ‘conspiracy’ whatsoever, nor it even complies an hostility whatsoever.
medias implicitly migrate toward simplifying and seeking scandal approach, which you can proof, if you notice the analogy in their attitude referring whatever other topic.
I’m not pushing a conspiracy, I’m to talk about how media outlets are literally at least 700% more likely to report on a violent incident if the attacker was “Muslim”. While yes, the media likes to simplify stories generally, most also like to paint all Muslims as violent unpatriotic ungrateful terrorists.
As pointed out before, muslims are doing a fine job of them all by themselves.Social media like facebook, twitter and even TikTok are being flooded by muslims expressing their hatred of France for the cartoons, while only a few muslims (but not zero - and that is important to remember) think the murders are a vastly bigger deal and vastly more insulting to their faith.
As long as the vile and disgusting idea that blasphemy* is more evil than murder persists, there will be clashes between much of "the west" and the muslim world.
Then again, places like Poland will probably agree with the "blasphemy is the ultimate sin" yellers.
--
* Where "blasphemy" is ofc defined as "something that disagrees with Islam.
Blasphemy against other gods by muslims is perfectly fine and a-ok, as we e.g. hear blasting from the speakers of the mosques every friday.
