More serious than abuse of power, obstruction of Congress and extortion apparently.
Advertisement
by Gormwood » Mon Jan 06, 2020 5:41 pm
by West Leas Oros 2 » Mon Jan 06, 2020 5:42 pm
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>
by Fahran » Mon Jan 06, 2020 5:44 pm
Gormwood wrote:More serious than abuse of power, obstruction of Congress and extortion apparently.
by Northern Davincia » Mon Jan 06, 2020 5:47 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Farnhamia » Mon Jan 06, 2020 5:49 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:Gormwood wrote:
More serious than abuse of power, obstruction of Congress and extortion apparently.
The extortion charge is silly and not something Trump was impeached for, abuse of power is a hallmark of the modern presidency, and obstruction of congress only applies to the witnesses who refused to comply.
by The Black Forrest » Mon Jan 06, 2020 6:27 pm
by West Leas Oros 2 » Mon Jan 06, 2020 6:36 pm
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Mon Jan 06, 2020 6:43 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:The extortion charge is silly and not something Trump was impeached for, abuse of power is a hallmark of the modern presidency, and obstruction of congress only applies to the witnesses who refused to comply.
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=475022
by The Black Forrest » Mon Jan 06, 2020 7:08 pm
by Farnhamia » Mon Jan 06, 2020 7:18 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:West Leas Oros 2 wrote:I don't think Fahran claimed otherwise.
That's the thing of it. People said " but he committed perjury!!!!!" Yes; that is a bad thing. However, it was for a question that didn't need to be raised. How was the US threatened by this?
People forget the investigation started because of Whitewater and when they couldn't get a case for that; they leaped on on the blowjob event.
by The Black Forrest » Mon Jan 06, 2020 7:22 pm
Farnhamia wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
That's the thing of it. People said " but he committed perjury!!!!!" Yes; that is a bad thing. However, it was for a question that didn't need to be raised. How was the US threatened by this?
People forget the investigation started because of Whitewater and when they couldn't get a case for that; they leaped on on the blowjob event.
What part of "NOT Impeachment" in the thread title are you having trouble with?
by Farnhamia » Mon Jan 06, 2020 7:28 pm
by The Black Forrest » Mon Jan 06, 2020 8:05 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Mon Jan 06, 2020 9:11 pm
Farnhamia wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
That's the thing of it. People said " but he committed perjury!!!!!" Yes; that is a bad thing. However, it was for a question that didn't need to be raised. How was the US threatened by this?
People forget the investigation started because of Whitewater and when they couldn't get a case for that; they leaped on on the blowjob event.
What part of "NOT Impeachment" in the thread title are you having trouble with?
by Farnhamia » Mon Jan 06, 2020 9:13 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Farnhamia wrote:What part of "NOT Impeachment" in the thread title are you having trouble with?
The fact that discussing a president who has been impeached will intrinsically involve his impeachment and trying to separate it into two different discussions where in one we never mention it is intrinsically silly and means that this is your life now.
by New haven america » Mon Jan 06, 2020 9:39 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:The fact that discussing a president who has been impeached will intrinsically involve his impeachment and trying to separate it into two different discussions where in one we never mention it is intrinsically silly and means that this is your life now.
Yes, but with a perfectly good impeachment thread right there, it should be simple for someone to say, "Yes, but we should take this over to the impeachment thread." And trust me, you have no idea what my life is like now.
by Farnhamia » Mon Jan 06, 2020 9:45 pm
New haven america wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Yes, but with a perfectly good impeachment thread right there, it should be simple for someone to say, "Yes, but we should take this over to the impeachment thread." And trust me, you have no idea what my life is like now.
So we can't just merge or move the impeachment thread here because...?
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Tue Jan 07, 2020 12:14 am
by Fahran » Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:24 am
The Black Forrest wrote:Uhhuh. Ok.
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:21 am
West Leas Oros 2 wrote:Again, why didn't we kill this guy discreetly? I know how Trump loves his ego boosts, but lives are on the line.
by Fahran » Tue Jan 07, 2020 12:03 pm
West Leas Oros 2 wrote:Again, why didn't we kill this guy discreetly? I know how Trump loves his ego boosts, but lives are on the line.
by Vassenor » Tue Jan 07, 2020 12:06 pm
West Leas Oros 2 wrote:Again, why didn't we kill this guy discreetly? I know how Trump loves his ego boosts, but lives are on the line.
by Vassenor » Tue Jan 07, 2020 12:13 pm
by Gormwood » Tue Jan 07, 2020 12:23 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Bovad, Dazchan, Foxyshire, Gnark, Great Eddy, Haganham, Khoikhoia, Lunayria, Port Carverton, Statesburg, Tiami
Advertisement