Agarntrop wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Again it's exceedingly rare. Exceedingly rare. I can be forgiven for saying what I said, as it is accurate, as tiny sub-percentage stats are not enough to disrupt an overwhelming trend.
I still think after a certain cutoff point it should be restricted.
That would not be feasible, SPECIFICALLY because of the fact that the cast majorityof such abortions are due to medical complications.
Agarntrop wrote:Really we should subsidise and encourage the use of contraception, which would drive down the abortion rate.
Aye, on this point we agree. But there will still be a need for abortion services even then. Even so, this option (among others) are largely advocated by the pro-choice folks, and often shot down by pro-life types.