Liberimery wrote:(Um, did this die?)
OOC: Hopefully after losing at vote a second time, we can finally put this issue to bed.
Advertisement
by Sciongrad » Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:43 pm
Liberimery wrote:(Um, did this die?)
by Auralia » Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:11 am
by Aclion » Fri Oct 12, 2018 10:52 am
by Kenmoria » Sat Oct 13, 2018 10:08 am
Speaking as someone who strongly supports the target resolution, I wouldn’t care if the death penalty was restricted to nations with a ‘t’ in the name, as long as the death penalty is restricted.)Auralia wrote:Sciongrad wrote:OOC: Hopefully after losing at vote a second time, we can finally put this issue to bed.
Hmm? This was never submitted, though it certainly will be -- at a politically opportune time.
Honestly, I'm surprised there's not more support for this repeal from the anti-death penalty bloc. Parts (b) and (c) of the repeal relate to issues of substantive equality with respect to member states and convicts.
by Sacara » Sat Oct 13, 2018 10:10 am
The Spacefaring Federation of Sacara"Our Universe is under no obligation to make sense to you" - Neil deGrasse Tyson
I spend most of my time in the Got Issues? sub-forum.
Issues That I've Authored (15)
Commended by SC #382
by United Massachusetts » Sat Oct 13, 2018 9:47 pm
Auralia wrote:Sciongrad wrote:OOC: Hopefully after losing at vote a second time, we can finally put this issue to bed.
Hmm? This was never submitted, though it certainly will be -- at a politically opportune time.
Honestly, I'm surprised there's not more support for this repeal from the anti-death penalty bloc. Parts (b) and (c) of the repeal relate to issues of substantive equality with respect to member states and convicts.
by Teldland » Sat Oct 13, 2018 9:49 pm
Isansland wrote:I oppose. I believe there should be no capital punishment.
by Sierra Lyricalia » Wed Nov 07, 2018 11:15 am
by Demiurges » Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:52 pm
by New Bremerton » Sun Nov 11, 2018 7:47 am
by Galiantus III » Sun Nov 11, 2018 5:28 pm
Frisbeeteria wrote:For some reason I have a mental image of a dolphin, trying to organize a new pod of his fellow dolphins to change the course of a nuclear sub. It's entertaining, I'll give ya that.
Ballotonia wrote:Testing is for sissies. The actual test is to see how many people complain when any change is made ;)
by Doing it Rightland » Sun Nov 11, 2018 7:10 pm
by Lord Dominator » Sun Nov 11, 2018 7:13 pm
Doing it Rightland wrote:I swore this had reached quorum before, and was listed as a proposal yesterday. Could someone explain what happened?
by Doing it Rightland » Sun Nov 11, 2018 7:14 pm
by Lord Dominator » Sun Nov 11, 2018 7:15 pm
by Doing it Rightland » Sun Nov 11, 2018 7:18 pm
Lord Dominator wrote:A series of raids in a single game update, in this case done to bump delegates who had approved certain proposals out of their seats so as to reset the approvals they gave.
by Lord Dominator » Sun Nov 11, 2018 7:30 pm
Doing it Rightland wrote:Lord Dominator wrote:A series of raids in a single game update, in this case done to bump delegates who had approved certain proposals out of their seats so as to reset the approvals they gave.
Oh. That makes sense. Thanks for the clarification. That's really annoying, to harass the WA to a dysfunctional state.
by New Bremerton » Mon Nov 12, 2018 12:49 am
by Sierra Lyricalia » Mon Nov 12, 2018 6:22 am
Galiantus III wrote: It's not personal, I just want to harass the WA.
by Sefy the Great » Mon Nov 12, 2018 6:54 am
A 12.7 civilization, according to this index.
by Auralia » Mon Nov 12, 2018 10:00 am
Galiantus III wrote:I am unaware of a counter campaign, but it just so happens that I triggered a run by Amestris, and took part in a second one with Lily, that aimed to remove delegates approving two WA proposals, one of which was this one. It's not personal, I just want to harass the WA.
Advertisement
Advertisement