NATION

PASSWORD

[Abortion][REVISED POLL] If you had the power...

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

If you had the power to address the controversy over abortion rights, how would you do it?

1. Leave as is
90
5%
2. Illegal across the board
166
8%
3. Illegal with exceptions
301
15%
4. Enact measures to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies / the burden of pregnancy and parenthood, but not make it illegal because emergencies happen
733
37%
5. Enact measures to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies / the burden of pregnancy and parenthood, AND make it illegal across the board
85
4%
6. Enact measures to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies / the burden of pregnancy and parenthood, AND make it illegal with exceptions
277
14%
7. Reduce/remove any existing restrictions on abortion and cut entitlements
218
11%
8. Institute compulsory population control measures
90
5%
 
Total votes : 1960

User avatar
Martian Commonwealths
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: Sep 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Martian Commonwealths » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:51 pm

The Martian Empire lays the issue out like this:

1. It's the child's right to be born.

2. However there are uncontrollable cases where the mother's right to abort come first, such as rape, because the baby could grow up to become a rapist or in general a terrible person because of the father. Mother's health is the second case in which abortion should be allowed, assuming of course that it's an either or scenario, our goal will be to save both of them to the best of our abilities. Incest is the last and final case in which abortion should be a right due to birth defects in the child that could occur.

3. For financially struggling women who want their child but can't pay for it, the federal government will set aside $10-$100 a month in the mother's savings account. If more money is required she can sign up for a maternity loan of $250-$500 if she meets the criteria.

4. If she wants to have the child but doesn't want to keep it we have an online program that would allow a family wanting to adopt to find the child.

5. We are experimenting with our healthcare system currently. We have several areas like Family Spending where the government invests in the well being of growing families, or Senior Aid, where another investment is made to help the elderly. It's just a group of investments that hopefully will cover all martians who need immediate service. Of course this means we'd have to have a flat tax on top of other taxes of 2% of an individual martians income to put money in our federal savings account

User avatar
Keshiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1469
Founded: Dec 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Keshiland » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:51 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:


That is what he said and that is what I'm referencing. This is what you replied to with your strawman statement of this statement above somehow equals rape culture. Which is ridiculous and completely unrelated.

K so clearly you don't know what a strawman is.


a strawman is taking ones argument and using the most extreme example you can find or an outlier that's what you did you took sex and made it rape.
OOC- I am a Prolife Liberal who is Anti Gun, Pro Immigration, Pro UHC, Pro financial aid, and anything that makes children's lives better. I am also eco-friendly.

IC- The Federation of Keshiland stands for freedom and local governance. Requirements for state hood. A territory atleast 1,000 KL and a population of atleast 100k. Our Constitution keeps us free and can only be changed with a 3/4ths ratification of the states.

State count 135

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:52 pm

Martian Commonwealths wrote:The Martian Empire lays the issue out like this:

1. It's the child's right to be born.

2. However there are uncontrollable cases where the mother's right to abort come first, such as rape, because the baby could grow up to become a rapist or in general a terrible person because of the father. Mother's health is the second case in which abortion should be allowed, assuming of course that it's an either or scenario, our goal will be to save both of them to the best of our abilities. Incest is the last and final case in which abortion should be a right due to birth defects in the child that could occur.

3. For financially struggling women who want their child but can't pay for it, the federal government will set aside $10-$100 a month in the mother's savings account. If more money is required she can sign up for a maternity loan of $250-$500 if she meets the criteria.

4. If she wants to have the child but doesn't want to keep it we have an online program that would allow a family wanting to adopt to find the child.

5. We are experimenting with our healthcare system currently. We have several areas like Family Spending where the government invests in the well being of growing families, or Senior Aid, where another investment is made to help the elderly. It's just a group of investments that hopefully will cover all martians who need immediate service. Of course this means we'd have to have a flat tax on top of other taxes of 2% of an individual martians income to put money in our federal savings account

The Martian Empire lays the issue out like this:

Stop right there, General is IRL not in-game.

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44099
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:52 pm

Martian Commonwealths wrote:The Martian Empire lays the issue out like this:

General is OOC.
Last edited by New haven america on Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:52 pm

Keshiland wrote:
Genivaria wrote:K so clearly you don't know what a strawman is.


a strawman is taking ones argument and using the most extreme example you can find or an outlier that's what you did you took sex and made it rape.

No.
A strawman is misrepresenting someone's argument.
What I did was make an analogy using your logic.

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44099
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:53 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:


That is what he said and that is what I'm referencing. This is what you replied to with your strawman statement of this statement above somehow equals rape culture. Which is ridiculous and completely unrelated.

K so clearly you don't know what a strawman is.

A lot don't, it's just their go-to thing because they don't know about other fallacies.
Last edited by New haven america on Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68116
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:53 pm

I still don't understand why women should not have the right to control their own bodies.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
The Grande Republic 0f Arcadia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1990
Founded: Oct 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grande Republic 0f Arcadia » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:54 pm

Martian Commonwealths wrote:The Martian Empire lays the issue out like this:

1. It's the child's right to be born.

2. However there are uncontrollable cases where the mother's right to abort come first, such as rape, because the baby could grow up to become a rapist or in general a terrible person because of the father. Mother's health is the second case in which abortion should be allowed, assuming of course that it's an either or scenario, our goal will be to save both of them to the best of our abilities. Incest is the last and final case in which abortion should be a right due to birth defects in the child that could occur.

-snip-


I would like to add two points on two, on the fact that you should also allow abortions if they are under 18 or the contraceptives failed aswell, and while I agree with your point , it wouldnt be able to be enforced, and would push people to have illegal abortions outside of a KFC type of situation where the woman could very well die from a botched abortion. So thats why choice is the best option right now.
Proud Member of theINTERNATIONAL FREEDOM COALITION!
https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=422664

Been on NS since 2014
Right Leaning Centrist Kinda Libertarian Kinda Republican Take Your Pick

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44099
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:54 pm

Vassenor wrote:I still don't understand why women should not have the right to control their own bodies.

Because they obviously don't know what's best for them. *nod*
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Omakhandia
Envoy
 
Posts: 231
Founded: Jun 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Omakhandia » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:55 pm

If you anti-abortion wingnuts really thought babies were the same as fetuses, you'd be blowing yourselves up at the clinics all the time. Deep down, you know they're not people, so you relegate much of your activism to online message boards.
Don't copy+paste this into your signature. Come up with something original. Be an individual.

Pro: Capitalism, free speech, libertarianism, classical liberalism, secular humanism, gun rights, real feminism, religious freedom, choice, centrism, free trade.
Anti: Corruption, fascism, communism, vegans, far-left socialism, the alt-left and alt-right, religious fundamentalism, authoritarianism, collectivism.


In my spare time I admin for a movie discussion site. Drop by if you're interested!

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:57 pm

New haven america wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:
Logic: If you don't want babies, best way to not have them is to not have sex = Don't dress like a slut if you don't want to get raped.

I don't see the connection outside of making a more convenient argument for yourself in a disingenuous way. He didn't make any remarks on women, or rape culture at all, he made the actually true statement for both men and women that sex can lead to pregnancy. Dress or rape culture is irrelevant to that statement.

Here's the explanation: "Don't do X if you don't want Y" is a very toxic and destructive line of thinking.

Don't have sex if you don't want kids, don't dress like a slut if you don't want to get raped, just make money if you want to stop being poor, don't be abused if you don't want to be abused, etc... all pretty much mean the same thing, it's only your fault if something you don't want happens, you only have yourself to blame, deal with the consequences. It dehumanizes others and gives the people who support this view a warped vision of life.


You can't choose not to be poor, you can't choose to not be raped when it happens, you can't choose not to be abused if you're stuck in that situation. You can choose to not have consensual sex. It's not comparable to the above situations. People do it literally all the time.

As it is in the description, consensual sex implies consent and choice to do the act and therefore an acceptance of certain risks and possible consequences. Does this mean that people who choose to make a mistake should be abused and shamed? No, that's not helpful. And besides we're all guilty of making mistakes and foolish decisions. That doesn't make it ok to destroy a life.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37014
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:59 pm

Martian Commonwealths wrote:The Martian Empire lays the issue out like this:

1. It's the child's right to be born.

2. However there are uncontrollable cases where the mother's right to abort come first, such as rape, because the baby could grow up to become a rapist or in general a terrible person because of the father. Mother's health is the second case in which abortion should be allowed, assuming of course that it's an either or scenario, our goal will be to save both of them to the best of our abilities. Incest is the last and final case in which abortion should be a right due to birth defects in the child that could occur.

3. For financially struggling women who want their child but can't pay for it, the federal government will set aside $10-$100 a month in the mother's savings account. If more money is required she can sign up for a maternity loan of $250-$500 if she meets the criteria.

4. If she wants to have the child but doesn't want to keep it we have an online program that would allow a family wanting to adopt to find the child.

5. We are experimenting with our healthcare system currently. We have several areas like Family Spending where the government invests in the well being of growing families, or Senior Aid, where another investment is made to help the elderly. It's just a group of investments that hopefully will cover all martians who need immediate service. Of course this means we'd have to have a flat tax on top of other taxes of 2% of an individual martians income to put money in our federal savings account

This is not a roleplaying thread, nor a roleplaying forum. This is an 'in real life' board.

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:00 pm

Omakhandia wrote:If you anti-abortion wingnuts really thought babies were the same as fetuses, you'd be blowing yourselves up at the clinics all the time. Deep down, you know they're not people, so you relegate much of your activism to online message boards.


Or maybe some people realize that blowing people up isn't the most effective way to deal with problems. Or the most moral.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Verenigde Staten van Amerika
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 25
Founded: Sep 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Verenigde Staten van Amerika » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:00 pm

I don't understand why the hell there is only one abortion clinic in the whole damn state. You conservatives should stop trying to tell people what to do with their non-living zygotes.
What if the Netherlands took Britain's new world colonies instead of visa-versa? This nation would happen. (However, a lot of history remains more or less the same for simplicity's sake.)

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:01 pm

New haven america wrote:
Vassenor wrote:I still don't understand why women should not have the right to control their own bodies.

Because they obviously don't know what's best for them. *nod*


Ironically, I've heard Pro-Choice advocates use that phrase in reference to pro-life women many, many times.

Funnily little world, innit?
Last edited by Salus Maior on Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44099
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:01 pm

Salus Maior wrote:
New haven america wrote:Here's the explanation: "Don't do X if you don't want Y" is a very toxic and destructive line of thinking.

Don't have sex if you don't want kids, don't dress like a slut if you don't want to get raped, just make money if you want to stop being poor, don't be abused if you don't want to be abused, etc... all pretty much mean the same thing, it's only your fault if something you don't want happens, you only have yourself to blame, deal with the consequences. It dehumanizes others and gives the people who support this view a warped vision of life.


1.You can't choose not to be poor, 2. you can't choose to not be raped when it happens, 3.you can't choose not to be abused if you're stuck in that situation. 4.You can choose to not have consensual sex. It's not comparable to the above situations. People do it literally all the time.

5. As it is in the description, consensual sex implies consent and choice to do the act and therefore an acceptance of certain risks and possible consequences. 6. Does this mean that people who choose to make a mistake should be abused and shamed? No, that's not helpful. And besides we're all guilty of making mistakes and foolish decisions. 7.That doesn't make it ok to destroy a life.

1. Yes you can, you can just choose not to work
2. Sure you can, by not dressing like a slut
3. Sure you can, don't be around abusive people
4. And you shouldn't be punished with something you don't want if you do
5. That is true
6. Oh the irony in this
7. It's not a life though, it's basically a parasite or a virus (That's basically how the mother's body tends to view fetuses, especially if they have a different blood type than the mother) with no conscience or sense of awareness. You see, you yourself are using reproduction as a punishment for people doing something you don't agree with.
Last edited by New haven america on Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:06 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Keshiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1469
Founded: Dec 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Keshiland » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:03 pm

I would consede defeat on the matter if all clinics needed to play on loop babies crying while people ask wait and perform abortions. Hey maybe people should set up huge stereos outside clinics of crying babies and babies saying mommy.
OOC- I am a Prolife Liberal who is Anti Gun, Pro Immigration, Pro UHC, Pro financial aid, and anything that makes children's lives better. I am also eco-friendly.

IC- The Federation of Keshiland stands for freedom and local governance. Requirements for state hood. A territory atleast 1,000 KL and a population of atleast 100k. Our Constitution keeps us free and can only be changed with a 3/4ths ratification of the states.

State count 135

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37014
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:03 pm

Vassenor wrote:I still don't understand why women should not have the right to control their own bodies.


Because men said so, and because they're too stupid/irresponsible/evil to make their own decisions, and because their only purpose is to have children and serve men.

User avatar
Anywhere Else But Here
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5651
Founded: Mar 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Anywhere Else But Here » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:03 pm

Salus Maior wrote:
New haven america wrote:Here's the explanation: "Don't do X if you don't want Y" is a very toxic and destructive line of thinking.

Don't have sex if you don't want kids, don't dress like a slut if you don't want to get raped, just make money if you want to stop being poor, don't be abused if you don't want to be abused, etc... all pretty much mean the same thing, it's only your fault if something you don't want happens, you only have yourself to blame, deal with the consequences. It dehumanizes others and gives the people who support this view a warped vision of life.


You can't choose not to be poor, you can't choose to not be raped when it happens, you can't choose not to be abused if you're stuck in that situation. You can choose to not have consensual sex. It's not comparable to the above situations. People do it literally all the time.

As it is in the description, consensual sex implies consent and choice to do the act and therefore an acceptance of certain risks and possible consequences. Does this mean that people who choose to make a mistake should be abused and shamed? No, that's not helpful. And besides we're all guilty of making mistakes and foolish decisions. That doesn't make it ok to destroy a life.

Careful. Carry on down that line, and you'll grant de facto privileges to gays, and I'm sure you wouldn't that.

User avatar
Omakhandia
Envoy
 
Posts: 231
Founded: Jun 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Omakhandia » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:03 pm

Salus Maior wrote:
Omakhandia wrote:If you anti-abortion wingnuts really thought babies were the same as fetuses, you'd be blowing yourselves up at the clinics all the time. Deep down, you know they're not people, so you relegate much of your activism to online message boards.


Or maybe some people realize that blowing people up isn't the most effective way to deal with problems. Or the most moral.


If the government was indeed running baby-killing facilities, as anti-abortion activists seem to think, that is far past the line of authoritarian evil. Violence would certainly be called for, assuming they were actually killing babies. Thankfully, they're not.
Last edited by Omakhandia on Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don't copy+paste this into your signature. Come up with something original. Be an individual.

Pro: Capitalism, free speech, libertarianism, classical liberalism, secular humanism, gun rights, real feminism, religious freedom, choice, centrism, free trade.
Anti: Corruption, fascism, communism, vegans, far-left socialism, the alt-left and alt-right, religious fundamentalism, authoritarianism, collectivism.


In my spare time I admin for a movie discussion site. Drop by if you're interested!

User avatar
Martian Commonwealths
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: Sep 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Martian Commonwealths » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:05 pm

The Grande Republic 0f Arcadia wrote:
Martian Commonwealths wrote:The Martian Empire lays the issue out like this:

1. It's the child's right to be born.

2. However there are uncontrollable cases where the mother's right to abort come first, such as rape, because the baby could grow up to become a rapist or in general a terrible person because of the father. Mother's health is the second case in which abortion should be allowed, assuming of course that it's an either or scenario, our goal will be to save both of them to the best of our abilities. Incest is the last and final case in which abortion should be a right due to birth defects in the child that could occur.

-snip-


I would like to add two points on two, on the fact that you should also allow abortions if they are under 18 or the contraceptives failed aswell, and while I agree with your point , it wouldnt be able to be enforced, and would push people to have illegal abortions outside of a KFC type of situation where the woman could very well die from a botched abortion. So thats why choice is the best option right now.


Under 18 I can understand that too, I'm not informed on contraceptives so no comment, well I mean if we are pronounced dead when the heart stops pumping, why aren't we considered alive when the heart starts pumping? For the women who don't want the baby there should be healthcare options they can take or some plan you know?

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37014
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:05 pm

Keshiland wrote:I would consede defeat on the matter if all clinics needed to play on loop babies crying while people ask wait and perform abortions. Hey maybe people should set up huge stereos outside clinics of crying babies and babies saying mommy.



Nice. Why don't you just scream at them that they're baby-murdering sluts? I mean, do you really think emotional abuse is appropriate?

User avatar
Omakhandia
Envoy
 
Posts: 231
Founded: Jun 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Omakhandia » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:05 pm

Keshiland wrote:I would consede defeat on the matter if all clinics needed to play on loop babies crying while people ask wait and perform abortions. Hey maybe people should set up huge stereos outside clinics of crying babies and babies saying mommy.


Fetuses can't cry, so this isn't even remotely relevant. But sure, play whatever you want. Crying babies are better than muzak.
Don't copy+paste this into your signature. Come up with something original. Be an individual.

Pro: Capitalism, free speech, libertarianism, classical liberalism, secular humanism, gun rights, real feminism, religious freedom, choice, centrism, free trade.
Anti: Corruption, fascism, communism, vegans, far-left socialism, the alt-left and alt-right, religious fundamentalism, authoritarianism, collectivism.


In my spare time I admin for a movie discussion site. Drop by if you're interested!

User avatar
Keshiland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1469
Founded: Dec 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Keshiland » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:07 pm

Katganistan wrote:
Keshiland wrote:I would consede defeat on the matter if all clinics needed to play on loop babies crying while people ask wait and perform abortions. Hey maybe people should set up huge stereos outside clinics of crying babies and babies saying mommy.



Nice. Why don't you just scream at them that they're baby-murdering sluts? I mean, do you really think emotional abuse is appropriate?


Its not abuse its tapping into the maternal instinked and it would stop a huge amount of people from getting an abortions.

Playing things like crying babies, I want my mommy, mommy please no, and crying while saying mommy.
OOC- I am a Prolife Liberal who is Anti Gun, Pro Immigration, Pro UHC, Pro financial aid, and anything that makes children's lives better. I am also eco-friendly.

IC- The Federation of Keshiland stands for freedom and local governance. Requirements for state hood. A territory atleast 1,000 KL and a population of atleast 100k. Our Constitution keeps us free and can only be changed with a 3/4ths ratification of the states.

State count 135

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44099
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:08 pm

Keshiland wrote:
Katganistan wrote:

Nice. Why don't you just scream at them that they're baby-murdering sluts? I mean, do you really think emotional abuse is appropriate?


Its not abuse its tapping into the maternal instinked and it would stop a huge amount of people from getting an abortions.

Playing things like crying babies, I want my mommy, mommy please no, and crying while saying mommy.

If I was a women who want an abortion that would just make me want to get one even more.

Also, what's an "Instinked"?
Last edited by New haven america on Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Katinea, Umeria

Advertisement

Remove ads