Advertisement
by FreeOlesia » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:26 pm
by Ainin » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:27 pm
Venaleria wrote:This does not include Distruzio or Regnum's votes, as I am unclear to their meanings.
by Venaleria » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:31 pm
by Costa Alegria » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:34 pm
Kamchastkia wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:
It does not in any way do that.HEREBY recognises the monarch of the Commonwealth realms as the Head of the Commonwealth and accepts the English language as the medium of inter-Commonwealth communication as well as all other Commonwealth norms and conventions.
read the bill you will be amazed, now let's move this to the lobby.
by Venaleria » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:35 pm
Costa Alegria wrote:
Just quickly, Head of the Commonwealth =/= Head of State. You can be a republic without the Queen as the head of state and still be in the Commonwealth (see South Africa and India). The Queen as the head of state only applies to Commonwealth realms which are independently governed nations that still have the Queen as the head of state, i.e Australia, Canada, New Zealand etc.
by Venaleria » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:37 pm
by Phalnia » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:38 pm
by Venaleria » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:40 pm
by The Soviet Russian Empire » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:46 pm
by Venaleria » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:48 pm
by Venaleria » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:51 pm
First Amendment to the Senate Ethics Act (2013)
Written by: Martin Vebussy [RG] | Urgency: Medium-High | Category: Senate Procedures
Sponsors: Alexander Ainin [TR/VP] Dragomere [NASA] Wulukuno Maklohi Porunalakai [LD/DPM] Tom Jenkins [RG] Simonia [MSP]
APPLAUDING the overall motive of the Senate Ethics Act (2013)
BELIEVING the said act to nevertheless have faults which were not anticipated previously
NOTING some terms to not fully detail certain rules of the Senate and with that fact, the tendency of some Senators to not wrongfully violate unsaid rules and regulations of the Senate
Defines,
Advertising- the senatorial act or practice of calling public attention to one's party, candidacy, or senate announcement
Hereby enacts the following:
A.) Clause 2 shall be changed to the following,
"All political party, senatorial, election, or promotional advertising shall be prohibited in any NSG Senate threads and must be performed solely through telegram."
B.) Failure to comply with this regulation will result in administrative action, with the following penalties:
1st Offense- Warning
2nd Offense- Final Warning
3rd Offense- Appropriated Action by Administrators
The Senate of Aurentina hereby passes the First Amendment to the Senate Ethics Act (2013).
- Code: Select all
[box][align=center][size=150][b]First Amendment to the Senate Ethics Act (2013)[/b][/size]
[size=125]Written by: Venaleria | Urgency: Medium-High
Sponsors:[/size][/align]
[b]APPLAUDING[/b] the overall motive of the Senate Ethics Act (2013)
[b]BELIEVING[/b] the said act to nevertheless have faults which were not anticipated previously
[b]NOTING[/b] some terms to not fully detail certain rules of the Senate and with that fact, the tendency of some Senators to not wrongfully violate unsaid rules and regulations of the Senate
Defines,
Advertising- [i]the senatorial act or practice of calling public attention to one's party, candidacy, or senate announcement [/i]
Hereby enacts the following:
A.) Clause 2 shall be changed to the following,
[i]"All political party, senatorial, election, or promotional advertising shall be prohibited in any NSG Senate threads and must be performed solely through advertising."[/i]
[b]The Senate of Aurentina hereby passes the First Amendment to the Senate Ethics Act (2013).[/b][/box]
by Katepano » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:26 pm
by Ainin » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:31 pm
Termination of Loopholes and Judicial System Improvement Act | Urgency: Utmost | Author: Ainin [TR] | SIMBEDS Category: Senatorial Procedures
Sponsors: Geilinor [LD], The Nihilistic View [NLP], CTALNH [SAP], Belmaria [LCP]
Whereas we acknowledge the unjust and undemocratic attempts to deprive persons of their law-given rights and freedoms through the exploitation of loopholes in legislation,
Whereas we also acknowledge the fact that under current legislative circumstances
Whereas these are problems that must immediately be resolved,
The Aurentine Senate enacts the following sections into law:
Section I - On the Termination of Loopholes and Judicial System Improvement Act
1. Rights and freedoms are defined as law-given protections to individuals and organized groups thereof against maltreatment and injustice.
2. Reasonable person is defined as an adult person not affected by any mental or physical disabilities impeding rational thought, to be further determined by the judge(s) involved in a case in which this definition is invoked.
3. Any attempts to interpret this law in a manner in which the protections are rendered incapacitated or invalid, as determined by a panel of judges considering interpretation of the offending action in the eyes of a reasonable person, is conspiracy to deprive an individual of rights, a derelict.
4. Significant other is defined as any person who has great importance to an individual's life or well-being.
Section II - Second Amendment to the Judicial Act
1. The following clause shall be added to the Judicial Act.
13b. All references to "euros", in both singular and plural form, as well as to the symbol "€" and closely resembling derivatives thereof, are interpreted to be to the currency used by the European Union, and no other currency sharing its name or symbol.
2. Violations of Judicial Act Clause 13b is considered fraud.
Section III - Reasonable Acquittal
1. The following are deemed to be reasonable grounds for acquittal [1a-1c, 1e] or a reduced sentence [1d, 1f] from a court of law if proven beyond reasonable doubt.1a. Self-defence: Self-defence is the use of reasonable and measured force against an aggressor who may be interpreted by a reasonable person as putting the life of the person, his family or his significant other in imminent danger.
As an example to base rulings on is the following: The use of a firearm to defend from an armed robbery in which the life of the person in question was in imminent theft is self-defence. Shooting an unarmed thief running away with your goods is not.
1b. Good Samaritan: A Good Samaritan, for the purpose of this act, is a person who unknowingly causes harm to a person while attempting to offer reasonable assistance to those who are injured, ill, in peril, or otherwise incapacitated.
1c. Defence of property: Defence of property is the usage of nonlethal force to stop an attempt to trespass on or otherwise violate one's property.
1d. Necessity: Necessity is defined for the purpose of this act as the commitment of a crime to escape a situation in which one's life is in imminent danger.
1e. False confession: A false confession is a confession forced by law enforcement through blackmail or other forms of coercion in which the confessor is not determined to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
1f. Automatism: Automatism is defined as a crime committed in which the suspect is determined not to have been in control of his mental capabilities, such as sleepwalking. This may not be interpreted to include the side-effects of the willful consumption of alcohol, tobacco and other recreational drugs.
by Ceroulia » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:17 pm
by Oneracon » Thu Sep 12, 2013 6:12 am
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by Pesda » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:45 am
by Belmaria » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:12 am
by Osea 767 » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:18 am
by The IASM » Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:33 am
by Agritum » Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:46 am
by Old Tyrannia » Thu Sep 12, 2013 1:31 pm
by Senate President pro Tempore » Thu Sep 12, 2013 1:49 pm
by Senate President pro Tempore » Thu Sep 12, 2013 1:51 pm
by Senate President pro Tempore » Thu Sep 12, 2013 2:00 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:How long left to vote?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement