Advertisement
by Martian Commonwealths » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:51 pm
by Keshiland » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:51 pm
by Genivaria » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:52 pm
Martian Commonwealths wrote:The Martian Empire lays the issue out like this:
1. It's the child's right to be born.
2. However there are uncontrollable cases where the mother's right to abort come first, such as rape, because the baby could grow up to become a rapist or in general a terrible person because of the father. Mother's health is the second case in which abortion should be allowed, assuming of course that it's an either or scenario, our goal will be to save both of them to the best of our abilities. Incest is the last and final case in which abortion should be a right due to birth defects in the child that could occur.
3. For financially struggling women who want their child but can't pay for it, the federal government will set aside $10-$100 a month in the mother's savings account. If more money is required she can sign up for a maternity loan of $250-$500 if she meets the criteria.
4. If she wants to have the child but doesn't want to keep it we have an online program that would allow a family wanting to adopt to find the child.
5. We are experimenting with our healthcare system currently. We have several areas like Family Spending where the government invests in the well being of growing families, or Senior Aid, where another investment is made to help the elderly. It's just a group of investments that hopefully will cover all martians who need immediate service. Of course this means we'd have to have a flat tax on top of other taxes of 2% of an individual martians income to put money in our federal savings account
The Martian Empire lays the issue out like this:
by New haven america » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:52 pm
Martian Commonwealths wrote:The Martian Empire lays the issue out like this:
by New haven america » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:53 pm
by Vassenor » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:53 pm
by The Grande Republic 0f Arcadia » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:54 pm
Martian Commonwealths wrote:The Martian Empire lays the issue out like this:
1. It's the child's right to be born.
2. However there are uncontrollable cases where the mother's right to abort come first, such as rape, because the baby could grow up to become a rapist or in general a terrible person because of the father. Mother's health is the second case in which abortion should be allowed, assuming of course that it's an either or scenario, our goal will be to save both of them to the best of our abilities. Incest is the last and final case in which abortion should be a right due to birth defects in the child that could occur.
-snip-
by New haven america » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:54 pm
Vassenor wrote:I still don't understand why women should not have the right to control their own bodies.
by Omakhandia » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:55 pm
by Salus Maior » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:57 pm
New haven america wrote:Salus Maior wrote:
Logic: If you don't want babies, best way to not have them is to not have sex = Don't dress like a slut if you don't want to get raped.
I don't see the connection outside of making a more convenient argument for yourself in a disingenuous way. He didn't make any remarks on women, or rape culture at all, he made the actually true statement for both men and women that sex can lead to pregnancy. Dress or rape culture is irrelevant to that statement.
Here's the explanation: "Don't do X if you don't want Y" is a very toxic and destructive line of thinking.
Don't have sex if you don't want kids, don't dress like a slut if you don't want to get raped, just make money if you want to stop being poor, don't be abused if you don't want to be abused, etc... all pretty much mean the same thing, it's only your fault if something you don't want happens, you only have yourself to blame, deal with the consequences. It dehumanizes others and gives the people who support this view a warped vision of life.
by Katganistan » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:59 pm
Martian Commonwealths wrote:The Martian Empire lays the issue out like this:
1. It's the child's right to be born.
2. However there are uncontrollable cases where the mother's right to abort come first, such as rape, because the baby could grow up to become a rapist or in general a terrible person because of the father. Mother's health is the second case in which abortion should be allowed, assuming of course that it's an either or scenario, our goal will be to save both of them to the best of our abilities. Incest is the last and final case in which abortion should be a right due to birth defects in the child that could occur.
3. For financially struggling women who want their child but can't pay for it, the federal government will set aside $10-$100 a month in the mother's savings account. If more money is required she can sign up for a maternity loan of $250-$500 if she meets the criteria.
4. If she wants to have the child but doesn't want to keep it we have an online program that would allow a family wanting to adopt to find the child.
5. We are experimenting with our healthcare system currently. We have several areas like Family Spending where the government invests in the well being of growing families, or Senior Aid, where another investment is made to help the elderly. It's just a group of investments that hopefully will cover all martians who need immediate service. Of course this means we'd have to have a flat tax on top of other taxes of 2% of an individual martians income to put money in our federal savings account
by Salus Maior » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:00 pm
Omakhandia wrote:If you anti-abortion wingnuts really thought babies were the same as fetuses, you'd be blowing yourselves up at the clinics all the time. Deep down, you know they're not people, so you relegate much of your activism to online message boards.
by Verenigde Staten van Amerika » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:00 pm
by Salus Maior » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:01 pm
by New haven america » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:01 pm
Salus Maior wrote:New haven america wrote:Here's the explanation: "Don't do X if you don't want Y" is a very toxic and destructive line of thinking.
Don't have sex if you don't want kids, don't dress like a slut if you don't want to get raped, just make money if you want to stop being poor, don't be abused if you don't want to be abused, etc... all pretty much mean the same thing, it's only your fault if something you don't want happens, you only have yourself to blame, deal with the consequences. It dehumanizes others and gives the people who support this view a warped vision of life.
1.You can't choose not to be poor, 2. you can't choose to not be raped when it happens, 3.you can't choose not to be abused if you're stuck in that situation. 4.You can choose to not have consensual sex. It's not comparable to the above situations. People do it literally all the time.
5. As it is in the description, consensual sex implies consent and choice to do the act and therefore an acceptance of certain risks and possible consequences. 6. Does this mean that people who choose to make a mistake should be abused and shamed? No, that's not helpful. And besides we're all guilty of making mistakes and foolish decisions. 7.That doesn't make it ok to destroy a life.
by Keshiland » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:03 pm
by Katganistan » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:03 pm
Vassenor wrote:I still don't understand why women should not have the right to control their own bodies.
by Anywhere Else But Here » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:03 pm
Salus Maior wrote:New haven america wrote:Here's the explanation: "Don't do X if you don't want Y" is a very toxic and destructive line of thinking.
Don't have sex if you don't want kids, don't dress like a slut if you don't want to get raped, just make money if you want to stop being poor, don't be abused if you don't want to be abused, etc... all pretty much mean the same thing, it's only your fault if something you don't want happens, you only have yourself to blame, deal with the consequences. It dehumanizes others and gives the people who support this view a warped vision of life.
You can't choose not to be poor, you can't choose to not be raped when it happens, you can't choose not to be abused if you're stuck in that situation. You can choose to not have consensual sex. It's not comparable to the above situations. People do it literally all the time.
As it is in the description, consensual sex implies consent and choice to do the act and therefore an acceptance of certain risks and possible consequences. Does this mean that people who choose to make a mistake should be abused and shamed? No, that's not helpful. And besides we're all guilty of making mistakes and foolish decisions. That doesn't make it ok to destroy a life.
by Omakhandia » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:03 pm
Salus Maior wrote:Omakhandia wrote:If you anti-abortion wingnuts really thought babies were the same as fetuses, you'd be blowing yourselves up at the clinics all the time. Deep down, you know they're not people, so you relegate much of your activism to online message boards.
Or maybe some people realize that blowing people up isn't the most effective way to deal with problems. Or the most moral.
by Martian Commonwealths » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:05 pm
The Grande Republic 0f Arcadia wrote:Martian Commonwealths wrote:The Martian Empire lays the issue out like this:
1. It's the child's right to be born.
2. However there are uncontrollable cases where the mother's right to abort come first, such as rape, because the baby could grow up to become a rapist or in general a terrible person because of the father. Mother's health is the second case in which abortion should be allowed, assuming of course that it's an either or scenario, our goal will be to save both of them to the best of our abilities. Incest is the last and final case in which abortion should be a right due to birth defects in the child that could occur.
-snip-
I would like to add two points on two, on the fact that you should also allow abortions if they are under 18 or the contraceptives failed aswell, and while I agree with your point , it wouldnt be able to be enforced, and would push people to have illegal abortions outside of a KFC type of situation where the woman could very well die from a botched abortion. So thats why choice is the best option right now.
by Katganistan » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:05 pm
Keshiland wrote:I would consede defeat on the matter if all clinics needed to play on loop babies crying while people ask wait and perform abortions. Hey maybe people should set up huge stereos outside clinics of crying babies and babies saying mommy.
by Omakhandia » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:05 pm
Keshiland wrote:I would consede defeat on the matter if all clinics needed to play on loop babies crying while people ask wait and perform abortions. Hey maybe people should set up huge stereos outside clinics of crying babies and babies saying mommy.
by Keshiland » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:07 pm
Katganistan wrote:Keshiland wrote:I would consede defeat on the matter if all clinics needed to play on loop babies crying while people ask wait and perform abortions. Hey maybe people should set up huge stereos outside clinics of crying babies and babies saying mommy.
Nice. Why don't you just scream at them that they're baby-murdering sluts? I mean, do you really think emotional abuse is appropriate?
by New haven america » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:08 pm
Keshiland wrote:Katganistan wrote:
Nice. Why don't you just scream at them that they're baby-murdering sluts? I mean, do you really think emotional abuse is appropriate?
Its not abuse its tapping into the maternal instinked and it would stop a huge amount of people from getting an abortions.
Playing things like crying babies, I want my mommy, mommy please no, and crying while saying mommy.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Katinea, Umeria
Advertisement