Advertisement

by USS Monitor » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:48 pm
by Jello Biafra » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:48 pm
Bressen wrote:Jello Biafra wrote:"Social exclusion is the process in which individuals or people are systematically blocked from (or denied full access to) various rights, opportunities and resources that are normally available to members of a different group, and which are fundamental to social integration and observance of human rights within that particular group (e.g., housing, employment, healthcare, civic engagement, democratic participation, and due process)."
A marginalized group would be a group that suffers from social exclusion.
so can you explain to me how non-white people can be marginalised on the basis of their race but white people can't, since social exclusion is not associated to race by this definition.

by Internationalist Bastard » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:49 pm
36 Camera Perspective wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:Ok, no. That's just people reading way too much into stupid stuff
http://news.ucsc.edu/2016/10/byrd-microaggressions.html

by Soyouso » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:49 pm

by 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:50 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Avoiding eye contact with black people is racist, but it's mild enough that we don't need to make a big stink about it every time someone does it.
You know what we do need to do? Wrap our heads around the idea that there is such a thing as mild racism. In other words, learn how to talk about things being racist without the implication that every racist thing is a national emergency. Understand that people can have a couple of racist habits or mild biases without being bad people overall. Nobody's perfect, after all.
A lot of people -- sometimes including me -- do have racist eye-contact habits, and we should be able to talk about that and point it out as racist without having a big fucking controversy. It's just a product of living in a society that has unresolved race issues, even for people that aren't white supremacists. It doesn't always mean the person is hateful. Sometimes they're a good person who just feels uncomfortable with the whole race thing, but they have no problem with people of other races if you can get past that awkwardness. Most of the time, I don't think people are even doing it on purpose. I'm dating a black guy and don't have any particular ill-will toward black people, but I still catch myself doing the awkward avoid-eye-contact thing once in a while. Like I said, it's a product of living in a divided society and it's not necessarily intentional.

by Rodez » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:50 pm

by Bressen » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:51 pm
Jello Biafra wrote:Bressen wrote:so can you explain to me how non-white people can be marginalised on the basis of their race but white people can't, since social exclusion is not associated to race by this definition.
Race is not specifically mentioned in this definition, but it falls under the broad headings of "people" and "a different group".
Can you give examples of white people not having access to housing, employment, healthcare, civic engagement, democratic participation, and due process in ways that other groups have those things normally available to them?

by 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:51 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:
Saying you didn't expect someone to be gay? C'mon, this shits just overboard

by Tekeristan » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:52 pm

by Internationalist Bastard » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:52 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Avoiding eye contact with black people is racist, but it's mild enough that we don't need to make a big stink about it every time someone does it.
You know what we do need to do? Wrap our heads around the idea that there is such a thing as mild racism. In other words, learn how to talk about things being racist without the implication that every racist thing is a national emergency. Understand that people can have a couple of racist habits or mild biases without being bad people overall. Nobody's perfect, after all.
A lot of people -- sometimes including me -- do have racist eye-contact habits, and we should be able to talk about that and point it out as racist without having a big fucking controversy. It's just a product of living in a society that has unresolved race issues, even for people that aren't white supremacists. It doesn't always mean the person is hateful. Sometimes they're a good person who just feels uncomfortable with the whole race thing, but they have no problem with people of other races if you can get past that awkwardness. Most of the time, I don't think people are even doing it on purpose. I'm dating a black guy and don't have any particular ill-will toward black people, but I still catch myself doing the awkward avoid-eye-contact thing once in a while. Like I said, it's a product of living in a divided society and it's not necessarily intentional.

by Telconi » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:53 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Avoiding eye contact with black people is racist, but it's mild enough that we don't need to make a big stink about it every time someone does it.
You know what we do need to do? Wrap our heads around the idea that there is such a thing as mild racism. In other words, learn how to talk about things being racist without the implication that every racist thing is a national emergency. Understand that people can have a couple of racist habits or mild biases without being bad people overall. Nobody's perfect, after all.
A lot of people -- sometimes including me -- do have racist eye-contact habits, and we should be able to talk about that and point it out as racist without having a big fucking controversy. It's just a product of living in a society that has unresolved race issues, even for people that aren't white supremacists. It doesn't always mean the person is hateful. Sometimes they're a good person who just feels uncomfortable with the whole race thing, but they have no problem with people of other races if you can get past that awkwardness. Most of the time, I don't think people are even doing it on purpose. I'm dating a black guy and don't have any particular ill-will toward black people, but I still catch myself doing the awkward avoid-eye-contact thing once in a while. Like I said, it's a product of living in a divided society and it's not necessarily intentional.

by Internationalist Bastard » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:53 pm

by Bressen » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:54 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Avoiding eye contact with black people is racist.

by 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:55 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:36 Camera Perspective wrote:
It's annoying and stereotypical, especially when repeated over multiple instances. And as you saw in the summary, the harmful effects are real.
Uh huh. As a kid I got beat up for being gay. Somebody stating they didn't expect me to be gay is literally nothing

by Internationalist Bastard » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:56 pm

by Salandriagado » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:56 pm

by 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:57 pm

by Galloism » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:58 pm
36 Camera Perspective wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:Ok, no. That's just people reading way too much into stupid stuff
http://news.ucsc.edu/2016/10/byrd-microaggressions.html

by Tekeristan » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:59 pm


by 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:59 pm

by Neutraligon » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:00 pm
Salandriagado wrote:
Just last year, we've had gene drives, which is probably the single most important medical discovery since antibiotics, no fewer than three serious proposals for Mars missions, metallic hydrogen, potentially the best conventional (meaning non-nuclear, non-antimatter) fuel possible, technology to extract clean water from air, serious steps towards reversing paralysis, major advances in quantum computing, and hot solar panels. If you think we aren't making massive discoveries, you aren't paying attention.

by Internationalist Bastard » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:00 pm

by Internationalist Bastard » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:02 pm
Tekeristan wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:For most people I imagine, since that's like, one of the most calm reactions I've ever heard in my life
Isn't it a numbers thing too?
Most people aren't gay. Odds are the person you meet isn't.
Nonetheless, I fail to see how when you meet people and they don't give the thought that your gay is something over all harmful? It's not exactly something everyone advertises.
And it's something to get sad/depressed/ or angry about?

by Tekeristan » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:04 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Tekeristan wrote:Isn't it a numbers thing too?
Most people aren't gay. Odds are the person you meet isn't.
Nonetheless, I fail to see how when you meet people and they don't give the thought that your gay is something over all harmful? It's not exactly something everyone advertises.
And it's something to get sad/depressed/ or angry about?
It's a statement.
Like, "oh, you're gay, I wasn't expecting that"
No insult, nothing
by Jello Biafra » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:06 pm
Bressen wrote:Jello Biafra wrote:Race is not specifically mentioned in this definition, but it falls under the broad headings of "people" and "a different group".
Can you give examples of white people not having access to housing, employment, healthcare, civic engagement, democratic participation, and due process in ways that other groups have those things normally available to them?
can you give me current systematic examples of non-white people not having access to these things?
Nothing illustrates the difference between justice for the races than the war on drugs. Whites and blacks use drugs at roughly the same rate – there isn’t a statistically significant difference, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Black people, however, are arrested for drug use at a much higher rate. At the disparities’ peak in the late 1980s and early 1990s, blacks were five times more likely to be arrested for drugs than whites were.
The panel seemed to say it found the equivalent of a smoking gun. “Before enacting that law, the legislature requested data on the use, by race, of a number of voting practices,” Motz wrote. “Upon receipt of the race data, the General Assembly enacted legislation that restricted voting and registration in five different ways, all of which disproportionately affected African Americans.”
The panel found the law was passed with racially discriminatory intent, violating the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. It said that “intentionally targeting a particular race’s access to the franchise because its members vote for a particular party, in a predictable manner, constitutes discriminatory purpose.”
Last year, four researchers—John Nunley, economics professor at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, Adam Pugh at CUNA Mutual Group in Madison, Wisconsin, Nicholas Romero, an economics professor at the University of Pennsylvania, and Richard Seals, an economics professor at Auburn University in Alabama—conducted an experiment to understand the job market for recent college graduates in the wake of the Great Recession.
They submitted 9,400 fake resumes of nonexistent recent college graduates through online job applications for positions based in Atlanta, Baltimore, Portland, Oregon, Los Angeles, Boston, and Minneapolis. They sent four resumes per job and randomly changed certain variables in the applications, such as college major, work experience, gender, and race....
The results? Young African-Americans still face persistent discrimination in the job market, and it is not tied to socioeconomic status, a lack of a degree, or other factors...
The discrimination gap existed in every city.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Anti-Void, Asukalia 2000, Cerespasia, Ifreann, Innocala
Advertisement