No it isn't.
Advertisement
by Dyakovo » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:08 pm
by The Black Forrest » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:10 pm
Amacia wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
It's a business so the same is in play.
It's simple. If there is an open sign, they have to follow the rules.
He said businesses aren't capable of beliefs. A sole proprietorship is. As is a general partnership.
And as I've said for the umpteenth time, at this point RIGHT NOW, the law no longer applies to them.
by Amacia » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:13 pm
by Amacia » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:14 pm
by Neutraligon » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:15 pm
Amacia wrote:Ok, here's the thing. They are (currently) a religious corporation. The law exempts religious corporations. Given these facts, should they be punished.
by Amacia » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:16 pm
by Master Shake » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:16 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Amacia wrote:He said businesses aren't capable of beliefs. A sole proprietorship is. As is a general partnership.
And as I've said for the umpteenth time, at this point RIGHT NOW, the law no longer applies to them.
Yes it does. If they are open to the public, the laws apply to them.
by Master Shake » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:16 pm
Amacia wrote:Ok, here's the thing. They are (currently) a religious corporation. The law exempts religious corporations. Given these facts, should they be punished.
by Neutraligon » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:17 pm
by Amacia » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:17 pm
by Master Shake » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:18 pm
by The Black Forrest » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:22 pm
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:23 pm
Master Shake wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
They were a business, not a church.
Heh...This reminds me of the christian BAKERY/store that wouldn't make a sex cake....
I think they lost their lawsuit too...
EDIT this brings up an interesting point...
Should religious corporations be exempt from laws that govern other corporations?
I say yes...
I wonder what Idaho state law says on this matter....
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Oct 29, 2014 11:48 pm
Master Shake wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
They were a business, not a church.
Heh...This reminds me of the christian BAKERY/store that wouldn't make a sex cake....
I think they lost their lawsuit too...
EDIT this brings up an interesting point...
Should religious corporations be exempt from laws that govern other corporations?
I say yes...
I wonder what Idaho state law says on this matter....
by Master Shake » Wed Oct 29, 2014 11:55 pm
by Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Oct 30, 2014 12:36 am
Master Shake wrote:http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-28206581
I do recall we had a thread on it at NSG, but I can't find it...
by Aahmerica » Thu Oct 30, 2014 12:54 am
by Master Shake » Thu Oct 30, 2014 1:02 am
Aahmerica wrote:In my opinion marriage rights should have never been the government's business.
Marriage is a religious construct right? Seperation of church and state and all that.
I think they should be allowed to practice what they want, not be forced by the government.
I could be wrong.
by The Rich Port » Thu Oct 30, 2014 5:20 am
Amacia wrote:Ok, here's the thing. They are (currently) a religious corporation. The law exempts religious corporations. Given these facts, should they be punished.
by Dyakovo » Thu Oct 30, 2014 6:35 am
by Dyakovo » Thu Oct 30, 2014 6:37 am
Master Shake wrote:Should religious corporations be exempt from laws that govern other corporations?
by Dyakovo » Thu Oct 30, 2014 6:40 am
Aahmerica wrote:In my opinion marriage rights should have never been the government's business.
Marriage is a religious construct right? Seperation of church and state and all that.
I think they should be allowed to practice what they want, not be forced by the government.
I could be wrong.
by Neutraligon » Thu Oct 30, 2014 6:41 am
Aahmerica wrote:In my opinion marriage rights should have never been the government's business.
Marriage is a religious construct right? Seperation of church and state and all that.
I think they should be allowed to practice what they want, not be forced by the government.
I could be wrong.
by The Rich Port » Thu Oct 30, 2014 8:58 am
Aahmerica wrote:In my opinion marriage rights should have never been the government's business.
Marriage is a religious construct right? Seperation of church and state and all that.
I think they should be allowed to practice what they want, not be forced by the government.
I could be wrong.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cheblonsk, Duvniask, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Neu California, Pingu 2nd, Spirit of Hope
Advertisement