Or Steyer, since billionaires are a different breed than traditional Dems.
Advertisement
by Outer Sparta » Sun Nov 24, 2019 8:59 pm
by New haven america » Sun Nov 24, 2019 9:03 pm
by Zurkerx » Sun Nov 24, 2019 9:05 pm
by South Odreria 2 » Sun Nov 24, 2019 9:40 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Blargoblarg » Sun Nov 24, 2019 11:39 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Sun Nov 24, 2019 11:45 pm
Blargoblarg wrote:Bernie's been surging for a while already, though the mainstream media doesn't want you to know that.
by Lamoni » Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:08 am
Telconi wrote:Valrifell wrote:
Stop lying.
Ohoohoo, this is excillersting! I see why you do it. Wow, what a rush.
Anywho, Bloomberg is a laughably bad candidate who much of the country can't stand, he already has a successful personal brand so he only has everything to lose.
Plus Warren and Sanders might give him a heart attack from their anti-billionaire rhetoric. I'm concerned for his health, see.
Are you five? Or just that immature?
Licana on the M-21A2 MBT: "Well, it is one of the most badass tanks on NS."
Vortiaganica: Lamoni I understand fully, of course. The two (Lamoni & Lyras) are more inseparable than the Clinton family and politics.
Triplebaconation: Lamoni commands a quiet respect that carries its own authority. He is the Mandela of NS.
by Vassenor » Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:31 am
Blargoblarg wrote:Bernie's been surging for a while already, though the mainstream media doesn't want you to know that.
by Aclion » Mon Nov 25, 2019 3:42 am
New haven america wrote:Or do you think the Dems should pick a Rep to run as the Democratic presidential candidate?
by West Leas Oros 2 » Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:51 am
Telconi wrote:West Leas Oros 2 wrote:A lot of people, whether they call themselves that or not, have lots of anti-capitalist sentiments. Politicians just find ways to divert their attention, usually along the lines of "Immigrants took r jobs!!!" or some other deflection.
Okay, so? This in no way supports the idea that there's some homogeneous "working class" that has any discernible political beliefs.
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>
by Gormwood » Mon Nov 25, 2019 7:28 am
Vassenor wrote:Blargoblarg wrote:Bernie's been surging for a while already, though the mainstream media doesn't want you to know that.
Why is it everything that happens is some sort of magical establishment conspiracy to keep Sanders from winning?
Also if you need more reasons to hate Bloomberg he's the reason the Central Park Five were unable to get compensation from the city after being acquitted.
by Aureumterra » Mon Nov 25, 2019 8:50 am
by Asle Leopolka » Mon Nov 25, 2019 9:46 am
by Major-Tom » Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:27 am
Asle Leopolka wrote:Serious question - how does Kamala keep qualifying for these debates? She's hated in California, puts her foot in her mouth almost as much as Joe, and is such a partisan hack that even the DNC wants her to cool it. It boggles the mind!
by San Lumen » Mon Nov 25, 2019 12:08 pm
Blargoblarg wrote:Bernie's been surging for a while already, though the mainstream media doesn't want you to know that.
by Saturna1ia » Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:21 pm
Talvezout wrote:Prediction: Bloomberg might surge if Biden winds up falling out
by Cannot think of a name » Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:32 pm
by Saturna1ia » Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:41 pm
Talvezout wrote:
Emphasis on might
But for real, if Biden for whatever reason does end up falling out, who would take up his mantle? Bloomberg? Buttigieg? Klobuchar?
by Juristonia » Tue Nov 26, 2019 2:53 am
Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.
by The Andromeda Island Group » Tue Nov 26, 2019 3:24 am
Juristonia wrote:I don't see Bloomberg going anywhere, to be honest.
He's not exactly mister popular in general, and the optics of him literally buying his way in to the race are not going to sit well with people.
Everyone already knows money will get you far in politics, but there does seem to be a limit to how blatantly you can abuse that.
by Telconi » Tue Nov 26, 2019 4:11 am
The Andromeda Island Group wrote:Juristonia wrote:I don't see Bloomberg going anywhere, to be honest.
He's not exactly mister popular in general, and the optics of him literally buying his way in to the race are not going to sit well with people.
Everyone already knows money will get you far in politics, but there does seem to be a limit to how blatantly you can abuse that.
I think whoever emerges from the current Dem field (minus late entries by Bloomberg & Patrick) will eventually beat Trump. The American public are tired of the sideshow antics, the incompetence & the corruption that have defined the Trump Administration.
The childish name calling and the drunk tweeting were all so cute in 2016 cycle, but it's no substitute for a President that actually does his job.
by Vassenor » Tue Nov 26, 2019 4:12 am
Telconi wrote:The Andromeda Island Group wrote:
I think whoever emerges from the current Dem field (minus late entries by Bloomberg & Patrick) will eventually beat Trump. The American public are tired of the sideshow antics, the incompetence & the corruption that have defined the Trump Administration.
The childish name calling and the drunk tweeting were all so cute in 2016 cycle, but it's no substitute for a President that actually does his job.
I think your concept of the "American public" is narrow and ignorant.
by Telconi » Tue Nov 26, 2019 4:13 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dayganistan, Eragon Island, Forsher, Gun Manufacturers, HISPIDA, Ineva, Ravemath, Stratonesia, The Xenopolis Confederation
Advertisement