Looks like this:
I am guessing tat is what it is supposed to be.
Advertisement
by United States of Raptors » Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:29 pm
The Archregimancy wrote:I only have one:
That most people in NSG actually know that much about history/archaeology in the first place.
by Risen Britannia » Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:43 pm
Grand Britannia wrote:So, how do you make it so symmetrical? Do you make one side, copy it, and flip it to make the other?
Lineart:Risen Britannia is no longer my main nation, if you have any questions please TG Novorden.
Old showroom and requests
New showroom
by Saurisisia » Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:48 pm
by Velkanika » Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:29 pm
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1
by Hurtful Thoughts » Fri Dec 28, 2012 12:30 pm
United States of Raptors wrote:Just about every Ace Combat Super Fighter ever? Yeah, OWN IT!
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:If there was only a "like" button for NS posts....
by -the Ukrainian SSR- » Fri Dec 28, 2012 12:52 pm
Velkanika wrote:I just spotted this off of a Wikipedia link and figured you fellas might appreciate this as much as I do:(Image)
Count those Adders. Also, I hear it has two auxiliary bays in the wings for two Archers and that those main bays can fit two Arrows each. All it needs is a NATO reporting name and it's a big boy.
by The Kievan People » Fri Dec 28, 2012 12:59 pm
Velkanika wrote:I just spotted this off of a Wikipedia link and figured you fellas might appreciate this as much as I do:(Image)
Count those Adders. Also, I hear it has two auxiliary bays in the wings for two Archers and that those main bays can fit two Arrows each. All it needs is a NATO reporting name and it's a big boy.
by Velkanika » Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:35 pm
-The Ukrainian SSR- wrote:That's...something from Sukhoi I'm pretty sure and therefore more than likely already has a NATO reporting name because the West can't just go "Oh look, it's a *insert Russian designation here*"
The Kievan People wrote:If you followed the pre-release speculation, this is actually a disappointing load .
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1
by The Corparation » Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:36 pm
Velkanika wrote:-The Ukrainian SSR- wrote:That's...something from Sukhoi I'm pretty sure and therefore more than likely already has a NATO reporting name because the West can't just go "Oh look, it's a *insert Russian designation here*"
The Sukhoi T-50 PAK-FA still does not have a NATO reporting name. I find that rather odd, as most other fighters have had a reporting name by this point in their development cycle.
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by The Zeonic States » Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:11 pm
The Corparation wrote:Velkanika wrote:
The Sukhoi T-50 PAK-FA still does not have a NATO reporting name. I find that rather odd, as most other fighters have had a reporting name by this point in their development cycle.
This is a big issue. Clearly the Obama Administration needs to push NATO in this matter.My personal vote is for "Fuck" as in "Fuck they've started catching up to us."
by Imperial isa » Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:44 am
The Corparation wrote:Velkanika wrote:
The Sukhoi T-50 PAK-FA still does not have a NATO reporting name. I find that rather odd, as most other fighters have had a reporting name by this point in their development cycle.
This is a big issue. Clearly the Obama Administration needs to push NATO in this matter.My personal vote is for "Fuck" as in "Fuck they've started catching up to us."
by Hurtful Thoughts » Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:15 pm
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:If there was only a "like" button for NS posts....
by United States of Raptors » Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:20 pm
The Archregimancy wrote:I only have one:
That most people in NSG actually know that much about history/archaeology in the first place.
by Hurtful Thoughts » Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:28 pm
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:If there was only a "like" button for NS posts....
by Arkinesia » Sat Dec 29, 2012 6:46 pm
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
by Risen Britannia » Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:47 pm
Lineart:Risen Britannia is no longer my main nation, if you have any questions please TG Novorden.
Old showroom and requests
New showroom
by Amerikians » Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:49 pm
by Risen Britannia » Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:08 pm
Amerikians wrote:So pretty.
Lineart:Risen Britannia is no longer my main nation, if you have any questions please TG Novorden.
Old showroom and requests
New showroom
by Rupudska » Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:16 pm
Arkinesia wrote:The Arkinesian Confederate Air Force uses several domestically-developed types.
Formation of prototype aircraft from left to right: F-14E Block II “Ultracat,” F-59A Sabre II, F-56A Magnum. Some aircraft employing decoy US markings. F-56A and F-14E are air superiority fighters (though the F-14E is used in strike roles as well). F-59A is used as a multirole.
A-62 “Mule” attacker. EA-62 pictured.
C-27 “Pegasus” is the primary transport of the ACAF.
The RB-7A “Phoenix” is the primary bomber of the ACAF. B-70 is still sometimes used.
The ACAF possesses a small number of superheavy-lift C-50 transports.
The most common multirole in ACAF service is the F-48A “Sparrow” variant.
Images and names used with permission from Venom800TT.
Hladgos wrote:Scantly clad women, more like tanks
seem to be blowing up everyones banks
with airstrikes from girls with wings to their knees
which show a bit more than just their panties
by Leasath Republics » Mon Jan 14, 2013 5:18 pm
by New Nassrau » Mon Jan 14, 2013 5:33 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Lignuntia
Advertisement