For which I made you a legality challenge thread to argue in, rather than the poor proposal's drafting thread.
Personally I think it's better if the Council does look at things on its own too, but maybe you guys need to do that in a different manner; just post a "this council (or whatever you're calling yourselves now) is concerned of this proposal breaking this and that rule, could the author please provide a counter-argument?" And then refrain from the bickering match that follows, no matter how much each of you wants to defend the self-made challenge or takes offence at something Gruen says, etc.