Advertisement
by Nakari » Mon May 29, 2017 2:13 am
by Vuori Kunin-Grrs » Mon May 29, 2017 2:17 am
Nakari wrote:Eireann was not going to be griefed, and had border control officers, so would have been low chance of success and low urgency.
The Monarchist Entente was very likely to be griefed, and had no border control officers. High urgency and high chance of success.
Perhaps you might understand it better without snark.
by Nakari » Mon May 29, 2017 2:20 am
Vuori Kunin-Grrs wrote:I do believe that Eireann actually will be grieved, though it appears to be that TGW doesn't liberate from the perspective of the occupied region's natives, but rather the perspective of its public relations.
It's trying to gain relevance and popularity at the expense of disappointing and stressing out natives.
As of now: the more posts made, the more reasons I have to post.
by Vuori Kunin-Grrs » Mon May 29, 2017 2:23 am
Nakari wrote:Vuori Kunin-Grrs wrote:I do believe that Eireann actually will be grieved, though it appears to be that TGW doesn't liberate from the perspective of the occupied region's natives, but rather the perspective of its public relations.
It's trying to gain relevance and popularity at the expense of disappointing and stressing out natives.
As of now: the more posts made, the more reasons I have to post.
Eireann won't be griefed because the Europeian military is involved, and they do not take place in operations that will grief regions. The natives there are in far less danger of disappointment and stress.
by Nakari » Mon May 29, 2017 2:24 am
Vuori Kunin-Grrs wrote:Nakari wrote:
Eireann won't be griefed because the Europeian military is involved, and they do not take place in operations that will grief regions. The natives there are in far less danger of disappointment and stress.
That is, if KGB and Hellenic Empire, the two major organizers of the invasion, actually don't grief - Europeia is supporting, but that doesn't necessarily mean that "IF Europeia is supporting, THEN there is no chance of griefing."
by Roavin » Mon May 29, 2017 2:25 am
Vuori Kunin-Grrs wrote:That is, if KGB and Hellenic Empire, the two major organizers of the invasion, actually don't grief - Europeia is supporting, but that doesn't necessarily mean that "IF Europeia is supporting, THEN there is no chance of griefing."
by Kurnugia » Mon May 29, 2017 2:25 am
Vuori Kunin-Grrs wrote:It's trying to gain relevance and popularity at the expense of disappointing and stressing out natives.
As of now: the more posts made, the more reasons I have to post.
by Panzer Vier » Mon May 29, 2017 2:26 am
Vuori Kunin-Grrs wrote:Nakari wrote:
Eireann won't be griefed because the Europeian military is involved, and they do not take place in operations that will grief regions. The natives there are in far less danger of disappointment and stress.
That is, if KGB and Hellenic Empire, the two major organizers of the invasion, actually don't grief - Europeia is supporting, but that doesn't necessarily mean that "IF Europeia is supporting, THEN there is no chance of griefing."
by Vuori Kunin-Grrs » Mon May 29, 2017 2:29 am
Panzer Vier wrote:Vuori Kunin-Grrs wrote:That is, if KGB and Hellenic Empire, the two major organizers of the invasion, actually don't grief - Europeia is supporting, but that doesn't necessarily mean that "IF Europeia is supporting, THEN there is no chance of griefing."
If they ever want to count on Europeian piler forces and avoid accruing a reputation for not keeping their word, sure. It's certainly possible
by Shizensky » Mon May 29, 2017 9:55 am
Vuori Kunin-Grrs wrote:This furthermore goes to show that NS virtually has no defenders that will actually defend all regions being raided or invaded, which is what defending technically should be, and instead has a bunch of terms and conditions that must be followed for defense.
by Cormactopia Prime » Mon May 29, 2017 9:55 am
by Benevolent Thomas » Mon May 29, 2017 10:21 am
Cormactopia Prime wrote:I can't believe it took three pages to get to this point.
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by Vuori Kunin-Grrs » Mon May 29, 2017 10:31 am
Benevolent Thomas wrote:Cormactopia Prime wrote:I can't believe it took three pages to get to this point.
For real though. Why did some even feel the need to give this salty kiddo any oxygen? He's not entitled to any explanation, nor is his region entitled to our benevolent protection. We offered it, he took it for granted, and he lost it (and the region).
If he thinks he can do better than us, I invite him to try. Its much more difficult, and certainly far more impressive, than trying to settle grudges on the forum.
by Consular » Mon May 29, 2017 9:39 pm
Vuori Kunin-Grrs wrote:Maybe later.
by La Navasse » Mon May 29, 2017 10:24 pm
by Funkadelia » Tue May 30, 2017 12:29 am
Tim-Opolis wrote:You tried. We tried harder
by Vincent Drake » Tue May 30, 2017 1:30 am
by Nakari » Tue May 30, 2017 11:29 am
by Tim-Opolis » Tue May 30, 2017 11:30 am
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Vuori Kunin-Grrs » Tue May 30, 2017 4:29 pm
by Drop Your Pants » Tue May 30, 2017 4:37 pm
by Indo-Malaysia » Tue May 30, 2017 4:42 pm
Drop Your Pants wrote:I can't believe i'm getting credit for defending at major when I was really eating dinner (I forgot to sign out of the channel properly ).
by Tim-Opolis » Tue May 30, 2017 11:51 pm
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Homalia, The Achericend
Advertisement