by Calant » Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:53 pm
by Marxist Germany » Thu Sep 26, 2019 5:25 pm
by Drongonia » Thu Sep 26, 2019 5:54 pm
The Republic of Drongonia
The MT powerhouse of Oceania. New Zealand but richer.
Overview | Political Parties | Our Leader | Defence Force Info | 9axes | Faces of Drongonia | Drongonia - The Man Behind the Spreadsheet
by Inkopolitia » Thu Sep 26, 2019 5:57 pm
by The Biggles Syndicate » Thu Sep 26, 2019 5:59 pm
Marxist Germany wrote:Players are allowed unlimited alts, some people have over 130 alts *cough* Lord Dominator *cough*
by Woryand » Thu Sep 26, 2019 6:01 pm
Marxist Germany wrote:Players are allowed unlimited alts, some people have over 130 alts *cough* Lord Dominator *cough*
by The Galactic Liberal Democracy » Thu Sep 26, 2019 6:02 pm
Cossack Khanate wrote:This shall forever be known as World War Sh*t: Newark Aggression. Now if I see one more troop deployed, I will call on the force of all the Hindu gods to reverse time and wipe your race of the face of the planet. Cease.
The Black Party wrote:(TBP kamikaze's into all 99999999999 nukes before they hit our territory because we just have that many pilots ready to die for dah blak regime, we also counter-attack into your nation with our entire population of 45 million because this RP allows it.)
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Galatic Liberal Democracy short-circuits all of NS with FACTS and LOGIC
by Scorpio Spikal » Thu Sep 26, 2019 6:03 pm
by Side 3 » Thu Sep 26, 2019 6:08 pm
January 22nd, 0097: Stocks in the Zimmad Corporation have gone down by 5% today, following the military's decision to halt its purchase of the company's latest mobile armor. The unnamed mobile armor has been rumored to have been in development for the past 6 years, and would've been worth roughly $150 million.
by The Biggles Syndicate » Thu Sep 26, 2019 6:10 pm
by Woryand » Thu Sep 26, 2019 6:10 pm
Side 3 wrote:Well, if you want to get him back it works both ways. It's pretty stupid though, because you basically can't "lose". One of your nations dies? Just make a new one. That one dies? Another one. Hopefully they change it next year.
by Presbyterians » Thu Sep 26, 2019 6:15 pm
by Catsfern » Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:20 pm
by The Sherpa Empire » Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:26 pm
by Catsfern » Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:28 pm
The Sherpa Empire wrote:If someone is willing to invest the time to switch between all those different puppets, why shouldn't they?
If they were doing it with a script I could see the case for abuse, but anyone can manually jump around puppets if they give enough of a crap.
by Harmonic Empire » Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:53 am
Calant wrote:It’s barely been a few hours since the start of the event and my entire faction has been erased off the face of the pitiful planet by a single guy and his 20 fresh alternate accounts. To be frank, I think this borders on abuse of the multiple nation ownership system, although I’m not sure what anyone can do about it. It's come to the point of absurdity, the sheer number of alternate accounts by a single guy.
(Image)
by Castelia » Fri Sep 27, 2019 4:43 am
by Xentherida » Fri Sep 27, 2019 7:12 am
by Lord Dominator » Fri Sep 27, 2019 9:00 am
by Greater vakolicci haven » Fri Sep 27, 2019 9:07 am
by Greater vakolicci haven » Fri Sep 27, 2019 9:12 am
Bolysus wrote:We could resolve this by tying production to population and thus nation age.
by The Biggles Syndicate » Fri Sep 27, 2019 9:45 am
Woryand wrote:Side 3 wrote:Well, if you want to get him back it works both ways. It's pretty stupid though, because you basically can't "lose". One of your nations dies? Just make a new one. That one dies? Another one. Hopefully they change it next year.
I believe that there is a minimum of 12 million population required to participate in n-day, though.
Parhe has ~3 thousand, iirc.
by Window Land » Fri Sep 27, 2019 9:48 am
Woodie Flowers wrote:If you’re anti-science, you’re pro-stupid.
Evelyn Beatrice Hall wrote:I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
Winston Churchill wrote:Democracy is the worst form of government – except for all the others that have been tried.
Free SpeechRandall Munroe wrote: I can't remember where I heard this, but someone once said that defending a position by citing free speech is sort of the ultimate concession; you're saying that the most compelling thing you can say for your position is that it's not literally illegal to express.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement