Advertisement

by Shrillland » Thu May 30, 2019 10:05 am

by San Lumen » Thu May 30, 2019 11:31 am
Shrillland wrote:Mississippi will be going to the polls for Governor in a few months, and a lawsuit is challenging how they do it: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mississippi-has-racist-way-choosing-governors-lawsuit-says-n1011961
The lawsuit is challenging the requirement of both a majority of the popular vote and a majority of house districts, saying that the requirement is meant to favour whites.
In other election news...there are some races on Tuesday:
States: First, New Jersey's having their legislative primaries on Tuesday, so go vote if you're there.
Second, we have a couple of state Byelections in California, starting in SD-1(Redding-Inland North). No change here, both candidates are Republicans taking over a Republican who was elected to the Board of Equalisation(CA's elected property tax authority). Next, we have a two-party race in SD-33(Long Beach Central), a likely Democratic hold after the former incumbent was elected State Insurance Commissioner.

by Aclion » Thu May 30, 2019 11:46 am
San Lumen wrote:I’m glad the election rules in Mississippi for Governor are being challenged as it’s a clear violation of one man one vote.
I find it interesting the plaintiffs don’t suggest an alternative way of electing statewide offices . Why not just whoever gets the most votes wins? Amazing concept I know

by San Lumen » Thu May 30, 2019 12:37 pm
Aclion wrote:San Lumen wrote:I’m glad the election rules in Mississippi for Governor are being challenged as it’s a clear violation of one man one vote.
I find it interesting the plaintiffs don’t suggest an alternative way of electing statewide offices . Why not just whoever gets the most votes wins? Amazing concept I know
One man one vote isn't constitutionally required, nor is it required for a democracy, nether the US congress, nor the presidential election, nor EU apportionment distribute voting power under the principle of one man one vote. So the supreme court is unlikely to accept that not doing so is a legal requirement for legitimate elections. Which is too bad. If we could get laws ruled unconstitutional because they were historically written to discriminate against black people we could get may issue and suitable person laws in gun licencing overturned tomorrow.

by Arlenton » Fri May 31, 2019 11:35 pm
San Lumen wrote:Aclion wrote:One man one vote isn't constitutionally required, nor is it required for a democracy, nether the US congress, nor the presidential election, nor EU apportionment distribute voting power under the principle of one man one vote. So the supreme court is unlikely to accept that not doing so is a legal requirement for legitimate elections. Which is too bad. If we could get laws ruled unconstitutional because they were historically written to discriminate against black people we could get may issue and suitable person laws in gun licencing overturned tomorrow.
You think it’s fair for someone to get the most votes but not get elected because their opponent got the most land area?

by Shrillland » Sat Jun 01, 2019 2:31 am

by Galloism » Sat Jun 01, 2019 6:31 am
San Lumen wrote:Aclion wrote:One man one vote isn't constitutionally required, nor is it required for a democracy, nether the US congress, nor the presidential election, nor EU apportionment distribute voting power under the principle of one man one vote. So the supreme court is unlikely to accept that not doing so is a legal requirement for legitimate elections. Which is too bad. If we could get laws ruled unconstitutional because they were historically written to discriminate against black people we could get may issue and suitable person laws in gun licencing overturned tomorrow.
You think it’s fair for someone to get the most votes but not get elected because their opponent got the most land area?

by San Lumen » Sat Jun 01, 2019 6:33 am

by Galloism » Sat Jun 01, 2019 6:37 am
San Lumen wrote:Galloism wrote:You didn’t read the post you responded to did you?
we were talking about Mississippi. You think its fair for someone to get the most votes but not be elected because they didnt win the most house districts a nearly impossible feat for a Democrat to pull off these days. The rule in the state is a holdover from Jim Crow. It was designed to suppress black votes.
Aclion wrote:San Lumen wrote:I’m glad the election rules in Mississippi for Governor are being challenged as it’s a clear violation of one man one vote.
I find it interesting the plaintiffs don’t suggest an alternative way of electing statewide offices . Why not just whoever gets the most votes wins? Amazing concept I know
One man one vote isn't constitutionally required, nor is it required for a democracy, nether the US congress, nor the presidential election, nor EU apportionment distribute voting power under the principle of one man one vote. So the supreme court is unlikely to accept that not doing so is a legal requirement for legitimate elections. Which is too bad. If we could get laws ruled unconstitutional because they were historically written to discriminate against black people we could get may issue and suitable person laws in gun licencing overturned tomorrow.

by Arlenton » Sat Jun 01, 2019 7:28 pm
Shrillland wrote:Mississippi will be going to the polls for Governor in a few months, and a lawsuit is challenging how they do it: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mississippi-has-racist-way-choosing-governors-lawsuit-says-n1011961
The lawsuit is challenging the requirement of both a majority of the popular vote and a majority of house districts, saying that the requirement is meant to favour whites.
In other election news...there are some races on Tuesday:
States: First, New Jersey's having their legislative primaries on Tuesday, so go vote if you're there.
Second, we have a couple of state Byelections in California, starting in SD-1(Redding-Inland North). No change here, both candidates are Republicans taking over a Republican who was elected to the Board of Equalisation(CA's elected property tax authority). Next, we have a two-party race in SD-33(Long Beach Central), a likely Democratic hold after the former incumbent was elected State Insurance Commissioner.

by Duhon » Sat Jun 01, 2019 7:42 pm
Arlenton wrote:Shrillland wrote:Mississippi will be going to the polls for Governor in a few months, and a lawsuit is challenging how they do it: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mississippi-has-racist-way-choosing-governors-lawsuit-says-n1011961
The lawsuit is challenging the requirement of both a majority of the popular vote and a majority of house districts, saying that the requirement is meant to favour whites.
In other election news...there are some races on Tuesday:
States: First, New Jersey's having their legislative primaries on Tuesday, so go vote if you're there.
Second, we have a couple of state Byelections in California, starting in SD-1(Redding-Inland North). No change here, both candidates are Republicans taking over a Republican who was elected to the Board of Equalisation(CA's elected property tax authority). Next, we have a two-party race in SD-33(Long Beach Central), a likely Democratic hold after the former incumbent was elected State Insurance Commissioner.
Mississippi should elect local Mississippi officials however the hell Mississippi wants.

by San Lumen » Sat Jun 01, 2019 9:37 pm

by Nakena » Sat Jun 01, 2019 9:45 pm
Wikipedia wrote: [...] Let's tell the truth if it bursts the bottom of the Universe. [...] We came here to exclude the Negro. Nothing short of this will answer.
— Solomon Saladin "S.S." Calhoon, Mississippi Constitutional Convention of 1890, (emphasis added).[16][7][32][3][4]

by Shrillland » Mon Jun 03, 2019 7:47 pm

by Shrillland » Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:34 am

by San Lumen » Wed Jun 05, 2019 7:40 am

by Shrillland » Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:27 am

by San Lumen » Sun Jun 09, 2019 12:08 pm

by Major-Tom » Sun Jun 09, 2019 12:10 pm

by San Lumen » Sun Jun 09, 2019 2:19 pm
Major-Tom wrote:Always nice to see Lumen/Shrilland and others posting about elections I otherwise would be unaware of. Good work.
I will say that I've heard from Coloradans that Hancock has become a controversial mayor, so the Denver race was the only mayoral race I was paying attention to. Not too surprised he won, but I thought there was a chance for an upset.

by San Lumen » Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:38 pm

by Shrillland » Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:42 pm
San Lumen wrote:Democrats held the by election in ME-HD45 by a wide margin which was widely expected given its in Cumberland County a democratic stronghold
The Virginia Primaries went largely as expected though there were a few upsets including a Democratic state senator in SD-16 losing their primary to former state legislator and convicted felon. The district contains Petersburg and part of Richmond so he's near certainty to return to the state capitol.
There also was an upset of the incumbent in the GOP primary for HD-28 a competitive district based around Fredericksburg. The incumbent Bob Thomas narrowly won in 2017 and the new nominee Paul Milde III has been labeled as extreme and will have a difficult time holding this district in November.
All 100 seats in the Virginia House of Delegates and all 40 seats in the State Senate are up for election in November. a gain of two seats in either chamber would flip control to the Democrats and they are favored do to so especially with the court order that redrew several districts for racial discrimination including that of the Speaker.
Next week we have two by elections in Florida HD-7 which is south of Tallahassee and HD-38 a rural district northeast of Tampa Both will likely stay Republican as they are very red districts
Kansas City, Missouri will be holding its mayoral and city council elections. City Council members Quinton Lucas and Jolie Justus will be vying for the Mayor's Office.

by San Lumen » Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:45 pm
Shrillland wrote:San Lumen wrote:Democrats held the by election in ME-HD45 by a wide margin which was widely expected given its in Cumberland County a democratic stronghold
The Virginia Primaries went largely as expected though there were a few upsets including a Democratic state senator in SD-16 losing their primary to former state legislator and convicted felon. The district contains Petersburg and part of Richmond so he's near certainty to return to the state capitol.
There also was an upset of the incumbent in the GOP primary for HD-28 a competitive district based around Fredericksburg. The incumbent Bob Thomas narrowly won in 2017 and the new nominee Paul Milde III has been labeled as extreme and will have a difficult time holding this district in November.
All 100 seats in the Virginia House of Delegates and all 40 seats in the State Senate are up for election in November. a gain of two seats in either chamber would flip control to the Democrats and they are favored do to so especially with the court order that redrew several districts for racial discrimination including that of the Speaker.
Next week we have two by elections in Florida HD-7 which is south of Tallahassee and HD-38 a rural district northeast of Tampa Both will likely stay Republican as they are very red districts
Kansas City, Missouri will be holding its mayoral and city council elections. City Council members Quinton Lucas and Jolie Justus will be vying for the Mayor's Office.
I'm not sure about that, myself. His misdemeanour conviction was because he had a relationship with a 17 year-old girl and was in his late 30s at the time. This isn't the 80s where they'd just shrug it off like they did with Gerry Stubbs in Massachusetts. This isn't even 2015 when Morrissey won the byelection as an independent, this is the age of Me Too, and voters may be less forgiving now.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ariddia, Ci Arovannea, Great Britain-and Northern Ireland, Infected Mushroom, Itrion, Kabran, Page, PettyKingdoms, Pluonia, The Notorious Mad Jack, Yorsa II
Advertisement