Advertisement
by Alevuss » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:10 pm
by Reploid Productions » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:33 pm
Arborlawn wrote:I am not sure about you, but I have felt that Mods have been abusing their powers in many areas. I feel that there is too much left to the discretion of certain Mods, rather than a uniform set of rules, which is plenty of room for abuse and corruption. Please, explain your thoughts, what your criteria is to be a Mod, what the rules should be, and what areas a Mod should have jurisdiction over. Nobody should feel that Mods are abusing their power, never, not even sometimes.
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Jari Head » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:40 pm
Rokartian States wrote:Der Teutoniker wrote:
We get a lot of people with their asshat's on. Because of the oft-politically charged environment there can be a lot of tension, and trolls, which can lead to flaming. Plus, a lot of people on the internet are just douches. Also "a lot" is two words.
The plural of 'asshat' is 'asshats', not 'asshat's'.
by Katganistan » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:47 pm
by Jari Head » Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:01 pm
Katganistan wrote:Jari Head wrote:The actions of asshats is known as asshatery and the medical term is Crainal Rectal Insertion (CRI)
[English teacher]Speaking from a grammatical point of reference, asshatery would, logically speaking, be the hatred of asses. Asshattery would be the actions of asshats.[/English Teacher, fading into background]
by Anagonia » Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:20 pm
by Nazi Flower Power » Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:21 pm
by Grenartia » Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:25 pm
Arborlawn wrote:I am not sure about you, but I have felt that Mods have been abusing their powers in many areas. I feel that there is too much left to the discretion of certain Mods, rather than a uniform set of rules, which is plenty of room for abuse and corruption. Please, explain your thoughts, what your criteria is to be a Mod, what the rules should be, and what areas a Mod should have jurisdiction over. Nobody should feel that Mods are abusing their power, never, not even sometimes.
by Grenartia » Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:32 pm
Bajireyn wrote::palm: not another one of these threads,
If the mods were actually abusing their power, they would've deleted your post, and permabanned you already okay?
by Person012345 » Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:35 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:Every web forum you go to, someone thinks the mods are out to get them or the man is keeping them down. It's pretty pathetic.
by Ardchoille » Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:04 pm
Person012345 wrote:... Obviously the mods love me so much because I'm a random internet person none of them have ever met.
by Nazi Flower Power » Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:46 pm
Person012345 wrote:Obviously the mods love me so much because I'm a random internet person none of them have ever met.
by Holy Marsh » Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:40 pm
by Audentias Gryphus » Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:21 pm
Economic Left/Right: 2.97 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.88 |
by Bluth Corporation » Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:32 pm
Rokartian States wrote:Once in a blue moon and by complete and total accident, sure. Other than that, no. The mods here are some of the finest I've ever seen.
by Ohyesido » Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:52 pm
by Euroslavia » Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:54 pm
Ohyesido wrote:Rules are pretty strict here compared to similar sized forums I've been too. Having a moderation forum for player tattletaleing doesn't really help matters. Also did I mention how humorless they are with their rulings?
by Reploid Productions » Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:56 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:This is simply utter nonsense. In the time I've been here, I have seen moderators:
- Repeatedly use condescending and unprofessional language, even when dealing with people who may have slipped up but obviously meant well
- Issue warnings to people for doing exactly what they told those people to do, and then completely ignore them when that is pointed out
- Give justifications for warnings that not only ignore, but outright falsify the easily-observable facts of what actually happened
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Rokartian States » Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:03 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:Rokartian States wrote:Once in a blue moon and by complete and total accident, sure. Other than that, no. The mods here are some of the finest I've ever seen.
This is simply utter nonsense. In the time I've been here, I have seen moderators:
- Repeatedly use condescending and unprofessional language, even when dealing with people who may have slipped up but obviously meant well
- Issue warnings to people for doing exactly what they told those people to do, and then completely ignore them when that is pointed out
- Give justifications for warnings that not only ignore, but outright falsify the easily-observable facts of what actually happened
Southern United Africa wrote:Say "pray" over and over in quick succession. I dare you.
Jobbla wrote:hey dude my bitch is a mod on this site shes gonna punish you for squealing on me!
Norstal wrote:That is egotistical on so many level. Its like 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon, except theres one 1 degree and its your ego.
Sozut wrote:IT IS DEFINITELY BIRDS!
Sibirsky wrote:The truth is, you ideology has failed, will continue to fail, and is made of fail.
Embrihated Koalas wrote:SO THEIR BALLS ARE INERT
Cnetral america wrote:you have int got the flu soooo long it cagt you up
:geek:
by Mad hatters in jeans » Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:04 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:Rokartian States wrote:Once in a blue moon and by complete and total accident, sure. Other than that, no. The mods here are some of the finest I've ever seen.
This is simply utter nonsense. In the time I've been here, I have seen moderators:
- Repeatedly use condescending and unprofessional language, even when dealing with people who may have slipped up but obviously meant well
- Issue warnings to people for doing exactly what they told those people to do, and then completely ignore them when that is pointed out
- Give justifications for warnings that not only ignore, but outright falsify the easily-observable facts of what actually happened
by Cartavesqa » Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:07 pm
by Nightkill the Emperor » Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:10 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by The Rich Port » Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:11 pm
by The Merchant Republics » Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:12 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: East Chimore, Godular, Nu Elysium, Rammeludia, The Phantom Gambler
Advertisement