Advertisement
by Sao Nova Europa » Tue Feb 28, 2023 4:44 pm
by New England and Greater New Brunswick » Tue Feb 28, 2023 6:25 pm
AKA Ensolay
Mostly active in II and
Global Affairs
Open an embassy
with New England here
He/Him
Founded 1620
King King Jakob II
People's Minister PM Lackshore
Regent-in-Waiting Duke Irvin
National Interest
To Defend An Ally
United Kingdom of New England
Deus, Patria, et Rex Super Omnia
The UK New England is a nation known for immense national pride, prized civil liberties, and the rigorous protection of freedom across the globe.
Boston Inquirer - Gov. remains silent on Nifonese consulate issue, satellite shows armed forces on both sides | OPINION: Is Lackshore Too Old? | Boston Gossip - New English Crown Prince to open St. Botolph Square Thanksgiving Parade in lieu of father, reasons unknown.
by Sao Nova Europa » Tue Feb 28, 2023 7:09 pm
New England and Greater New Brunswick wrote:While I understand that there is a brown scare and repression is likely virtually as harsh, would a German-American Bunde leader work? Such a group would probably be right on the edge of plausable deniability, teetering just on the safe zone of anti-nazi laws.
I'm thinking of such agroup being led by a charismatic Goebells type character with a steriotypical German name. He could be a Montanan born to two German immigrants who was radicalized by treatment against Germans during World War 1, and in order to defend from attacks by Yankees he founded some type of German association, perhaps the German-American Interests Front. During WW2, they came under public scrutiny, which catapulted the groups membership. Now, they consist of maybe a million NAZI sympathizers and nationalists. They could have secret contacts with Germany and may be trying to orchestrate a deal where the GAIF gets SS help to orchestrate a coup, but they are still trying to remain indpenedent and not have a junior relationship with Germany. Perhaps they could get found out?
by Union Princes » Tue Feb 28, 2023 7:27 pm
by Arvenia » Wed Mar 01, 2023 1:25 am
by Arvenia » Wed Mar 01, 2023 4:06 am
by Turkducken » Wed Mar 01, 2023 8:06 am
Arvenia wrote:Can I applicate as a politician who resembles James Dean?
by New England and Greater New Brunswick » Wed Mar 01, 2023 3:20 pm
Union Princes wrote:There's already Joyner. The German-American Bund already fled to his camp for refuge during the Brown Scare.
You can't make another prominent far right politician
AKA Ensolay
Mostly active in II and
Global Affairs
Open an embassy
with New England here
He/Him
Founded 1620
King King Jakob II
People's Minister PM Lackshore
Regent-in-Waiting Duke Irvin
National Interest
To Defend An Ally
United Kingdom of New England
Deus, Patria, et Rex Super Omnia
The UK New England is a nation known for immense national pride, prized civil liberties, and the rigorous protection of freedom across the globe.
Boston Inquirer - Gov. remains silent on Nifonese consulate issue, satellite shows armed forces on both sides | OPINION: Is Lackshore Too Old? | Boston Gossip - New English Crown Prince to open St. Botolph Square Thanksgiving Parade in lieu of father, reasons unknown.
by Sao Nova Europa » Wed Mar 01, 2023 4:46 pm
by Fukuyamist America » Wed Mar 01, 2023 5:07 pm
by Sao Nova Europa » Wed Mar 01, 2023 5:14 pm
by Hopal » Wed Mar 01, 2023 5:40 pm
by Sao Nova Europa » Wed Mar 01, 2023 5:45 pm
Hopal wrote:Noticing lack of Republican Representatives here.
Been watching this from afar lately, and I've liked what I've seen, felt a bit left out. I think I'll have enough time on my hands to sustain this in the near future.
So I'm thinking of apping as a Republic representative from Nebraska to fill the gap. Fairly experienced, who's a lassez-faire libertarian, war-hawk Jackson ally, who's neutral. Maybe holding a minor role in Leadership like Chair of the Policy Committee or something just to fill in the gap. What do you think?
by Turkducken » Wed Mar 01, 2023 6:20 pm
Hopal wrote:Noticing lack of Republican Representatives here.
Been watching this from afar lately, and I've liked what I've seen, felt a bit left out. I think I'll have enough time on my hands to sustain this in the near future.
So I'm thinking of apping as a Republic representative from Nebraska to fill the gap. Fairly experienced, who's a lassez-faire libertarian, war-hawk Jackson ally, who's neutral. Maybe holding a minor role in Leadership like Chair of the Policy Committee or something just to fill in the gap. What do you think?
by Arvenia » Thu Mar 02, 2023 3:05 am
by Turkducken » Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:32 am
by Cybernetic Socialist Republics » Thu Mar 02, 2023 11:12 am
Official Name: Worker Assistance Guaranteeing Entrepreneurialism ActNickname: WAGE Act
Overview: This legislation is intended to decrease bureaucracy and addresse chronic poverty experienced by millions within these United States while protecting and advancing free enterprise through the creation of a Federal Minimum Income Program. Furthermore, this legislation seeks to relieve the burden of wage controls on unemployed people unable to find work, small businesses who are driven into stagnation and inflation pressures caused by artifical increases to costs of productionsSponsor: Senator Emily Nelson (R-NY)
Co-Sponsors:
Section 1: The story of American prosperity has been the story of free individuals exchanging goods and services with each other through the mechanism of the market and freedom of enterprise. Yet the great depression taught us that a failure of government to provide a means for the less fortunate to be insulated by fluctuations in the market leads to immense suffering . The federal government therefore, while the must to provide the best possible means to ensure the maximum possible freedom of markets and enterprise, it most also protect the citizenry from poverty. In response to the great depression, a web of well meaning, though tangled programs were implemented to provide economic security. We must, implement a remedy to this conundrum that is most compatible with American ideals of freedom, while cutting down on bureaucracy
Section 2: The Department of Health, Education and Welfare with determining poverty lines for households, accounting for federal, state and local prices required for a sustainable standard of living, accounting for federal, state and local programs and tax burdens.
Section 3: Establishes a Federal Minimum Income Program managed by the The Department of Health, Education and Welfare, tasked paying all citizens either employed or in education for the purpose of future employment, with incomes below the poverty line, with gradual phase outs to preserve incentive to increase incomes.
Section 4: The Department of Health, Education and Welfare is tasked with assseing the gap between potential earnings on federal, state and local minimum wages for households and the additional income that would be required for said households to be brought above the poverty line, with this gap representing the Maximum Payment the said household may receive,
Section 5: The Department of Health, Education and Welfare is provided the authority to design and implement a phase outs of existing programs under its authority for the purpose of providing funding for the Federal Minimum Income Program.
Section 6: When The Department of Health, Education and Welfare is capable of providing payments to households that would provide for an income above the poverty line without the current federal, state or local minimum wage in whole or in part, the The Department of Labor is tasked with imposing a phase out of the relevant minimum wage standard.
Section 7: The Department of Health, Education, and Welfare is tasked with presenting congress with a yearly estimation of the funding gap between what it can assign from existing programs and what is required to provide payments that would ensure all american households remain above their given poverty lines, so that congress may determine approriate funding.
This bill is then honorably presented to the Senate for consideration in order to change welfare and anti-poverty measures to improve the United States Law and is backed by Emily Nelson on January 6th 1960
by Laka Strolistandiler » Thu Mar 02, 2023 1:07 pm
I reserve the right to /stillme any one-liners if my post is at least two lines long
by Sao Nova Europa » Thu Mar 02, 2023 1:08 pm
Laka Strolistandiler wrote:So… Would it be alright if I’d include into my first post a notice about Vonner holding a public briefing of some sorts? He, being politically incompetent as he is will probably tell the truth about the war- and present a relatively stable plan which will basically be “Vietnamization” preceded by bombing everything which moves and doesn’t look like a friendly. It’s stupid but this is how he does things
by The Rio Grande River Basin » Thu Mar 02, 2023 1:09 pm
Sao Nova Europa wrote:Laka Strolistandiler wrote:So… Would it be alright if I’d include into my first post a notice about Vonner holding a public briefing of some sorts? He, being politically incompetent as he is will probably tell the truth about the war- and present a relatively stable plan which will basically be “Vietnamization” preceded by bombing everything which moves and doesn’t look like a friendly. It’s stupid but this is how he does things
Sure. It would be interesting.
Battle of Mar’Sa’Nakar ends in Pyrrhic victory as the Galactic Federation suffers losses, in defending the critical sector. GFS Andromeda severely damaged, GFS Comet destroyed. Mass evacuation of outer sector worlds beginning.
by Arvenia » Thu Mar 02, 2023 1:31 pm
by Sao Nova Europa » Thu Mar 02, 2023 1:44 pm
by Cybernetic Socialist Republics » Thu Mar 02, 2023 8:34 pm
Official Name: Equal Protection Implementation Correction ActNickname: EPIC ACT
Overview: Provides a variety of civil rights enforcement measures directly grounded in constitutional requirements.Sponsor: Senator Emily Nelson (R-NY)
Section 1: AN ACT To enforce the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act shall be known as the "Equal Protection Implementation Correction Act"
Section 2: Recognizing that the 14th amendment makes clear that no state shall make or enforce any law which may deny any person within it's jurisdiction the equal protection of the law, Sections 18 to 26 ensure that all level of government and any private organizations in direct interaction with by any government, will be in alignment with the expression Section 1 of the 14th amendment, as required by Section 5 of said amendment to enforce the provisions of the 14th amendment by appropriate legislation.
Section 3: Equal Protection Standards (EPS), the specifics of which are to be designed and maintained by the Department of Justice, are intended to ensure, through the regulation of institutions owned, operated by, or in direct interaction with governments, the primacy of merit in these United states, over discrimination against disadvantaged groups on the basis of race, color, gender, creed or wealth.
Section 4: Establishes three categories relative to the Equal Protection Standards:
(a) Within
(b) Pending
(c) Outside
Section 5: All assessable institutions begin with an assumption of being categorized as within standards. All institutions owned and/or operated by the federal, state, local etc. are governmental assessable institutions (GAIs). All private assessable institutions (PAIs) which meet the follow criteria are assessable institutions:
(a) Engage in exchange of goods and/or services with any government institutions
(b) Receive direct payments, tax credits, in kind goods/services or equivalent aid from any public institutions
Section 6: PAIs put under assessment of the Department of Justice are to be categorized as pending, the procedures for PAIs categorized as pending are as follows:
(a) PAIs categorized as pending found to be alignment with EPS they are to be recategorized as 'Within Standards'
(b) PAIs that are categorized as pending found to be misaligned with EPS are to provided with targets to meet standards
(c) PAIs that show credible efforts to reach targets are to be kept as pending.
(d) PAIs that fail to show credible effort to reach targets are to be recategorized as Outside Standards
Section 7: PAIs that are categorized as Outside Standards are to denied governmental patronization until they've reached targets assigned to them while they were pending.
Section 8: GAIs put under assessment of the Department of Justice are to be categorized as pending, the procedures for GAIs categorized as pending are as follows:
(a) GAIs categorized as pending found to be alignment with EPS are to be recategorized as 'Within Standards'
(b) GAIs that are categorized as pending found to be misaligned with EPS are to provided with targets to meet standards
(c) GAIs that show credible efforts to reach targets are to be kept as pending.
(d) GAIs that fail to show credible effort to reach targets are to be recategorized as Outside Standards
Section 9: GAIs that are categorized as Outside Standards are to have their functions federalized under the executive branch until they've reached targets assigned to them while they were pending.
(a) Attempts by civil or political officials to obstruct or provide support to obstruction are to be treated as unconstitutional actions consistent with consequences as outlined by Section 3 of the 14th amendment.
Section 10: To aid the responsibilities of the Department of Justice, petitions can be filled by citizens concerned about assessable institutions, alignments with EPS, which must be processed by the Department of Justice, which may prioritize on the basis of severity, volume and credibility of petitions.
Section 11: Recognizing that while the right to protest as a whole is sacred under the First Amendment, recent events have shown that a particular type of protest, that is protests made with purpose of advocating for the full application of the Fourteenth Amendment, have come under recent, violent and organized attack by forces that seek to undermine the Constitution of the United States of America. However, recognizing that many of those who end up participating in such efforts to undermine the constitution are often victims in their own way, this bill is intended to target the leadership and management of these efforts rather than their rank and file.
Section 12: Defines Equal Protection Demonstrations as public protests/events where their primary purpose is the advocacy for the protection and enforcement of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
Section 13: Charges those who organize and/or lead efforts with the intent of obstructing and/or disrupting Equal Protection Demonstrations with an offense under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241, followed by an investigation into other potential illegal activity by the accused.
(a) To aid in the deployment of adequate investigators/observers, petitions can be filled by citizens concerned that a given Equal Protection Demonstration will or has been obstructed or disrupted, which must be processed by the Department of Justice, which may prioritize on the basis of severity and volume of petitions.
(b) Where obstructive and or/disruptive efforts against Equal Protection Demonstrations are leaderless, participants are to be treated as they were organizing and/or leading efforts.
Section 14: Requires local law enforcement to provide adequate security from obstructive and/or disruptive efforts against Equal Protection Demonstrations.
(a) Failure to provide adequate security for Equal Protection Demonstrations, while having the capacity to do so will result in charges under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 against those immediately responsible for the failure to provide adequate security.
(b) To ensure the deployment of adequate security, petitions can be filled by citizens concerned that law enforcement local to a demonstration will or has failed to provide adequate security for equal protection demonstrations, which must be processed by the Department of Justice, which may prioritize on the basis of severity and volume of petitions.
(c) Should for whatever reason, adequate security for Equal Protection Demonstrations is not forthcoming, law enforcement external to the jurisdiction of the Equal Protection Demonstration are permitted, but not required to, provide reinforcement and local law enforcement are required to, within reason, cooperate with such efforts, with failure to do so invoking (a) of this section.
(d) Should regular law enforcement not be adequate security for Equal Protection Demonstrations not be forthcoming from local authorities, national guardsmen must be deployed in sufficient numbers to provide adequate security for Equal Protection Demonstrations.
This bill is then honorably presented to the Senate for consideration in order to enforce Equal Protections through United States Law and is backed by Senator Emily Nelson
by Obrela » Fri Mar 03, 2023 9:02 am
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Newne Carriebean7, Segral, Sivio
Advertisement