NATION

PASSWORD

Contraception - Religious liberty

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:19 pm

Jocabia wrote:And they aren't just saying they won't use it. They aren't even saying they won't pay for it. They're saying they want to know if you're using it and what for. The above law does more than allow them enforce their beliefs on you by denying insurance coverage for you for contraception. It removes all barriers to firing you for using contraception for birth control.

It's a lovely mix of woman-hating and classism, isn't it?

Time was, it was recognized that health benefits are something that an employee receives in lieu of higher wages, and that, consequently, one's health insurance is in fact part of one's pay for doing one's job. And, thus, your employer isn't "paying for" your health insurance...YOU are paying for it, with YOUR wages, which YOU earned.

But then women had to get all uppity and start holding paying jobs and receiving benefits just as though they were actual PEOPLE or something. And now it's ruined for everyone, because the corporate overlords have figured out that the best way to ensure that the underclasses will stay under is by setting them against one another, and woman-hating never fails to accomplish that.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:20 pm

New Asgariath wrote:Or... people could learn self control?


Or we could base policy decision on realism, rather than absurdly naive and idealistic notions.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
New Asgariath
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 370
Founded: Feb 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Asgariath » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:22 pm

Page wrote:
New Asgariath wrote:Other way around. People in the top 10% of American income tend to pay for the rest of you.


Do you want fries with your classist snobbery?

No, we don't eat cheap redneck food.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 56475
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
New York Times Democracy

Postby Risottia » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:22 pm

Four-sided Triangles wrote:
New Asgariath wrote:Or... people could learn self control?

Or we could base policy decision on realism, rather than absurdly naive and idealistic notions.


But the silent majority guys don't like facts in their rants.
nangiqatigillugu kalaałłiit nunaanni
je soutiens le canada / i stand with canada
estoy con panamá

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:24 pm

Jocabia wrote:How is the guy who ended up with more of the pie the victim there?


Because the most privileged people are almost always the most likely ones to complain about how oppressed they are. It's the spoiled brat syndrome.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
Krakosov
Diplomat
 
Posts: 691
Founded: Oct 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Krakosov » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:29 pm

if people want to use contraception why should not be able to.
if your religion is aposed to it, than dont use it.

just because some religions ban thair members from eating pork or meat entierly
it should not affect people who is not in that religion.
feelings are dumb and should be hated!!!
favorite song http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkPzOJbA ... re=related

User avatar
New Asgariath
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 370
Founded: Feb 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Asgariath » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:33 pm

Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Jocabia wrote:How is the guy who ended up with more of the pie the victim there?


Because the most privileged people are almost always the most likely ones to complain about how oppressed they are. It's the spoiled brat syndrome.

No, we just see through the bullshit that the "99%" people proclaim.

Besides, many of us don't live any better than the middle class despite having a higher income. My family started out here with nothing after moving from Russia 10 years ago. Now we are in the top 5% by income, but live in a middle class area in a middle class home. Why? Because all of our money is being used to pay for the house. I drive a $15,000 car. I'm many things, but I am not nearly as spoiled as you would think.

So, living like any middle class person, I hate it when people call me spoiled and expect me to pay for them. If they and I live in the same conditions, they have no right to claim that they can't pay for condoms but I can pay for all of them.
Last edited by New Asgariath on Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Jocabia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5273
Founded: Mar 25, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Jocabia » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:35 pm

Bottle wrote:
Jocabia wrote:And they aren't just saying they won't use it. They aren't even saying they won't pay for it. They're saying they want to know if you're using it and what for. The above law does more than allow them enforce their beliefs on you by denying insurance coverage for you for contraception. It removes all barriers to firing you for using contraception for birth control.

It's a lovely mix of woman-hating and classism, isn't it?

Time was, it was recognized that health benefits are something that an employee receives in lieu of higher wages, and that, consequently, one's health insurance is in fact part of one's pay for doing one's job. And, thus, your employer isn't "paying for" your health insurance...YOU are paying for it, with YOUR wages, which YOU earned.

But then women had to get all uppity and start holding paying jobs and receiving benefits just as though they were actual PEOPLE or something. And now it's ruined for everyone, because the corporate overlords have figured out that the best way to ensure that the underclasses will stay under is by setting them against one another, and woman-hating never fails to accomplish that.

You're right. It has several of the never fails. They even throw in that specter of the red menace (and in this case I don't mean moon time) and the war on Christians. It's amazing rich, Christian males survived in a country that has denied them access to liberty for so long.
Sgt Toomey wrote:Come to think of it, it would make more sense to hate him for being black. At least its half true..
JJ Place wrote:Sure, the statistics are that a gun is more likely to harm a family member than a criminal

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:36 pm

New Asgariath wrote:
Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Because the most privileged people are almost always the most likely ones to complain about how oppressed they are. It's the spoiled brat syndrome.

No, we just see through the bullshit that the "99%" people proclaim.

Besides, many of us don't live any better than the middle class despite having a higher income. My family started out here with nothing after moving from Russia 10 years ago. Now we are in the top 5% by income, but live in a middle class area in a middle class home. Why? Because all of our money is being used to pay for the house. I drive a $15,000 car. I'm many things, but I am not nearly as spoiled as you would think.

So, living like any middle class person, I hate it when people call me spoiled and expect me to pay for them.

Well, surely you can afford to buy me a $5,000 car, right?

Nobody is asking you to buy us anything and no - not even the health insurance we are actually paying for. Good that you are living frugally, I guess?
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:37 pm

It's amazing just how far the Right will go to keep the sport of Slut Shaming alive.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 56475
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
New York Times Democracy

Postby Risottia » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:38 pm

New Asgariath wrote: I drive a $15,000 car.

15000 $, that's more or less 12000 €, right?
Evidently you're not exactly scraping it for the bare essential...
nangiqatigillugu kalaałłiit nunaanni
je soutiens le canada / i stand with canada
estoy con panamá

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:38 pm

Desperate Measures wrote:Well, surely you can afford to buy me a $5,000 car, right?

Nobody is asking you to buy us anything and no - not even the health insurance we are actually paying for. Good that you are living frugally, I guess?


Hyper-individualism. It's an American syndrome that causes us to be utterly blind to collective phenomena because we only ever focus on individuals completely removed from social context.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:41 pm

Bottle wrote:
Jocabia wrote:And they aren't just saying they won't use it. They aren't even saying they won't pay for it. They're saying they want to know if you're using it and what for. The above law does more than allow them enforce their beliefs on you by denying insurance coverage for you for contraception. It removes all barriers to firing you for using contraception for birth control.

It's a lovely mix of woman-hating and classism, isn't it?

Time was, it was recognized that health benefits are something that an employee receives in lieu of higher wages, and that, consequently, one's health insurance is in fact part of one's pay for doing one's job. And, thus, your employer isn't "paying for" your health insurance...YOU are paying for it, with YOUR wages, which YOU earned.

But then women had to get all uppity and start holding paying jobs and receiving benefits just as though they were actual PEOPLE or something. And now it's ruined for everyone, because the corporate overlords have figured out that the best way to ensure that the underclasses will stay under is by setting them against one another, and woman-hating never fails to accomplish that.


Given that The Handmaid's Tale is a Republican wet dream, are you really surprised?
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37710
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Katganistan » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:43 pm

Free States of America wrote:This contraception issue is only happening because of the enormous expansion of government under Bush+Obama, while the comments of some from the right are disgraceful, they do have a point.
Why should the taxpayer pay for your sexual activities?
If you want to have sex(everybody does :lol:), pay for it. It's simple personal responsability issue.

Then ban insurance paying for Viagra too. Because the only reason to need an erection is to have sex, correct?

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:45 pm

Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:Well, surely you can afford to buy me a $5,000 car, right?

Nobody is asking you to buy us anything and no - not even the health insurance we are actually paying for. Good that you are living frugally, I guess?


Hyper-individualism. It's an American syndrome that causes us to be utterly blind to collective phenomena because we only ever focus on individuals completely removed from social context.

It's pretty annoying. I'm making more money today than I've ever made in my life but I'm still struggling to find an apartment (2 jobs and a 2 bedroom apartment is out of my price range - seriously?), pay for my daughters well-being, car insurance and repairs, etc. and etc. and motherfucking etc. Family planning is definitely an important part of my well being. I can't pay for another kid at this point. Contraception is not only a necessity for that reason but for other medical reasons, as well.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
New Asgariath
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 370
Founded: Feb 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Asgariath » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:46 pm

Risottia wrote:
New Asgariath wrote: I drive a $15,000 car.

15000 $, that's more or less 12000 €, right?
Evidently you're not exactly scraping it for the bare essential...

My friend who has a lower income just bought a car for 85,000... 15,000 is tiny when you are making 160,000 per year.

Anyways, this is getting off topic.

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37710
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Katganistan » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:47 pm

Free States of America wrote:But because of the individual mandate I am forced to buy insurance so the government is indirectly forcing me to pay for the birth control of another insured person.

And we have to pay for your kidney stones. So?

User avatar
Jocabia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5273
Founded: Mar 25, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Jocabia » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:49 pm

New Asgariath wrote:
Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Because the most privileged people are almost always the most likely ones to complain about how oppressed they are. It's the spoiled brat syndrome.

No, we just see through the bullshit that the "99%" people proclaim.

Besides, many of us don't live any better than the middle class despite having a higher income. My family started out here with nothing after moving from Russia 10 years ago. Now we are in the top 5% by income, but live in a middle class area in a middle class home. Why? Because all of our money is being used to pay for the house. I drive a $15,000 car. I'm many things, but I am not nearly as spoiled as you would think.

So, living like any middle class person, I hate it when people call me spoiled and expect me to pay for them. If they and I live in the same conditions, they have no right to claim that they can't pay for condoms but I can pay for all of them.

That's the funny bit. It's the top 1% who are asking for you to pay. They have the most say in our political process. The most responsibility for the state of our economy and our government debt. And they pay the least amount in relation to the amount of money they've pulled out of the economy (which, by the way, is bad for the economy). But they don't actually want to stop spending. (That's why Republicans signed a pledge not to raise taxes, or even close the loopholes that make it so the very rich pay less taxes than the middle class but have not signed a pledge to lower spending).

If you compare taxes to wealth, the uber-rich are the ones screwing you. But they don't want you to notice so they convince that cops are getting paid too much. And fireman. And social workers. And district attorneys. And soldiers. (All government employees). And the convince you that the huge percentage of this country that live below the poverty line is really the reason you don't have any money. That guy making 15000 grand a year is really the reason you don't have a summer home. And they convinced you that really it's not all the Americans buying stuff that creates jobs. Nope. They create jobs out of the kindness of their hearts. So we can't ask them to put back into the system they got so much out of. That would kill jobs. Because, as a small business owner, I don't employ people because there is a demand for my product. Nope. I just hire people whenever I have extra money. That's just good business.

(By the way, if you really think that is how business works, please take a class. Successful business people like the ones in Congress know that isn't how it works. But they missed the part in their Bibles where it says not to bear false witness.)

As someone who has been incredibly fortunate in the American economy, I would be a horrible person and the opposite of a patriot if I did not feel like I owe something to the country that helped me get here and the people supported me. Yes, I worked hard. Yes, I earned what I have. But I didn't do it in a vacuum. And I have an obligation to ensure that others have the good fortune of good health and a good education so they have the same opportunities I did.
Sgt Toomey wrote:Come to think of it, it would make more sense to hate him for being black. At least its half true..
JJ Place wrote:Sure, the statistics are that a gun is more likely to harm a family member than a criminal

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:49 pm

New Asgariath wrote:15,000 is tiny when you are making 160,000 per year.

Anyways, this is getting off topic.

Actually, I think that sentence is PRECISELY on topic.

If you think $15,000 is "tiny," you're not middle class. You aren't anywhere CLOSE to middle class. You make everyone who is actually middle class laugh out loud when you claim that you have any concept of "middle class."

Seriously, congrats on all your success and stuff, but give me a break. :P
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 56475
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
New York Times Democracy

Postby Risottia » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:49 pm

New Asgariath wrote:
Risottia wrote:15000 $, that's more or less 12000 €, right?
Evidently you're not exactly scraping it for the bare essential...

My friend who has a lower income just bought a car for 85,000... 15,000 is tiny when you are making 160,000 per year.

Aka being rich.

Anyways, this is getting off topic.

True that.
nangiqatigillugu kalaałłiit nunaanni
je soutiens le canada / i stand with canada
estoy con panamá

User avatar
Socialdemokraterne
Minister
 
Posts: 3446
Founded: Dec 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialdemokraterne » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:50 pm

New Asgariath wrote:No, we just see through the bullshit that the "99%" people proclaim.

Besides, many of us don't live any better than the middle class despite having a higher income. My family started out here with nothing after moving from Russia 10 years ago. Now we are in the top 5% by income, but live in a middle class area in a middle class home. Why? Because all of our money is being used to pay for the house. I drive a $15,000 car. I'm many things, but I am not nearly as spoiled as you would think.

So, living like any middle class person, I hate it when people call me spoiled and expect me to pay for them. If they and I live in the same conditions, they have no right to claim that they can't pay for condoms but I can pay for all of them.


First of all, well done on your family's part. Industrious people are needed to advance this country, and we're glad to have you.

With that said, mandating that insurance companies offer birth control as part of their coverage and mandating that all people have some form of healthcare coverage does not amount to tax dollars funding contraception. What it amounts to is private consumers who pay for their insurance plans (such as yourself) being able to rest assured that their contraception is covered by the premiums that they (that is, not you) pay for.

It's nothing like making you pay for someone's condoms. It's like making the drug store carry condoms while still requiring customers to buy their own condoms.
A social democracy following a variant of the Nordic model of the European welfare state composed of a union of Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Greenland, Denmark, Sleswig-Holstein, and a bit of Estonia.

Leder du måske efter en dansk region? Dansk!

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:51 pm

Bottle wrote:
New Asgariath wrote:15,000 is tiny when you are making 160,000 per year.

Anyways, this is getting off topic.

Actually, I think that sentence is PRECISELY on topic.

If you think $15,000 is "tiny," you're not middle class. You aren't anywhere CLOSE to middle class. You make everyone who is actually middle class laugh out loud when you claim that you have any concept of "middle class."

Seriously, congrats on all your success and stuff, but give me a break. :P


Hey look, a Romney!
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:53 pm

New Asgariath wrote:My friend who has a lower income just bought a car for 85,000... 15,000 is tiny when you are making 160,000 per year.

Anyways, this is getting off topic.


The amount of privilege blindness this exudes is enormous.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:58 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Bottle wrote:Actually, I think that sentence is PRECISELY on topic.

If you think $15,000 is "tiny," you're not middle class. You aren't anywhere CLOSE to middle class. You make everyone who is actually middle class laugh out loud when you claim that you have any concept of "middle class."

Seriously, congrats on all your success and stuff, but give me a break. :P


Hey look, a Romney!

No joke.

There is nothing wrong with being successful. If you've worked hard and got rich, fucking well done, and no need to act ashamed of it! Rich people who walk around trying to act like they're "salt of the Earth" are just embarrassing. Own your success, dammit.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Jocabia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5273
Founded: Mar 25, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Jocabia » Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:01 pm

New Asgariath wrote:
Risottia wrote:15000 $, that's more or less 12000 €, right?
Evidently you're not exactly scraping it for the bare essential...

My friend who has a lower income just bought a car for 85,000... 15,000 is tiny when you are making 160,000 per year.

Anyways, this is getting off topic.

Evidently, your friend is an idiot.

That said, the very point that your friend of a lower income can afford a wildly extravagant car is proof that you genuinely don't get it. That's what has gotten sad about this country. People used to actually be thankful when they were privileged. Now they whine like children about how they wanted every toy in the store and instead only got half the store.

I'll say this about the rich, they've accomplished something brilliant. 100 people are in a room and they're all hungry so they order enough pizza to feed 1000 people. 1 person in the room says, "Hey, you know what, I like you guys, so I'm going to pay 50% of the cost of the pizza." 40 people in the room put in whatever money they have but it's not enough to for them to pay for what they need to no longer be hungry. The remaining 59 people pay for about 40% of the pizza. When the pizza arrives the 1 person who paid the most takes 95% of the pizza. Now there isn't enough for everyone else to eat. They start to turn on the one guy, but somehow, amazingly, he convinces them that the fact that he has way more pizza than he could ever eat is not the problem. He instead convinces them that the problem is the 40 people who, in fact, don't have any pizza.

That's what is silly about what people are arguing. There is plenty to go around. More than enough. So if you feel like you're not getting enough, don't look at the guy who is starving and ask him to stop eating your pizza. Look at the guy smiling while refusing to share the pizza you all earned.
Sgt Toomey wrote:Come to think of it, it would make more sense to hate him for being black. At least its half true..
JJ Place wrote:Sure, the statistics are that a gun is more likely to harm a family member than a criminal

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Armistoca, Giustinia, Omerta, The Republic of the United Marble Tribes, Untecna

Advertisement

Remove ads