Advertisement
by Earth Orbit » Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:28 pm
FNS HOMEPAGE | 11/23/2170 | BREAKING: VIOLETIST ATTACKS TAKING PLACE ACROSS FEDERATION, LUNA - STATE OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY DECLARED | 11/23/2170 | FNS HOMEPAGE
by Luziyca » Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:43 pm
by Mushet » Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:47 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Mushet wrote:How would you enforce it? Seems like the people that would be getting their vote bought can just send the picture instead of posting it on Facebook. What we're gonna confiscate electronic devices?
In my state cameras, phones, and other electronic devices are not allowed to be within 50ft of a polling place. You will be fined and the device will be confiscated
by Kubra » Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:48 pm
by The Greater Ohio Valley » Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:54 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Mushet wrote:How would you enforce it? Seems like the people that would be getting their vote bought can just send the picture instead of posting it on Facebook. What we're gonna confiscate electronic devices?
In my state cameras, phones, and other electronic devices are not allowed to be within 50ft of a polling place. You will be fined and the device will be confiscated
by New Bremerton » Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:17 am
by Risottia » Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:41 am
Page wrote:I believe that secrecy of one's vote is a right, not an obligation
by Risottia » Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:52 am
Earth Orbit wrote:The way India does it is great. IIRC ballot selfies are punishable by a fine and (I think?) revocation of your vote.
by Radiatia » Wed Feb 12, 2020 1:01 am
by Telconi » Wed Feb 12, 2020 2:37 am
Page wrote:Antityranicals wrote:I'd agree with that. Personally, though, I haven't got a problem with people selling their vote. It is, after all, theirs, and they ought be able to do what they wish with it.
The problem with vote selling is that people will sacrifice a long term greater gain (their interests being upheld in legislation and administration) for the short term smaller gain of some quick cash. If Michael Bloomberg offered me $5000 to vote for him I might be tempted to vote for him but I would instead vote for Bernie Sanders for free, knowing that if I am living in America and get seriously sick or injured, I'll save far more than that in health care costs when Sanders implements single-payer.
But for someone who is desperate to keep their lights on, feed their kids, vote buying is coercive. They sacrifice their long term interests for money they need right away.
If vote buying were allowed, politicians would do even less to improve material conditions than they do now.
by The Sherpa Empire » Wed Feb 12, 2020 2:51 am
Telconi wrote:Page wrote:
The problem with vote selling is that people will sacrifice a long term greater gain (their interests being upheld in legislation and administration) for the short term smaller gain of some quick cash. If Michael Bloomberg offered me $5000 to vote for him I might be tempted to vote for him but I would instead vote for Bernie Sanders for free, knowing that if I am living in America and get seriously sick or injured, I'll save far more than that in health care costs when Sanders implements single-payer.
But for someone who is desperate to keep their lights on, feed their kids, vote buying is coercive. They sacrifice their long term interests for money they need right away.
If vote buying were allowed, politicians would do even less to improve material conditions than they do now.
I'd vote for Bloomberg for five Gs.
by Page » Wed Feb 12, 2020 2:58 am
by Telconi » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:15 am
by Telconi » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:16 am
Page wrote:My problem with the idea that ballot selfies for the sake of political speech should be banned because they could hypothetically be done for vote buying is that a law should not prohibit one action because of the potential for another action. Don't ban alcohol just because some people drive drunk. But the metaphor doesn't even work because drunk driving is a thing that thousands of people do every day, while vote buying in America is non-existent.
by Page » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:21 am
Telconi wrote:Page wrote:My problem with the idea that ballot selfies for the sake of political speech should be banned because they could hypothetically be done for vote buying is that a law should not prohibit one action because of the potential for another action. Don't ban alcohol just because some people drive drunk. But the metaphor doesn't even work because drunk driving is a thing that thousands of people do every day, while vote buying in America is non-existent.
You'd be hard pressed to support the assertion that vote buying is non-existant.
by Telconi » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:25 am
by The Greater Ohio Valley » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:33 am
Telconi wrote: because I don't see anything wrong with vote buying.
by Telconi » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:33 am
by Page » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:35 am
Telconi wrote:Page wrote:
Voter fraud in America is basically non-existent, so I don't expect vote buying in an election would be more than you could count on one hand either.
"I don't expect X" and "There is no X" are two very different things.
Having said that I don't see anything wrong with ballot selfies because I don't see anything wrong with vote buying.
by Telconi » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:37 am
Page wrote:Telconi wrote:
"I don't expect X" and "There is no X" are two very different things.
Having said that I don't see anything wrong with ballot selfies because I don't see anything wrong with vote buying.
Every election, there are at most 5 people in the entire country who vote fraudulently. Take 10 states like California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Texas, and Oklahoma and in one of those ten states you might find a single person who commits voter fraud.
Is there any reason to suspect that vote buying occurs at a greater rate?
by The Greater Ohio Valley » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:44 am
by Madrinet » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:47 am
Cekoviu wrote:Selfies as a whole should be illegal.
Page wrote:Antityranicals wrote:I'd agree with that. Personally, though, I haven't got a problem with people selling their vote. It is, after all, theirs, and they ought be able to do what they wish with it.
The problem with vote selling is that people will sacrifice a long term greater gain (their interests being upheld in legislation and administration) for the short term smaller gain of some quick cash. If Michael Bloomberg offered me $5000 to vote for him I might be tempted to vote for him but I would instead vote for Bernie Sanders for free, knowing that if I am living in America and get seriously sick or injured, I'll save far more than that in health care costs when Sanders implements single-payer.
But for someone who is desperate to keep their lights on, feed their kids, vote buying is coercive. They sacrifice their long term interests for money they need right away.
If vote buying were allowed, politicians would do even less to improve material conditions than they do now.
by Drongonia » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:48 am
The Republic of Drongonia
The MT powerhouse of Oceania. New Zealand but richer.
Overview | Political Parties | Our Leader | Defence Force Info | 9axes | Faces of Drongonia | Drongonia - The Man Behind the Spreadsheet
by Telconi » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:48 am
by The Greater Ohio Valley » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:51 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Bhadeshistan, Castelia, El Lazaro, Elejamie, Experina, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Tabako, The Archregimancy, The Holy Therns, Turenia, Zurkerx
Advertisement