NATION

PASSWORD

The T in LGBT

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:10 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:
Jormengand wrote:LGB does not include T.

Aaaand I'm done talking to you. Good day. :D

You could have done the courtesy of bothering to read why. Or you could have gone "Herp derp I so clever I can ignore you! Yaaaay!"

Zottistan wrote:
Jormengand wrote:LGB does not include T. They are separate issues that require separate understanding. Both groups require rights, and both are being denied them. Also, they are partially linked. Sticking them together is a failed attempt to make us look like a little less of a minority.

No, sticking them together is a hopefully not failing attempt to unite two groups of people in opposition to one kind of bigotry.

It is failing, though. Having more people isn't actually going to change people's opinions.
Last edited by Jormengand on Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:12 pm

Luveria wrote:
Heleventia wrote:Besides, being a trans is so not normal and I can never approve it.

It's entirely normal, and transgender people don't need your approval.

Actually, he is correct that it isn't normal... It's just meaningless. "Not normal" =/= "bad".
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:14 pm

Dyakovo wrote:
Luveria wrote:
It's entirely normal, and transgender people don't need your approval.

Actually, he is correct that it isn't normal... It's just meaningless. "Not normal" =/= "bad".

Indeed. Men, Americans and Atheists aren't "Normal," but I doubt that even the most fundamentalist "feminazi" anti-American is going to try to argue that being normal makes all those things wrong.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
The Truth and Light
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29311
Founded: Jan 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Truth and Light » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:14 pm

Zottistan wrote:
Jormengand wrote:LGB does not include T. They are separate issues that require separate understanding. Both groups require rights, and both are being denied them. Also, they are partially linked. Sticking them together is a failed attempt to make us look like a little less of a minority.

No, sticking them together is a hopefully not failing attempt to unite two groups of people in opposition to one kind of bigotry.

It's not "sticking them together". People don't seem to realize how closely intertwined cissexism and heterosexism are. LGBT includes the T because we are alienated from society for the same reasons as the LGB.

This idea that Queer and Trans* issues are somehow "equal but separate" is just a thinly veiled attempt on the part of cis Queer people to alienate Trans* people from the single movement that can help us gain recognition and humanity. It's cisness and trans*phobia. Nothing more.
Last edited by The Truth and Light on Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ylkaeenplypkhkos
Envoy
 
Posts: 216
Founded: Sep 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ylkaeenplypkhkos » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:16 pm

Luveria wrote:
Blasveck wrote:
That's probably because, in my experience, people, and Americans especially, don't even know that there's even such a thing as being transgender.

Hell, I didn't even know any transgender individuals until I met Luv.

I'm sure you've met others but they probably didn't want to mention it for the same reasons I prefer to hide it. As I've said, I don't know what else to do in these type of threads except be open about it so other transgender people don't have to go through as much discrimination and harassment as I've been through.

Ylkaeenplypkhkos wrote:
sorry about that. i changed my post.

I appreciate that.


out of curiosity how far are you in your gender transition? pre-hormone or post-hormone or somewhere in between?
http://i.imgur.com/mancLZs.png
Social Democrat
12% cosmopolitan
23% secular
50% visionary
31% anarchistic
46% communistic
3% militaristic
40% ecological
I Scored 63 out of 100
I am High Machs
http://i.imgur.com/PP0ydl4.png
☻/
/▌
/ \
http://i.imgur.com/PnFhHuu.png
72.000 radicalism
93.750 socialism
46.875 tenderness
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=270556[/url]

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:17 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:This idea that Queer and Trans* issues are somehow "equal but separate" is just a thinly veiled attempted on the part of cis Queer people to alienate Trans* people from the single movement that can help us gain recognition and humanity. It's cisness and trans*phobia. Nothing more.

They are equal and separate. One is to do with who you are attracted to, one is to do with what you identify as. They are linked, but they're not the same issue.

Also, I'm not cisgendered or transphobic, and would like you never again to accuse me of either.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Luveria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25370
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:18 pm

Ylkaeenplypkhkos wrote:
Luveria wrote:I'm sure you've met others but they probably didn't want to mention it for the same reasons I prefer to hide it. As I've said, I don't know what else to do in these type of threads except be open about it so other transgender people don't have to go through as much discrimination and harassment as I've been through.


I appreciate that.


out of curiosity how far are you in your gender transition? pre-hormone or post-hormone or somewhere in between?

I'm waiting to start seeing a gender therapist in a few weeks so can I begin hormones, but I expect it will be another few months until that actually begins.

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14887
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zottistan » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:21 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:
Zottistan wrote:No, sticking them together is a hopefully not failing attempt to unite two groups of people in opposition to one kind of bigotry.

It's not "sticking them together". People don't seem to realize how closely intertwined cissexism and heterosexism are. LGBT includes the T because we are alienated from society for the same reasons as the LGB.1

This idea that Queer and Trans* issues are somehow "equal but separate" is just a thinly veiled attempt on the part of cis Queer people to alienate Trans* people from the single movement that can help us gain recognition and humanity.2 It's cisness and trans*phobia. Nothing more3.

1) Yeah, that's basically what I was saying. People with suffering from a problem uniting against the cause of that problem. Bigotry.

2)No. That's like saying that by claiming racism and sexism are different issues, but putting them together under human rights issues is alienating women. It's not "equal but separate". It's "equal, together and with a different issue".

3) Acknowledging that gender and sexual orientation are different things isn't transphobic...
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
The Truth and Light
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29311
Founded: Jan 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Truth and Light » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:21 pm

Jormengand wrote:
The Truth and Light wrote:This idea that Queer and Trans* issues are somehow "equal but separate" is just a thinly veiled attempted on the part of cis Queer people to alienate Trans* people from the single movement that can help us gain recognition and humanity. It's cisness and trans*phobia. Nothing more.

They are equal and separate. One is to do with who you are attracted to, one is to do with what you identify as. They are linked, but they're not the same issue.

Also, I'm not cisgendered or transphobic, and would like you never again to accuse me of either.

Number one, I did not gender you. Don't get it twisted.

Number two, they are not linked - they are intertwined.

Of course they're not the same issue. Hell, discrimination against Gay men and discrimination against Lesbian Women are distinct as well - but they are intertwined, so it is ridiculous to try and separate them. Even Bisexual people face their own distinct brand of oppression apart from people who are monosexual. But they are part of the same movement for a reason.

Do you know what it is? I'll let you take a few guesses.

User avatar
The Truth and Light
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29311
Founded: Jan 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Truth and Light » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:24 pm

Zottistan wrote:
The Truth and Light wrote:It's not "sticking them together". People don't seem to realize how closely intertwined cissexism and heterosexism are. LGBT includes the T because we are alienated from society for the same reasons as the LGB.1

This idea that Queer and Trans* issues are somehow "equal but separate" is just a thinly veiled attempt on the part of cis Queer people to alienate Trans* people from the single movement that can help us gain recognition and humanity.2 It's cisness and trans*phobia. Nothing more3.

1) Yeah, that's basically what I was saying. People with suffering from a problem uniting against the cause of that problem. Bigotry.

2)No. That's like saying that by claiming racism and sexism are different issues, but putting them together under human rights issues is alienating women. It's not "equal but separate". It's "equal, together and with a different issue".

3) Acknowledging that gender and sexual orientation are different things isn't transphobic...

1) Agreed on that point.

2) Not what I was saying. I was railing against the removement of the T from LGBT. I find it likens to removing sexism from human rights concerns, as your analogy was.

3) No, but when Trans* people are alienated from the Queer community... that's trans*phobic.

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:25 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:
Jormengand wrote:They are equal and separate. One is to do with who you are attracted to, one is to do with what you identify as. They are linked, but they're not the same issue.

Also, I'm not cisgendered or transphobic, and would like you never again to accuse me of either.

Number one, I did not gender you. Don't get it twisted.

Number two, they are not linked - they are intertwined.

Of course they're not the same issue. Hell, discrimination against Gay men and discrimination against Lesbian Women are distinct as well - but they are intertwined, so it is ridiculous to try and separate them. Even Bisexual people face their own distinct brand of oppression apart from people who are monosexual. But they are part of the same movement for a reason.

Do you know what it is? I'll let you take a few guesses.

Number one, balls:
The Truth and Light wrote:It's cisness and trans*phobia.

Number two, it's called a synonym.

Number three, the reason why LGB are linked together is because they're all sexuality issues.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:27 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:2) Not what I was saying. I was railing against the removement of the T from LGBT. I find it likens to removing sexism from human rights concerns, as your analogy was.

3) No, but when Trans* people are alienated from the Queer community... that's trans*phobic.

2) We're not trying to say trans*-ness isn't a human rights concern. We're saying it's not a sexuality issue, and shouldn't be treated like one, because that only leads to confusion.

3) The Queer "Community" does not exist.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
The Truth and Light
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29311
Founded: Jan 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Truth and Light » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:28 pm

Jormengand wrote:Number three, the reason why LGB are linked together is because they're all sexuality issues.

Not really.

Lesbians, Gays, and Bisexuals are linked together because they don't fit into a heterosexist society.

Trans* people don't either. But apparently we don't fit in a discussion about rights for Queer people. It's double alienation.

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:30 pm

Jormengand wrote:3) The Queer "Community" does not exist.

Proof? It clearly exists where I live. We have our own culture and scene.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
The Truth and Light
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29311
Founded: Jan 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Truth and Light » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:30 pm

Jormengand wrote:
The Truth and Light wrote:2) Not what I was saying. I was railing against the removement of the T from LGBT. I find it likens to removing sexism from human rights concerns, as your analogy was.

3) No, but when Trans* people are alienated from the Queer community... that's trans*phobic.

2) We're not trying to say trans*-ness isn't a human rights concern. We're saying it's not a sexuality issue, and shouldn't be treated like one, because that only leads to confusion.

Lol.

That's the common thread here? Trans* people don't have sexualities?

Got it.
Last edited by The Truth and Light on Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:30 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:
Zottistan wrote:No, sticking them together is a hopefully not failing attempt to unite two groups of people in opposition to one kind of bigotry.

It's not "sticking them together". People don't seem to realize how closely intertwined cissexism and heterosexism are. LGBT includes the T because we are alienated from society for the same reasons as the LGB.

This idea that Queer and Trans* issues are somehow "equal but separate" is just a thinly veiled attempt on the part of cis Queer people to alienate Trans* people from the single movement that can help us gain recognition and humanity. It's cisness and trans*phobia. Nothing more.

I'm going to try to formulate a thought here. Bear with me because I'm struggling.

I agree that heterosexism and cissexism are intertwined. I agree that the fundamental reasons why the T get alienated from society are the same reasons why the LG and B get alienated. I further agree that transphobia is a real problem in the LGB community.

With all that said, here's my malfunction:

I feel that much of trans activism relies upon the acceptance of the concept of binary gender. I realize trans people are not a monolith, but this is the general impression I get from the reading and interacting I have done thus far.

I, personally, believe binary gender is bullshit.

Therefore, I find myself wondering: Is it possible for me to say with any degree of honesty that I am a legit trans ally, when I believe the divisions into "men" and "women" are inherently garbage in the first place?

I support any person's right to modify their own body in whatever way suits them. I unequivocally support the idea that trans people should be treated no differently from any other person who modifies their body in any other way. But can I really say I support trans activism, when I'm actually interested in tearing down precisely the framework that allows trans identity to exist in the first place?

When it comes to gay rights it's a lot easier for me. I think gender is irrelevant, so obviously discriminating based on the gender of someone's partners is bullshit. My desire to destroy the practice of gendering does not interfere with that, it synergizes. I feel like that is not the case with trans rights.
Last edited by Bottle on Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:31 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:But apparently we don't fit in a discussion about rights for Queer people. non-heterosexuals. It's double alienation.

Trans people have their own issues, which have NOTHING TO DO with sexuality, and I have absolutely no idea why you keep trying to insist they do.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Melfar
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 139
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Melfar » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:33 pm

Rocopurr wrote:Genderqueer/queer- Someone whose gender is not female or male.


What would you be then? :?:
Sexism really sucks. But it really sucks that it's freakin' everywhere.
Abortion: Which do you hate more, women or children?
Seriously though, I'm for a woman's right to choose.
I have no problem with people having religions, but don't shove it down my throat.
"No, you don't understand: Edgar is the one in the hole." -Ryan Haywood
"I'm going cakeless." -Ray Narvaez, Jr.

Flynt. Coal?
Interests: Music, Guitar, Video Games, Achievements, Green, Wrestling
It's amazing how much a lesbian who likes Nirvana can change your entire view on the world.

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:34 pm

Melfar wrote:
Rocopurr wrote:Genderqueer/queer- Someone whose gender is not female or male.


What would you be then? :?:

Can't speak for anybody else, but I'm queer.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
The Truth and Light
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29311
Founded: Jan 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Truth and Light » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:34 pm

Bottle wrote:
The Truth and Light wrote:It's not "sticking them together". People don't seem to realize how closely intertwined cissexism and heterosexism are. LGBT includes the T because we are alienated from society for the same reasons as the LGB.

This idea that Queer and Trans* issues are somehow "equal but separate" is just a thinly veiled attempt on the part of cis Queer people to alienate Trans* people from the single movement that can help us gain recognition and humanity. It's cisness and trans*phobia. Nothing more.

I'm going to try to formulate a thought here. Bear with me because I'm struggling.

I agree that heterosexism and cissexism are intertwined. I agree that the fundamental reasons why the T get alienated from society are the same reasons why the LG and B get alienated. I further agree that transphobia is a real problem in the LGB community.

With all that said, here's my malfunction:

I feel that much of trans activism relies upon the acceptance of the concept of binary gender. I realize trans people are not a monolith, but this is the general impression I get from the reading and interacting I have done thus far.

I, personally, believe binary gender is bullshit.

Therefore, I find myself wondering: Is it possible for me to say with any degree of honesty that I am a legit trans ally, when I believe the divisions into "men" and "women" are inherently garbage in the first place?

I support any person's right to modify their own body in whatever way suits them. I unequivocally support the idea that trans people should be treated no differently from any other person who modifies their body in any other way. But can I really say I support trans activism, when I'm actually interested in tearing down precisely the framework that allows trans identity to exist in the first place?

When it comes to gay rights it's a lot easier for me. I think gender is irrelevant, so obviously discriminating based on the gender of someone's partners is bullshit. My desire to destroy the practice of gendering does not interfere with that, it synergizes. I feel like that is not the case with trans rights.

Fair disclaimer: I'm Genderqueer. I don't fit on a gender binary.

I feel like, yeah, a gender binary is problematic, but not for the same reasons and I certainly don't want to destroy gender. Could you elaborate on why you want to dismantle the concept of gender?

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:34 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:
Jormengand wrote:2) We're not trying to say trans*-ness isn't a human rights concern. We're saying it's not a sexuality issue, and shouldn't be treated like one, because that only leads to confusion.

Lol.

That's the common thread here? Trans* people don't have sexualities?

Got it.

I know that's not what I'm saying. You know that's not why I'm saying. Put the straw man down, you're hurting him.

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
Jormengand wrote:3) The Queer "Community" does not exist.

Proof? It clearly exists where I live. We have our own culture and scene.

There are queer communities. There is not The Queer Community, in the sense people use it.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:34 pm

Bottle wrote:
The Truth and Light wrote:It's not "sticking them together". People don't seem to realize how closely intertwined cissexism and heterosexism are. LGBT includes the T because we are alienated from society for the same reasons as the LGB.

This idea that Queer and Trans* issues are somehow "equal but separate" is just a thinly veiled attempt on the part of cis Queer people to alienate Trans* people from the single movement that can help us gain recognition and humanity. It's cisness and trans*phobia. Nothing more.

I'm going to try to formulate a thought here. Bear with me because I'm struggling.

I agree that heterosexism and cissexism are intertwined. I agree that the fundamental reasons why the T get alienated from society are the same reasons why the LG and B get alienated. I further agree that transphobia is a real problem in the LGB community.

With all that said, here's my malfunction:

I feel that much of trans activism relies upon the acceptance of the concept of binary gender. I realize trans people are not a monolith, but this is the general impression I get from the reading and interacting I have done thus far.

I, personally, believe binary gender is bullshit.

Therefore, I find myself wondering: Is it possible for me to say with any degree of honesty that I am a legit trans ally, when I believe the divisions into "men" and "women" are inherently garbage in the first place?

I support any person's right to modify their own body in whatever way suits them. I unequivocally support the idea that trans people should be treated no differently from any other person who modifies their body in any other way. But can I really say I support trans activism, when I'm actually interested in tearing down precisely the framework that allows trans identity to exist in the first place?

When it comes to gay rights it's a lot easier for me. I think gender is irrelevant, so obviously discriminating based on the gender of someone's partners is bullshit. My desire to destroy the practice of gendering does not interfere with that, it synergizes. I feel like that is not the case with trans rights.

Except the group most likely to know about the bullshit the binary gender is, and to support us non-binary people the most, are our fellow trans*?
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:35 pm

Jormengand wrote:
The Truth and Light wrote:But apparently we don't fit in a discussion about rights for Queer people. non-heterosexuals. It's double alienation.

Trans people have their own issues, which have NOTHING TO DO with sexuality, and I have absolutely no idea why you keep trying to insist they do.

TTaL is probably continuing to disagree because your arguments have been unconvincing.

I, too, am unconvinced. Perhaps you can present more arguments?
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Melfar
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 139
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Melfar » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:36 pm

Bottle wrote:
Melfar wrote:
What would you be then? :?:

Can't speak for anybody else, but I'm queer.


So your gender is queer? Is that correct?
Sexism really sucks. But it really sucks that it's freakin' everywhere.
Abortion: Which do you hate more, women or children?
Seriously though, I'm for a woman's right to choose.
I have no problem with people having religions, but don't shove it down my throat.
"No, you don't understand: Edgar is the one in the hole." -Ryan Haywood
"I'm going cakeless." -Ray Narvaez, Jr.

Flynt. Coal?
Interests: Music, Guitar, Video Games, Achievements, Green, Wrestling
It's amazing how much a lesbian who likes Nirvana can change your entire view on the world.

User avatar
The Truth and Light
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29311
Founded: Jan 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Truth and Light » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:36 pm

Jormengand wrote:
The Truth and Light wrote:But apparently we don't fit in a discussion about rights for Queer people. non-heterosexuals. It's double alienation.

Trans people have their own issues, which have NOTHING TO DO with sexuality

Okay, I'm going to walk away laughing. This is ridiculous.

Trans* issues are in a great part related to sexuality. To deny this is intended ignorance.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ariddia, Europeasia, Liberty Martyred, Myrensis, NOUSANTERRAS, Sousia, Tepertopia, Zantalio

Advertisement

Remove ads