NATION

PASSWORD

2015 UK Politics Megathread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who would you _currently_ vote for?

Conservatives
73
21%
Labour
71
21%
Liberal Democrats
47
14%
UKIP
57
17%
Greens [England & Wales, Scotland, or NI]
39
11%
SNP
19
6%
Plaid Cymru
3
1%
Northern Ireland SF/SDLP
11
3%
Northern Ireland DUP/UUP
2
1%
Other (please explain)
18
5%
 
Total votes : 340

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Thu May 07, 2015 12:20 am

Evil Lord Sauron wrote:
Barrera wrote:This poll is as hung as Britain's Parliament... :P

However, pretty sure UKIP is probably over represented because of the small but vocal ultra conservative types from the U.S. :roll:


Yeah be interesting to have two UKIP options, UKIP and UKIP (none British person) or something along those lines.

I doubt there is that many UKIP British voters here.

I think their could be 1...and that's it.
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
Herargon
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7472
Founded: Apr 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Herargon » Thu May 07, 2015 12:24 am

Good luck with voting, people! :)
Pro: tolerance, individualism, technocratism, democratism, freedom, freedom of speech and moderate religious expression, the ban on hate speech, constitutional monarchism, the Rhine model
Against: intolerance, radicalism, strong discrimination, populism, fascism, nazism, communism, totalitarianism, authoritarianism, absolutarianism, fundamentalism, strong religious expression, strong nationalism, police states

If you like philosophy, then here you can see what your own philosophical alignements are.

Ifreann wrote:That would certainly save the local regiment of American troops the trouble of plugging your head in ye olde shittere.
How scifi alliances actually work.

User avatar
Barrera
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 146
Founded: Mar 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Barrera » Thu May 07, 2015 12:28 am


That was really informative. Thanks for sharing!

It actually changed my mind, too. (Though I'm not eligible to vote, so the poll will have to count!)
Realm of Barrera
(Basically a Caribbean U.K.)

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Thu May 07, 2015 12:48 am

I'm back. Quick hop and a skip to the polling station, which was empty at this time of day. Filled out two ballots. Lib Dems oddly missing from the local elections.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30597
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Thu May 07, 2015 12:51 am

Parti Ouvrier wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:
Come to think of it, Nick Clegg is the only party leader with an archaeology degree...

Social anthropology.
http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2010/04/10/jo ... eadership/


The degree is formally in anthropology, but at Cambridge this required him to study both archaeology and anthropology.

And anyway, I have an anthropology degree too.

User avatar
Shamhnan Insir
Minister
 
Posts: 2842
Founded: Jul 08, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Shamhnan Insir » Thu May 07, 2015 12:56 am

Managed to evict a group of SNP supporters who were jeering outside the polling station. That's my good deed for the day. :)
Call me Sham

-"Governments may think and say as they like, but force cannot be eliminated, and it is the only real and unanswerable power. We are told that the pen is mightier than the sword, but I know which of these weapons I would choose." Sir Adrian Paul Ghislain Carton de Wiart VC, KBE, CB, CMG, DSO.

Nationalism is an infantile disease, it is the measles of humanity.
Darwinish Brentsylvania wrote:Shamhnan Insir started this wonderful tranquility, ALL PRAISE THE SHEPHERD KING

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Thu May 07, 2015 12:58 am

You can tell I live in a Tory stronghold because the only people outside the polling station were a Tory councilor and some random UKIP member who were measuring turnout.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Shamhnan Insir
Minister
 
Posts: 2842
Founded: Jul 08, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Shamhnan Insir » Thu May 07, 2015 1:00 am

Steamtopia wrote:You can tell I live in a Tory stronghold because the only people outside the polling station were a Tory councilor and some random UKIP member who were measuring turnout.


I live rural, apart from the supporter mob that I moved, there was a pick-up full of sheep, I'm not sure who they will be voting for.
Call me Sham

-"Governments may think and say as they like, but force cannot be eliminated, and it is the only real and unanswerable power. We are told that the pen is mightier than the sword, but I know which of these weapons I would choose." Sir Adrian Paul Ghislain Carton de Wiart VC, KBE, CB, CMG, DSO.

Nationalism is an infantile disease, it is the measles of humanity.
Darwinish Brentsylvania wrote:Shamhnan Insir started this wonderful tranquility, ALL PRAISE THE SHEPHERD KING

User avatar
Herargon
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7472
Founded: Apr 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Herargon » Thu May 07, 2015 1:01 am

Shamhnan Insir wrote:
Steamtopia wrote:You can tell I live in a Tory stronghold because the only people outside the polling station were a Tory councilor and some random UKIP member who were measuring turnout.


I live rural, apart from the supporter mob that I moved, there was a pick-up full of sheep, I'm not sure who they will be voting for.


Plaid Cymru, maybe?

Edit: Now a more serious answer;from what I know, farmlands tend to be more conservative, except if these are poorer; then it tends to be more social democratic.
Last edited by Herargon on Thu May 07, 2015 1:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pro: tolerance, individualism, technocratism, democratism, freedom, freedom of speech and moderate religious expression, the ban on hate speech, constitutional monarchism, the Rhine model
Against: intolerance, radicalism, strong discrimination, populism, fascism, nazism, communism, totalitarianism, authoritarianism, absolutarianism, fundamentalism, strong religious expression, strong nationalism, police states

If you like philosophy, then here you can see what your own philosophical alignements are.

Ifreann wrote:That would certainly save the local regiment of American troops the trouble of plugging your head in ye olde shittere.
How scifi alliances actually work.

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Thu May 07, 2015 1:03 am

Shamhnan Insir wrote:
Steamtopia wrote:You can tell I live in a Tory stronghold because the only people outside the polling station were a Tory councilor and some random UKIP member who were measuring turnout.


I live rural, apart from the supporter mob that I moved, there was a pick-up full of sheep, I'm not sure who they will be voting for.

I'm in a small suburb. It was completely empty, but I expected that at 8AM in a Tory stronghold.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Shamhnan Insir
Minister
 
Posts: 2842
Founded: Jul 08, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Shamhnan Insir » Thu May 07, 2015 1:05 am

Herargon wrote:
Shamhnan Insir wrote:
I live rural, apart from the supporter mob that I moved, there was a pick-up full of sheep, I'm not sure who they will be voting for.


Plaid Cymru, maybe?

Edit: Now a more serious answer;from what I know, farmlands tend to be more conservative, except if these are poorer; then it tends to be more social democratic.


Unless they are voting tactically perhaps? I'm in the west of Scotland, no Plaid Cymru here. Maybe they went for the Green party....
Call me Sham

-"Governments may think and say as they like, but force cannot be eliminated, and it is the only real and unanswerable power. We are told that the pen is mightier than the sword, but I know which of these weapons I would choose." Sir Adrian Paul Ghislain Carton de Wiart VC, KBE, CB, CMG, DSO.

Nationalism is an infantile disease, it is the measles of humanity.
Darwinish Brentsylvania wrote:Shamhnan Insir started this wonderful tranquility, ALL PRAISE THE SHEPHERD KING

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30597
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Thu May 07, 2015 1:18 am

Pesda wrote:Two things.
First, you are mistaken when you say "Even with Nationalist support, a Lab/LibDem coalition would have been four seats short" What you mean to say is "even with Scottish nationalist support..." Lab/Libdem/SNP/PC/SDLP would have had 327 seats which is a majority. As was said in the previous thread; maybe a Lab/Lib/nat agreement would have been politically difficult (some might argue) but it was arithmetically possible. The Libdems chose a coalition with the Tories, they didn't have to do that. It can be argued it was the best choice but it was still a choice.

Also, what many people are angry about is, not just that the Libdems couldn't implement everything in their own manifesto, but that they enabled the Conservatives to implement the unpopular things in the Tory manifesto, and even some unpopular things not in the Tory manifesto.

"We had to" is no excuse. "We stopped the Tories from being as bad as they would have been" is no excuse. The Libdems deliberately allowed the Tories to do things people don't like. That is why your party deserves a bad election tomorrow.


I was deliberately excluding Northern Ireland parties from the equation - and I note you left out Naomi Long :p

More seriously, while there was a choice of sorts, the fact remains that a coalition involving 363 seats and a majority for two parties was inherently more workable than a coalition involving a minority government of 315 seats propped up by informal support from two nationalist parties (each - rightly - with their own agenda) with 6 and 3 MPS respectively, 3 SDLP MPs, and 1 Alliance MP. I remain genuinely surprised that anyone thinks the latter would have proved viable in the political climate of May 2010, and in a period pre-dating the new fixed-term parliament dispensation.

Also, I'm not sure if it's widely realised the extent to which the Labour - LibDem negotiations were deliberately sabotaged by some senior figures Labour - by Ed Balls in particular. Balls denies it (he would, wouldn't he?), but it's a genuine belief in LibDem circles that Labour were so divided over the desirability of a coalition - even if the numbers could be made to work - that several senior Labour figures went out of their way to make sure the negotiations failed. Other senior Labour figures might have been sympathetic to a deal, but genuinely believed that they had lost the election and therefore had no moral right to govern.

The views that Phil Woolas expressed in 2010 are instructive here as they combine both views in a single short quote from a single senior Labour figure:

"I am not going to join a terrible marriage or go into a government with Chris Huhne. We have not got a moral mandate to govern. We might have been able to run an arithmetical government, but it would not be a real government. The Liberal Democrats in my part of the world are surrogate Tories, and if you speak to the Labour MPs that is the view of two thirds of them."

So if there was a choice, the choice was far more circumscribed than your panglossian view of the only remotely viable alternative might suggest, at least in part because Labour were unsure about what they wanted. Pardon the cliche, but it takes two to tango.

And I repeat, in any coalition government in any normal European country, the junior coalition partner will find itself being forced to help pass policies it disagrees with. That doesn't remotely mean that the junior coalition partner should be absolved from responsibility for those policies - on the contrary, the coalition is collectively responsible for its programme in government, and the LibDems will indeed pay a price for that collective responsibility - but it does mean that the junior coalition partner shouldn't be held to be somehow uniquely or disproportionately culpable.
Last edited by The Archregimancy on Thu May 07, 2015 2:21 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Thu May 07, 2015 1:34 am

Oh good god. The Times screwed up and used the hashtag "GE0125". Now it's trending.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
L Ron Cupboard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9054
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby L Ron Cupboard » Thu May 07, 2015 1:38 am

So the UKIP candidate for mayor of Leicester is called Willem 'Dutch' Veldhuizen ... keep those immigrants out Dutch, keep those immigrants out.
A leopard in every home, you know it makes sense.

User avatar
Bittermanistan
Attaché
 
Posts: 69
Founded: Mar 29, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Bittermanistan » Thu May 07, 2015 1:39 am

POLLS ARE OPEN HYPE MODE ACTIVATED

FINGERS CROSSED NIGEY

WE CAN DO IT

VOTE UKIP
hhhhhhhhhh

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Thu May 07, 2015 1:40 am

Bittermanistan wrote:POLLS ARE OPEN HYPE MODE ACTIVATED

FINGERS CROSSED NIGEY

WE CAN DO IT

VOTE UKIP

No. Nigel won't even win his seat. UKIP will be lucky if they win their maximum prediction of 3 seats.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30597
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Thu May 07, 2015 1:41 am

Die Volkstaat wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
well i voted lib dem, not clegg specifically


Right, but I have reason to suspect that most LibDem voters in 2010 voted for the party because of the short lived Cleggmania.


LibDem share of the vote in 2005: 22%

LibDem share of the vote in 2010: 23%

Average LibDem polling figures in the 9 days between Brown calling the election and the first televised debate: 19.64%
(figures for latter personally derived from data here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_po ... ction#2010)

Conclusion: final impact of 'Cleggmania' on 2010 LibDem voting share was actually fairly marginal; it certainly didn't represent 'most LibDem voters in 2010'.

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Thu May 07, 2015 1:44 am

L Ron Cupboard wrote:So the UKIP candidate for mayor of Leicester is called Willem 'Dutch' Veldhuizen ... keep those immigrants out Dutch, keep those immigrants out.

Reminds me of the Monster Raving Looney's 2010 candidate for the constituency I'm moving to in a month's time.

Baron von Thunderclap.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Teemant
Senator
 
Posts: 4130
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Teemant » Thu May 07, 2015 1:45 am

Steamtopia wrote:
Shamhnan Insir wrote:
I live rural, apart from the supporter mob that I moved, there was a pick-up full of sheep, I'm not sure who they will be voting for.

I'm in a small suburb. It was completely empty, but I expected that at 8AM in a Tory stronghold.


Because they are working people. :lol2:
Eesti
Latvija
Lietuva
Polska

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Thu May 07, 2015 1:48 am

Teemant wrote:
Steamtopia wrote:I'm in a small suburb. It was completely empty, but I expected that at 8AM in a Tory stronghold.


Because they are working people. :lol2:

I'm in one of the richest parts of Surrey. Everyone's either retired and rich, so they're sleeping, or working and rich, so they're working. And then there's me, who has a flexible schedule.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Teemant
Senator
 
Posts: 4130
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Teemant » Thu May 07, 2015 1:50 am

Steamtopia wrote:
Teemant wrote:
Because they are working people. :lol2:

I'm in one of the richest parts of Surrey. Everyone's either retired and rich, so they're sleeping, or working and rich, so they're working. And then there's me, who has a flexible schedule.


How much turnout will be there in your opinion? Will it be at least like 60% or how has it been in previous years?
Eesti
Latvija
Lietuva
Polska

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Thu May 07, 2015 1:52 am

Teemant wrote:
Steamtopia wrote:I'm in one of the richest parts of Surrey. Everyone's either retired and rich, so they're sleeping, or working and rich, so they're working. And then there's me, who has a flexible schedule.


How much turnout will be there in your opinion? Will it be at least like 60% or how has it been in previous years?

Turnout is expected to be higher than 2010. By what degree, it's unclear.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Teemant
Senator
 
Posts: 4130
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Teemant » Thu May 07, 2015 1:57 am

Maybe newspapers will reveal exit polls later in the day (if they do these in United Kingdom).

I'm not UK citizen but I wouldn't know who to vote right now. I would support Conservatives but I'm not against EU - I think there might be people in UK with this dilemma. Or people who would support Labour but don't want to be part of EU.
Eesti
Latvija
Lietuva
Polska

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Thu May 07, 2015 1:58 am

Teemant wrote:Maybe newspapers will reveal exit polls later in the day (if they do these in United Kingdom).

After the voting, possibly. Not during.

Teemant wrote:I'm not UK citizen but I wouldn't know who to vote right now. I would support Conservatives but I'm not against EU - I think there might be people in UK with this dilemma. Or people who would support Labour but don't want to be part of EU.

Pro-EU Tories tend to vote Lib Dem. Anti-EU Labourites tend to vote UKIP.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Thu May 07, 2015 2:01 am

Teemant wrote:Maybe newspapers will reveal exit polls later in the day (if they do these in United Kingdom).

I'm not UK citizen but I wouldn't know who to vote right now. I would support Conservatives but I'm not against EU - I think there might be people in UK with this dilemma. Or people who would support Labour but don't want to be part of EU.

Exit polls are revealed at 22:00 in London (17:00 EDT).

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Elejamie, Emotional Support Crocodile, Hekamia, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Neo-Hermitius

Advertisement

Remove ads