Advertisement
by Mr Dale Gribble » Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:31 am
by Vassenor » Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:33 am
Mr Dale Gribble wrote:https://fortune.com/2019/10/16/will-trump-win-2020-predictions-election-model/
Here. Go ahead. Prove Miami wrong.
That said, Moody’s says it “hesitate[s] to hang its hat” on a single model. And the election could come down to who shows up. If nonincumbent turnout is especially strong, says the organization, Democrats could win.
by The Black Forrest » Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:37 am
Mr Dale Gribble wrote:https://fortune.com/2019/10/16/will-trump-win-2020-predictions-election-model/
Here. Go ahead. Prove Miami wrong.
by Farnhamia » Mon Nov 25, 2019 12:00 pm
Mr Dale Gribble wrote:https://fortune.com/2019/10/16/will-trump-win-2020-predictions-election-model/
Here. Go ahead. Prove Miami wrong.
by Vassenor » Mon Nov 25, 2019 12:08 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Mr Dale Gribble wrote:https://fortune.com/2019/10/16/will-trump-win-2020-predictions-election-model/
Here. Go ahead. Prove Miami wrong.
"There are, of course, plenty of X factors that could come up between now and next November that could change the tide of the election, from impeachment proceedings to whoever the Democrats ultimately choose as their candidate (an issue that still seems undecided after Tuesday’s debate)."
You really should read things you throw in people's faces.
by Vassenor » Mon Nov 25, 2019 12:44 pm
by Salandriagado » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:59 pm
Greater Miami Shores wrote:Salandriagado wrote:
I might be missing something, but isn't the whole premise of the discussion that Trump is entirely out of the running before it even starts?
By most Democrats, leftists and anti Trumpers you are correct as you all wish so. President Trump should be and probably is beating Sanders and Warren as well. As I have predicted, Independent voters especially in the battleground states will help reelect President Trump during the 2020 US Presidential elections.
by The East Marches II » Mon Nov 25, 2019 3:23 pm
Vassenor wrote:Also Graham is claiming that the White House ordered him to block the bill condemning the Armenian Genocide.
Probably trying to keep Erdogan on side.
by Greater Miami Shores » Mon Nov 25, 2019 3:34 pm
Salandriagado wrote:Greater Miami Shores wrote:By most Democrats, leftists and anti Trumpers you are correct as you all wish so. President Trump should be and probably is beating Sanders and Warren as well. As I have predicted, Independent voters especially in the battleground states will help reelect President Trump during the 2020 US Presidential elections.
Don't jump into discussions that you don't understand. You'll just embarrass yourself.
by The East Marches II » Mon Nov 25, 2019 3:42 pm
Salandriagado wrote:Greater Miami Shores wrote:By most Democrats, leftists and anti Trumpers you are correct as you all wish so. President Trump should be and probably is beating Sanders and Warren as well. As I have predicted, Independent voters especially in the battleground states will help reelect President Trump during the 2020 US Presidential elections.
Don't jump into discussions that you don't understand. You'll just embarrass yourself.
by Salandriagado » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:39 pm
Greater Miami Shores wrote:Salandriagado wrote:
Don't jump into discussions that you don't understand. You'll just embarrass yourself.
Salandriagado, I proudly post all my posts and views on President Trump and all issues. I understand the discussions just as good as you or anyone else on nation states. You are clearly not respecting my rights to my views and my rights to post them. I don't tell you or any fellow nations persons:
Don't jump into discussions that you don't understand. You'll just embarrass yourself.
Because I don't agree with them on President Trump or any issues.
I respect your right to your views on President Trump or any issues.
Thanks for your posts.
Greater Miami Shores - Alberto
by Zurkerx » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:46 pm
by San Lumen » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:57 pm
Zurkerx wrote:Don McGahn must testify about time as White House lawyer, judge rules.
The decision is expected to put pressure on other reluctant witnesses to testify, but it may not shift the timing of Democrats’ impeachment inquiry. The ruling is suspected to be appealed by the DOJ, who represents McGahn. It was obviously expected although given this Administration, they'll fight to the bitter end.
Also, the U.S. Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Release Of Trump's Tax Records until Trump's legal team files a petition (which he must do by the 5th of December, and will likely happen) for the full court to debate whether to take it up. Hmm, this seems like it has a good chance it'll be taken up although, I feel the Court would like to decide before 2020 since that's an election year and deciding on Trump's Tax Returns might be too political. After all, Roberts, who leans conservative, does want to preserve the integrity of the court as a non-political branch to the best of his ability.
by Greater Miami Shores » Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:04 pm
Salandriagado wrote:Greater Miami Shores wrote:Salandriagado, I proudly post all my posts and views on President Trump and all issues. I understand the discussions just as good as you or anyone else on nation states. You are clearly not respecting my rights to my views and my rights to post them. I don't tell you or any fellow nations persons:
Don't jump into discussions that you don't understand. You'll just embarrass yourself.
Because I don't agree with them on President Trump or any issues.
I respect your right to your views on President Trump or any issues.
Thanks for your posts.
Greater Miami Shores - Alberto
You misunderstand, again. I am not saying that you do not understand the substantive issues underlying the argument - though I find it very probable that you do not - I am saying that you literally do not understand the sentences of the posts that you are responding to.
by Telconi » Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:08 pm
San Lumen wrote:Zurkerx wrote:Don McGahn must testify about time as White House lawyer, judge rules.
The decision is expected to put pressure on other reluctant witnesses to testify, but it may not shift the timing of Democrats’ impeachment inquiry. The ruling is suspected to be appealed by the DOJ, who represents McGahn. It was obviously expected although given this Administration, they'll fight to the bitter end.
Also, the U.S. Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Release Of Trump's Tax Records until Trump's legal team files a petition (which he must do by the 5th of December, and will likely happen) for the full court to debate whether to take it up. Hmm, this seems like it has a good chance it'll be taken up although, I feel the Court would like to decide before 2020 since that's an election year and deciding on Trump's Tax Returns might be too political. After all, Roberts, who leans conservative, does want to preserve the integrity of the court as a non-political branch to the best of his ability.
wanting to preserve the integrity of the court is why I think he would also uphold Congress's ability to compel people to testify. I dont think he wants to be known as the justice who destroyed congressional oversight.
by Greater Miami Shores » Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:14 pm
Telconi wrote:San Lumen wrote:wanting to preserve the integrity of the court is why I think he would also uphold Congress's ability to compel people to testify. I dont think he wants to be known as the justice who destroyed congressional oversight.
It's really a tad silly at this point. The idea that the court exists above politics at this point is pure fiction, and all Roberts would need to do to realize this is look at his fellow justices on the bench.
by Nakena » Mon Nov 25, 2019 7:53 pm
San Lumen wrote:Zurkerx wrote:Don McGahn must testify about time as White House lawyer, judge rules.
The decision is expected to put pressure on other reluctant witnesses to testify, but it may not shift the timing of Democrats’ impeachment inquiry. The ruling is suspected to be appealed by the DOJ, who represents McGahn. It was obviously expected although given this Administration, they'll fight to the bitter end.
Also, the U.S. Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Release Of Trump's Tax Records until Trump's legal team files a petition (which he must do by the 5th of December, and will likely happen) for the full court to debate whether to take it up. Hmm, this seems like it has a good chance it'll be taken up although, I feel the Court would like to decide before 2020 since that's an election year and deciding on Trump's Tax Returns might be too political. After all, Roberts, who leans conservative, does want to preserve the integrity of the court as a non-political branch to the best of his ability.
wanting to preserve the integrity of the court is why I think he would also uphold Congress's ability to compel people to testify. I dont think he wants to be known as the justice who destroyed congressional oversight.
by Greater Miami Shores » Mon Nov 25, 2019 8:36 pm
Nakena wrote:San Lumen wrote:wanting to preserve the integrity of the court is why I think he would also uphold Congress's ability to compel people to testify. I dont think he wants to be known as the justice who destroyed congressional oversight.
Probably the records would reveal that Trump is, shocking, not as rich as he pretends to be.
by Proctopeo » Mon Nov 25, 2019 9:29 pm
Nakena wrote:San Lumen wrote:wanting to preserve the integrity of the court is why I think he would also uphold Congress's ability to compel people to testify. I dont think he wants to be known as the justice who destroyed congressional oversight.
Probably the records would reveal that Trump is, shocking, not as rich as he pretends to be.
by Greater Miami Shores » Mon Nov 25, 2019 9:41 pm
by Gormwood » Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:59 pm
by Nakena » Tue Nov 26, 2019 12:02 am
Gormwood wrote:National Enquirer company chief David Pecker talking with New York prosecutors
It's like everyone associated with Trump goes to jail, turns on him, or both.
by Greater Miami Shores » Tue Nov 26, 2019 1:03 am
Gormwood wrote:National Enquirer company chief David Pecker talking with New York prosecutors
It's like everyone associated with Trump goes to jail, turns on him, or both.
by Nakena » Tue Nov 26, 2019 1:04 am
Greater Miami Shores wrote:Gormwood wrote:National Enquirer company chief David Pecker talking with New York prosecutors
It's like everyone associated with Trump goes to jail, turns on him, or both.
Finally one site source I don't consider serious the National Enquirer. I consider it like a gossip lol site not a news site.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, ML Library, Tungstan, Vassenor, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement