Bananaistan wrote:OOC: I don't recall the wording at the time of my previous comments but this still look likes a potential committee only violation? If you strip out all the committee related clauses, you're left with a clause which only effects future WA action and has no effect on member nations.
Not sure if that's true or not. You should ask GenSec. But true or not....:
Perhaps a BS clause directly encouraging member states to erect space traffic lights or some other superficial or harmless non-committee related action would make it bullet proof.
Or better yet, change this:
Member states engaging in nonmilitary space launches that may cross into either international or foreign national territory are required to liaise with IASA and the IMO to coordinate flight plans to avoid conflict, collision, or other unintended risk to other space programs or launches;
to this:
Member states engaging in nonmilitary space launches that may cross into either international or foreign national territory are required to coordinate flight plans, with either the IASA or the affected nations or territories, to avoid conflict, collision, or other unintended risk to other space programs or launches;
Now you're mandating a nation to take an action, either with the committee or with another nation. That should certainly be enough to be "bullet-proof", while also cutting down on the bureaucracy a bit.