NATION

PASSWORD

Loved one, or stranger?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do, or don't?

Rape her.
30
33%
Resist.
7
8%
If I had the proper equipment, I would.
1
1%
Even if I had the proper equipment, I wouldn't.
2
2%
You have creepy dreams, Gallo. See a psychiatrist.
51
56%
 
Total votes : 91

User avatar
Khithali
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 121
Founded: Feb 18, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Khithali » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:32 pm

Well, my first reaction is to look for a third option, but thats not the question, so...

I would not be able to stand seeing my SO being tortured, and would thus do it at some point. How long that would take, I don't know, but I reckon sooner rather than later, as I would be pragmatic enough to realise that it would be better to do so earlier rather than later, as my SO would be tortured less. I'd still hate myself for doing it, but I think overall, it would be the better choice.

And yes Galloism, you do have some sick dreams.

User avatar
Callisdrun
Senator
 
Posts: 4107
Founded: Feb 20, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Callisdrun » Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:32 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Bottle wrote:I find rape more comparable to torture than to murder.

If somebody asks me, would you murder somebody to save your brother? I might say yes. I could probably pull a trigger and shoot another person, if I had to, to save the life of my brother.

But if somebody asked me, would you torture somebody to save your brother? I think I'd have to say no, because I don't honestly think I could do it. I don't think I could torture somebody else.

Oh, and here's a "ladies" view on the OP's situation: if I was the SO, and my (male) SO decided to rape that other woman to "save" me, then I would lose all respect for him and would get away from him as quickly as possible. I would not feel any gratitude, I would not view him as a hero, and I would never remotely consider being involved with him ever again. I'm sure lots of guys will leap to call me an ungrateful bitch for not recognizing his poor, poor plight, and how he was so noble for raping somebody to "save" me because he cared so very much, but I don't see anything noble about torturing.


Someone's definitely not a utilitarian.

And that's perfectly fine. People are different.
Pro: feminism, socialism, environmentalism, LGBT+, sex workers' rights, bdsm, chocolate, communism

Anti: patriarchy, fascism, homophobia, prudes, cilantro, capitalism

User avatar
Callisdrun
Senator
 
Posts: 4107
Founded: Feb 20, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Callisdrun » Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:37 pm

Dyakovo wrote:
Bottle wrote:
Barringtonia wrote:Personally I find rape worse than murder but for me it's because one lives with the effects.

I find rape more comparable to torture than to murder.

If somebody asks me, would you murder somebody to save your brother? I might say yes. I could probably pull a trigger and shoot another person, if I had to, to save the life of my brother.

But if somebody asked me, would you torture somebody to save your brother? I think I'd have to say no, because I don't honestly think I could do it. I don't think I could torture somebody else.

Oh, and here's a "ladies" view on the OP's situation: if I was the SO, and my (male) SO decided to rape that other woman to "save" me, then I would lose all respect for him and would get away from him as quickly as possible. I would not feel any gratitude, I would not view him as a hero, and I would never remotely consider being involved with him ever again. I'm sure lots of guys will leap to call me an ungrateful bitch for not recognizing his poor, poor plight, and how he was so noble for raping somebody to "save" me because he cared so very much, but I don't see anything noble about torturing.

Actually that's what I think my wife's reaction would be. I would still (if as in the hypothetical there was no other choice) choose to rape a stranger to save her.

Indeed. I wouldn't expect to be thanked, nor for the relationship to continue. I care about my girlfriend enough that our relationship ending is preferable to her being indefinitely tortured.

I wouldn't be around long after this anyway.
Pro: feminism, socialism, environmentalism, LGBT+, sex workers' rights, bdsm, chocolate, communism

Anti: patriarchy, fascism, homophobia, prudes, cilantro, capitalism

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Tue Mar 16, 2010 5:08 pm

Ullostien wrote:After reading this I have changed my mind.
I don't think I would actually be able to rape a 15 year old girl even though I am only 16.
When I think about the consequences:
1. Would my SO still want to be with me after what I'd done?
2. Would I be able to live with myself after I'd done it?
But then I wouldn't want my SO to suffer, I'd sacrifice my life to save her's if that was an option.
I'd probably not be able to deal with the situation.

1) Probably (i.e. most likely) not.
2) It depends upon how well you managed to rationalize it.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Tue Mar 16, 2010 5:45 pm

Callisdrun wrote:If my SO was being tortured, I'd do it, because I care about her more than the random girl.

But I'd feel like such a monster that I'd kill myself after.


But if you don't kill yourself, you might get a chance at killing the schmuck who brought this down upon you.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 6:11 pm

Zoharland wrote:
Galloism wrote:A very interesting hypothetical based on a dream I had a few years ago. By the way, I have very interesting dreams. This dream is told from the perspective of a man, and there's no way for me to convert it. You'll just have to make do, ladies.

Let's suppose that someone of infinite moneys and power (or, finite, but enough that you can't match it) has kidnapped you because he likes your DNA profile, and has kidnapped another person that he liked her DNA profile. This powerful person's aim, of course, is for you two to produce a child which then the rich person will take as his own. You are your age, and the girl is ~15.

Here's the kicker. She doesn't want to have sex with you, and she's so idealistic he hasn't been able to barter or threaten her with anything to make her willingly submit. Therefore, you will have to rape her.

As leverage, this rich man has kidnapped your SO, and she will be tortured until you rape this girl and impregnate her (however many times that takes), at which time you and your SO will be released.

So, how will it be - rape the girl and force her to carry your spawn, or watch your loved one suffer?

By the way - this is a hypothetical, and there's no way to escape or otherwise beat it. Either you rape the girl, or you don't.


I'd rape her, If only because my SO would be far more important than some stranger. :?

I mean, the guy is even going to raise the kid after its born, its not like thats not a plus.

The only problem is, does he let her go afterwards. If he did, I'd have to kill her to keep her from going to the proper authorities about it. Oh, and you'd have to keep it from your wife, less see leave you for thinking you a monster.

... :?

1. I doubt you would be prosecuted for that.
2. I'm certainly not going to lie to my SO about something like that. If she left me for it that's her choice.

User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 6:13 pm

Person012345 wrote:
Zoharland wrote:
Galloism wrote:A very interesting hypothetical based on a dream I had a few years ago. By the way, I have very interesting dreams. This dream is told from the perspective of a man, and there's no way for me to convert it. You'll just have to make do, ladies.

Let's suppose that someone of infinite moneys and power (or, finite, but enough that you can't match it) has kidnapped you because he likes your DNA profile, and has kidnapped another person that he liked her DNA profile. This powerful person's aim, of course, is for you two to produce a child which then the rich person will take as his own. You are your age, and the girl is ~15.

Here's the kicker. She doesn't want to have sex with you, and she's so idealistic he hasn't been able to barter or threaten her with anything to make her willingly submit. Therefore, you will have to rape her.

As leverage, this rich man has kidnapped your SO, and she will be tortured until you rape this girl and impregnate her (however many times that takes), at which time you and your SO will be released.

So, how will it be - rape the girl and force her to carry your spawn, or watch your loved one suffer?

By the way - this is a hypothetical, and there's no way to escape or otherwise beat it. Either you rape the girl, or you don't.


I'd rape her, If only because my SO would be far more important than some stranger. :?

I mean, the guy is even going to raise the kid after its born, its not like thats not a plus.

The only problem is, does he let her go afterwards. If he did, I'd have to kill her to keep her from going to the proper authorities about it. Oh, and you'd have to keep it from your wife, less see leave you for thinking you a monster.

... :?

1. I doubt you would be prosecuted for that.
2. I'm certainly not going to lie to my SO about something like that. If she left me for it that's her choice.

1. maybe, probably depends a lot on the jurisdiction, and how much they believe you
2. If she leaves, you're probably better off with out her...
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
Callisdrun
Senator
 
Posts: 4107
Founded: Feb 20, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Callisdrun » Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:41 am

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Callisdrun wrote:If my SO was being tortured, I'd do it, because I care about her more than the random girl.

But I'd feel like such a monster that I'd kill myself after.


But if you don't kill yourself, you might get a chance at killing the schmuck who brought this down upon you.

This is after I kill the evil rich guy.
Pro: feminism, socialism, environmentalism, LGBT+, sex workers' rights, bdsm, chocolate, communism

Anti: patriarchy, fascism, homophobia, prudes, cilantro, capitalism

User avatar
Ermarian
Minister
 
Posts: 2783
Founded: Jan 11, 2004
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ermarian » Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:46 am

Rape her, kill the man and/or free her when the opportunity presents itself, probably kill myself.

My rationale is that even if I resist or managed to kill myself first, the man will find someone else, compounding the overall suffering and not changing the outcome for the girl. Freeing all three of us from the situation, killing the man if necessary, is naturally the first priority, but I would be ready for rape in order to get that opportunity.

In the worst case, I and the hostage are killed immediately once our purpose is fulfilled. In that case, nothing is accomplished by my action except saving the lives of another man and another hostage who might otherwise have been chosen. Possibly, I and the hostage are freed but unable to free the girl, in which case my action also minimized "my" hostage's suffering. In the best case, being freed gives me the opportunity to free the girl too, in which case my choice helped all of us in the long term.

Regardless of either, in the event that I am not able to free both, or in the event that they are unable to forgive my actions, I would likely see no option but to kill myself afterward.
Last edited by Ermarian on Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Endless Empire of Ermarian | Jolt Archives | Encyclopedia Ermariana | ( -6.38 | -8.56 ) | Luna is best pony.
"Without deeper reflection one knows from daily life that one exists for other people - first of all for those upon whose smiles and well-being our own happiness is wholly dependent, and then for the many, unknown to us, to whose destinies we are bound by the ties of sympathy." -Einstein
"Is there a topic for discussion here, or did you just want to be wrong in public?" -Ifreann

User avatar
Alevuss
Senator
 
Posts: 3976
Founded: Jan 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Alevuss » Thu Mar 18, 2010 1:47 pm

There is a third option that results in no deaths, torture, or anything that would bring harm to anyone involved.

Wake up.
Last edited by Alevuss on Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
When life gives you lemons. . . You might as well shove 'em where the sun don't shine, because you sure as hell aren't ever going to see any lemonade.-Rob Thurman
Kalaspia-Shimarata wrote:Man, these Austrians sure don't speak English...

Georgism wrote:Those Australians sure don't speak English...

Aelosia wrote:
Neaglia wrote:There's a whole internet full of porn out there! You guys are wasting the fraction of a penny that these shares have entitled you to

But this is NS related. This is a NS related thing. This is a NS player.
アレヴッ —Alevuss

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: East Leaf Republic, Google [Bot], The Apollonian Systems, The Huskar Social Union, The Lone Alliance

Advertisement

Remove ads