by Brogavia » Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:59 pm
by Maurepas » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:00 pm
by NERVUN » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:01 pm
by Greed and Death » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:01 pm
Maurepas wrote:Depends, I would say the government has no right to take your guns away....
However if your arsenal starts to out step the US military, then there are problems...
by Maurepas » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:02 pm
NERVUN wrote:*sighs* No, please no.
by Brogavia » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:02 pm
NERVUN wrote:*sighs* No, please no.
by Brogavia » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:02 pm
Maurepas wrote:NERVUN wrote:*sighs* No, please no.
But your body is tellin me yes,
by Maurepas » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:03 pm
greed and death wrote:Maurepas wrote:Depends, I would say the government has no right to take your guns away....
However if your arsenal starts to out step the US military, then there are problems...
I doubt anyone person in the world could out step the US military.
by Maurepas » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:03 pm
Brogavia wrote:Maurepas wrote:NERVUN wrote:*sighs* No, please no.
But your body is tellin me yes,
Damn you!
by NERVUN » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:03 pm
Brogavia wrote:Maurepas wrote:But your body is tellin me yes,
Damn you!
by Bluth Corporation » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:04 pm
Maurepas wrote:However if your arsenal starts to out step the US military, then there are problems...
by Brogavia » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:04 pm
Maurepas wrote:greed and death wrote:Maurepas wrote:Depends, I would say the government has no right to take your guns away....
However if your arsenal starts to out step the US military, then there are problems...
I doubt anyone person in the world could out step the US military.
true, I really meant more like, having weapons capable of doing serious damage to it, like Machine Guns, Grenade Launchers, Bazookas, etc...
by Secruss » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:05 pm
by Bavin » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:06 pm
Maurepas wrote:Depends, I would say the government has no right to take your guns away....
However if your arsenal starts to out step the US military, then there are problems...
by Maurepas » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:08 pm
Bavin wrote:Maurepas wrote:Depends, I would say the government has no right to take your guns away....
However if your arsenal starts to out step the US military, then there are problems...
How about if you are more heavily armed then the Vatican Guards...
by Brogavia » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:08 pm
Bavin wrote:Maurepas wrote:Depends, I would say the government has no right to take your guns away....
However if your arsenal starts to out step the US military, then there are problems...
How about if you are more heavily armed then the Vatican Guards...
by Secruss » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:08 pm
by Sapphista » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:09 pm
by NERVUN » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:10 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:Maurepas wrote:However if your arsenal starts to out step the US military, then there are problems...
No, there's not.
After all, the whole point of civilian ownership of weapons is to ensure the populace can mount an effective revolt against government should it ever become necessary.
by Techno-Soviet » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:11 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:Maurepas wrote:However if your arsenal starts to out step the US military, then there are problems...
No, there's not.
After all, the whole point of civilian ownership of weapons is to ensure the populace can mount an effective revolt against government should it ever become necessary.
by Brogavia » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:11 pm
Sapphista wrote:We gotta have our guns ready in case the deer start hunting us.
by Secruss » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:13 pm
by Bluth Corporation » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:13 pm
NERVUN wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:Maurepas wrote:However if your arsenal starts to out step the US military, then there are problems...
No, there's not.
After all, the whole point of civilian ownership of weapons is to ensure the populace can mount an effective revolt against government should it ever become necessary.
Which might have been the case up to, say, the Civil War. Now-a-days, not even close.
by Brogavia » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:14 pm
Techno-Soviet wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:Maurepas wrote:However if your arsenal starts to out step the US military, then there are problems...
No, there's not.
After all, the whole point of civilian ownership of weapons is to ensure the populace can mount an effective revolt against government should it ever become necessary.
I thought it was because they were compensating for something.
I like my reasoning better.
by Gun Manufacturers » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:14 pm
Brogavia wrote:This is by far the most unlikely thing that has ever happened.
NSG, without its a gun control debate? Its madness I tell you!.
But really, where do you stand on Victim disarmarment aka gun control?
Personally, I believe that there are no constitutionally allowable restrictions on a citizens right to own a firearm.
Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...
Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo
Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.
Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dazchan, Eahland, Free Radio States, Google [Bot], Haganham, Himmelland, Ineva, Kostane, New Temecula, Soviet Haaregrad, Statesburg, Tiami, Verkhoyanska
Advertisement