Advertisement
by The Noble Thatcherites » Fri Mar 16, 2018 7:55 pm
Kanglia wrote:Thatcher. Wants. As. Little. To. Do. With. You. All. As. Possible.
Résumé
The Union of Democratic States
Citizen and Founder
Prime Minister (x1)
Motion(s) Passed (x15)
Ambassador (x21)
Publisher for The Union Post (x5)
Constitutional Framer (x4)
The Free Nations Region
Citizen and Legislator
Justice (x1)
Motion(s) Passed (1x)
The Allied States
Citizen
Senator (x1)
FORGE
Representative (x4)
Chancellor (x1)
ITDA
Founder
Representative (x1)
Secretary General (x1)
Charter Author (x2)
Court of International Law and Justice
Foreign Affairs Justice (x1)
Europeia
Citizen and Assemblyman (x1)
The South Pacific
Citizen
SPSF Recruit (x1)
by Lenlyvit » Mon Mar 19, 2018 5:24 pm
by Frisbeeteria » Mon Mar 19, 2018 6:29 pm
Lenlyvit wrote:Bump
by Kuriko » Wed Sep 05, 2018 12:07 pm
by USS Monitor » Wed Sep 05, 2018 12:23 pm
Kuriko wrote:I still need to figure out what to do about finding issues co-authors so stay tuned for that.
by Kuriko » Wed Sep 05, 2018 9:35 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Kuriko wrote:I still need to figure out what to do about finding issues co-authors so stay tuned for that.
Try looking through the credits in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=88
For example, this issue has two authors: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=88&start=25#895
Older issues may have uncredited co-authors because the issues set-up was less sophisticated back then.
by USS Monitor » Wed Sep 05, 2018 9:59 pm
Kuriko wrote:USS Monitor wrote:
Try looking through the credits in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=88
For example, this issue has two authors: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=88&start=25#895
Older issues may have uncredited co-authors because the issues set-up was less sophisticated back then.
Alright, I've added what I found although it doesn't seem there's very many. If I missed any I would appreciate it if someone pointed that out.
by Flanderlion » Wed Sep 05, 2018 11:44 pm
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:29 am
Flanderlion wrote:How many nations will this actually be applied to? I can't imagine a badge would be hard to create, but it's not exactly something I would put as a priority (even on the 5 year list Fris mentioned 6 months back). Add in having to apply to all the past co-authors, and then figuring out whether it's automatic which OP said (lots of work for techies now) or mods/GenSec/issue editors having to apply it for every resolution (lots of work but over time). Like, I'm not against the idea in principle, just seems like a lot of work for only a small amount of players when the same effort could go in for other small new features/QoL stuff/reruns of events etc.
by Kuriko » Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:53 am
USS Monitor wrote:Kuriko wrote:Alright, I've added what I found although it doesn't seem there's very many. If I missed any I would appreciate it if someone pointed that out.
I think co-authoring is less common in issues because people can get the editors to help them clean up their issue instead of getting a co-author to help them before they submit. You have to get your draft to the point that there's something for the editors to work with, but you don't have to get it to the point that it's ready to go in the game as is.
by Lenlyvit » Sun Mar 17, 2019 2:45 pm
by Lenlyvit » Sun Oct 27, 2019 5:10 pm
by Marxist Germany » Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:20 pm
by Bears Armed » Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:48 am
by Kuriko » Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:08 pm
I don't know about the GA, but in the SC there are hardly any disputes on co-authorship and I highly doubt there are disputes on issues being written. Also, sometimes it's fairly obvious when someone contributes enough to a proposal for co-authorship because they'll be right there in the discussion thread with the author. At least, that's what I see most of the time.Bears Armed wrote:This would make it even more important for Gensec (in the GA), the Mods (in the SC), and Issues Editors (for issues, of course), to look at whether a named co-author had actually contributed enough to earn the badge... which could seem highly subjective, and a probable cause of disputes.
Against.
(and I say this as as [twice] a GA co-author...)
by Bears Armed » Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:08 am
Kuriko wrote:I just want to gently bump this since [v] seems to be around again lately, and hopefully see what she thinks.I don't know about the GA, but in the SC there are hardly any disputes on co-authorship and I highly doubt there are disputes on issues being written. Also, sometimes it's fairly obvious when someone contributes enough to a proposal for co-authorship because they'll be right there in the discussion thread with the author. At least, that's what I see most of the time.Bears Armed wrote:This would make it even more important for Gensec (in the GA), the Mods (in the SC), and Issues Editors (for issues, of course), to look at whether a named co-author had actually contributed enough to earn the badge... which could seem highly subjective, and a probable cause of disputes.
Against.
(and I say this as as [twice] a GA co-author...)
by [violet] » Mon Dec 16, 2019 2:57 pm
Kuriko wrote:I just want to gently bump this since [v] seems to be around again lately, and hopefully see what she thinks.
by Aclion » Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:22 pm
[violet] wrote:Kuriko wrote:I just want to gently bump this since [v] seems to be around again lately, and hopefully see what she thinks.
Well from my perspective, the basic functionality of allowing people to enter co-authors could be implemented without too much trouble. But everything else does seem troublesome, in particular:
- When someone lists other nations as co-authors of their proposals, who / how do we verify that those nations really are co-authors and want to be listed
[violet] wrote:- There is currently no ability to edit past WA resolutions
- Assuming I could add an edit feature, going back and editing 2,000+ past resolutions and issues based on sketchy surviving records is quite a lot of error-prone work. I also imagine it would be essentially never-ending as people retrospectively realize that this or that resolution should/shouldn't have a particular nation listed.
Bears Armed wrote:I suspect that if there was a badge involved more people might name 'co-authors' even when those other players named hadn't really done much, to "reward" friends or for some quid pro quo...
by Kuriko » Thu Dec 19, 2019 10:30 pm
by Separatist Peoples » Fri Dec 20, 2019 5:10 am
Aclion wrote:Well, right now the standard is that they post in the drafting thread that their work is being used with permission. I don't know if there's ever been an attempt to list someone as a coauthor with their permission but I don't see why it wouldn't apply.
by [violet] » Sun Dec 22, 2019 12:58 pm
Kuriko wrote:What I'm asking, [v], is if it would be possible to retroactively place a badge on co-author nations.
by Morover » Sun Dec 22, 2019 1:37 pm
by Kuriko » Wed Dec 25, 2019 12:39 pm
by Tinhampton » Sat Jun 19, 2021 10:26 pm
by Graintfjall » Sun Jun 20, 2021 1:24 am
[violet] wrote:So if it's going to be done, I think it should be done properly, i.e. by editing past resolutions.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Havensky
Advertisement