Now that this thread has made it clear that people cannot make SC proposals with regions / nations that were created with non PG-11 wording, I have a concern that this can be used and abused by people who would want to avoid the interference of the SC alltogether. Basically this is saying that if you want to have your region free from any attempt at liberation, condemnation or commendation, you just need to put non PG-11 wording into the name.
This probably has a greater potential impact on nation names, since these can be used to propose, endorse and give regional delegate votes to resolutions, the first example is permanently kept on the record of the resolution. The question I have is: Does this PG-11 wording for SC proposal titles in effect require a PG-11 requirement on the creation of nation and region names?