Britanno wrote:NB has been busy with his elections, so that's why things have moved... well, not moved.
I don't really think it's fair to try to have a vote here while there's a presidential election going on.
Advertisement
by New Bierstaat » Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:26 pm
Britanno wrote:NB has been busy with his elections, so that's why things have moved... well, not moved.
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28
Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.
by The United Colonies of Earth » Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:54 pm
by Britanno » Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:56 pm
by The Nihilistic view » Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:56 pm
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Marcus Jenkins's vote on the Domestic Development package:
An Act for the Establishment of National Honours for Extraordinary Achievements in the Arts- I approve. Aye.
Repeal of the First Amendment to the Limiting Legislation Act- I disapprove. Nay.
Transport Safety Act-I approve. Aye.
Motor Vehicle Licencing and Registration Act-
Sign Language Standardisation Act-
Post-Care Youth Accommodation Act-
Careers Advice 12-18 Year Old Act-
The others I will vote on after I read them.
-Marcus Jenkins, district 120 (independent)
by New Bierstaat » Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:02 pm
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28
Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.
by The United Colonies of Earth » Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:03 pm
by The Nihilistic view » Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:04 pm
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Oh. Well then, when will there be a vote in the chamber, when we have a new President?
by The Licentian Isles » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:41 pm
by Costa Alegria » Tue Nov 19, 2013 9:06 pm
Railway Operations and Regulations Act
Category: Domestic Development
Urgency: None
Drafted By: Michael Blumenthal (NDP)
Sponsors: Minarchist States (LP), Coronea (Reform), Dangelia (CMP), Divitaen (CMP)
RECOGNISING: The attempts made by the Railways Act to regulate the railways network and ensure safe operation of said railways.
NOTING: That whilst the Railways Act was made with good intentions, it was inadequate and did not cover all aspects of rail transportation in Aurentina.
HEREBY: Repeals the Railways Act and passes the Railway Operations and Regulations Act.
Article 1: On Infrastructure
1a: Hereby mandates that all public railways are to retain the 1435mm ( international standard) gauge lines and that all rolling stock intended to operate on public lines must be compatible.
1b: Adopts the British system of railway signalling and rules regarding signalling.
1c: Mandates that British standard visual signals are to be maintained on all public lines and replaced when necessary.
1d: Mandates that level crossings in urban areas have the following:1e: Mandates that level crossings in rural areas have the following:
- Road markings indicating a level crossing
- Road signs indicating a level crossing
- Audible warning sirens which are to be standardised
- Visual warnings such as flashing lights
- Automatic barriers
- Road markings indicating a level crossing
- Road signs indicating a level crossing
- Audible or visual warnings
- Stop sign
1f: All speed limit signs are to be displayed on yellow signs with black characters and numerals.
1g: All public rail infrastructure is to be maintained and owned by the government under a subsidiary created and owned by the Ministry of Transport.
1h: All train stations are to be owned jointly by the Ministry of Transport and local city and district councils.
1i: City councils may construct control rooms to handle commuter, passenger and freight traffic on all rail lines within the council's territory.
1j: All rail lines are to have a 25 KV AC overhead electric rail traction system as standard.
1k: All companies operating services on public lines must pay a set amount of profits annually to the government for the maintenance of the public rail system.
Article 2: On Operation
2a: All commuter rail trains must not exceed posted speed limits and are limited to a top speed of 110km/h.
2b: All inter-city passenger and freight trains must not exceed 160km/h.
2c: All high-speed train sets must not exceed 320km/h or their safe operating speed, whichever comes first.
2d: Failure to abide by the speed limit will result in an immediate £1,500 fine plus an additional £100 per kilometre over the posted limit.
2e: All train drivers must be appropriately licenced. Failure to abide by this will result in an immediate suspension and a fine against the operating company of £5,000.
2f: All train companies must ensure that their employees are not operating train services under the influence of drugs or other substances. To do so whilst under the influence is illegal and is punishable by immediate suspension and a fine of £5,000 against the company.
2g: Hereby deregulates the railway network to allow private companies to begin operations.
2h: Mandates that Aurail must be retained as a state-owned enterprise.
2i: Declares the following to be necessary for operation in Aurentina:2j: Allows city councils to contract commuter rail services to private or public companies and to use rates collected to subsidise commuter rail services.
- A minimum of £15 million as an initial investment to acquire rolling stock, locomotives and employees.
- An appropriate licence for the type of service the company wishes to engage in.
- Have already well established rail services in another country.
Article 3: On Heritage Rail
3a: Allows heritage rail societies to purchase disused rail locomotives, rolling stock and rail line sections fron Aurail or other companies in order to begin operations.
3b: All drivers registered with a heritage rail society must be resgistered as any other train driver.
3c: All trains on pirvate lines must abide by speed limits on public lines where posted.
3d: All trains on public lines must abide by the same laws as commerical trains.
by The United Colonies of Earth » Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:20 pm
by The Nihilistic view » Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:22 pm
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Has debate restarted or are we moving to a fifth NSG Senate chamber?
by New Bierstaat » Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:23 pm
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Has debate restarted or are we moving to a fifth NSG Senate chamber?
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28
Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.
by The United Colonies of Earth » Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:34 pm
by President Pro-Tempore of the Senate » Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:25 am
by President Pro-Tempore of the Senate » Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:28 am
by Next Washington » Thu Nov 21, 2013 9:40 am
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX |
by President Pro-Tempore of the Senate » Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:27 am
Next Washington wrote:Section A
- An Act for the Establishment of National Honours for Extraordinary Achievements in the Arts - waste of money
- Repeal of the First Amendment to the Limiting Legislation Act -
- Transport Safety Act - a ship in my eyes needs an engine , bus: define "many" seats (is a van with 8 seats a bus?), altogether: overregulation, not really needed in my eyes
- National Motor Vehicle Licencing and Registration Act - as i read the MVRA: " Administration shall be vested in a roading agency upon its creation or controlled directly by the Ministry of Transport as outlined in Article 1c. " -> 1c: "1c: The Ministry of Transport shall administer all government bodies that are not administered by relevant government agencies. " so why do do we need a new law?
- Post-Care Youth Accommodation Act - Accomodation is not defined... where's the ALHC when you need it?
- Careers Advice 12-18 Year Old Act - 12-18 years... so if someone has to repeat one class and he's 19 he doesn't get advice anymore
[i want the johnson trophy ]
by Next Washington » Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:35 am
President Pro-Tempore of the Senate wrote:Next Washington wrote:Section A
- An Act for the Establishment of National Honours for Extraordinary Achievements in the Arts - waste of money
- Repeal of the First Amendment to the Limiting Legislation Act -
- Transport Safety Act - a ship in my eyes needs an engine , bus: define "many" seats (is a van with 8 seats a bus?), altogether: overregulation, not really needed in my eyes
- National Motor Vehicle Licencing and Registration Act - as i read the MVRA: " Administration shall be vested in a roading agency upon its creation or controlled directly by the Ministry of Transport as outlined in Article 1c. " -> 1c: "1c: The Ministry of Transport shall administer all government bodies that are not administered by relevant government agencies. " so why do do we need a new law?
- Post-Care Youth Accommodation Act - Accomodation is not defined... where's the ALHC when you need it?
- Careers Advice 12-18 Year Old Act - 12-18 years... so if someone has to repeat one class and he's 19 he doesn't get advice anymore
[i want the johnson trophy ]
You will need better critical analysis if you wish to obtain the Johnson Trophy.
Why senator do you believe that *insert mouthful of a bill name about The Arts* is a waste of money?
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX |
by Minarchist States » Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:45 am
by President Pro-Tempore of the Senate » Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:48 am
Next Washington wrote:President Pro-Tempore of the Senate wrote:
You will need better critical analysis if you wish to obtain the Johnson Trophy.
Why senator do you believe that *insert mouthful of a bill name about The Arts* is a waste of money?
you really believe i want your price? [i don't drink, so i couldn't use the champagne]
well, why should the gov pay a poet? i mean, a photographer, ok, a pr-manager, ok, but a poet?
and why a states chronicler? there are hundreds of private historian who wrote national chronicles, tons of tv shows and articles about aurentina history, so leave that to the private sector
btw if you wanna discuss use your nv account, the sppt should only announce and call votes
by The Licentian Isles » Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:57 am
Next Washington wrote:President Pro-Tempore of the Senate wrote:
You will need better critical analysis if you wish to obtain the Johnson Trophy.
Why senator do you believe that *insert mouthful of a bill name about The Arts* is a waste of money?
you really believe i want your price? [i don't drink, so i couldn't use the champagne]
well, why should the gov pay a poet? i mean, a photographer, ok, a pr-manager, ok, but a poet?
and why a states chronicler? there are hundreds of private historian who wrote national chronicles, tons of tv shows and articles about aurentina history, so leave that to the private sector
btw if you wanna discuss use your nv account, the sppt should only announce and call votes
by Next Washington » Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:59 am
President Pro-Tempore of the Senate wrote:Next Washington wrote:
you really believe i want your price? [i don't drink, so i couldn't use the champagne]
well, why should the gov pay a poet? i mean, a photographer, ok, a pr-manager, ok, but a poet?
and why a states chronicler? there are hundreds of private historian who wrote national chronicles, tons of tv shows and articles about aurentina history, so leave that to the private sector
btw if you wanna discuss use your nv account, the sppt should only announce and call votes
Interesting point's, Whilst the author of the bill does not seem to be present today I am sure there must be those who support the bill. Who may also wish to speak on his behalf as to why they believe this bill should be supported by the senate.
btw I am asking questions to facilitate discussion not discussing or giving my own opinions, I am trying to get senators to say more than "waste of money" when talking about a bill Mkay. Just as many "speakers" do around the world. I presume you can recognize this difference sir?
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX |
by Next Washington » Thu Nov 21, 2013 11:01 am
The Licentian Isles wrote:Next Washington wrote:
you really believe i want your price? [i don't drink, so i couldn't use the champagne]
well, why should the gov pay a poet? i mean, a photographer, ok, a pr-manager, ok, but a poet?
and why a states chronicler? there are hundreds of private historian who wrote national chronicles, tons of tv shows and articles about aurentina history, so leave that to the private sector
btw if you wanna discuss use your nv account, the sppt should only announce and call votes
The arts aren't a waste of money. They have inspired millions of people around the world into doing something different, and to find a career for themselves. If it wasn't for people telling me to have a go at acting and music, I would never have been confident enough to say my name to the Chamber, never mind make comments challenging people. The arts inspire; we need to put funding behind that.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX |
by The Licentian Isles » Thu Nov 21, 2013 11:11 am
Next Washington wrote:The Licentian Isles wrote:
The arts aren't a waste of money. They have inspired millions of people around the world into doing something different, and to find a career for themselves. If it wasn't for people telling me to have a go at acting and music, I would never have been confident enough to say my name to the Chamber, never mind make comments challenging people. The arts inspire; we need to put funding behind that.
if arts inspire people, ok, but artists should earn their own money and participate, like every other form of entrepreneur, in the private sector, and not be indirectly subsidized by the gov by paying a poet and chronologist
by President Pro-Tempore of the Senate » Thu Nov 21, 2013 11:15 am
Next Washington wrote:President Pro-Tempore of the Senate wrote:
Interesting point's, Whilst the author of the bill does not seem to be present today I am sure there must be those who support the bill. Who may also wish to speak on his behalf as to why they believe this bill should be supported by the senate.
btw I am asking questions to facilitate discussion not discussing or giving my own opinions, I am trying to get senators to say more than "waste of money" when talking about a bill Mkay. Just as many "speakers" do around the world. I presume you can recognize this difference sir?
i have no problem with the fact that there are those who'll support this bill, that's called democracy , and i support the idea
nevertheless discussion means that different opinions come together and, in the best case, lift the overall satisfaction with the idea by a multipartisan agreement
Noble position that you wanna "ignitiate" discussion, but the old sppt didn't do it, and i don't think it'd be your job, although i don#t wanna question the way you execute your job, so keep asking
btw: as sppt i hope you know what's going on with the alhc... ainin somehow refused to form it, what will this gov do so mistakes, eg the (in my eyes) misdecription of ship, won't happen again?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement