NATION

PASSWORD

[Abortion][REVISED POLL] If you had the power...

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

If you had the power to address the controversy over abortion rights, how would you do it?

1. Leave as is
90
5%
2. Illegal across the board
166
8%
3. Illegal with exceptions
301
15%
4. Enact measures to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies / the burden of pregnancy and parenthood, but not make it illegal because emergencies happen
733
37%
5. Enact measures to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies / the burden of pregnancy and parenthood, AND make it illegal across the board
85
4%
6. Enact measures to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies / the burden of pregnancy and parenthood, AND make it illegal with exceptions
277
14%
7. Reduce/remove any existing restrictions on abortion and cut entitlements
218
11%
8. Institute compulsory population control measures
90
5%
 
Total votes : 1960

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 178436
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:04 am

Dylar wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I like that you ignored everything else I said. But anyway, yes, we have an anti-abortion amendment in our constitution, for now. It doesn't actually say "No abortions" or anything like that. It says that the government must give equal recognition to the right to life of the unborn as to the right to life of the mother. The movement calling for its repeal is substantial. We'll probably be rid of it within a few years.

I thought they were reforming it, not repealing it?

Yeah, I think some of the government wants to amend the 8th or something like that.


Keshiland wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Keshiland, do you actually know what goes on in Ireland in relation to abortion? Have you done any research at all? Are you aware of the horrific cases that the anti-abortion laws in Ireland have caused? Look at the cases of Whelan v Ireland, Mellet v Ireland, PP v HSE, Savita Halappanavar, Miss D, D v Ireland, C Case, and X Case. Educate yourself before saying that The United States needs the same laws as Ireland in relation to abortion.


Well looking at the Irish Constitution they have some truly fighting amendments. Like what the duck is this

Family and home life: Under Article 41.1 the state promises to "protect the Family", and recognises the family as having "inalienable and imprescriptible rights, antecedent and superior to all positive law". Under Article 41.2 the state is required to ensure that "economic necessity" does not oblige a mother "to engage in labour to the neglect of [her] duties in the home". Article 41.3 sets out conditions that must be fulfilled before a court may grant a divorce, including that adequate financial provision has been made for both spouses and any of their children.

Did they really just say that mothers can not work outside the home?

No.
Last edited by Ifreann on Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
He/Him
If you're in line to destroy America, stay in line!
Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
NeuPolska
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7801
Founded: Jun 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby NeuPolska » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:21 am

Ok maybe we should talk about something else besides the constant bodily sovereignty vs. sanctity of unborn life arguing, namely, what about in cases when a woman deceives a man or outright rapes a man in order to become pregnant? Is it still her choice, or can she be forced to have an abortion because it was rape? Currently as far as I know the man would have to pay child support regardless, and the woman gets to have her baby.

Forcing an abortion sounds horrible though, and while I understand that child support is meant for the child's well-being, why make the victim of a rape pay for the outcome?

Please, call me POLSKA
U.S. Army Enlisted
Kar-Esseria wrote:Who is that and are they female because if not then they can go make love to their hand.
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Go home Polska wins NS.
United Mongol Hordes wrote:Polska isn't exactly the nicest guy in the world
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Hurd you miss the point more than Polska misses Poland.
Rhodesialund wrote:when you have Charlie ten feet away or something operating operationally.
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Gayla is living in 1985 but these guys are already in 1916

User avatar
Keshiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1469
Founded: Dec 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Keshiland » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:26 am

NeuPolska wrote:Ok maybe we should talk about something else besides the constant bodily sovereignty vs. sanctity of unborn life arguing, namely, what about in cases when a woman deceives a man or outright rapes a man in order to become pregnant? Is it still her choice, or can she be forced to have an abortion because it was rape? Currently as far as I know the man would have to pay child support regardless, and the woman gets to have her baby.

Forcing an abortion sounds horrible though, and while I understand that child support is meant for the child's well-being, why make the victim of a rape pay for the outcome?


GTHO about women raping men. If he was stupid and got minipulated into thinking she was on birth control that's on him. He needs to man up and be a father.
OOC- I am a Prolife Liberal who is Anti Gun, Pro Immigration, Pro UHC, Pro financial aid, and anything that makes children's lives better. I am also eco-friendly.

IC- The Federation of Keshiland stands for freedom and local governance. Requirements for state hood. A territory atleast 1,000 KL and a population of atleast 100k. Our Constitution keeps us free and can only be changed with a 3/4ths ratification of the states.

State count 135

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 71309
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:28 am

Keshiland wrote:
NeuPolska wrote:Ok maybe we should talk about something else besides the constant bodily sovereignty vs. sanctity of unborn life arguing, namely, what about in cases when a woman deceives a man or outright rapes a man in order to become pregnant? Is it still her choice, or can she be forced to have an abortion because it was rape? Currently as far as I know the man would have to pay child support regardless, and the woman gets to have her baby.

Forcing an abortion sounds horrible though, and while I understand that child support is meant for the child's well-being, why make the victim of a rape pay for the outcome?


GTHO about women raping men. If he was stupid and got minipulated into thinking she was on birth control that's on him. He needs to man up and be a father.


...Wow that's even more reductive than the idea that emotional abuse is the answer to women wanting abortion.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN♀

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
NeuPolska
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7801
Founded: Jun 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby NeuPolska » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:28 am

Keshiland wrote:
NeuPolska wrote:Ok maybe we should talk about something else besides the constant bodily sovereignty vs. sanctity of unborn life arguing, namely, what about in cases when a woman deceives a man or outright rapes a man in order to become pregnant? Is it still her choice, or can she be forced to have an abortion because it was rape? Currently as far as I know the man would have to pay child support regardless, and the woman gets to have her baby.

Forcing an abortion sounds horrible though, and while I understand that child support is meant for the child's well-being, why make the victim of a rape pay for the outcome?


GTHO about women raping men. If he was stupid and got minipulated into thinking she was on birth control that's on him. He needs to man up and be a father.

That's not the only way it can happen. What if he gets drugged? Bound to a bed or chair? Forced at gunpoint or knifepoint? Or told to do it or else she'll cry "rape" herself and get him thrown in prison?

Please, call me POLSKA
U.S. Army Enlisted
Kar-Esseria wrote:Who is that and are they female because if not then they can go make love to their hand.
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Go home Polska wins NS.
United Mongol Hordes wrote:Polska isn't exactly the nicest guy in the world
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Hurd you miss the point more than Polska misses Poland.
Rhodesialund wrote:when you have Charlie ten feet away or something operating operationally.
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Gayla is living in 1985 but these guys are already in 1916

User avatar
Keshiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1469
Founded: Dec 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Keshiland » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:32 am

NeuPolska wrote:
Keshiland wrote:
GTHO about women raping men. If he was stupid and got minipulated into thinking she was on birth control that's on him. He needs to man up and be a father.

That's not the only way it can happen. What if he gets drugged? Bound to a bed or chair? Forced at gunpoint or knifepoint? Or told to do it or else she'll cry "rape" herself and get him thrown in prison?


Life sounds so hard for wannabe victims. I have never heard a forced female male rape story ever. For the 1 in 1M let him relinquish his duties
OOC- I am a Prolife Liberal who is Anti Gun, Pro Immigration, Pro UHC, Pro financial aid, and anything that makes children's lives better. I am also eco-friendly.

IC- The Federation of Keshiland stands for freedom and local governance. Requirements for state hood. A territory atleast 1,000 KL and a population of atleast 100k. Our Constitution keeps us free and can only be changed with a 3/4ths ratification of the states.

State count 135

User avatar
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary
Post Czar
 
Posts: 30756
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:34 am

Keshiland wrote:
NeuPolska wrote:That's not the only way it can happen. What if he gets drugged? Bound to a bed or chair? Forced at gunpoint or knifepoint? Or told to do it or else she'll cry "rape" herself and get him thrown in prison?


Life sounds so hard for wannabe victims. I have never heard a forced female male rape story ever. For the 1 in 1M let him relinquish his duties

Oh just you wait when Gallo finds this.
The Holy Romangnan Empire of Ostmark
something something the sole legitimate Austria-Hungary larp'er on NS :3

MT/MagicT
The Armed Forces|Embassy Programme|The Imperial and National Anthem of the Holy Roman Empire|Characters|The Map

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 178436
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:35 am

NeuPolska wrote:Ok maybe we should talk about something else besides the constant bodily sovereignty vs. sanctity of unborn life arguing, namely, what about in cases when a woman deceives a man or outright rapes a man in order to become pregnant? Is it still her choice,

Yes.
or can she be forced to have an abortion because it was rape?

No.
Currently as far as I know the man would have to pay child support regardless, and the woman gets to have her baby.

Forcing an abortion sounds horrible though, and while I understand that child support is meant for the child's well-being, why make the victim of a rape pay for the outcome?

A better question is what this has to do with the topic of the thread, i.e. abortion. If you want to talk about child support payments, start a thread about child support payments.
He/Him
If you're in line to destroy America, stay in line!
Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
NeuPolska
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7801
Founded: Jun 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby NeuPolska » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:36 am

Keshiland wrote:
NeuPolska wrote:That's not the only way it can happen. What if he gets drugged? Bound to a bed or chair? Forced at gunpoint or knifepoint? Or told to do it or else she'll cry "rape" herself and get him thrown in prison?


Life sounds so hard for wannabe victims. I have never heard a forced female male rape story ever. For the 1 in 1M let him relinquish his duties

A simple google search brings up this news article

Now you've heard one.

Please, call me POLSKA
U.S. Army Enlisted
Kar-Esseria wrote:Who is that and are they female because if not then they can go make love to their hand.
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Go home Polska wins NS.
United Mongol Hordes wrote:Polska isn't exactly the nicest guy in the world
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Hurd you miss the point more than Polska misses Poland.
Rhodesialund wrote:when you have Charlie ten feet away or something operating operationally.
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Gayla is living in 1985 but these guys are already in 1916

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37782
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Katganistan » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:38 am

The Norgan Alliance wrote:
Godular wrote:
This is a debate forum, be prepared to defend your statements. If you do not wish to debate, forum 7 or any of the actual gameplay forums may better suit your preference.

Well I mean technically this thread is supposed to be about what you would do with abortion if you ruled the US as an unquestioned autocrat. I guess that means Sailence is the only one doing it right rn.

Oh also sorry for being facetious earlier. Thank you for stopping being so belligerent.

It is not in any way a roleplay forum. So people speaking as if from the point of view of their imaginary nation are absolutely not doing it right rn, thanks.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 178436
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:38 am

NeuPolska wrote:
Keshiland wrote:
GTHO about women raping men. If he was stupid and got minipulated into thinking she was on birth control that's on him. He needs to man up and be a father.

That's not the only way it can happen. What if he gets drugged? Bound to a bed or chair? Forced at gunpoint or knifepoint? Or told to do it or else she'll cry "rape" herself and get him thrown in prison?

Unless this hypothetical man gets pregnant, which is pretty unlikely, his plight is not relevant to this thread.
He/Him
If you're in line to destroy America, stay in line!
Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
NeuPolska
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7801
Founded: Jun 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby NeuPolska » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:40 am

Ifreann wrote:
NeuPolska wrote:Ok maybe we should talk about something else besides the constant bodily sovereignty vs. sanctity of unborn life arguing, namely, what about in cases when a woman deceives a man or outright rapes a man in order to become pregnant? Is it still her choice,

Yes.
or can she be forced to have an abortion because it was rape?

No.
Currently as far as I know the man would have to pay child support regardless, and the woman gets to have her baby.

Forcing an abortion sounds horrible though, and while I understand that child support is meant for the child's well-being, why make the victim of a rape pay for the outcome?

A better question is what this has to do with the topic of the thread, i.e. abortion. If you want to talk about child support payments, start a thread about child support payments.

I know I brought up child support, but the rest of my post was intended to bring up the whole "abortion is okay in circumstances of rape" argument but flipped. My apologies if this was not clear. Since I couldn't justify forcing an abortion, I proposed the child support thing as an alternative, but my intention was to bring up the topic of male rape by women and pregnancy.

Please, call me POLSKA
U.S. Army Enlisted
Kar-Esseria wrote:Who is that and are they female because if not then they can go make love to their hand.
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Go home Polska wins NS.
United Mongol Hordes wrote:Polska isn't exactly the nicest guy in the world
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Hurd you miss the point more than Polska misses Poland.
Rhodesialund wrote:when you have Charlie ten feet away or something operating operationally.
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Gayla is living in 1985 but these guys are already in 1916

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:43 am

NeuPolska wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Yes.

No.

A better question is what this has to do with the topic of the thread, i.e. abortion. If you want to talk about child support payments, start a thread about child support payments.

I know I brought up child support, but the rest of my post was intended to bring up the whole "abortion is okay in circumstances of rape" argument but flipped. My apologies if this was not clear. Since I couldn't justify forcing an abortion, I proposed the child support thing as an alternative, but my intention was to bring up the topic of male rape by women and pregnancy.

If the man is raped I think the woman will have a hard time getting the court to make him pay for it.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 42642
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Neutraligon » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:45 am

Genivaria wrote:
NeuPolska wrote:I know I brought up child support, but the rest of my post was intended to bring up the whole "abortion is okay in circumstances of rape" argument but flipped. My apologies if this was not clear. Since I couldn't justify forcing an abortion, I proposed the child support thing as an alternative, but my intention was to bring up the topic of male rape by women and pregnancy.

If the man is raped I think the woman will have a hard time getting the court to make him pay for it.

I wish that where true, but there have been cases where he has had to pay for child support.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.1927767
Last edited by Neutraligon on Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37782
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Katganistan » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:46 am

Neanderthaland wrote:
Sailence wrote:We disagree on everything including watching someone betray their family to ease the burden of keeping them alive and paying for their healthcare (which is why most European nations have public healthcare to avoid this motive to pull the plug).

That's not why most European nations have public healthcare, and people in European nations still sometimes decide to pull the plug.

Agreed, Neanderthaland. Anybody remember Charlie Gard? on whom the plug was pulled by European healthcare explicitly against the pleas of his parents?

I don't think we really want to talk about European healthcare and pulling the plug as an argument point in this thread. That example alone certainly doesn't support Sailence's argument.
Last edited by Katganistan on Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:48 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:47 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Genivaria wrote:If the man is raped I think the woman will have a hard time getting the court to make him pay for it.

I wish that where true, but there have been cases where he has had to pay for child support.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer

What the actual fuck...

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 178436
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:49 am

NeuPolska wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Yes.

No.

A better question is what this has to do with the topic of the thread, i.e. abortion. If you want to talk about child support payments, start a thread about child support payments.

I know I brought up child support, but the rest of my post was intended to bring up the whole "abortion is okay in circumstances of rape" argument but flipped. My apologies if this was not clear. Since I couldn't justify forcing an abortion, I proposed the child support thing as an alternative, but my intention was to bring up the topic of male rape by women and pregnancy.

Well, in the situation that a woman becomes pregnant by raping a man, I would be of the position that she retains her right to bodily sovereignty. If she wants to remain pregnant, she remains pregnant. If she wants an abortion, she can have an abortion.
He/Him
If you're in line to destroy America, stay in line!
Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Neutraligon
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 42642
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Neutraligon » Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:50 am

Genivaria wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:I wish that where true, but there have been cases where he has had to pay for child support.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer

What the actual fuck...

Yep, victims of statutory rape have been forced to pay child support. I seem to recall a full on male rape victim (as in two adults) also was forced to pay but can't find the article. Yeah...the court system when it comes to male rape victims suck. One of those legal issues MRAs can point to as being just pure shit.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Tananat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 779
Founded: Mar 02, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Tananat » Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:01 am

Keshiland wrote:The alternative for abortion, not having sex or adoption.

Are you willing to adopt 10 unwanted babies? 20? Would you be ok with the state billeted unwanted children in people's homes?

Because even using the most generous of estimates, replacing abortion with adoption will add millions of children to the care system in half a decade.

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37782
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Katganistan » Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:05 am

Keshiland wrote:Having the right to do something does not make it moral. Doing something because you have the right to do it does not make your moral. If you kill a human life for any reason other than saving your own life then you are just as bad as any murderer alive today.

How did we get to the point where people said, you know what, you can have all the sex you want and if you get pregnant just kill it if you don't want the child. WTH? What happened to taking responsibility?

Its really disgusting that people who get abortion are protected by doctor patient confidentiality, they should at least have the info on who killed there offspring on a data base like the sex offender registry. Can't handle the social ridicule don't have an abortion.

Guys if you have a girlfriend/wife who is thinking about aborting the child tell all her and your family and friends that you guys are expecting and put the spot lite on her.
Parents if your daughter or son is or is pressuring someone into aborting threaten disownment and have the papers ready to show them that, that action crosses the line.

Girls if you have a boyfriend/Husband that is pressuring you into having an abortion tell everyone they know and that you know that your expecting to put the spot light on them if they try to run away.

Its time for society to step up and end this gross practice.

No, it is time to stop pretending that women are not human beings, and recognize that as humans they have a right to determine their fate and to ownership of their bodies. It's time to stop pretending that any human has the authority to force another to bear a child simply as a punishment for becoming pregant, and to stop pretending that they and their doctors cannot decide that a pregnancy is too dangerous/too much of an undue burden to continue because of a third party's insistence.

It is time to stop pretending that this is anything other than power and revenge fantasies when the argument revolves around punishment, humiliation, and emotional abuse. It's frankly disturbing to read that anyone believes that they are at all appropriate to use in a civilized society, and I would seriously fear for the well-being of anyone associated with someone who could espouse such things.
Keshiland wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Women have died because they were shamed into not aborting even in the face of obvious health risks. But clearly you don't care about that.


Thats tragic but they should have gone and done what they needed to do abort to save their life.

Yet you'd have them being shamed and humiliated and emotionally abused under your utopian system? But it's their fault if they die because they don't abort in the face of those horrific policies?

Then admit that really, the only point of your ideas is to shame, abuse, and humiliate.
Last edited by Katganistan on Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35507
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:10 am

Katganistan wrote:No, it is time to stop pretending that women are not human beings, and recognize that as humans they have a right to determine their fate and to ownership of their bodies. It's time to stop pretending that any human has the authority to force another to bear a child simply as a punishment for becoming pregant, and to stop pretending that they and their doctors cannot decide that a pregnancy is too dangerous/too much of an undue burden to continue because of a third party's insistence.

It is time to stop pretending that this is anything other than power and revenge fantasies when the argument revolves around punishment, humiliation, and emotional abuse. It's frankly disturbing to read that anyone believes that they are at all appropriate to use in a civilized society, and I would seriously fear for the well-being of anyone associated with someone who could espouse such things.

This. The punishment of, and power over, women seems to be a constant thread that runs through all of Keshiland's suggestions here. Every suggestion that he makes always has an air of punishment about it. And not just ordinary punishment either, sadistic vengeful punishment. I think that punishment of women is the real goal here, prevention of abortion is just a convenient excuse. If there hadn't been that excuse, I'm sure another excuse would have been found...
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37782
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Katganistan » Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:12 am

Keshiland wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Plus this is still on the "women should be subjected to abuse until they conform" level of stuff.


No its not. Having a sound track of crying or screaming or mommy calling babies in an abortion clinic is not abuse. It is simply a harmless deterrent. No one is getting beat. You really should stop using the seriousness of real abuse to win an argument.


So if for example someone were to organize a group of people that would follow you to your school/place of work and yell out insults, embarrassing statements, and the things you've written on this site, in public, for however long you were inside, that would be ok? Because you're not actually being beaten, you're just being called out on what you've said/the mistakes you've made/your appearance/any awkward moments you've experienced all day long?

Please think about what you're saying.
Last edited by Katganistan on Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:14 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 79496
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Thermodolia » Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:13 am

Keshiland wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Plus this is still on the "women should be subjected to abuse until they conform" level of stuff.


No its not. Having a sound track of crying or screaming or mommy calling babies in an abortion clinic is not abuse. It is simply a harmless deterrent. No one is getting beat. You really should stop using the seriousness of real abuse to win an argument.

Actually babies crying is even more of a reason to get an abortion
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 79496
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Thermodolia » Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:15 am

Keshiland wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
So yes, women should be subjected to abuse until they conform to your morality.


Its not ducking abuse. You know you're on the wrong side morally so you throw around words like rape and abuse. If someone is not strong enough to carry on with the abortion because their family/friends know about it or because of baby noises then they never really wanted it in the 1st place.

Um ya it is. As someone who suffered emotional and psychological abuse growing up what you are proposing is 100% abuse
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37782
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Katganistan » Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:15 am

Keshiland wrote:


Is it underhanded yes, Is it cheap yes, is it abusing no. It starts when they enter the clinic and stops when they exit it.

Clearly you read none of those links. It is abuse by definition.
Dylar wrote:
Keshiland wrote:
Its not ducking abuse. You know you're on the wrong side morally so you throw around words like rape and abuse. If someone is not strong enough to carry on with the abortion because their family/friends know about it or because of baby noises then they never really wanted it in the 1st place.

Look man, I'm pro-life, but even I think that it's emotional and psychological abuse. You simply cannot guilt trip somebody into carrying their unborn child, cause that'll lead the mother down the dark road of depression and could even lead to suicide killing both the mother and child.

Thank you.
Last edited by Katganistan on Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ariddia, Cannot think of a name, Glamour, Pasong Tirad, Philjia, The Grand World Order, Valrifell

Advertisement

Remove ads