If you feel I have broken any rules, please link to it in moderation and ask that it be reviewed rather than, once again, attacking me and not what I've written.
Advertisement
by Katganistan » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:32 pm
by Ors Might » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:32 pm
Katganistan wrote:Ors Might wrote:Please provide evidence that most man spreading is men taking up two to three seats, if you would.
Did I say most? Please, link that.
In reaction to that doesn't happen, men don't take more than a little of another seat I posted this:
which, let's count together. How many seats is this fine gent taking?
Really now. Don't make arguments for me I did not make. I did say people in the 50s-60s sat in a more reasonable stance. And provided proof.
The exaggerations of what was actually posted is coming from some people, on one side, who appear to feel threatened by "please be courteous". It would be hilarious, if not so sadly indicative of the problem.
by Saint Arsenio » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:32 pm
Katganistan wrote:Ors Might wrote:Please provide evidence that most man spreading is men taking up two to three seats, if you would.
Did I say most? Please, link that.
In reaction to that doesn't happen, men don't take more than a little of another seat I posted this:
which, let's count together. How many seats is this fine gent taking?
Really now. Don't make arguments for me I did not make. I did say people in the 50s-60s sat in a more reasonable stance. And provided proof.
The exaggerations of what was actually posted is coming from some people, on one side, who appear to feel threatened by "please be courteous". It would be hilarious, if not so sadly indicative of the problem.
The Influential | News: Protests in Saint Glennwood, surrounding area prompt city-wide state of emergency
by Scomagia » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:33 pm
Katganistan wrote:Ors Might wrote:Please provide evidence that most man spreading is men taking up two to three seats, if you would.
Did I say most? Please, link that.
In reaction to that doesn't happen, men don't take more than a little of another seat I posted this:
which, let's count together. How many seats is this fine gent taking?
Really now. Don't make arguments for me I did not make. I did say people in the 50s-60s sat in a more reasonable stance. And provided proof.
The exaggerations of what was actually posted is coming from some people, on one side, who appear to feel threatened by "please be courteous". It would be hilarious, if not so sadly indicative of the problem.
by Katganistan » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:33 pm
by Valentine Z » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:33 pm
♪ If you are reading my sig, I want you to have the best day ever ! You are worth it, do not let anyone get you down ! ♪
Glory to De Geweldige Sierlijke Katachtige Utopia en Zijne Autonome Machten ov Valentine Z !
(✿◠‿◠) ☆ \(^_^)/ ☆
♡ Issues Thread ♡ Photography Stuff ♡ Project: Save F7. ♡ Stats Analysis ♡
♡ The Sixty! ♡ Valentian Stories! ♡ Gwen's Adventures! ♡
• Never trouble trouble until trouble troubles you.
• World Map is a cat playing with Australia.
by Garner Industrial State » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:33 pm
Estanglia wrote:Garner Industrial State wrote:1: You said it a quote ago
1.5: It’s called a deconstruction
2: there is a thing called an inference
3: no one is omniscient
1) Show me where inExcept only one person has done that.I saidApparently a belief can’t be held unless it’s announced word for word
1.5) What?
2) Inferences can be incorrect, and don't be shocked when people call you out on a lack of evidence for your inference. For example, your inference that me saying "only one person expressed that belief" somehow means "Nobody can hold said belief unless it's announced word for word", which is incorrect, evidenceless and has promptly been burned as the strawman it is.
3) So you can't prove that any of us hold that belief. What's the point of bringing up that belief in the first place then when only one person has ever been shown to hold said belief, and only after you brought up said belief?
La Paz de Los Ricos wrote:They wanna be the very best, like no one ever was.
by Highever » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:34 pm
Scomagia wrote:Katganistan wrote:Did I say most? Please, link that.
In reaction to that doesn't happen, men don't take more than a little of another seat I posted this:
which, let's count together. How many seats is this fine gent taking?
Really now. Don't make arguments for me I did not make. I did say people in the 50s-60s sat in a more reasonable stance. And provided proof.
The exaggerations of what was actually posted is coming from some people, on one side, who appear to feel threatened by "please be courteous". It would be hilarious, if not so sadly indicative of the problem.
Oh, the stock photo again....
So much proofs.
Jolthig wrote:Use Soresu and not Juyo.
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
by Saint Arsenio » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:34 pm
The Influential | News: Protests in Saint Glennwood, surrounding area prompt city-wide state of emergency
by Ors Might » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:34 pm
Garner Industrial State wrote:Estanglia wrote:
1) Show me where inExcept only one person has done that.I saidApparently a belief can’t be held unless it’s announced word for word
1.5) What?
2) Inferences can be incorrect, and don't be shocked when people call you out on a lack of evidence for your inference. For example, your inference that me saying "only one person expressed that belief" somehow means "Nobody can hold said belief unless it's announced word for word", which is incorrect, evidenceless and has promptly been burned as the strawman it is.
3) So you can't prove that any of us hold that belief. What's the point of bringing up that belief in the first place then when only one person has ever been shown to hold said belief, and only after you brought up said belief?
1:just because you dont say it doesnt mean you dont think it
1.5:deconstruction is looking at something piece by piece, and i happen to disagree with most elements
2:inferences can also be right sometimes
3:you tried to bring it up
by Highever » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:35 pm
Jolthig wrote:Use Soresu and not Juyo.
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
by Scomagia » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:36 pm
Katganistan wrote:Scomagia wrote:Well, we wouldn't want to be hostile, would we? After all, we aren't mods. If we're obnoxious ideologues, people can actually ignore us.
If you feel I have broken any rules, please link to it in moderation and ask that it be reviewed rather than, once again, attacking me and not what I've written.
by Katganistan » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:36 pm
Ors Might wrote:Katganistan wrote:Did I say most? Please, link that.
In reaction to that doesn't happen, men don't take more than a little of another seat I posted this:
which, let's count together. How many seats is this fine gent taking?
Really now. Don't make arguments for me I did not make. I did say people in the 50s-60s sat in a more reasonable stance. And provided proof.
The exaggerations of what was actually posted is coming from some people, on one side, who appear to feel threatened by "please be courteous". It would be hilarious, if not so sadly indicative of the problem.
So if most men aren’t doing this, then there isn’t a widespread problem.
by Saint Arsenio » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:37 pm
Scomagia wrote:Katganistan wrote:If you feel I have broken any rules, please link to it in moderation and ask that it be reviewed rather than, once again, attacking me and not what I've written.
Well, the rules are a little different for you now, aren't they?
And I wasn't attacking you. I was attacking the substance of your writing. It's clear as day, babe. Not hard to understand. Your posts are ridiculously hostile and then you project that hostility onto others.
The Influential | News: Protests in Saint Glennwood, surrounding area prompt city-wide state of emergency
by Ors Might » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:37 pm
by Scomagia » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:37 pm
Valentine Z wrote:That picture, and I am being honest, but that picture is a bit of an exaggeration. Most of us spread, yes, but not THAT much.
Again, context is important. You could say that he took two seats during rush hour, but how about the opposite where maybe he is doing it because it's a rather empty and free train with not a lot of people looking for a seat?
by Valentine Z » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:37 pm
Scomagia wrote:Valentine Z wrote:That picture, and I am being honest, but that picture is a bit of an exaggeration. Most of us spread, yes, but not THAT much.
Again, context is important. You could say that he took two seats during rush hour, but how about the opposite where maybe he is doing it because it's a rather empty and free train with not a lot of people looking for a seat?
Of course its exagerrated, it's a staged shot.
♪ If you are reading my sig, I want you to have the best day ever ! You are worth it, do not let anyone get you down ! ♪
Glory to De Geweldige Sierlijke Katachtige Utopia en Zijne Autonome Machten ov Valentine Z !
(✿◠‿◠) ☆ \(^_^)/ ☆
♡ Issues Thread ♡ Photography Stuff ♡ Project: Save F7. ♡ Stats Analysis ♡
♡ The Sixty! ♡ Valentian Stories! ♡ Gwen's Adventures! ♡
• Never trouble trouble until trouble troubles you.
• World Map is a cat playing with Australia.
by Katganistan » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:38 pm
Saint Arsenio wrote:Katganistan wrote:Did I say most? Please, link that.
In reaction to that doesn't happen, men don't take more than a little of another seat I posted this:
which, let's count together. How many seats is this fine gent taking?
Really now. Don't make arguments for me I did not make. I did say people in the 50s-60s sat in a more reasonable stance. And provided proof.
The exaggerations of what was actually posted is coming from some people, on one side, who appear to feel threatened by "please be courteous". It would be hilarious, if not so sadly indicative of the problem.
That's one guy in one picture, and nobody looks squished or crowded to me. Even still, his actions don't define the rest of us.
by Highever » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:38 pm
Jolthig wrote:Use Soresu and not Juyo.
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
by Estanglia » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:39 pm
Garner Industrial State wrote:Estanglia wrote:
1) Show me where inExcept only one person has done that.I saidApparently a belief can’t be held unless it’s announced word for word
1.5) What?
2) Inferences can be incorrect, and don't be shocked when people call you out on a lack of evidence for your inference. For example, your inference that me saying "only one person expressed that belief" somehow means "Nobody can hold said belief unless it's announced word for word", which is incorrect, evidenceless and has promptly been burned as the strawman it is.
3) So you can't prove that any of us hold that belief. What's the point of bringing up that belief in the first place then when only one person has ever been shown to hold said belief, and only after you brought up said belief?
1:just because you dont say it doesnt mean you dont think it
1.5:deconstruction is looking at something piece by piece, and i happen to disagree with most elements
2:inferences can also be right sometimes
3:you tried to bring it up
Torrocca wrote:"Your honor, it was not mein fault! I didn't order the systematic genocide of millions of people, it was the twenty kilograms of pure-cut Bavarian cocaine that did it!"
by Ors Might » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:39 pm
by Saint Arsenio » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:39 pm
The Influential | News: Protests in Saint Glennwood, surrounding area prompt city-wide state of emergency
by Highever » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:40 pm
Jolthig wrote:Use Soresu and not Juyo.
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
by Katganistan » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:41 pm
Scomagia wrote:Katganistan wrote:Did I say most? Please, link that.
In reaction to that doesn't happen, men don't take more than a little of another seat I posted this:
which, let's count together. How many seats is this fine gent taking?
Really now. Don't make arguments for me I did not make. I did say people in the 50s-60s sat in a more reasonable stance. And provided proof.
The exaggerations of what was actually posted is coming from some people, on one side, who appear to feel threatened by "please be courteous". It would be hilarious, if not so sadly indicative of the problem.
Oh, the stock photo again....
So much proofs.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, Aggicificicerous, Alvecia, Deblar, Duvniask, Eahland, Ethel mermania, HISPIDA, Konadd, Neonian Imperium, New Crywyzyxycynya, Ors Might, Page, Romanic Imperium, Sempi Archipelago, Soviet Haaregrad, Tarsonis, The Black Forrest, The Jamesian Republic, The Two Jerseys, Tiami, Uiiop, Valrifall, Zazumo
Advertisement