Madjack wrote:The moment Europeia chose not to do as required by treaty and inform TRR, that person, whoever they are, became a Europeian agent or at the very least an intelligence asset.Quebecshire wrote:
Your dispatch uses the phrase "Europeian agent" multiple times, a phrase that is by all reasonable accounts impossible to be accurate if Europeia does not know the identity of an umprompted leaker. That's just the most obvious inaccuracy.
How is someone an “Europeian Agent” or an “intelligence asset”, if they weren’t set there to do that in the first place? If Europeia doesn’t even know the identity of the “leaker”, which means they have no control over the actions of whoever it was, making it impossible for the “leaker” to have been an “agent” or an “asset”.


















