I'm not saying that, but if fascist RP is permitted and they're only RP as fascist I just can't see where the problem is
Advertisement
by Nova Trieste » Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:49 am
by Blood Wine » Sat Sep 22, 2018 9:35 am
Elke and Elba wrote:Well Mall, you want Haven? I'd want your Joint Systems Alliance badge, then.
Discoveria wrote:Port blood is a raider through and through. Honest.
Tim-Opolis wrote:The Salt Mines will be fueled for months by the tears of silly fascists.
[4:27 PM] Antigone: Port Blood = Gameplay JesusSedgistan wrote:Attempted threadjack on sandwiches and satanism removed.
by Lord Dominator » Sat Sep 22, 2018 10:14 am
by Forestavia » Sat Sep 22, 2018 10:20 am
Caracasus wrote:Well I can put some of your fears to rest. Turns out that the diasporia from toxic communities do not, in fact, make things more toxic when their communities are destroyed. Quite the opposite in fact. Things get less toxic. Perhaps because they no longer have a safe space where their views go unnchallenged.
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&sourc ... 9gJm_a3obH
And no, for the umpteenth time, taking action to stop fascists does not make you as bad as the fascists.
by Forestavia » Sat Sep 22, 2018 10:25 am
Prydania wrote:Forestavia wrote:Respect the regional sovereignty and native rights of these nations and regions...
These people don’t even respect the fact that I’m a human being.We need to get our act together and act like a respectable world government.
A responsible world government sees fascism on the rise and does what it can to snuff it out.
by Forestavia » Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:26 am
Communaccord wrote:The Communaccordian delegation doesn’t usually give a damn about the security council, nor the whole issue of raiding, defending, and liberation. However, in particularly outstanding instances of overreach, it is dutiful to address present absurdities.
Under the current precedent for what necessitates liberation, and taking into account the intended course of action and outcome of such resolutions, it will be found that this resolution falls laughably short in every regard.
There is no barrier to free entry, nor occupation by foreign forces, rather a prevelance of an ideology and a tolerance of which the author of this proposal unabashedly finds intolerable and sees fit to be expunged. While this sentiment may be shared by many if not a solid majority of those present, a liberation is hardly an appropriate course of action, as there are no foreign forces to be expunged, nor native residents seeking a return.
If anything, a condemnation is in order, however this resolution is entirely uncalled for, and if it passes, a repeal will be in short order.
by USS Monitor » Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:40 am
Nova Trieste wrote:One last question, if fascist roleplay bothers you so much, why not include in the forum guidelines "You can roleplay anything you want except fascists ideologist"? At least you could hunt down "le ebil internet nahtzees" in the site without sounding like a whiny hypocrite
Nova Trieste wrote:Caracasus wrote:
Continued ad homeniems aren't doing a great deal for your claim to an ascended plane of maturity. That aside, this question as to whether they are RPing or not has been answered in quite some detail by myself and others. Take a look back through the topic.
Now unless you are gonna let us all in on how you have determined that they are not fascists, that it is not a fascist region and that they are just RPing, I don't really see what there is to discuss...
All I've seen so far is asinine squabble about semantics and people whining about how a certain kind of roleplaying makes them upset, not a single objective proof (like screenshots of conversations, telegrams, forum topics and whatnot) on how the members of the CCD genuinely promotes and encourage fascist ideas. So yeah, there's not much to discuss with brainlets triggered by roleplaying they don't like.
by Forestavia » Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:28 pm
RiderSyl wrote:Passing a preemptive liberation is not killing them. Come on now.
Also, preemptive liberations like this became a thing in the first place because condemnations do nothing. In that sense, preemptive liberations are a protest of condemnations being broken.
by Cosmopolitan borovan » Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:32 pm
by Blood Wine » Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:34 pm
Forestavia wrote:Commendations don't do anything either. And yet, the dictionary is very clear about what a condemnation is and what a commendation is. They are not broken. They still work. They still exist. They are a great way to label allies and enemies. Liberations, however, are a special kind of instrument that should be used wisely.
Of course you're right that a preemptive neoliberation isn't going to kill them - at least in the short term. Looking at KAISERREICH we can see that they've managed to survive with a "liberation" for many months now. But the death happens in the long term. What the Security Council is banking on is that someday the founders of these so-called "liberated" regions will die off. The long term goal is to raid these regions. So yes, long term we ARE killing regions with these fake liberations.
Forestavia wrote:Now, if the Confederation of Corrupt Dictators deserves a condemnation, then we should give them one. If they deserve a commendation, then we should give them one. But let's not force-feed a liberation onto a region that doesn't want nor need to be liberated. It is foolish to liberate a region from itself. They have an active founder. The region is safe. They are not being invaded. They are not occupied. Why are we interfering in their internal affairs? I'll tell you why. Because the World Assembly has decided to get arrogant with the power that it can wield through the Security Council. The power is addictive. We have become just as authoritarian as the region we are "liberating".
Forestavia wrote:There are residents in regions all over the world who would love to have a liberation because it would give them the hope that they might be able to return home again. But instead of helping those who really need it, here we are in this chamber acting all high and mighty and politicizing the very tool that was meant to help those who need it most. I guess we would rather militaristically target the nearly 500 nations that don't need to be liberated instead of helping those who do.
Elke and Elba wrote:Well Mall, you want Haven? I'd want your Joint Systems Alliance badge, then.
Discoveria wrote:Port blood is a raider through and through. Honest.
Tim-Opolis wrote:The Salt Mines will be fueled for months by the tears of silly fascists.
[4:27 PM] Antigone: Port Blood = Gameplay JesusSedgistan wrote:Attempted threadjack on sandwiches and satanism removed.
by Forestavia » Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:38 pm
Cosmopolitan borovan wrote:You can always find another region or found a new one it's not like your gonna die if a bunch of people are ejected it may hurt but it's not the end of the world
by Smitzburg » Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:39 pm
by Greater Cesnica » Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:41 pm
Smitzburg wrote:PEOPLE SHOULD BE ALOUD TO HAVE ANY OPINION THEY WANT AS LONG AS IT DOES NOT HURT ANYONE.
how many times must that be repeated?
Sic Semper Tyrannis.
WA Discord Server
Authorship Dispatch
WA Ambassador: Slick McCooley
Firearm Rights are Human Rights
privacytools.io - Use these tools to safeguard your online activities, freedoms, and safety
My IFAK and Booboo Kit Starter Guide!
novemberstars#8888 on Discord
San Lumen wrote:You are ridiculous.George Orwell wrote:“That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.”
by Forestavia » Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:45 pm
Blood Wine wrote:Forestavia wrote:Commendations don't do anything either. And yet, the dictionary is very clear about what a condemnation is and what a commendation is. They are not broken. They still work. They still exist. They are a great way to label allies and enemies. Liberations, however, are a special kind of instrument that should be used wisely.
Of course you're right that a preemptive neoliberation isn't going to kill them - at least in the short term. Looking at KAISERREICH we can see that they've managed to survive with a "liberation" for many months now. But the death happens in the long term. What the Security Council is banking on is that someday the founders of these so-called "liberated" regions will die off. The long term goal is to raid these regions. So yes, long term we ARE killing regions with these fake liberations.
Neoliberations are not about killing them - neither short or long termForestavia wrote:Now, if the Confederation of Corrupt Dictators deserves a condemnation, then we should give them one. If they deserve a commendation, then we should give them one. But let's not force-feed a liberation onto a region that doesn't want nor need to be liberated. It is foolish to liberate a region from itself. They have an active founder. The region is safe. They are not being invaded. They are not occupied. Why are we interfering in their internal affairs? I'll tell you why. Because the World Assembly has decided to get arrogant with the power that it can wield through the Security Council. The power is addictive. We have become just as authoritarian as the region we are "liberating".
Again, no, condemnations are a badge of honor - they do not deserve a badge of honor
Neoliberations are a tool the SC invented to get around the badge of honor issue by still slapping them with a mark, but one that is not honorableForestavia wrote:There are residents in regions all over the world who would love to have a liberation because it would give them the hope that they might be able to return home again. But instead of helping those who really need it, here we are in this chamber acting all high and mighty and politicizing the very tool that was meant to help those who need it most. I guess we would rather militaristically target the nearly 500 nations that don't need to be liberated instead of helping those who do.
The SC is inactive basically over half of the year, this argument is nonsensical
by Caracasus » Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:51 pm
Smitzburg wrote:PEOPLE SHOULD BE ALOUD TO HAVE ANY OPINION THEY WANT AS LONG AS IT DOES NOT HURT ANYONE.
how many times must that be repeated?
by Armaros » Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:59 pm
Forestavia wrote:Cosmopolitan borovan wrote:You can always find another region or found a new one it's not like your gonna die if a bunch of people are ejected it may hurt but it's not the end of the world
Oh, okay. What if that happened to your region? How would you feel? What if your whole community was broken up because of the selfish actions of the Security Council?
I'm sorry but I think that the Security Council should have your back as a citizen of the world. You should be able to know with confidence that the world government isn't going to fly in and destroy your region. The SC should protect your community. They should be the protectors and not the destroyers.
by Greater Cesnica » Sat Sep 22, 2018 1:00 pm
Armaros wrote:Forestavia wrote:Oh, okay. What if that happened to your region? How would you feel? What if your whole community was broken up because of the selfish actions of the Security Council?
I'm sorry but I think that the Security Council should have your back as a citizen of the world. You should be able to know with confidence that the world government isn't going to fly in and destroy your region. The SC should protect your community. They should be the protectors and not the destroyers.
"Selfish actions of the sc" I hope you realise you're talking about over 10 000 nations and people, each with their own stance, allignment, etc. And all with an equal say in things. Not sure how you call that "selfish".
Sic Semper Tyrannis.
WA Discord Server
Authorship Dispatch
WA Ambassador: Slick McCooley
Firearm Rights are Human Rights
privacytools.io - Use these tools to safeguard your online activities, freedoms, and safety
My IFAK and Booboo Kit Starter Guide!
novemberstars#8888 on Discord
San Lumen wrote:You are ridiculous.George Orwell wrote:“That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.”
by Armaros » Sat Sep 22, 2018 1:05 pm
Forestavia wrote:
1. We are setting Jocospor's region up for an invasion months or years down the road. That sounds like regional death to me.
2. Condemnations are not a badge of honor. They are a badge of dishonor.
3. Neoliberations are not a tool. They are an abomination of the original intent.
4. Maybe the Security Council isn't looking hard enough for regions that are always on the brink of death - regions with resident natives who still want to try to save their community. They're out there. We just have to look a little closer.
by Forestavia » Sat Sep 22, 2018 1:10 pm
Armaros wrote:Forestavia wrote:Oh, okay. What if that happened to your region? How would you feel? What if your whole community was broken up because of the selfish actions of the Security Council?
I'm sorry but I think that the Security Council should have your back as a citizen of the world. You should be able to know with confidence that the world government isn't going to fly in and destroy your region. The SC should protect your community. They should be the protectors and not the destroyers.
"Selfish actions of the sc" I hope you realise you're talking about over 10 000 nations and people, each with their own stance, allignment, etc. And all with an equal say in things. Not sure how you call that "selfish".
by Forestavia » Sat Sep 22, 2018 1:16 pm
Armaros wrote:Forestavia wrote:
1. We are setting Jocospor's region up for an invasion months or years down the road. That sounds like regional death to me.
2. Condemnations are not a badge of honor. They are a badge of dishonor.
3. Neoliberations are not a tool. They are an abomination of the original intent.
4. Maybe the Security Council isn't looking hard enough for regions that are always on the brink of death - regions with resident natives who still want to try to save their community. They're out there. We just have to look a little closer.
2 that's... not the case at all. They are trested as signs of honour. If you don't agree, look at condemned regions.
3 they're a tool. They can be used both ways, one to combat occupations, one to combat people seen as "bad"
4 they can make a proposal themselves. We can't look fkr them, they'll have tk come to us.
by Tigrexia » Sat Sep 22, 2018 1:32 pm
by Lord Dominator » Sat Sep 22, 2018 1:33 pm
Tigrexia wrote:Liberation Definition: the act of setting someone free from imprisonment, slavery, or oppression; release.
freedom from limits on thought or behavior.
Invasion Definition:an unwelcome intrusion into another's domain.
an incursion by a large number of people or things into a place or sphere of activity.
Which does this sound like?
by Forestavia » Sat Sep 22, 2018 1:35 pm
Tigrexia wrote:Liberation Definition: the act of setting someone free from imprisonment, slavery, or oppression; release.
freedom from limits on thought or behavior.
Invasion Definition:an unwelcome intrusion into another's domain.
an incursion by a large number of people or things into a place or sphere of activity.
Which does this sound like?
by Forestavia » Sat Sep 22, 2018 1:38 pm
Lord Dominator wrote:Tigrexia wrote:Liberation Definition: the act of setting someone free from imprisonment, slavery, or oppression; release.
freedom from limits on thought or behavior.
Invasion Definition:an unwelcome intrusion into another's domain.
an incursion by a large number of people or things into a place or sphere of activity.
Which does this sound like?
Not our fault the Liberation resolution is called as such.
by Kaboomlandia » Sat Sep 22, 2018 1:47 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement