US Anti-Police Protests and Riots Thread III

[Odreria]

For good reason, people have been protesting police brutality for awhile now.
That does not a warzone make.

Protesting doesn't involve billions in property damage and at least 20 deaths

It pretty clearly did actually.

[Drongonia]

Dont break the law firstly, secondly obey what the officer has told you to do

Newsflash: the police aren't supposed to kill guilty people either.

Okay but don't resist

[Grinning Dragon]

Dont break the law firstly, secondly obey what the officer has told you to do

Newsflash: the police aren't supposed to kill guilty people either.

Guilty people aren't being executed by police, since the default is innocent until proven guilty, a persons guilt is determined in a court of law.
However as of late the default of shoot first ask questions later is a problem with some police officers.

[Cultural Posadism]

Great Pacific Switzerland supports summary execution for minor offenses. Bold stance.

I think Great Pacific Switzerland and Greater Miami Shores have never said this.

Great Pacific Switzerland implied it.

[Cultural Posadism]

Newsflash: the police aren't supposed to kill guilty people either.

Guilty people aren't being executed by police, since the default is innocent until proven guilty, a persons guilt is determined in a court of law.
However as of late the default of shoot first ask questions later is a problem with some police officers.

It's a widespread and persistent problem, made all the worse by the fact that neither police departments nor the courts nor local governments have done much to curb it.

[Cultural Posadism]

Newsflash: the police aren't supposed to kill guilty people either.

Okay but don't resist

Or what?

[Great Pacific Switzerland]

Dont break the law firstly, secondly obey what the officer has told you to do

Great Pacific Switzerland supports summary execution for minor offenses. Bold stance.

I dont but i'm just saying, dont break the law in the first place unless they are complete bullshit

[Vassenor]

Newsflash: the police aren't supposed to kill guilty people either.

Okay but don't resist

What law makes resisting arrest a capital crime?

[Greater Miami Shores]

Newsflash: the police aren't supposed to kill guilty people either.

Guilty people aren't being executed by police, since the default is innocent until proven guilty, a persons guilt is determined in a court of law.
However as of late the default of shoot first ask questions later is a problem with some police officers.

Nice loophole, but the incidents as they are taking place count, lol. There are good cops and bad cops it happens, I have a Cuban cop cousin I have posted about a few times, I love these good cops:

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=tj ... &FORM=VIRE

[Greater Miami Shores]

Newsflash: the police aren't supposed to kill guilty people either.

Guilty people aren't being executed by police, since the default is innocent until proven guilty, a persons guilt is determined in a court of law.
However as of late the default of shoot first ask questions later is a problem with some police officers.

Nice loophole, but the incidents as they are taking place count, lol. There are good cops and bad cops it happens, I have a Cuban cop cousin I have posted about a few times, I love these good cops:

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=tj ... &FORM=VIRE

[Greater Miami Shores]

Newsflash: the police aren't supposed to kill guilty people either.

Guilty people aren't being executed by police, since the default is innocent until proven guilty, a persons guilt is determined in a court of law.
However as of late the default of shoot first ask questions later is a problem with some police officers.

Nice loophole, but the incidents as they are taking place count, lol. There are good cops and bad cops it happens, I have a good Cuban cousin cop, I have posted about a few times, I love these good cops:

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=tj ... &FORM=VIRE

[Cultural Posadism]

Great Pacific Switzerland supports summary execution for minor offenses. Bold stance.

I dont but i'm just saying, dont break the law in the first place unless they are complete bullshit

You could have just said "I don't" and left things there. Now you look like you do in fact think killing people without trial is justified, but don't have the courage in your convictions to say it outright so you express them through implication.

"I don't support summary execution but don't get accused of breaking the law if you don't want it to happen to you" is a perversely cowardly way of justifying summary execution.

[Grinning Dragon]

Guilty people aren't being executed by police, since the default is innocent until proven guilty, a persons guilt is determined in a court of law.
However as of late the default of shoot first ask questions later is a problem with some police officers.

It's a widespread and persistent problem, made all the worse by the fact that neither police departments nor the courts nor local governments have done much to curb it.

IMO, I wouldn't say it's widespread and persistent, I'd say it's in pockets. I do agree that the courts and local govts turn a blind eye when it does happen. I find it interesting that the public hears about a particular officer(s) with years worth of complaints and yet remains on the job. If it were any other sort of job those types of people would have been tossed to the curb, never understood why police officers get such the midas treatment.

[Great Pacific Switzerland]

I dont but i'm just saying, dont break the law in the first place unless they are complete bullshit

You could have just said "I don't" and left things there. Now you look like you do in fact think killing people without trial is justified, but don't have the courage in your convictions to say it outright so you express them through implication.

"I don't support summary execution but don't get accused of breaking the law if you don't want it to happen to you" is a perversely cowardly way of justifying summary execution.

Nah. I dont, I'm just too lazy to argue lmao. Don't assume random shit mate

[Cultural Posadism]

You could have just said "I don't" and left things there. Now you look like you do in fact think killing people without trial is justified, but don't have the courage in your convictions to say it outright so you express them through implication.

"I don't support summary execution but don't get accused of breaking the law if you don't want it to happen to you" is a perversely cowardly way of justifying summary execution.

Nah. I dont, I'm just too lazy to argue lmao. Don't assume random shit mate

I definitely believe you might be too lazy to argue, but you've nevertheless made your argument implicit: you seem to believe it's justifiable to be killed just for being accused of committing a crime, so long as the accuser is a cop.

[Drongonia]

Okay but don't resist

What law makes resisting arrest a capital crime?

None, but best practice would suggest you shouldn't resist.

[Cultural Posadism]

What law makes resisting arrest a capital crime?

None, but best practice would suggest you shouldn't resist.

This is kinda like saying "don't live near a nuclear reactor with incompetent staff or you might get Chernobyl'ed". Which, while superficially reasonable, suspiciously fails to address the underlying problem.

[Vassenor]

What law makes resisting arrest a capital crime?

None, but best practice would suggest you shouldn't resist.

So if no law makes it a capital crime to resist arrest then the police shouldn't be killing people for it.

[Odreria]

Okay but don't resist

What law makes resisting arrest a capital crime?

Presumably, dark skin.

[Austreylia]

So, yeah, these extrajudicial killings are technically unconstitutional if they were not threatening officers or the public with harm, lethal or otherwise.

I doubt that you care about the constitution when it comes to firearms.

[Cultural Posadism]

So, yeah, these extrajudicial killings are technically unconstitutional if they were not threatening officers or the public with harm, lethal or otherwise.

I doubt that you care about the constitution when it comes to firearms.

Non sequitur.

[Great Pacific Switzerland]

What law makes resisting arrest a capital crime?

Presumably, dark skin.

[Drongonia]

None, but best practice would suggest you shouldn't resist.

This is kinda like saying "don't live near a nuclear reactor with incompetent staff or you might get Chernobyl'ed". Which, while superficially reasonable, suspiciously fails to address the underlying problem.

Yeah you should move away from there or accept the risks. In a highly charged riot/protest environment, just don't go. Simple as.

[Vassenor]

This is kinda like saying "don't live near a nuclear reactor with incompetent staff or you might get Chernobyl'ed". Which, while superficially reasonable, suspiciously fails to address the underlying problem.

Yeah you should move away from there or accept the risks. In a highly charged riot/protest environment, just don't go. Simple as.

Right to free assembly says hi.

[Drongonia]

Yeah you should move away from there or accept the risks. In a highly charged riot/protest environment, just don't go. Simple as.

Right to free assembly says hi.

Right to free assembly: Yes
Right to break the law: No