NATION

PASSWORD

No more Twinkies: Baker's Union Bankrupt Hostess Corp

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:56 pm

Miss Defied wrote:You know, this got me thinking. If "Big Bizness" is able to cry that the union work stoppage was so crippling to operations that the corporation ceaced to be viable, wouldn't they then have to admit that the workers importance in the capitalist/labor equation is much greater than they previously thought? Isn't this proof positive that maybe the working class deserves a bigger piece of the pie?

You'd think so...
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27486
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:56 pm

Hippostania wrote:
Mike the Progressive wrote:
Exactly. In a free market, workers have a right to form unions and strike, businesses have to find a way to overcome it or they die.

The thing is, businessess are not allowed to deal with striking workers; they aren't allowed to fire them for unionizing or for organizing a strike. This is wrong and should be changed. If the employees can organize, then so should the employers.


Bleh, I was thinking of that actually when I wrote my comment. No I suppose not. Though to be honest, they've been having problems for some time. And I don't mean with unions and strikes.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 114357
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:56 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Hippostania wrote:The thing is, businessess are not allowed to deal with striking workers;

You don't even know what a strike is, do you?

That's when you knock down all 10 pins ... :blush: Sorry ... sorry ... *runs away*
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:57 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:You don't even know what a strike is, do you?

That's when you knock down all 10 pins ... :blush: Sorry ... sorry ... *runs away*

Oi, no stealing jobs you scab. I'm the bad joke maker here.

Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 47820
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:58 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:You don't even know what a strike is, do you?

That's when you knock down all 10 pins ... :blush: Sorry ... sorry ... *runs away*

Now I have the urge to form a 'too-clever-by-half' bowling team called 'The Picket Line'
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14606
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grand Britannia » Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:59 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Grand Britannia wrote:
Good point.

How much would a ton of Twinkies be?

Probably in the neighborhood of $10,000.


Damn it :(

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Grand Britannia wrote:My response.
(Image)
HOW WILL I DROWN MY WOES ON SAD, RAINY DAYS, NOW?

Little Debbie.

Image
Tempting....
ଘ( ˘ ᵕ˘)つ----x .*・。゚・ᵕ

User avatar
AynRandtopia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 112
Founded: Nov 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby AynRandtopia » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:01 pm

The workers got what they wanted. Now that they won't be working and are being paid by the state, they can devote their full attention to finding higher paying jobs.
Last edited by AynRandtopia on Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom."

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 114357
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:01 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Probably in the neighborhood of $10,000.


Damn it :(

Cannot think of a name wrote:Little Debbie.

Image
Tempting....

I can get you one per day for the next 50 years for about $7,300.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Nua Corda
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8342
Founded: Jul 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nua Corda » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:03 pm

You-Gi-Owe wrote:
Nua Corda wrote:
Because if forigen interests control the company, the profit goes out of the US. Ideally the company should be based and operated in the US, and the workers payed as much as possible so that the money circulates properly.

And they ARE the ones in charge. Not the plutocrats who have been inflating their own bonuses and crushing their workers.

But the foreign company, manufacturing good in the U.S. pays wages set by the Unions and/or Govt., pays U.S. taxes on their U.S. operations. So, obviously it must be the Ebil Foreign Banks, right?

"Payed as much as possible" ?!?!? How do you formulate that rubish?


No, because the profit, which doesnt go to the workers as it should, is going to foreign 1%ers, who we can't tax. Nothing to do with banks.

How about attacking the arguement, not the spelling? Or maybe you just have no response, as usual.
Call me Corda.
Sarcasm Warning! This post may not be entirely serious
Bullpups, Keymod and Magpul, oh my!
Bong Hits for Jesus!
Like Sci-Fi? Like Worldbuilding? Check out the Uprising Project!
Renegade for Life|Gun-toting Liberal. Because fuck stereotypes|Your friendly neighborhood gun nerd. Ask me anything!|Shameless Mass Effect Fan. I like Quarians a bit more than I should...|This nation is not a nation, and may or may not represent my views|I have been known to draw guns for folks, occasionally
Because people care, right?

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:04 pm

So a group of people got together and collectively decided that they weren't willing to work under the offer posed by the employer. The employer choose to cease operations rather than meet those demands.

Isn't this exactly what pro business right wing argues should happen? Isn't the whole premise upon which the philosophy rests predicated on the idea that if employees don't like the offer made by the employer they're free to say no?

What, exactly, is the problem here?
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27486
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:04 pm

Dyakovo wrote:
Miss Defied wrote:You know, this got me thinking. If "Big Bizness" is able to cry that the union work stoppage was so crippling to operations that the corporation ceaced to be viable, wouldn't they then have to admit that the workers importance in the capitalist/labor equation is much greater than they previously thought? Isn't this proof positive that maybe the working class deserves a bigger piece of the pie?

You'd think so...


Actually, I'd say that any capitalist who thinks he can do without labor is no capitalist at all, but a fool. Capital needs labor and vice versa.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 114357
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:05 pm

Neo Art wrote:So a group of people got together and collectively decided that they weren't willing to work under the offer posed by the employer. The employer choose to cease operations rather than meet those demands.

Isn't this exactly what pro business right wing argues should happen? Isn't the whole premise upon which the philosophy rests predicated on the idea that if employees don't like the offer made by the employer they're free to say no?

What, exactly, is the problem here?

Obama
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Nua Corda
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8342
Founded: Jul 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nua Corda » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:06 pm

Neo Art wrote:So a group of people got together and collectively decided that they weren't willing to work under the offer posed by the employer. The employer choose to cease operations rather than meet those demands.

Isn't this exactly what pro business right wing argues should happen? Isn't the whole premise upon which the philosophy rests predicated on the idea that if employees don't like the offer made by the employer they're free to say no?

What, exactly, is the problem here?


This. So much this.
Call me Corda.
Sarcasm Warning! This post may not be entirely serious
Bullpups, Keymod and Magpul, oh my!
Bong Hits for Jesus!
Like Sci-Fi? Like Worldbuilding? Check out the Uprising Project!
Renegade for Life|Gun-toting Liberal. Because fuck stereotypes|Your friendly neighborhood gun nerd. Ask me anything!|Shameless Mass Effect Fan. I like Quarians a bit more than I should...|This nation is not a nation, and may or may not represent my views|I have been known to draw guns for folks, occasionally
Because people care, right?

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:09 pm

Nua Corda wrote:
Neo Art wrote:So a group of people got together and collectively decided that they weren't willing to work under the offer posed by the employer. The employer choose to cease operations rather than meet those demands.

Isn't this exactly what pro business right wing argues should happen? Isn't the whole premise upon which the philosophy rests predicated on the idea that if employees don't like the offer made by the employer they're free to say no?

What, exactly, is the problem here?


This. So much this.


I think the right wing opposition to labor uinions is, frankly, part and parcel of the same reason the right wing is so apoplectic about having a black man as president.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
You-Gi-Owe
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6229
Founded: Jul 26, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby You-Gi-Owe » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:10 pm

Nua Corda wrote:
You-Gi-Owe wrote:But the foreign company, manufacturing good in the U.S. pays wages set by the Unions and/or Govt., pays U.S. taxes on their U.S. operations. So, obviously it must be the Ebil Foreign Banks, right?

"Payed as much as possible" ?!?!? How do you formulate that rubish?


No, because the profit, which doesnt go to the workers as it should, is going to foreign 1%ers, who we can't tax. Nothing to do with banks.

How about attacking the arguement, not the spelling? Or maybe you just have no response, as usual.

You're not very specific. If you own a company, providing employment and manufacturing a product for the market, why shouldn't the owner(s), investors and the managers make profits, too.

Here a link to a basic economics game for you. It's called Hammurabi. http://www.hammurabigame.com/hammurabi-game.php

Or maybe read the story of "The Little Red Hen", not the version where the govt. and unions get together to tax her and steal her bread.
“Man, I'm so hip I won't even eat a square meal!”
"We've always been at war with Eastasia." 1984, George Orwell
Tyrion: "Those are brave men knocking at our door. Let's go kill them!"
“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.” ~ James Madison quotes

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69282
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:12 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Neo Art wrote:So a group of people got together and collectively decided that they weren't willing to work under the offer posed by the employer. The employer choose to cease operations rather than meet those demands.

Isn't this exactly what pro business right wing argues should happen? Isn't the whole premise upon which the philosophy rests predicated on the idea that if employees don't like the offer made by the employer they're free to say no?

What, exactly, is the problem here?

Obama


And Unions!
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Khadgar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11414
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Khadgar » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:13 pm

You know, I haven't eaten a hostess product in years. Twinkies are the only thing they make that doesn't suck ass. Seriously, their cake is a lump of dry tasteless coated in sugar masquerading as a treat. It's entirely possible it was their god awful product that sank them.

User avatar
Tmutarakhan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10048
Founded: Dec 06, 2007
New York Times Democracy

Postby Tmutarakhan » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:16 pm

You-Gi-Owe wrote:
Or maybe read the story of "The Little Red Hen"

Who do you think did the baking (in the Hostess story)?
Life is a tragedy to those who feel, a comedy to those who think, and a musical to those who sing.

I am the very model of a Nation States General,
I am a holy terror to apologists Confederal,
When called upon to source a line, I give citations textual,
And argue about Palestine, and marriage homosexual!


A KNIGHT ON KARINZISTAN'S SPECIAL LIST OF POOPHEADS!

Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 47820
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:17 pm

Khadgar wrote:You know, I haven't eaten a hostess product in years. Twinkies are the only thing they make that doesn't suck ass. Seriously, their cake is a lump of dry tasteless coated in sugar masquerading as a treat. It's entirely possible it was their god awful product that sank them.

When I heard this I thought, "Fuck, I should go get a Twinkie!!" but then I thought, "Fuck, I haven't had an earnest urge for a Twinkie in, like, forever...I think I'm good."
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:17 pm

Khadgar wrote:You know, I haven't eaten a hostess product in years. Twinkies are the only thing they make that doesn't suck ass. Seriously, their cake is a lump of dry tasteless coated in sugar masquerading as a treat. It's entirely possible it was their god awful product that sank them.


I don't care to speculate. I don't care to place blame. I don't care to argue "well they're a bad company".

What caused the company to shut down is that their workers were not willing to work under the conditions offered. That's it. That's all. There's nothing further that needs to be said. They company went out of business because they weren't willing to make an offer to their employees sufficient to convince their employees to remain working for them.

So why SHOULD they have been kept in business? What right does a company have to remain solvent? They weren't able to meet hte demands of their labor, so their labor refused to work for them, so they shut down.

So. The fuck. What?
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Miss Defied
Minister
 
Posts: 2260
Founded: Mar 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Miss Defied » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:17 pm

Mike the Progressive wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:You'd think so...


Actually, I'd say that any capitalist who thinks he can do without labor is no capitalist at all, but a fool. Capital needs labor and vice versa.

Yes of course, but the argument is that the capitalists are way more important than labor, hence their justification for excessive compensation. I think maybe we can safely challenge that assertion. Hopefully workers, shareholders and consumers will work together to reign in these executives.
"You know you're like the A-bomb. Everybody's laughing, having a good time. Then you show up -BOOM- everything's dead." - Master Shake

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:18 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Khadgar wrote:You know, I haven't eaten a hostess product in years. Twinkies are the only thing they make that doesn't suck ass. Seriously, their cake is a lump of dry tasteless coated in sugar masquerading as a treat. It's entirely possible it was their god awful product that sank them.

When I heard this I thought, "Fuck, I should go get a Twinkie!!" but then I thought, "Fuck, I haven't had an earnest urge for a Twinkie in, like, forever...I think I'm good."


I might vaguely miss the hostess apple pies
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Skibereen
Minister
 
Posts: 2723
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Skibereen » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:20 pm

Mike the Progressive wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:I've never had a Twinkie. And I hate Ho-Hos. Good riddance. I will, however, start stocking up on the Donettes.


The free market works in more directions than one.


Exactly. In a free market, workers have a right to form unions and strike, businesses have to find a way to overcome it or they die.

Why exactly do Businessess die if workers have Rights to collective bargaining and contract enforcement? I fail to see how workers being allowed to negotiate a contract for payment and compensation in return for services rendered automatically kills business.

I believe UPS als fails to understand this...considering they are the largest Teamster contract, they provide stock options, healthcare, and partial pensions to PART TIME employees...all per their contract(and has done so for over a decade), and yet UPS is, and has steadily been stomping ass.
AND
Stock Holder Dividends Offered
UPS(Union) 2.80% yield
Fedex(No Union Major Competitor) 0.60% yield

Coverage Ratio
UPS(Union) 1.70
Fedex(non-Union) 1.52

Market Capital
UPS(Union)$73 billion
Fedex(non-Union)$30 billion

Consumer prices between Fedex and UPS -- are so comparable that ome must price by the item and vlume and weight to isolate a clear winner. 2-5lbs Fedex is cheaper, 5-15lbs UPS is cheaper, for letters obviously USPS is cheapest, but UPS is cheaper then FEDEX for letters, they both have comparable reliability(UPS 91%, Fedex 88%), UPS has out scored Fedex on customer service surveys ...bottom line is UPS and fedex are almost indistinguiable, except one is Union and one Isnt, if one is a consumer of their service its really a toss up, if one is looking for an investment...the Union house is the clear winner.

So yeah...fucking Unions.
argumentum ad logicam, seriously think about it.

"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."
James Madison
First in line for the pie in the sky

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177109
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:21 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:That's when you knock down all 10 pins ... :blush: Sorry ... sorry ... *runs away*

Now I have the urge to form a 'too-clever-by-half' bowling team called 'The Picket Line'

"Don't cross us!"
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 47820
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:21 pm

Neo Art wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:When I heard this I thought, "Fuck, I should go get a Twinkie!!" but then I thought, "Fuck, I haven't had an earnest urge for a Twinkie in, like, forever...I think I'm good."


I might vaguely miss the hostess apple pies

As a poor cat, I always went for the "four for a dollar" Home Run Pies, feeling that if I'm buying a mass-produced prepackaged confection for the change I scrounged from my car there was no point in pretending I was a connoisseur.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alasdair I Frosticus, Ariddia, Democratic Kingdom of South India, Fractalnavel, Great Britain-and Northern Ireland, Heldervin, Ifreann, Ostroeuropa, Pale Dawn, Tlaceceyaya, Varsemia, Welskerland

Advertisement

Remove ads