by 1000 Cats » Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:28 pm
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by [violet] » Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:37 pm
by 1000 Cats » Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:42 pm
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by 1000 Cats » Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:57 pm
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by Cogitation » Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:06 pm
by 1000 Cats » Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:19 pm
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by Cogitation » Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:32 pm
by [violet] » Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:41 pm
1000 Cats wrote:I quickly churned this out. With your approval I will use it as our WFE
by 1000 Cats » Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:47 pm
[violet] wrote:1000 Cats wrote:I quickly churned this out. With your approval I will use it as our WFE
My reading is that the term "zoophilia" refers to a practice that is against the law, a "zoophile" is one who engages in such practices, and "zoophilic" is one who supports such practices. There are other interpretations, but these ones seem most common.
As such, we can't permit language like, "this is a safe haven for zoophiles," or "we exist for the zoophilic community," since that would seem to be endorsing something illegal (and obscene).
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by 1000 Cats » Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:21 pm
[violet] wrote:No, you can't redefine words. Just use different language.
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by Corynth » Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:31 pm
by Sailsia » Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:31 pm
[violet] wrote:1000 Cats wrote:I quickly churned this out. With your approval I will use it as our WFE
My reading is that the term "zoophilia" refers to a practice that is against the law, a "zoophile" is one who engages in such practices, and "zoophilic" is one who supports such practices. There are other interpretations, but these ones seem most common.
As such, we can't permit language like, "this is a safe haven for zoophiles," or "we exist for the zoophilic community," since that would seem to be endorsing something illegal (and obscene).
by Corynth » Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:35 pm
by Neghaiiestar » Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:35 pm
by Neghaiiestar » Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:38 pm
by [violet] » Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:50 pm
1000 Cats wrote:That is, however, the definition of the word. It is not synonymous with bestiality.
by Corynth » Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:53 pm
[violet] wrote:At best, such language is likely to be highly ambiguous. So if that's not what you mean, please use words that say what you do mean.
by Crushing Our Enemies » Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:54 pm
by Frisbeeteria » Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:58 pm
Corynth wrote:The title does not contain the pre-face 'MODS ONLY'. The forum is, by the rules, open.
by [violet] » Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:02 pm
Sailsia wrote:Explain to me, please, why there is a region called "gay"? In many countries, for many years, homosexuality was on par with pedophilia. Even today, many people would see the region of gay and put in the same bracket of offensiveness as a region called zoophilia.
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... y_laws.svg)
*countries in red, brown, and yellow are places where homosexuality is illegal
So, my point is, where does this stop? If there cannot be a region called Zoophilia, can there be a region called Gay? Why is it we allow Nazi regions, but not regions like Zoophilia? I personally have no vested interest in this, but it seems strange none the less. I apologize if im out of bounds for posting here, but i feel it must be said, either you allow none or you allow all of the controversial regions.
by Tubbsalot » Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:03 pm
Sailsia wrote:Explain to me, please, why there is a region called "gay"? In many countries, for many years, homosexuality was on par with pedophilia. Even today, many people would see the region of gay and put in the same bracket of offensiveness as a region called zoophilia.(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/53/World_homosexuality_laws.svg)
*countries in red, brown, and yellow are places where homosexuality is illegal
So, my point is, where does this stop? If there cannot be a region called Zoophilia, can there be a region called Gay? Why is it we allow Nazi regions, but not regions like Zoophilia? I personally have no vested interest in this, but it seems strange none the less. I apologize if im out of bounds for posting here, but i feel it must be said, either you allow none or you allow all of the controversial regions.
Corynth wrote:The title does not contain the pre-face 'MODS ONLY'. The forum is, by the rules, open.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Imperializt Russia, Juristonia
Advertisement