NATION

PASSWORD

Ballot Selfies

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Earth Orbit
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 55
Founded: Oct 24, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Earth Orbit » Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:28 pm

The way India does it is great. IIRC ballot selfies are punishable by a fine and (I think?) revocation of your vote.

Given the increasing polarization of politics in the US - and the current and future violence that entails (see: Antifa) - I'd consider it exceedingly unwise to allow people to cement their vote in public like that. The absolute last thing we need right now is someone compiling a hit list using ballot selfies on Instagram, as unlikely as that may be.
A 7/0/7 10.28 civilization according to this index.
I don't usually use NS Stats.
FNS HOMEPAGE | 11/23/2170 | BREAKING: VIOLETIST ATTACKS TAKING PLACE ACROSS FEDERATION, LUNA - STATE OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY DECLARED | 11/23/2170 | FNS HOMEPAGE
Ah yes, asteroid mining techno space-capitalism. I'll be boarding the rocket immediately. - Synne Industries
...I’ve never seen one [future nations] that’s an orbital country. That’s a really unique concept and I’m a fan of it to be honest. - Cantelo
---
FACTBOOKS | OVERVIEW (PORTAL) | MILITARY | TECH PORTAL | DIPLOMACY PORTAL | FICTION PORTAL
Bored 16-y/o conservative American guy with an addiction to hard SF and the Internet.
More...

User avatar
Luziyca
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38300
Founded: Nov 13, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Luziyca » Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:43 pm

Honestly, they shouldn't be allowed: why would you take a selfie with your ballot? If you want to show that you voted with a selfie, take a selfie of you dropping the ballot into that ballot box, as opposed to just showing the ballot in and of itself.
|||The Kingdom of Rwizikuru|||
Your feeble attempts to change the very nature of how time itself has been organized by mankind shall fall on barren ground and bear no fruit
WikiFacebookKylaris: the best region for eight years runningAbout meYouTubePolitical compass

User avatar
Mushet
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17410
Founded: Apr 29, 2008
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Mushet » Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:47 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Mushet wrote:How would you enforce it? Seems like the people that would be getting their vote bought can just send the picture instead of posting it on Facebook. What we're gonna confiscate electronic devices?

In my state cameras, phones, and other electronic devices are not allowed to be within 50ft of a polling place. You will be fined and the device will be confiscated

Pain in the ass, technically I can get fined for walking home in front of the place even if I have no intention of voting at that time.
"what I believe is like a box, and we’re taking the energy of our thinking and putting into a box of beliefs, pretending that we’re thinking...I’ve gone through most of my life not believing anything. Either I know or I don’t know, or I think." - John Trudell

Gun control is, and always has been, a tool of white supremacy.

Puppet: E-City ranked #1 in the world for Highest Drug Use on 5/25/2015
Puppet Sacred Heart Church ranked #2 in the world for Nudest 2/25/2010
OP of a 5 page archived thread The Forum Seven Tit Museum
Previous Official King of Forum 7 (2010-2012/13), relinquished own title
First person to get AQ'd Quote was funnier in 2011, you had to have been there
Celebrating over a decade on Nationstates!

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17237
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:48 pm

Just set up some display for folks to pose at with an "I voted" button
bam, problem solved.
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
The Greater Ohio Valley
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7084
Founded: Jan 19, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Greater Ohio Valley » Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:54 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Mushet wrote:How would you enforce it? Seems like the people that would be getting their vote bought can just send the picture instead of posting it on Facebook. What we're gonna confiscate electronic devices?

In my state cameras, phones, and other electronic devices are not allowed to be within 50ft of a polling place. You will be fined and the device will be confiscated

Good thing my state isn’t as irrational when it comes to devices, I’ve voted without the need of officials taking my device since most of us here don’t take pics of anything in the voting booth. If someone takes my phone then they’ll get a criminal theft charge to their name.
Last edited by The Greater Ohio Valley on Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Occasionally the Neo-American States
"Choke on the ashes of your hate."
Authoritarian leftist as a means to a libertarian socialist end. Civic nationalist and American patriot. Democracy is non-negotiable. Uniting humanity, fixing our planet and venturing out into the stars is the overarching goal. Jaded and broken yet I persist.

User avatar
New Bremerton
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1344
Founded: Jul 20, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Bremerton » Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:17 am

Ballot selfies should be legal so I can scrawl a pee-pee over the entire page accompanied by the words FUCK YOU ALL and share it on FB.

EDIT: I mean a photo of just the ballot, not the ballot and myself.
Last edited by New Bremerton on Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
LIBERA TE TUTEMET EX INFERIS (Liberate yourself from hell)
Alt of Glorious Hong Kong

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55321
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:41 am

Page wrote:I believe that secrecy of one's vote is a right, not an obligation

The secrecy of the vote is meant to preserve a collective right, not a personal one. It is a right of the whole community of electors to have fraud ruled out from elections, so to have free and fair elections.
If you want to go around and tell what you voted for, you're free to do so. Having a material proof of your vote means you could show it to someone else who controls your vote. So, that's a no.
.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55321
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:52 am

Earth Orbit wrote:The way India does it is great. IIRC ballot selfies are punishable by a fine and (I think?) revocation of your vote.


In Italy, merely entering the voting booth with any image-capturing device will earn the elector a fine ranging between 300 and 1000 € AND three to six months in jail. Plus, annullation of the vote and expulsion from the current election. Electors are supposed to hand over their image-capturing devices to the officials who will guard them until the ballot has been cast.
Personally, in my career as electoral office president, I've had two electors arrested (yep, the office president gets to issue orders to the police, including arrest orders) for taking their phones into the booth and using them while voting... Stupid fuckers.
.

User avatar
Radiatia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8394
Founded: Oct 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Radiatia » Wed Feb 12, 2020 1:01 am

Funnily enough I just found a photo on my phone that I took in the voting booth in 2017. It wasn't a selfie (I don't do selfies) but it was of my ballot paper - and I recall the reason I took the picture in the first place was BECAUSE it was illegal to do so and at the time it was me committing a tiny act of civil disobedience.

It's not something I have particularly passionate views on, but in general I'm one of those people who will always do the opposite of what people tell me not to do because my personality is just like that.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Feb 12, 2020 2:37 am

Page wrote:
Antityranicals wrote:I'd agree with that. Personally, though, I haven't got a problem with people selling their vote. It is, after all, theirs, and they ought be able to do what they wish with it.


The problem with vote selling is that people will sacrifice a long term greater gain (their interests being upheld in legislation and administration) for the short term smaller gain of some quick cash. If Michael Bloomberg offered me $5000 to vote for him I might be tempted to vote for him but I would instead vote for Bernie Sanders for free, knowing that if I am living in America and get seriously sick or injured, I'll save far more than that in health care costs when Sanders implements single-payer.

But for someone who is desperate to keep their lights on, feed their kids, vote buying is coercive. They sacrifice their long term interests for money they need right away.

If vote buying were allowed, politicians would do even less to improve material conditions than they do now.


I'd vote for Bloomberg for five Gs.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
The Sherpa Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 3224
Founded: Jan 15, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Sherpa Empire » Wed Feb 12, 2020 2:51 am

Telconi wrote:
Page wrote:
The problem with vote selling is that people will sacrifice a long term greater gain (their interests being upheld in legislation and administration) for the short term smaller gain of some quick cash. If Michael Bloomberg offered me $5000 to vote for him I might be tempted to vote for him but I would instead vote for Bernie Sanders for free, knowing that if I am living in America and get seriously sick or injured, I'll save far more than that in health care costs when Sanders implements single-payer.

But for someone who is desperate to keep their lights on, feed their kids, vote buying is coercive. They sacrifice their long term interests for money they need right away.

If vote buying were allowed, politicians would do even less to improve material conditions than they do now.


I'd vote for Bloomberg for five Gs.


Same, but I don't really think that should be legalized.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།
Following new legislation in The Sherpa Empire, life is short but human kindness is endless.
Alternate IC names: Sherpaland, Pharak

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17524
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Wed Feb 12, 2020 2:58 am

My problem with the idea that ballot selfies for the sake of political speech should be banned because they could hypothetically be done for vote buying is that a law should not prohibit one action because of the potential for another action. Don't ban alcohol just because some people drive drunk. But the metaphor doesn't even work because drunk driving is a thing that thousands of people do every day, while vote buying in America is non-existent.
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:15 am

The Sherpa Empire wrote:
Telconi wrote:
I'd vote for Bloomberg for five Gs.


Same, but I don't really think that should be legalized.


Why not? We're permitted to sell it profit from every other right we have. I can be a paid spokesperson, for example.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:16 am

Page wrote:My problem with the idea that ballot selfies for the sake of political speech should be banned because they could hypothetically be done for vote buying is that a law should not prohibit one action because of the potential for another action. Don't ban alcohol just because some people drive drunk. But the metaphor doesn't even work because drunk driving is a thing that thousands of people do every day, while vote buying in America is non-existent.


You'd be hard pressed to support the assertion that vote buying is non-existant.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17524
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:21 am

Telconi wrote:
Page wrote:My problem with the idea that ballot selfies for the sake of political speech should be banned because they could hypothetically be done for vote buying is that a law should not prohibit one action because of the potential for another action. Don't ban alcohol just because some people drive drunk. But the metaphor doesn't even work because drunk driving is a thing that thousands of people do every day, while vote buying in America is non-existent.


You'd be hard pressed to support the assertion that vote buying is non-existant.


Voter fraud in America is basically non-existent, so I don't expect vote buying in an election would be more than you could count on one hand either.
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:25 am

Page wrote:
Telconi wrote:
You'd be hard pressed to support the assertion that vote buying is non-existant.


Voter fraud in America is basically non-existent, so I don't expect vote buying in an election would be more than you could count on one hand either.


"I don't expect X" and "There is no X" are two very different things.

Having said that I don't see anything wrong with ballot selfies because I don't see anything wrong with vote buying.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
The Greater Ohio Valley
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7084
Founded: Jan 19, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Greater Ohio Valley » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:33 am

Telconi wrote: because I don't see anything wrong with vote buying.

I’m sure you don’t.
Occasionally the Neo-American States
"Choke on the ashes of your hate."
Authoritarian leftist as a means to a libertarian socialist end. Civic nationalist and American patriot. Democracy is non-negotiable. Uniting humanity, fixing our planet and venturing out into the stars is the overarching goal. Jaded and broken yet I persist.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:33 am

The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:
Telconi wrote: because I don't see anything wrong with vote buying.

I’m sure you don’t.


Would that be because I just stated it and you possess basic literacy skills?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17524
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:35 am

Telconi wrote:
Page wrote:
Voter fraud in America is basically non-existent, so I don't expect vote buying in an election would be more than you could count on one hand either.


"I don't expect X" and "There is no X" are two very different things.

Having said that I don't see anything wrong with ballot selfies because I don't see anything wrong with vote buying.


Every election, there are at most 5 people in the entire country who vote fraudulently. Take 10 states like California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Texas, and Oklahoma and in one of those ten states you might find a single person who commits voter fraud.

Is there any reason to suspect that vote buying occurs at a greater rate?
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:37 am

Page wrote:
Telconi wrote:
"I don't expect X" and "There is no X" are two very different things.

Having said that I don't see anything wrong with ballot selfies because I don't see anything wrong with vote buying.


Every election, there are at most 5 people in the entire country who vote fraudulently. Take 10 states like California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Texas, and Oklahoma and in one of those ten states you might find a single person who commits voter fraud.

Is there any reason to suspect that vote buying occurs at a greater rate?


Fraudulent voting is, at the very least, a subject in which concise information is woefully lacking.

The simple fact of the matter is that we haven't the slightest clue how many people actually vote fraudulently.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
The Greater Ohio Valley
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7084
Founded: Jan 19, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Greater Ohio Valley » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:44 am

Telconi wrote:
The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:I’m sure you don’t.


Would that be because I just stated it and you possess basic literacy skills?

More like I already suspected you supported things like buying votes, given your anti-American leanings.
Occasionally the Neo-American States
"Choke on the ashes of your hate."
Authoritarian leftist as a means to a libertarian socialist end. Civic nationalist and American patriot. Democracy is non-negotiable. Uniting humanity, fixing our planet and venturing out into the stars is the overarching goal. Jaded and broken yet I persist.

User avatar
Madrinet
Envoy
 
Posts: 250
Founded: Oct 14, 2016
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Madrinet » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:47 am

Cekoviu wrote:Selfies as a whole should be illegal.


Ok boomer

Page wrote:
Antityranicals wrote:I'd agree with that. Personally, though, I haven't got a problem with people selling their vote. It is, after all, theirs, and they ought be able to do what they wish with it.


The problem with vote selling is that people will sacrifice a long term greater gain (their interests being upheld in legislation and administration) for the short term smaller gain of some quick cash. If Michael Bloomberg offered me $5000 to vote for him I might be tempted to vote for him but I would instead vote for Bernie Sanders for free, knowing that if I am living in America and get seriously sick or injured, I'll save far more than that in health care costs when Sanders implements single-payer.

But for someone who is desperate to keep their lights on, feed their kids, vote buying is coercive. They sacrifice their long term interests for money they need right away.

If vote buying were allowed, politicians would do even less to improve material conditions than they do now.


I mean, people vote against their interests all the time. At least with vote buying they get something tangible.

It's not for us to decide why someone votes, or how they vote, anyway.
------------------------------------The Kingdom of Madrinet------------------------------------
Avanti Madrinallia!
HM Amadeus X | Embassy programme | Clarault Gazette | Currency: Madrinetan florin (ƒ) | Population: 1,198,000 | Map

User avatar
Drongonia
Minister
 
Posts: 3222
Founded: Feb 11, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Drongonia » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:48 am

Well, here in New Zealand it's illegal to post anything about who you voted for or who you're supporting on social media as it can get you fined. In 2014, three prominent sports stars in NZ were referred to the cops on election day (not prosecuted in the end, however) because they posted about supporting the centre-right National Party. No, not because the party sucks and is a husk of its once-conservative former self, but because it's illegal to tweet about how you're looking forward to the big boost in sports funding.

According to the Electoral Commission, It's a criminal offence to do anything that can influence voters:
- on election day
- in an advance voting place
- within 10 metres of an advance voting place

"This includes public statements, processions, and speeches, as well as displaying candidate and party names, emblems, slogans or logos. Sections 197 and 197A of the Electoral Act have the full lists of restricted activities. Remove or cover all your election advertising that’s visible from a public place before election day. Returning Officers can remove or cover advertising that breaches the rules."

There are specific exemptions to the Act in terms of stuff like wearing party lapels (you can have ONE) but party merch is specifically prohibited. Let's be honest though, political party merch is cringe anyway.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:48 am

The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Would that be because I just stated it and you possess basic literacy skills?

More like I already suspected you supported things like buying votes, given your anti-American leanings.


I forgot that freedom is anti-American. Thank you for reminding me, Mr. Supreme Arbiter of American-ness.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
The Greater Ohio Valley
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7084
Founded: Jan 19, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Greater Ohio Valley » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:51 am

Telconi wrote:
The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:More like I already suspected you supported things like buying votes, given your anti-American leanings.


I forgot that freedom is anti-American. Thank you for reminding me, Mr. Supreme Arbiter of American-ness.

:roll: uh huh.
Occasionally the Neo-American States
"Choke on the ashes of your hate."
Authoritarian leftist as a means to a libertarian socialist end. Civic nationalist and American patriot. Democracy is non-negotiable. Uniting humanity, fixing our planet and venturing out into the stars is the overarching goal. Jaded and broken yet I persist.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Bhadeshistan, Castelia, El Lazaro, Elejamie, Experina, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Tabako, The Archregimancy, The Holy Therns, Turenia, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads