They spend a ton on Windex®
Advertisement

by Grinning Dragon » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:49 am

by Wallenburg » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:49 am
Tarsonis wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
I didn't know H was chasing teenagers.
No but when her husband was accused by multiple women, she stood by Bill and openly mocked his accusers. Democrats don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to this topic. Not so long as the Clintons are party darlings.
And let's not forget, Teddy Kennedy is the only politician with a confirmed kill in the War on Women.

by Tarsonis » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:54 am
Wallenburg wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
No but when her husband was accused by multiple women, she stood by Bill and openly mocked his accusers. Democrats don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to this topic. Not so long as the Clintons are party darlings.
And let's not forget, Teddy Kennedy is the only politician with a confirmed kill in the War on Women.
Hillary Clinton is a party darling? Don't make me laugh.

by The Black Forrest » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:58 am
Tarsonis wrote:Wallenburg wrote:Hillary Clinton is a party darling? Don't make me laugh.
She was the nominee in 2016 and barring the rise of some new party favorite, she's likely the nominee again 2020.
Bill is still celebrated, and the Party's cool uncle. Hell they made a meme out of him leering at Ariana Grande.
If she's not the party darling it's because there's nobody in the Democratic Party that anybody likes.

by Tarsonis » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:08 am
The Black Forrest wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
She was the nominee in 2016 and barring the rise of some new party favorite, she's likely the nominee again 2020.
Bill is still celebrated, and the Party's cool uncle. Hell they made a meme out of him leering at Ariana Grande.
If she's not the party darling it's because there's nobody in the Democratic Party that anybody likes.
Ok we get it you don't like her. Here's a shocker. There are many dems who don't as well.
Do continue the "but Hillary" defense.

by Wallenburg » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:09 am
Tarsonis wrote:Wallenburg wrote:Hillary Clinton is a party darling? Don't make me laugh.
She was the nominee in 2016 and barring the rise of some new party favorite, she's likely the nominee again 2020.
Bill is still celebrated, and the Party's cool uncle. Hell they made a meme out of him leering at Ariana Grande.
If she's not the party darling it's because there's nobody in the Democratic Party that anybody likes.

by Tarsonis » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:11 am
Wallenburg wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
She was the nominee in 2016 and barring the rise of some new party favorite, she's likely the nominee again 2020.
Bill is still celebrated, and the Party's cool uncle. Hell they made a meme out of him leering at Ariana Grande.
If she's not the party darling it's because there's nobody in the Democratic Party that anybody likes.
Hillary Clinton is widely despised among the Democratic voters. Her husband less so, but mostly due to a surplus of nostalgia glasses. As Black Forrest said, don't bother bringing up Clinton when I'll gladly feed her to the tigers along with every cretinous scumbag in Washington.

by Petrasylvania » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:13 am
The Black Forrest wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
She was the nominee in 2016 and barring the rise of some new party favorite, she's likely the nominee again 2020.
Bill is still celebrated, and the Party's cool uncle. Hell they made a meme out of him leering at Ariana Grande.
If she's not the party darling it's because there's nobody in the Democratic Party that anybody likes.
Ok we get it you don't like her. Here's a shocker. There are many dems who don't as well.
Do continue the "but Hillary" defense.

by Hurtful Thoughts » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:17 am
Wallenburg wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
She was the nominee in 2016 and barring the rise of some new party favorite, she's likely the nominee again 2020.
Bill is still celebrated, and the Party's cool uncle. Hell they made a meme out of him leering at Ariana Grande.
If she's not the party darling it's because there's nobody in the Democratic Party that anybody likes.
Hillary Clinton is widely despised among the Democratic voters. Her husband less so, but mostly due to a surplus of nostalgia glasses. As Black Forrest said, don't bother bringing up Clinton when I'll gladly feed her to the tigers along with every cretinous scumbag in Washington.
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War
Hurtful Thoughts wrote:It was remarkable how much could happen in as little as fifteen seconds.

by Wallenburg » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:19 am
Tarsonis wrote:Wallenburg wrote:Hillary Clinton is widely despised among the Democratic voters. Her husband less so, but mostly due to a surplus of nostalgia glasses. As Black Forrest said, don't bother bringing up Clinton when I'll gladly feed her to the tigers along with every cretinous scumbag in Washington.
Until the Party does, that's mean nothing.

by Tarsonis » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:19 am
Hurtful Thoughts wrote:Wallenburg wrote:Hillary Clinton is widely despised among the Democratic voters. Her husband less so, but mostly due to a surplus of nostalgia glasses. As Black Forrest said, don't bother bringing up Clinton when I'll gladly feed her to the tigers along with every cretinous scumbag in Washington.
Would be nice if you actually fed them to the swamp-creatures.
They look extra hungry today.

by Hurtful Thoughts » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:20 am
Wallenburg wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
Until the Party does, that's mean nothing.
In that case, your objections to our concerns over sexual assault clearly aren't based in a desire to eliminate hypocrisy, but in a partisan drive to defend your party members at all times and attack opposition members at all times.
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War
Hurtful Thoughts wrote:It was remarkable how much could happen in as little as fifteen seconds.

by Wallenburg » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:29 am

by Tobleste » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:38 am
Tarsonis wrote:Tobleste wrote:
And all of those people (bar McCain) happily worked with Trump and were open to working with Moore if he won. Voters care about rape allegations. Republicans don't.
Oh yeah, Democrats really light the fire when one of their own is accused. Hillary Clinton was the nominee ffs.

by Petrasylvania » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:38 am
Wallenburg wrote:Tarsonis wrote:won't happen. Dems groan that they hate her, but they only hate her because she lost. If she had won they'd be kissing her ass and calling us sexist for not.
I hate her for entering the race at all. She felt entitled to every American's vote and took down her party with her.

by Tobleste » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:39 am
Tarsonis wrote:LBJ would repeatedly expose himself to women, staffers, etc. Don't hear the left clamoring to pull his statues down.

by The Black Forrest » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:39 am
Wallenburg wrote:Tarsonis wrote:won't happen. Dems groan that they hate her, but they only hate her because she lost. If she had won they'd be kissing her ass and calling us sexist for not.
I hate her for entering the race at all. She felt entitled to every American's vote and took down her party with her.

by Tobleste » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:40 am

by Petrasylvania » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:41 am
Tarsonis wrote:LBJ would repeatedly expose himself to women, staffers, etc. Don't hear the left clamoring to pull his statues down.

by Petrasylvania » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:43 am

by Tobleste » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:44 am
Tarsonis wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Ok we get it you don't like her. Here's a shocker. There are many dems who don't as well.
Do continue the "but Hillary" defense.
It's not a defense, it's a "spare me the sanctimonious bullshit of "republicans don't care about SA allegations." Democrats don't give a shit either unless it suits them to.

by Washington Resistance Army » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:45 am

by Kaggeceria » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:51 am
Mystic Warriors wrote:Kaggeceria wrote:Aaaaaaaaaaaaand there you go.
And, I mean, even the people who were at the party said nothing happened.
But, uh sure. Waaaaahhhh, poor Ford. She has no evidence for her bullshit claims but we should believe her anyway because Trump fans are big meanies waaahhhh.
Seriously, that's your response? If you cant answer the question just say so, no need to get defensive about it.

by Kaggeceria » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:52 am

by Shofercia » Mon Sep 24, 2018 12:53 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Saiwania-, Almonaster Nuevo, Australian rePublic, Bombadil, Democratic Kingdom of South India, Elejamie, Fjolmidlum, Google [Bot], Greater Britannian Realm, La Xinga, Nu Elysium, Slembana, Stellar Colonies, Tlaceceyaya, Uan aa Boa, Valrifell, Xmara, Yerachmeal
Advertisement