Dylar wrote:Ifreann wrote:I like that you ignored everything else I said. But anyway, yes, we have an anti-abortion amendment in our constitution, for now. It doesn't actually say "No abortions" or anything like that. It says that the government must give equal recognition to the right to life of the unborn as to the right to life of the mother. The movement calling for its repeal is substantial. We'll probably be rid of it within a few years.
I thought they were reforming it, not repealing it?
Yeah, I think some of the government wants to amend the 8th or something like that.
Keshiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Keshiland, do you actually know what goes on in Ireland in relation to abortion? Have you done any research at all? Are you aware of the horrific cases that the anti-abortion laws in Ireland have caused? Look at the cases of Whelan v Ireland, Mellet v Ireland, PP v HSE, Savita Halappanavar, Miss D, D v Ireland, C Case, and X Case. Educate yourself before saying that The United States needs the same laws as Ireland in relation to abortion.
Well looking at the Irish Constitution they have some truly fighting amendments. Like what the duck is this
Family and home life: Under Article 41.1 the state promises to "protect the Family", and recognises the family as having "inalienable and imprescriptible rights, antecedent and superior to all positive law". Under Article 41.2 the state is required to ensure that "economic necessity" does not oblige a mother "to engage in labour to the neglect of [her] duties in the home". Article 41.3 sets out conditions that must be fulfilled before a court may grant a divorce, including that adequate financial provision has been made for both spouses and any of their children.
Did they really just say that mothers can not work outside the home?
No.







