Advertisement
by The North Polish Union » Wed Mar 15, 2023 8:59 am
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.
by New Makasta » Wed Mar 15, 2023 9:40 am
The North Polish Union wrote:Say what you will, I truly appreciate Quebecshire's dedication to getting the SC authorship badge on as many of his nations as possible. Its a truly unique form of badge hunting and has the advantage that most of the proposals at least appear legitimate and aren't the mediocre self-commends that practice is so often associated with. Some of us may quibble with the detail, but you have to admit that although authors have submitted proposals from multiple nations in the past, I don't think that I'd previously seen the variety in nations that Q's been bringing out recently. Bravo!
by Felix Legion I » Wed Mar 15, 2023 9:46 am
by The Ice States » Wed Mar 15, 2023 12:21 pm
by Isle of Westland » Wed Mar 15, 2023 2:06 pm
-Northumbria wrote:Opposed for obvious reasons.
by WayNeacTia » Wed Mar 15, 2023 3:45 pm
New Makasta wrote:The North Polish Union wrote:Say what you will, I truly appreciate Quebecshire's dedication to getting the SC authorship badge on as many of his nations as possible. Its a truly unique form of badge hunting and has the advantage that most of the proposals at least appear legitimate and aren't the mediocre self-commends that practice is so often associated with. Some of us may quibble with the detail, but you have to admit that although authors have submitted proposals from multiple nations in the past, I don't think that I'd previously seen the variety in nations that Q's been bringing out recently. Bravo!
NPU, can I call you NPU? I would hope that you can see this as clearly as its laid out, why would Quebec resign from a nation with ~110 endos, during a liberation mind you, to go back to his main nation to submit the SC proposal? Now I may not be as experienced as you are in NS but to me dropping WA for a liberation proposal that helps a liberation seems, counterproductive to say the least. But that is my 2 cents
edit: Forgot we added more endos at minor
Felix Legion I wrote:I understand you're attached to your role as raiderdom's basic algebra person, but it's not that deep. I'm fully capable of influence calculations and management (see: when I ripped Malice's treaty ally to pieces in under a week, Maur's Concord in 3 days, and took point in helping New Westphalia's natives lock things down) as is the faction in general. You're free to continue fixating on something from 3-4 months ago and projecting it onto this situation, but it's simply not applicable.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Felix Legion I » Wed Mar 15, 2023 4:05 pm
WayNeacTia wrote:Because there isn’t 700 other defenders out there that could submit the liberation? Right?
by WayNeacTia » Wed Mar 15, 2023 4:16 pm
Felix Legion I wrote:WayNeacTia wrote:Because there isn’t 700 other defenders out there that could submit the liberation? Right?
The horror of the two people who wrote the proposal being credited as having done so.
Nothing else in your post warrants a response, Chester, I'm being charitable by replying to this part at all.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Quebecshire » Wed Mar 15, 2023 4:25 pm
Benevolent Thomas wrote:I founded a defender organization out of my dislike of invaders, what invading represents, and my desire to see them suffer.
Pergamon wrote:I must say, you are truly what they deserve.
by WayNeacTia » Wed Mar 15, 2023 5:18 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Matthew the Man » Wed Mar 15, 2023 9:32 pm
Benevolent Thomas wrote:It is fun for me to see invaders lose at something they won at for so long.
by Isle of Westland » Wed Mar 15, 2023 9:58 pm
WayNeacTia wrote:
I honestly want to know, do you have some addiction to either ignoring or willfully misrepresenting the point? Go after me all you want, I really don't care. Your continual attempts to gaslight Souls and everyone else is where I draw the line though.
by The North Polish Union » Wed Mar 15, 2023 9:59 pm
New Makasta wrote:The North Polish Union wrote:Say what you will, I truly appreciate Quebecshire's dedication to getting the SC authorship badge on as many of his nations as possible. Its a truly unique form of badge hunting and has the advantage that most of the proposals at least appear legitimate and aren't the mediocre self-commends that practice is so often associated with. Some of us may quibble with the detail, but you have to admit that although authors have submitted proposals from multiple nations in the past, I don't think that I'd previously seen the variety in nations that Q's been bringing out recently. Bravo!
NPU, can I call you NPU? I would hope that you can see this as clearly as its laid out, why would Quebec resign from a nation with ~110 endos, during a liberation mind you, to go back to his main nation to submit the SC proposal? Now I may not be as experienced as you are in NS but to me dropping WA for a liberation proposal that helps a liberation seems, counterproductive to say the least. But that is my 2 cents
edit: Forgot we added more endos at minor
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.
by The Poker » Wed Mar 15, 2023 10:00 pm
Isle of Westland wrote:WayNeacTia wrote:I honestly want to know, do you have some addiction to either ignoring or willfully misrepresenting the point? Go after me all you want, I really don't care. Your continual attempts to gaslight Souls and everyone else is where I draw the line though.
Sounds like someone needs a cup of tea... I'll pop the kettle on.
by WayNeacTia » Wed Mar 15, 2023 10:24 pm
The North Polish Union wrote:New Makasta wrote:NPU, can I call you NPU? I would hope that you can see this as clearly as its laid out, why would Quebec resign from a nation with ~110 endos, during a liberation mind you, to go back to his main nation to submit the SC proposal? Now I may not be as experienced as you are in NS but to me dropping WA for a liberation proposal that helps a liberation seems, counterproductive to say the least. But that is my 2 cents
edit: Forgot we added more endos at minor
I was pretty clearly saying I thought it was unique? I don't know of many other authors that have passed resolutions on so many different nations. Python/Apato/Ice States/Magecastle has resolutions passed by 6 different nations and that's the only player I can think of that comes close.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Westinor » Wed Mar 15, 2023 10:28 pm
WayNeacTia wrote:The North Polish Union wrote:I was pretty clearly saying I thought it was unique? I don't know of many other authors that have passed resolutions on so many different nations. Python/Apato/Ice States/Magecastle has resolutions passed by 6 different nations and that's the only player I can think of that comes close.
Eh... I doubt it. As you can see, Q's motivation behind his authorship seems driven more by fealty and gluteus smoochism, rather than what was submitted on which nation.
by WayNeacTia » Wed Mar 15, 2023 10:55 pm
Westinor wrote:WayNeacTia wrote:Eh... I doubt it. As you can see, Q's motivation behind his authorship seems driven more by fealty and gluteus smoochism, rather than what was submitted on which nation.
Hey! I provided the gluteus smoochism; I deserve credit too!! Just like I whined for credit on this proposal despite doing nothing to add to it :>
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Felix Legion I » Thu Mar 16, 2023 5:22 am
The North Polish Union wrote:New Makasta wrote:NPU, can I call you NPU? I would hope that you can see this as clearly as its laid out, why would Quebec resign from a nation with ~110 endos, during a liberation mind you, to go back to his main nation to submit the SC proposal? Now I may not be as experienced as you are in NS but to me dropping WA for a liberation proposal that helps a liberation seems, counterproductive to say the least. But that is my 2 cents
edit: Forgot we added more endos at minor
I was pretty clearly saying I thought it was unique? I don't know of many other authors that have passed resolutions on so many different nations. Python/Apato/Ice States/Magecastle has resolutions passed by 6 different nations and that's the only player I can think of that comes close.
by Syberis » Thu Mar 16, 2023 6:34 am
WayNeacTia wrote:New Makasta wrote:NPU, can I call you NPU? I would hope that you can see this as clearly as its laid out, why would Quebec resign from a nation with ~110 endos, during a liberation mind you, to go back to his main nation to submit the SC proposal? Now I may not be as experienced as you are in NS but to me dropping WA for a liberation proposal that helps a liberation seems, counterproductive to say the least. But that is my 2 cents
edit: Forgot we added more endos at minor
Because there isn’t 700 other defenders out there that could submit the liberation? Right?
Zaolat wrote:WHO THE F*** IS SYBERIS
by Westinor » Thu Mar 16, 2023 12:05 pm
WayNeacTia wrote:Westinor wrote:Hey! I provided the gluteus smoochism; I deserve credit too!! Just like I whined for credit on this proposal despite doing nothing to add to it :>
It would be wrong to deny credit where it is due. Perhaps you can answer my question? Do you believe the situation is so exigent that proposals need to be pulled ahead of it, based purely on the math which Q claims to have done, or because Malice is involved in the raid?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement