Advertisement
by Jakker » Tue Feb 28, 2017 4:52 pm
The Bruce wrote:Mostly I feel sorry for [raiders], because they put in all this effort and at the end of the day have nothing to show for it and have created nothing.
by Falapatorius » Tue Feb 28, 2017 5:17 pm
Jakker wrote:In conclusion, your point that condemnations are viewed as a point of pride does not matter. It was a thing back then too. When there is no effect besides a badge, that is what happens. The only point that I will give you is that the proposal is not well-written. Everyone knows that. People knew that back then, but it still passed. There is such much more beyond the words that trying to repeal this condemnation is erasing a significant part of SC history.
by Jakker » Tue Feb 28, 2017 5:26 pm
Falapatorius wrote:Jakker wrote:In conclusion, your point that condemnations are viewed as a point of pride does not matter. It was a thing back then too. When there is no effect besides a badge, that is what happens. The only point that I will give you is that the proposal is not well-written. Everyone knows that. People knew that back then, but it still passed. There is such much more beyond the words that trying to repeal this condemnation is erasing a significant part of SC history.
Hmm.. perhaps repealing a 'badge of honor' (or not giving one in the first place) is the most effective condemnation, judging from the angst generated by it's possible repeal in this case.
The Bruce wrote:Mostly I feel sorry for [raiders], because they put in all this effort and at the end of the day have nothing to show for it and have created nothing.
by The Stalker » Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:05 pm
by New Dukaine » Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:06 pm
by Lord Dominator » Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:16 pm
New Dukaine wrote:Opposed. they deserve two, they get two.
by Abhichandra » Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:33 pm
by Consular » Tue Feb 28, 2017 10:20 pm
Abhichandra wrote:What does a condemnation even do to a region?
by Small Huts » Tue Feb 28, 2017 10:44 pm
by Raionitu » Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:07 pm
Koth wrote:you guys are cool, like lately ive been watching the overal state of the raider world and been like,"ew", but you guys are very not ew
Reppy wrote:Swearing is just fucking fine on this goddamn fucking forum.
Aguaria Major wrote:The Black Hawks is essentially a regional equivalent of Heath Ledger's Joker: they just want to watch the world burn
Frisbeeteria wrote:Please stop.Please.
Souls wrote:Hi, I'm Souls. Have you embraced our lord and savior , Piling yet?
Souls wrote:Note to self: Watch out for Rai in my bedroom
Altinsane wrote:Me, about every suspiciously helpful newb I meet: "It's probably Rai."
Lord Dominator wrote:Koth is a drunken alternate personality of yours
by The Stalker » Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:15 pm
Raionitu wrote:<_< >_> you submitted it as a condemnation, not a repeal. If it wasn't gonna pass before it certainly won't when it isn't even a repeal mechanically.
by Small Huts » Wed Mar 01, 2017 12:06 am
by Mallorea and Riva » Wed Mar 01, 2017 12:13 am
Small Huts wrote:Mallorea and Riva, I am compelled to state that this is my legislation and not a project from Equilism as a Region.
by Cormactopia Prime » Wed Mar 01, 2017 1:09 am
by Cerian Quilor » Wed Mar 01, 2017 7:36 am
by Consular » Wed Mar 01, 2017 8:07 am
Cormactopia Prime wrote:not actual condemnations aimed at regions and nations we don't like because of actually deplorable behavior, which would be better off receiving no attention at all.
by Small Huts » Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:36 am
by Sygian II » Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:50 am
But, do TBH need 2 condemnations? No, no they don't.
Benevolent Thomas wrote:The Black Hawks continue to be the largest and most successful invader organization in NationStates
by Cerian Quilor » Wed Mar 01, 2017 11:59 am
by Drasnia » Wed Mar 01, 2017 12:05 pm
Small Huts wrote:Cormactopia Prime, I fully agree with the first part of your statement. We should not be considering whether the receiver wishes the Condemnation or not, we should be focussed on whether they deserve it. The corruption of purpose on the condemnations really has to stop so that any Nation, new or old, knows what to expect from a Region or Nation with a Condemnation attached.
But, do TBH need 2 condemnations? No, no they don't.
by Small Huts » Thu Mar 02, 2017 8:18 am
Concerned that accumulating condemnations encourages unsportsmanlike behaviour in anyone pursuing only notoriety,
by Sygian II » Thu Mar 02, 2017 9:46 am
Benevolent Thomas wrote:The Black Hawks continue to be the largest and most successful invader organization in NationStates
by Cerian Quilor » Thu Mar 02, 2017 11:18 am
Small Huts wrote:But, do TBH need 2 condemnations? No, no they don't.
by Kurnugia » Thu Mar 02, 2017 11:29 am
by Small Huts » Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:51 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Angevin-Romanov Crimea, Debussy, Haku, Rosartemis, Tungstan
Advertisement