[Report] Signature Related (reports and mods only)

by **Shazbotdom** » Sun Jul 06, 2014 11:42 pm

Aren't phrases like "lolbertarians" banned (within the "likes and dislikes" spoiler, for reference)?

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=466948

by **The Risen Jaguar Warriors** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 3:01 am

Nine...

by **Ardoki** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 3:56 pm

Shazbotdom wrote:Aren't phrases like "lolbertarians" banned (within the "likes and dislikes" spoiler, for reference)?

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=466948

It was merely a joke. I didn't intend for it to be mean, or a flame.

This is like the fifth time I've been warned (or in some cases banned) for just making innocent jokes, which are taken as flaming or trolling by some.

by **Frisbeeteria** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:01 pm

Ardoki wrote:This is like the fifth time I've been warned (or in some cases banned) for just making innocent jokes, which are taken as flaming or trolling by some.

You'd think that after the first two or three you might see a pattern, and perhaps pay more attention to site rules. I'm not seeing this as OUR failure.

by **Ardoki** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:11 pm

Frisbeeteria wrote:
Ardoki wrote:This is like the fifth time I've been warned (or in some cases banned) for just making innocent jokes, which are taken as flaming or trolling by some.

You'd think that after the first two or three you might see a pattern, and perhaps pay more attention to site rules. I'm not seeing this as OUR failure.

I didn't have bad intentions, I often have trouble understanding or predicting the emotions and reactions of other humans, I can't really relate to them.

by **Ardoki** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:20 pm

I couldn't fine anything in the rules thread, which said that attacking ideologies is prohibited or a rule violation.

by **Frisbeeteria** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:50 pm

Ardoki wrote:I couldn't fine anything in the rules thread, which said that attacking ideologies is prohibited or a rule violation.

Apparently the specific phrasing was left out of the latest iteration OSRS. There is, however, at least five years of precedent that it's considered trolling or flamebaiting to use "diminutive political names".

by **Ardoki** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:56 pm

Frisbeeteria wrote:
Ardoki wrote:I couldn't fine anything in the rules thread, which said that attacking ideologies is prohibited or a rule violation.

Apparently the specific phrasing was left out of the latest iteration OSRS. There is, however, at least five years of precedent that it's considered trolling or flamebaiting to use "diminutive political names".

Okay. Sorry, I won't do it again.

I didn't mean any offence with it at all, though I can now understand that some people may have thought of that as offensive.

by **Maltropia** » Tue Jul 08, 2014 2:47 am

Bit long.

by **District XIV** » Tue Jul 08, 2014 2:20 pm

A lot.

by **Grand Eurasian Union** » Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:29 pm

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=444293
I think this is over the limit...

by **Maltropia** » Wed Jul 09, 2014 2:38 am

9 or 10. Not sure if the last blank line there is part of it or not.

by **The Risen Jaguar Warriors** » Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:07 am

At LEAST 10

by **The Risen Jaguar Warriors** » Wed Jul 09, 2014 5:54 pm

by **Greater Terrania (Ancient)** » Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:44 pm

http://forum.nationstates.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=521127

by **Frisbeeteria** » Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:36 pm

Up to date.

by **The Saint James Islands** » Thu Jul 10, 2014 12:40 am

Looks like 9.5

by **Union of Sovereign Socialist Republics** » Thu Jul 10, 2014 4:25 am

http://forum.nationstates.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=534830
Pretty sure "Eat shit and die" isn't allowed.

by **MERIZoC** » Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:49 am

Holy giant signatures, Batman!
http://forum.nationstates.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=536246

by **Kannap** » Thu Jul 10, 2014 4:40 pm

Tuva's sig shows as 22 lines on my monitor. I may be horrible at math but I am certain that is more than 8.

by **Shazbotdom** » Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:00 pm

Kannap wrote:Tuva's sig shows as 22 lines on my monitor. I may be horrible at math but I am certain that is more than 8.

Seems like he has a problem with his bbCode. That or too much text that made his sig go over the limit.

by **Frisbeeteria** » Thu Jul 10, 2014 7:14 pm

Shazbotdom wrote:Seems like he has a problem with his bbCode.

There's a "Disable BBCode" checkbox under Options that they checked for reasons unknown. Unchecking that yields an entirely legal sig.

by **The Risen Jaguar Warriors** » Fri Jul 11, 2014 2:20 am

by **District XIV** » Fri Jul 11, 2014 2:10 pm

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=344327

edit: Same guy that Merizoc reported edited his sig back to over the limit:

Merizoc wrote:Holy giant signatures, Batman!
http://forum.nationstates.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=536246

by **Frisbeeteria** » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:49 pm

Caught up.

[Report] Signature Related (reports and mods only)

Who is online