by The Grand Imperium of Man » Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:55 am
by Khadgar » Fri Mar 08, 2013 12:00 pm
by Blazedtown » Fri Mar 08, 2013 12:37 pm
Genivaria wrote:What do YOU think?
And the world says no.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_Space_Treaty
by Sidhae » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:23 pm
by Ainin » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:29 pm
Blazedtown wrote:Genivaria wrote:What do YOU think?
And the world says no.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_Space_Treaty
The world also said that you can;t built aircraft carriers that displace more than 27,000 tons but the US has 10 carriers over 100,000 tons and 9 amphibious assault ships over 40,000 tons.
Treaties can be broken, international law is just words if there is nothing to back it up. The outer space treaty is obsolete and needs to be scrapped.
by Magnusia » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:31 pm
by The Corparation » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:33 pm
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Blazedtown » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:33 pm
Ainin wrote:Blazedtown wrote:
The world also said that you can;t built aircraft carriers that displace more than 27,000 tons but the US has 10 carriers over 100,000 tons and 9 amphibious assault ships over 40,000 tons.
Treaties can be broken, international law is just words if there is nothing to back it up. The outer space treaty is obsolete and needs to be scrapped.
[citation needed]
Not that I'm saying it's wrong, but source?
by Samozaryadnyastan » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:37 pm
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Oceara » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:37 pm
Genivaria wrote:What do YOU think?
And the world says no.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_Space_Treaty
by Priory Academy USSR » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:43 pm
by Desperate Measures » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:44 pm
by Saiwania » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:57 pm
by Ainin » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:00 pm
Saiwania wrote:I think it is a good idea. The US needs to stick it to the Russians and the Chinese and build an ABM system so powerful as to make all of their ICBMs obsolete. Preferably it would enable the US to nuke them, but they wouldn't be able to nuke back. A world in which the US is the only superpower is one I'd like to enable again.
by Blazedtown » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:10 pm
Ainin wrote:Saiwania wrote:I think it is a good idea. The US needs to stick it to the Russians and the Chinese and build an ABM system so powerful as to make all of their ICBMs obsolete. Preferably it would enable the US to nuke them, but they wouldn't be able to nuke back. A world in which the US is the only superpower is one I'd like to enable again.
*sigh* People just don't get it...
No nukes in space
No nukes in space
No nukes in space
by Tyrants » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:13 pm
Blazedtown wrote:
Treaties are only useful if they can be enforced.
Those agreements are outdated and need to be abandoned.
by Blazedtown » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:19 pm
Tyrants wrote:Blazedtown wrote:
Treaties are only useful if they can be enforced.
Those agreements are outdated and need to be abandoned.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_heritage_of_mankind
by Priory Academy USSR » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:37 pm
Blazedtown wrote:
If we aided by those treaties forever we will never leave this rock. We need to truly open up the final frontier.
by Tyrants » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:40 pm
Blazedtown wrote:
If we aided by those treaties forever we will never leave this rock. We need to truly open up the final frontier.
by Blazedtown » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:47 pm
Tyrants wrote:Blazedtown wrote:
If we aided by those treaties forever we will never leave this rock. We need to truly open up the final frontier.
Blowing up space won't help.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_A119
by Ainin » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:49 pm
Blazedtown wrote:
We left the planet because we were blowing shit up. Without the V-2, and other early ballistic missiles, we would have never had the Saturn V. By not allowing military bases in space, we are hamstringing ourselves. If we would put the space program back under military control and never let Space Station Freedom turn into the ISS we would be decades ahead of where we are now. What would be better for mankind, one space station run by all of us or if we had a space station from Europe, Russia, China, Japan, and anyone else that wants one. The ISS was the biggest mistake NASA has ever been involved with.
by Blazedtown » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:52 pm
Ainin wrote:Blazedtown wrote:
We left the planet because we were blowing shit up. Without the V-2, and other early ballistic missiles, we would have never had the Saturn V. By not allowing military bases in space, we are hamstringing ourselves. If we would put the space program back under military control and never let Space Station Freedom turn into the ISS we would be decades ahead of where we are now. What would be better for mankind, one space station run by all of us or if we had a space station from Europe, Russia, China, Japan, and anyone else that wants one. The ISS was the biggest mistake NASA has ever been involved with.
[citation needed that this marvel of science is a bad idea]
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Bracadun, Faisol, Franovia, Google [Bot], Homalia, Ineva, La Xinga, Likhinia, Neanderthaland, Neo-Hermitius, Neu California, Nivosea, Panagouge, Polanas, Port Carverton, Saiwana, San Lumen, Shrillland, Tiami
Advertisement