NATION

PASSWORD

"My Body, My Choice!": Should it Extend to Suicide?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should people have the right to end their own life?

Yes. The motivation is nobody else's business.
69
18%
Yes, and mental health services and awareness need to be improved to prevent suicide.
149
38%
Only under certain circumstances/for certain reasons. (Explain?)
28
7%
Only after some sort of evaluation. (Explain?)
24
6%
No. Mental health services and awareness needs to be improved to prevent suicide.
76
19%
No, period.
42
11%
Other. (Explain?)
6
2%
 
Total votes : 394

User avatar
Highever
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Dec 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Highever » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:03 am

United Civil Republic wrote:Suicide should not be allowed, for the same reason that assisted suicide is considered murder. That is exactly what it is.

So...what you are going to apply criminal penalties to those who attempt suicide and throw them in prison or something? Yeah that will for sure change their mindset and make them realize that they have so much to live for.
ΦΣK
⚦ Through the souls of your brothers and sisters I take My place amongst the Three; through their pleasure I ascend my Throne. Pleasure, for Pleasure's sake! ⚦
Remember Bloody Sunday
A wise man once said, ("We all dead, fuck it")
There's something in the water
Jolthig wrote:Use Soresu and not Juyo.
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.

User avatar
Neanderthaland
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9295
Founded: Sep 10, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Neanderthaland » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:31 am

United Civil Republic wrote:Suicide should not be allowed, for the same reason that assisted suicide is considered murder. That is exactly what it is.

This makes about as much sense as charging a dominatrix with assault.

Is it really a crime if the "victim" wants it?
Ug make fire. Mod ban Ug.

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44957
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:33 am

Neanderthaland wrote:
United Civil Republic wrote:Suicide should not be allowed, for the same reason that assisted suicide is considered murder. That is exactly what it is.

This makes about as much sense as charging a dominatrix with assault.

Old people say the greatest things…
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.


Historian, of sorts.

Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
The Land of the Ephyral
Diplomat
 
Posts: 798
Founded: Jun 03, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Land of the Ephyral » Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:08 am

The header statement is more valid for suicide than abortion because at least it is your body you are going to destroy.

I have yet to take a position on suicide though so I will see if any arguments of suicide convince me.

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:21 am

The Land of the Ephyral wrote:The header statement is more valid for suicide than abortion because at least it is your body you are going to destroy.

It can be argued to be valid for both, albeit in different ways.

The Land of the Ephyral wrote:I have yet to take a position on suicide though so I will see if any arguments of suicide convince me.

Then venture forth and read through the thread.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
The Land of the Ephyral
Diplomat
 
Posts: 798
Founded: Jun 03, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Land of the Ephyral » Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:29 am

The New California Republic wrote:It can be argued to be valid for both, albeit in different ways.


This is true, though on abortion I reject bodily autonomy as a reason outright.

The New California Republic wrote:Then venture forth and read through the thread.


I have done a skim through. Nothing really convincing to me. I am leaning towards the side of not permitted except perhaps in cases of terminal disease but that wasn't the original question.

In truth I do not subscribe to an absolute theory of self-sovereignty because of how humans are social animals. The whole comes before the desires of one or a few. Self-sovereignty to the extreme just strikes me as symptomatic of hyperindividualism which in my view does not remotely support the structures necessary to keep society intact.

I fail to see how the free and taboo-less suicide of people at a whim could benefit society as a whole and thus support all the people within it.

So, currently leaning towards a position of anti-suicide.

User avatar
Abaja
Diplomat
 
Posts: 706
Founded: Nov 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Abaja » Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:33 am

Purgatio wrote:Suicide, at the end of the day, is a personal choice people make over what should happen to their own body. We don't have centres out there telling people not to tattoo themselves or not to braid their hair, why is it any of the business of so-called 'suicide prevention' organisations or 'mental health' organisations to tell thinking, autonomous human beings, in the free exercise of their agency, to make a free, informed choice over what happens to their body? We should treat suicide as a personal choice, and not cast judgment on what another person chooses to do with their body through these discriminatory 'suicide prevention' NGOs

No one means any harm when they try to help others overcome their struggles and prevent suicide. The reason why we don't tell people who get tattoos not to get them or tell people not to braid their hair is because it harms no one. Suicide harms yourself and can break your family/loved ones.

People will tell you not to swim in an ocean full of sharks. Does that mean they don't respect your "personal choice?" No, it means they want you to be safe. Someone who prevents another person from committing suicide is likely doing so because they care for them. Unless you want the suicide rate to get higher, you should be taking steps to help prevent it. Anti-suicide organizations want to do that. And you criticize them?

I couldn't imagine telling an innocent suicidal "go ahead" without feeling sick.
Last edited by Abaja on Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF ABAJA
Population: 89 million | Leader: President Aman Salam-Ross | Capital: Olulawi | Largest City: Kingston | Trigramme: ABJ | Founded: 1665 |
Factbook | Sportswire | H&P Steel | Join TWP!

Co-Host of IBC 23 & IBC 27 | RO16: IBC 20, IBC 21, IBC 27 | Quarterfinals: IBC 22, World Bowl XXX | Semifinals: IBC 23 | Finals: None

User avatar
Estanglia
Senator
 
Posts: 3858
Founded: Dec 31, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Estanglia » Mon Jul 29, 2019 3:42 am

United Civil Republic wrote:Suicide should not be allowed, for the same reason that assisted suicide is considered murder. That is exactly what it is.


1) Whether or not assisted suicide is considered murder depends upon the country.

2) How can you murder yourself?

3) How are you gonna punish people who commit suicide? Throw their corpse in jail for the rest of their death?
Yeah: Egalitarianism, equality
Meh: Labour, the EU
Nah: pointless discrimination, authoritarianism, Brexit, Trump, both American parties, the Conservatives
I flop between "optimistic about the future" and "pessimistic about the future" every time I go on NSG.

(Taken 29/08/2020)
Political compass test:
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.05

8values thinks I'm a Libertarian Socialist.

Torrocca wrote:"Your honor, it was not mein fault! I didn't order the systematic genocide of millions of people, it was the twenty kilograms of pure-cut Bavarian cocaine that did it!"

User avatar
Godular
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 13092
Founded: Sep 09, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Godular » Mon Jul 29, 2019 3:43 am

Estanglia wrote:
United Civil Republic wrote:Suicide should not be allowed, for the same reason that assisted suicide is considered murder. That is exactly what it is.


1) Whether or not assisted suicide is considered murder depends upon the country.

2) How can you murder yourself?

3) How are you gonna punish people who commit suicide? Throw their corpse in jail for the rest of their death?


Reexecution. Hang them by the neck until they're... EXTREMELY dead.
Now the moderation team really IS Godmoding.
Step 1: One-Stop Rules Shop. Step 2: ctrl+f. Step 3: Type in what you saw in modbox. Step 4: Don't do it again.
New to F7? Click here!


User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Mon Jul 29, 2019 5:45 am

Abaja wrote:
Purgatio wrote:Suicide, at the end of the day, is a personal choice people make over what should happen to their own body. We don't have centres out there telling people not to tattoo themselves or not to braid their hair, why is it any of the business of so-called 'suicide prevention' organisations or 'mental health' organisations to tell thinking, autonomous human beings, in the free exercise of their agency, to make a free, informed choice over what happens to their body? We should treat suicide as a personal choice, and not cast judgment on what another person chooses to do with their body through these discriminatory 'suicide prevention' NGOs

No one means any harm when they try to help others overcome their struggles and prevent suicide. The reason why we don't tell people who get tattoos not to get them or tell people not to braid their hair is because it harms no one. Suicide harms yourself and can break your family/loved ones.

People will tell you not to swim in an ocean full of sharks. Does that mean they don't respect your "personal choice?" No, it means they want you to be safe. Someone who prevents another person from committing suicide is likely doing so because they care for them. Unless you want the suicide rate to get higher, you should be taking steps to help prevent it. Anti-suicide organizations want to do that. And you criticize them?

I couldn't imagine telling an innocent suicidal "go ahead" without feeling sick.


Even if that other person is in constant pain and suffers constantly ? Are you really so selfish that you would tell them they have to live on because otherwise YOU would feel sad ?
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17486
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Mon Jul 29, 2019 5:52 am

United Civil Republic wrote:Suicide should not be allowed, for the same reason that assisted suicide is considered murder. That is exactly what it is.


I don't think even assisted suicide should be illegal, provided that one assists out of compassion for the person who wants to die and not for personal gain. That is already the case in some countries.
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Mon Jul 29, 2019 5:58 am

Page wrote:
United Civil Republic wrote:Suicide should not be allowed, for the same reason that assisted suicide is considered murder. That is exactly what it is.


I don't think even assisted suicide should be illegal, provided that one assists out of compassion for the person who wants to die and not for personal gain. That is already the case in some countries.

Yup. In cases of assisted suicide there are robust frameworks in countries where it is legal, which gives the person multiple opportunities to back out after being told explicitly and repeatedly what will happen if they continue, with opportunities to say if they are doing it under duress.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Drongonia
Minister
 
Posts: 3222
Founded: Feb 11, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Drongonia » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:01 am

I'm very torn. The conservative part of me wants people NOT to kill themselves, because why the hell should the government allow them to?

The more libertarian part of me says: MUH FREEDOM!

So how about this...

After a proper examination, opinion and diagnosis from a specialist or two in the field of their illness (eg: Cancer), terminally ill people should be allowed to legally commit assisted suicide with the help of a licensed and fully trained medical practitioner. It is also paramount that medical professionals have the right to object to performing this procedure.

It will also reduce the emotional impact on the patients and their families in the long run. A vast majority of people don't want their last memories of their mother, father, sibling, or even child, to be that of them lying in a bed slowly sliding towards death. They want to go on a holiday, spend time walking on the beach, have their favourite meals together, visit a sports match they like, and do other family activities while their family member is happy and still relatively healthy. They don't want to get a phone call during the night to tell them their beloved family member has died (or is on their deathbed) and that they need to get to the hospital, or be sitting next to them and suddenly they succumb to their illness.

Putting people through months of chemotherapy and other treatments when they don't really want it is insane! It should be viewed as an extension to the individual's right to refuse healthcare of any form, as long as they are of a sound mind to do so.

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/member/2017/0269/latest/DLM7285905.html#DLM7285957
Last edited by Drongonia on Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:05 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:06 am

Drongonia wrote:I'm very torn. The conservative part of me wants people NOT to kill themselves, because why the hell should the government allow them to?

The more libertarian part of me says: MUH FREEDOM!

So how about this...

After a proper examination, opinion and diagnosis from a specialist or two in the field of their illness (eg: Cancer), terminally ill people should be allowed to legally commit assisted suicide with the help of a licensed and fully trained medical practitioner. It is also paramount that medical professionals have the right to object to performing this procedure.

It will also reduce the emotional impact on the patients and their families in the long run. A vast majority of people don't want their last memories of their mother, father, sibling, or even child, to be that of them lying in a bed slowly sliding towards death. They want to go on a holiday, spend time walking on the beach, have their favourite meals together, visit a sports match they like, and do other family activities while their family member is happy and still relatively healthy. They don't want to get a phone call during the night to tell them their beloved family member has died (or is on their deathbed) and that they need to get to the hospital, or be sitting next to them and suddenly they succumb to their illness.

Putting people through months of chemotherapy and other treatments when they don't really want it is insane! It should be viewed as an extension to the individual's right to refuse healthcare of any form, as long as they are of a sound mind to do so.

The problem is that many of the cases that involve people seeking assisted suicide do not necessarily have terminal illnesses at all; it is people with Motor Neurone Disease etc whereby it isn't going to kill them because of the ability to intervene medically, but the person will lose their ability to walk (or even move at all), to eat independently, to drink independently, to speak, to go to the bathroom, etc, and many people just do not want to live that way. I certainly wouldn't.
Last edited by The New California Republic on Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Drongonia
Minister
 
Posts: 3222
Founded: Feb 11, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Drongonia » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:08 am

The New California Republic wrote:The problem is that many of the cases that involve people seeking assisted suicide do not necessarily have terminal illnesses at all; it is people with Motor Neurone Disease etc whereby it isn't going to kill them because of the ability to intervene medically, but the person will lose their ability to walk (or even move at all), to eat independently, to drink independently, to speak, etc, and many people just do not want to live that way. I certainly wouldn't.

I agree with you there, and as long as the person is of a sound mind and is able to communicate that they want the treatment, then I suppose why not? It's definitely a life-altering illness which impacts their quality of life greatly. I'm just stuck in the terminal illness mindset because that's what the debate centres around here.

User avatar
Fascist Soyouso
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 108
Founded: Jun 23, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Fascist Soyouso » Mon Jul 29, 2019 7:55 am

Abaja wrote:No one means any harm when they try to help others overcome their struggles and prevent suicide. The reason why we don't tell people who get tattoos not to get them or tell people not to braid their hair is because it harms no one. Suicide harms yourself and can break your family/loved ones.


If someone attempts suicide the only way we know for sure they can harm themselves is by failing due to not being assisted by a professional, and thus having to deal with the injuries they suffered by the time people found them. Like how smoking while pregnant isn't really harmful to the eventual child if the person is planning to get an abortion and no child is going to exist.

And indeed it can do that to other people, but why should that be a reason to stop people if they really want to?

People will tell you not to swim in an ocean full of sharks. Does that mean they don't respect your "personal choice?" No, it means they want you to be safe. Someone who prevents another person from committing suicide is likely doing so because they care for them. Unless you want the suicide rate to get higher, you should be taking steps to help prevent it. Anti-suicide organizations want to do that. And you criticize them?


Yes it does mean they don't respect their personal choice, good intentions don't change anything. They're putting what they want for them, or their feelings about the other person, above their decision.

I support both. Suicide prevention should not be about stopping people from dying, but decreasing the amount of people who want to die. It's stupid for it to be about the former. Awareness, education, and compassion about the issues that often get people to this point needs to be increased for the wellness of society, as well as services for people who need help. Doesn't mean we should suddenly have more say in how long a person lives than that person. We can have our cake and eat it too here.

I couldn't imagine telling an innocent suicidal "go ahead" without feeling sick.


And? Plenty of people couldn't tell people to get an abortion without feeling sick because they see it as murder, doesn't mean their feelings should matter in what they do with their body.

User avatar
Elwher
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9243
Founded: May 24, 2012
Capitalizt

Postby Elwher » Mon Jul 29, 2019 7:59 am

This got buried in the Muslim digression, so I am reposting it now that we seem to be back on track.

Suicide can be a rational choice under certain circumstances, and as such, should not be made illegal nor have barriers put up against it.

One may have evaluated the possible outcomes in one's life and found none of them worthwhile. In that case, living on is irrational.

One may have committed such dishonorable actions that continued existence will bring nothing but shame to one's family and friends. In that case, continued existence is selfish.

One may be in a position where one's death will prevent many deaths. In that case, continued existence is cowardly.
CYNIC, n. A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. Hence the custom among the Scythians of plucking out a cynic's eyes to improve his vision.
Ambrose Bierce

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Mon Jul 29, 2019 8:29 am

United Civil Republic wrote:Suicide should not be allowed, for the same reason that assisted suicide is considered murder. That is exactly what it is.

It should not be considered murder (and is not in some Western countries and US states), as it is consensual and exercises the right to bodily autonomy.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Ohioan Territory
Diplomat
 
Posts: 780
Founded: Dec 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ohioan Territory » Mon Jul 29, 2019 8:40 am

Sure. But often, suicide is considered/attempted by people that lack adequate mental health treatment. Fix that up first.
Justice for East Palestine.

User avatar
Abaja
Diplomat
 
Posts: 706
Founded: Nov 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Abaja » Mon Jul 29, 2019 12:02 pm

The Alma Mater wrote:
Abaja wrote:No one means any harm when they try to help others overcome their struggles and prevent suicide. The reason why we don't tell people who get tattoos not to get them or tell people not to braid their hair is because it harms no one. Suicide harms yourself and can break your family/loved ones.

People will tell you not to swim in an ocean full of sharks. Does that mean they don't respect your "personal choice?" No, it means they want you to be safe. Someone who prevents another person from committing suicide is likely doing so because they care for them. Unless you want the suicide rate to get higher, you should be taking steps to help prevent it. Anti-suicide organizations want to do that. And you criticize them?

I couldn't imagine telling an innocent suicidal "go ahead" without feeling sick.


Even if that other person is in constant pain and suffers constantly ? Are you really so selfish that you would tell them they have to live on because otherwise YOU would feel sad ?

I have a hard time understanding how helping someone out is selfish. Do you want the suicide rate to go down or not? Because leaving them be without making an effort to help it is definetly going to make it spike.

About 90% of people who commit suicide had an underlying mental illness, such as depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, etc. Often times people kill themselves not because they just want to die, but because they don't want to endure their mental trauma any longer. Having more connectivity to the person can reduce their risk of committing suicide and reduce feelings of isolation. Psychotherapy, or having relationship with a therapist, can help fade negative feelings and produce positive ones. 80% to 90% of people that seek treatment for depression are treated successfully using therapy and/or medication.

So no, it's not about letting the person continue in constant pain because the whole point of preventing suicide is about eliminating that constant pain.
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF ABAJA
Population: 89 million | Leader: President Aman Salam-Ross | Capital: Olulawi | Largest City: Kingston | Trigramme: ABJ | Founded: 1665 |
Factbook | Sportswire | H&P Steel | Join TWP!

Co-Host of IBC 23 & IBC 27 | RO16: IBC 20, IBC 21, IBC 27 | Quarterfinals: IBC 22, World Bowl XXX | Semifinals: IBC 23 | Finals: None

User avatar
Ginicun
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 100
Founded: Jan 23, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Ginicun » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:01 pm

Yes, but it should be discouraged. Suicide is a painful thing that some families have to deal with, and even though people have the right to take their own life.... DON'T. PERIOD.
proud agender gay person. biologically male. they/them is preferred, or he/him if it makes your life easier, though i can get really mad over that.

i'm also a music fan, mainly into progressive/Avant/experimental type stuff.
right-libertarian bordering ancap whos into anarcho-individualism and free-market socialism.

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:04 pm

Lots of people already think it does.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:06 pm

Purgatio wrote:Suicide, at the end of the day, is a personal choice people make over what should happen to their own body. We don't have centres out there telling people not to tattoo themselves or not to braid their hair, why is it any of the business of so-called 'suicide prevention' organisations or 'mental health' organisations to tell thinking, autonomous human beings, in the free exercise of their agency, to make a free, informed choice over what happens to their body? We should treat suicide as a personal choice, and not cast judgment on what another person chooses to do with their body through these discriminatory 'suicide prevention' NGOs


You've obviously never known someone who's committed suicide.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:09 pm

The Alma Mater wrote:
Even if that other person is in constant pain and suffers constantly ? Are you really so selfish that you would tell them they have to live on because otherwise YOU would feel sad ?


Then we give them every ounce of help we can to help them through whatever trouble or imbalance that's causing them to be suicidal.

Or if it's an end-of-life thing, there's already something that exists that is meant to help an easy passing but I forget what it's called.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Mexican Great Union
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jul 29, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Mexican Great Union » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:13 pm

To me suicide should be a topic most avoided
Mexico be the greatest
Y U PRESS DIS?

so why are you reading this tiny text, huh?
AnD ThEy AsK YoU HoW YoU ArE AnD YoU HaVe To SaY YoUr FiNe

UwU

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Billyabna, Cretie, Experina, Foxyshire, Kannap, Lunayria, Lycom, Quasi-Stellar Star Civilizations, The Black Forrest, The New York Nation

Advertisement

Remove ads