Thank you. I quite enjoy making jokes on this thread.
Advertisement

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Fri Nov 18, 2011 6:57 pm

by Strykyh » Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:31 pm
Zaras wrote:Strykyh wrote:USA
Economic issues:
-Raise taxes on anyone that makes $1,000,000+ to 90%
-Lower Taxes on the middle class and poor to 15%
-Introduce heavy regulations on financial institutions and punish harshly if they don't follow the law
-Encourage free trade
-Make churches pay taxes
-Raise minimum wage significantly
Can't disagree there.Domestic issues:
-Establish a healthcare system based on Britain's NHS
-Legalize all soft and hard drugs drugs. Regulate and tax
-Legalize prostitution. Regulate and tax
-Legalize euthanasia
-Decrease politicians salaries and cut their benefits
-Establish term limits for all elected politicians
-Abolish the Electoral College
-Make all higher education free of charge
-Cut defense spending in half
-Legalize gay marriage
Yes! Except the term limits one. That I don't believe in.-Recognize the Republic of China
Strykyh y u want to piss off China r u rly masochistic


by Palyfious » Fri Nov 18, 2011 8:23 pm
Soxastan wrote:For the USA:
Economic
-Raise taxes to 90% for the higher classes
-Stop supporting manufacturing, increase service industries
-Destroy big banks, reducing from the Big Four to 10 smaller ones.
-Decriminalize Marijuana, impose government regulation
-Invest in new energy (IE wind, solar, tidal, etc)
-Raise taxes on corporations
Domestic
-Reduce military budget
-Increase education and welfare budgets
-Eliminate all parties, parties are now illegal.
-Reduce government corruption
-Limit terms for senators
-Introduce ranked voting method
-Secularize the government, E plurbius unum is the National motto again
-Introduce reforming for criminals, abolish punishment.
-Eliminate death penalty for smaller crimes, death penalty still legal for the most severe crimes
Foreign
-Reduce foreign aid
-Pull out of Afghanistan, Iraq, wherever else.
-Support UN, give them more control

by Zaras » Sat Nov 19, 2011 4:40 am
Palyfious wrote:Soxastan wrote:For the USA:
Economic
-Raise taxes to 90% for the higher classes
-Stop supporting manufacturing, increase service industries
-Destroy big banks, reducing from the Big Four to 10 smaller ones.
-Decriminalize Marijuana, impose government regulation
-Invest in new energy (IE wind, solar, tidal, etc)
-Raise taxes on corporations
Domestic
-Reduce military budget
-Increase education and welfare budgets
-Eliminate all parties, parties are now illegal.
-Reduce government corruption
-Limit terms for senators
-Introduce ranked voting method
-Secularize the government, E plurbius unum is the National motto again
-Introduce reforming for criminals, abolish punishment.
-Eliminate death penalty for smaller crimes, death penalty still legal for the most severe crimes
Foreign
-Reduce foreign aid
-Pull out of Afghanistan, Iraq, wherever else.
-Support UN, give them more control
i would vote for you, but it would arguably be better to legalize, regulate, and tax all drugs. in doing so, you will limit the power of the drug lords by decreasing the value of the drugs. in addition, it would reduce violence and loss of life because the people would not be forced to buy it from illegal sources. the taxes made from the drugs could be used to fix america's crumbling infastructure, or even to fund widespread information programs about the dangers of said drugs.
Bythyrona wrote:Zaras wrote:Democratic People's Republic of Glorious Misty Mountain Hop.
The bat in the middle commemmorates their crushing victory in the bloody Battle of Evermore, where the Communists were saved at the last minute by General "Black Dog" Bonham of the Rock 'n Roll Brigade detonating a levee armed with only four sticks and flooding the enemy encampment. He later retired with honours and went to live in California for the rest of his life before ascending to heaven.
Best post I've seen on NS since I've been here. :clap:

by Kemaliste » Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:52 am
Yanitza wrote:Kemaliste wrote:
Don't take it state political. Yes this problem is over for the state, but not for me personally. And this topic is not about what would we do if we were ruling our country ? so these are my wishes. And yes I'll do my best to make it real if I get the power one day.
And yes, the islands and most of balkan regions majorically consisted of main settlers just because Ottoman Empire never attempted to change the population of the regions expelling, creating fake fires or murdering citizens. Today, there are many '' Turkish immigrants from balkans '' here who were forced to leave their homes or escaped from the chaos at the beginning of 1900s. But balkan people have lived in their own lands since Ottoman rule and they were not touched.
Greek state causes some border violations in Aegea. Some islands that currently belong to us have been captured by Greeks. They put Greek flag there. I can not get angry at them because our government ignores this issue and does nothing. But of course we will give some responses.
Imperialist powers made a '' fait accompli '' in Aegean Islands and Mosul-Kirkuk issues. Those issues should be taken up again imo.
So becuase these area's had minority Turkish populations they should be part of the Turkish state? And I do believe it was not just Turkish settlers who had to flee the Balkans. Plenty of Greeks, Armenians and Jews had to flee from Lnads they had lived for centuries.
If the Balkan peoples lived so peacefully, why would there have been the Nationalist revolts? Many problems in the Balkans. ie Kosovo can be traced to Ottoman times. Part of my family are Greeks who orginated from Izmir but I am not advocating for those area's to become Greek again becuase the population there is Turkish and there would be little point in re igniting a long died conflict in an area as volatile as the Balkans.
I respect the fact that this is your opnion, I am merely discussing it.

by Erendi » Sat Nov 19, 2011 8:21 am

by Yanitza » Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:15 pm

by The Greater Aryan Race » Mon Nov 21, 2011 6:55 am
New England and The Maritimes wrote:What isn't vague and obvious is terrible.
Imperium Sidhicum wrote:So, uh... Is this another one of those threads where everyone is supposed to feel outraged and circle-jerk in agreement of how injust and terrible the described incident is?
Because if it is, I'm probably going to say something mean and contrary just to contradict the majority.

by New England and The Maritimes » Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:01 am
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by The Greater Aryan Race » Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:19 am
Imperium Sidhicum wrote:So, uh... Is this another one of those threads where everyone is supposed to feel outraged and circle-jerk in agreement of how injust and terrible the described incident is?
Because if it is, I'm probably going to say something mean and contrary just to contradict the majority.

by New England and The Maritimes » Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:23 am
The Greater Aryan Race wrote:Unless you have been living in Singapore (which in this case, I must assume you don't), there is a perfectly good reason for my policy of protecting taxi drivers which is this: There has been a recent spate of cases where passengers deliberately avoid paying their fares when their journey is complete or they inflict physical harm on these people. Now there surely is nothing wrong with protecting the rights of these people now is there?
As for my other points on banning and criminalizing homosexuality, I am curious as to why you are singling me out over this matter, there are other supposedly ridiculous proposals being floated around, but why mention me?
Banning opposition political parties is again based on my own personal political convictions. There are plenty of other individuals who also believe in one-party rule.
The death penalty for sex offenders is something which may or may not work but I don't suppose you have a better idea as to clamping down on sexual crimes do you? Then again, I could instead amend it to banning pornography but you're going to lean on me because of that.
The point on the outlawing of the usage of drugs is, I admit, vague at most. I can amend it to include "except for medical use" because the usage of drugs like Cocaine or Heroin for casual use is plain wrong because those things kill.
Bringing in of drugs like Cocaine and Heroin is dangerous because these drugs kill, wreck finances and families as well. Now don't spoon-feed this silly little clap-trap about freedom of choice because I don't buy it. The bringing in of dangerous substances is a crime, plain and simple.
Littering and spitting are uncouth and uncivilised and the current penalties in place are not effectively deterring other people from doing it. So, a change must be facilitated even if it may seem barbaric.
Now I admit that my other proposals may seem vague and ambiguous but I have no intention of writing a HUGE three-page essay. That is for political parties and politicians to do.
Now I don't understand why you have a problem with my proposals, they are simply a representation of my beliefs. Why don't you single out other people for their illogical proposals? If you have a problem then don't visit this panel for goodness sake.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by The Greater Aryan Race » Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:32 am
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Saw yours first. For the record, everyone else who also believes in banning homosexuals etc is a nonce who should feel bad about themselves.
Banning drugs will do nothing but make it more profitable. Don't see why it's your right to tell other people they're not allowed to hurt themselves.
Death penalty for sex offenders will just make most rapes rape-murders.
Banning the opposition results in either revolution or becoming a shit tip a la the eastern bloc/north fucking korea.
I understand fines for littering, but nobody has a right to hit anybody else aside from self defense.
Imperium Sidhicum wrote:So, uh... Is this another one of those threads where everyone is supposed to feel outraged and circle-jerk in agreement of how injust and terrible the described incident is?
Because if it is, I'm probably going to say something mean and contrary just to contradict the majority.

by Euskirribakondara » Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:36 am
Turan Federasyonu wrote:Azerbaijan:
1. Economic issues:
-Diversify the economic sectors.
-Stricter control for the foreign corporations
-High tarrifs for the import and low for the exports
-Privatisation and strong support for the private initiative
2. Internal issues
-Put end to the authoritarian government policies
-Change the presidential system with the parliamentary one.
-Purge in all government structures of former communists
-Modernisation of the army
-War with the corruption
-the religous policies will stay the same
-Making the nationalism official doctrine
3. Foreign politics:
-Strong Anti-armenian, anti-russian and anti-iranian policy.
-Full cooperation and federation with our ethnic brothers
-More active contacts with the European Union and Nato.

by Pirin » Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:38 am

by New England and The Maritimes » Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:42 am
The Greater Aryan Race wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:Saw yours first. For the record, everyone else who also believes in banning homosexuals etc is a nonce who should feel bad about themselves.
Banning drugs will do nothing but make it more profitable. Don't see why it's your right to tell other people they're not allowed to hurt themselves.
Death penalty for sex offenders will just make most rapes rape-murders.
Banning the opposition results in either revolution or becoming a shit tip a la the eastern bloc/north fucking korea.
I understand fines for littering, but nobody has a right to hit anybody else aside from self defense.
Why should we allow other people to hurt themselves? Engaging in such self-destructive acts, and then letting these people kill themselves seems like a huge waste to me.
Then what do you propose? Castration? You talk about the offender but what about the victim?
"Nobody has a right to hit anybody else", Singapore hasn't followed that approach and we're doing just fine.
With regards to your point against banning the opposition, I don't see what's so good about having the vote, hasn't worked out for Haiti or the Ivory Coast.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by The Greater Aryan Race » Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:49 am
New England and The Maritimes wrote:The Greater Aryan Race wrote:
Why should we allow other people to hurt themselves? Engaging in such self-destructive acts, and then letting these people kill themselves seems like a huge waste to me.
Then what do you propose? Castration? You talk about the offender but what about the victim?
"Nobody has a right to hit anybody else", Singapore hasn't followed that approach and we're doing just fine.
With regards to your point against banning the opposition, I don't see what's so good about having the vote, hasn't worked out for Haiti or the Ivory Coast.
Why should you stop them from hurting themselves?
I propose imprisoning them.
Ahuh singapore also has a healthy natural resource sector and that's allowed them to go mental on their population. Not good anyway.
Meanwhile they were both fucked by dictatorships for the past 50 years. That's democracy in action right?
Imperium Sidhicum wrote:So, uh... Is this another one of those threads where everyone is supposed to feel outraged and circle-jerk in agreement of how injust and terrible the described incident is?
Because if it is, I'm probably going to say something mean and contrary just to contradict the majority.

by New England and The Maritimes » Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:52 am
The Greater Aryan Race wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Why should you stop them from hurting themselves?
I propose imprisoning them.
Ahuh singapore also has a healthy natural resource sector and that's allowed them to go mental on their population. Not good anyway.
Meanwhile they were both fucked by dictatorships for the past 50 years. That's democracy in action right?
Why can't I stop them from hurting themselves? Its bad for them. And us, because we are the ones who have to clean up their mess.
Imprisoning? So you are going to expend vital resources on a bunch of sick perverts? Does that bring closure for the victims? I don't think so.
Uh for the record, Singapore has no natural resources, no oil, natural gas etc.
You're asking me? Haiti and the Ivory Coast haven't gotten any better under democracy, they're still pretty messed up.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by The Greater Aryan Race » Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:04 am
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Not really. Families pay for funerals.
Yeah generally when people break the law you lock them up for their safety and the safety of any potential victims, then release them when professionals have declared they are not a risk to public safety.
Fairly sure they have offshore oil. Even then, they're a bunch of dicks who treat people like animals.
Yeah, thanks to continuing political violence and nobody really giving a fuck about them in Ivory Coast's case, and a series of natural disasters followed by the implosion of their economy in Haiti's.
Imperium Sidhicum wrote:So, uh... Is this another one of those threads where everyone is supposed to feel outraged and circle-jerk in agreement of how injust and terrible the described incident is?
Because if it is, I'm probably going to say something mean and contrary just to contradict the majority.

by New England and The Maritimes » Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:34 am
The Greater Aryan Race wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:Not really. Families pay for funerals.
Yeah generally when people break the law you lock them up for their safety and the safety of any potential victims, then release them when professionals have declared they are not a risk to public safety.
Fairly sure they have offshore oil. Even then, they're a bunch of dicks who treat people like animals.
Yeah, thanks to continuing political violence and nobody really giving a fuck about them in Ivory Coast's case, and a series of natural disasters followed by the implosion of their economy in Haiti's.
And therefore, to help their poor families, stop these people from hurting themselves.
And who's to say they won't re-offend again? How can you be so sure that after they are released, they won't commit it again?
I can't help but laugh myself hoarse when I read this: Fairly sure they have offshore oil. No offence but you really need to boost your general knowledge. We have no natural resources, except for people. Yeah these people who "treat people like animals" have ensured that I can walk the streets in the middle of the night without fear of being robbed/raped/beaten. That I can live in a nice clean home. Yeah, I have these people to thank for that.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Schuleriara » Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:38 am
Divair wrote:What do?
Fill in these sections
Economic issues: Meaning the economy, issues relating to the financial system, etc.
Domestic issues: Issues within the country, including the environment and natural resources, the government, religion, personal freedom, etc.
Foreign issues: International or local, your call
I'll go first, representing Israel:
Economic issues:
- Raise taxes on the rich
- Reduce taxes on middle class
- Heavily tax large corporations
- Break up the monopolies that control most of the country's economy to increase competition
- Encourage foreign investment
- Put an end to the limit on what percent of a mortgage banks can pay
- Heavily invest in infrastructure
- Heavily invest in water solutions, eventually cut reliance on the Kineret
- Continue to invest in renewable energy, primarily solar due to Israel's location, and eventually cut reliance on oil
- Begin to research solutions for the lack of space in Israel, propose a possible "2nd floor" of roads and buildings for the urban area in the centre of Israel
- Heavily invest in increasing the internet's speed and capacity. It's time to properly connect us to the world wide web
Domestic issues:
- Legalize, regulate, and tax drugs
- Legalize, regulate, and tax prostitution
- Legalize and regulate euthanasia
- Heavily push for secularization
- Cut all religious groups out of the Knesset
- Cut all extra aid to religious groups and families, they will receive normal welfare if they need it
- Allow secular and other religious marriages, as well as same sex marriages
- Fully recognize English as a national language (so that now we have Hebrew, Arabic, and English)
- Allow prisons to use prisoners to do infrastructure work (if they are able to physically, of course)
- People who are able will work for unemployment checks
- Heavily reform education, cut religion as a class, encourage individual catering
- Reform healthcare, raise wages for doctors, fire those who are incompetent
- Reform welfare, make it more focused on providing jobs, and training people in preparation for gaining a job, heavily regulate what people can buy using welfare money
- Cut forced conscription
- Launch a massive campaign to plant greenery all over the country
Foreign issues:
- Demolish all settlements
- Heavily invest in defensive equipment, not offensive, to ensure no more rockets will hit Israel and that no more terrorists are able to get in
- After above is done, stop all attacks on the Palestinians
- Enter in to peace talks via UN, EU, and Arab League moderation
- Grant more work visas to the Palestinians
- Offer more scholarships to the Palestinians
- Initiate joint training and patrols with Palestinian military and police forces
- Heavily encourage multi-cultural shows, performances, and projects
- Negotiate with Jordan to completely open up the border for tourism
- Negotiate with Egypt to do the same
- Offer assistance to the Lebanese government to take back control of the country from terrorist groups
- Pressure the US to deal with Iran, peacefully or otherwise
- Expose all information concerning Israel's nuclear program, and sign all treaties to ensure international acceptance of Israel's nuclear program
- Sign as many free trade agreements as possible
- Sign up all extra soldiers to peacekeeping operations
Which leads to me this question (which you can add to your post as well)
Would you vote for me?

by Sunny Marionette » Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:57 am
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:One time in India, I managed to draw an elaborate battle scene in the sand with my piss. Granted, my friends aided me in this matter, but we finished with Darth Vader force choking a random Jedi. It was one of the greatest achievements of our lives.

by New England and The Maritimes » Mon Nov 21, 2011 9:01 am
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by CTALNH » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:41 am

by Angleter » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:52 am
Schuleriara wrote:Anyway, for Canada:
Economic Issues:
-Increase Corporate Tax dramatically, and steepen progressive taxes
-Stop selling oil to the US
-Mostly close down the tar sands and nationalize what I didn't of it
-Protect the Universal Healthcare system established by Tommy Douglas
-Crack down on bank corruption
-Make it easier to qualify for unemployment insurance

by Alyakia » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:56 am
12. Privatise the Royal Mail, but ensure that competition will take root, unlike the cartelised energy sector, which would need some competition somehow injected into it.
13. Privatise the BBC on a John Lewis sort of model, enshrine its independence and neutrality in law, and replace the licence fee with a subscription payment for their services. Allow product placement on all channels (without that giant P in the corner of the screen), while still banning adverts on the BBC.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Azov steel 2022, Bagong Timog Mindanao, Greater Britannian Realm, Hirota, Philjia, Platypus Bureaucracy, Slembana, Vassenor, Velstrania, We of the people
Advertisement