Gallia- wrote:It won WW3.
Oh right, your masturbatory fantasy. Too bad Hill-dawg never got in. Would be nice to see how WW3 would go.
Advertisement
by Rhodesialund » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:03 pm
Gallia- wrote:It won WW3.
by Gallia- » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:05 pm
Rhodesialund wrote:Would be nice to see how WW3 would go.
by Pavelania » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:04 pm
by Korva » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:14 pm
by Gallia- » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:16 pm
by The Technocratic Syndicalists » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:50 pm
SDI AG Arcaenian Military Factbook | Task Force Atlas International Freedom Coalition |
by Gallia- » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:53 pm
by The Technocratic Syndicalists » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:38 pm
Gallia- wrote:Are you implying there's something wrong with free gender-neutral child care, flat-screen TVs, and minibars in the barracks?
SDI AG Arcaenian Military Factbook | Task Force Atlas International Freedom Coalition |
by Gallia- » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:45 pm
by Urran » Mon Jan 23, 2017 9:52 pm
The Blood Ravens wrote: How wonderful. Its like Japan, and 1950''s America had a baby. All the racism of the 50s, and everything else Japanese.
by Pavelania » Mon Jan 23, 2017 10:45 pm
Urran wrote:General characteristics
• Crew: one or two
• Length: 17.3 m (56 ft 9 in)
• Wingspan: 11.5 m (37 ft 9 in)
• Height: 4.8 m (15 ft 9 in)
• Wing area: 40 m2 (430 sq ft)
• Max takeoff weight: 28,000 kg (61,729 lb)
• Powerplant: 2 × AJ200 afterburning turbofans (Size-reduced F119s), 98 kN (22,000 lbf) thrust each
• Maximum speed: Mach 2.3 (2,410 km/h, 1,500 mph)
• Supercruise: Mach 1.82
• Combat range: 1,250 km (777 mi; 675 nmi) on internal fuel, or 2,000 km (1,200 mi) with external tanks
Armament
• Hardpoints: 8 x external, and 6x in internal bay with a capacity of Up to 8,000 kilograms (18,000 lb), including including 2,000 kilograms (4,400 lb) internally
• Gun: 1 × 27 mm Mauser BK-27 revolver cannon with 150 rounds
Avionics
• AN/APG-81 AESA Radar
• Electro-Optical Distributed Aperture System (EODAS)
What is more or less a westernized J-31
Is this a doable design?
by Urran » Mon Jan 23, 2017 10:47 pm
Pavelania wrote:Urran wrote:General characteristics
• Crew: one or two
• Length: 17.3 m (56 ft 9 in)
• Wingspan: 11.5 m (37 ft 9 in)
• Height: 4.8 m (15 ft 9 in)
• Wing area: 40 m2 (430 sq ft)
• Max takeoff weight: 28,000 kg (61,729 lb)
• Powerplant: 2 × AJ200 afterburning turbofans (Size-reduced F119s), 98 kN (22,000 lbf) thrust each
• Maximum speed: Mach 2.3 (2,410 km/h, 1,500 mph)
• Supercruise: Mach 1.82
• Combat range: 1,250 km (777 mi; 675 nmi) on internal fuel, or 2,000 km (1,200 mi) with external tanks
Armament
• Hardpoints: 8 x external, and 6x in internal bay with a capacity of Up to 8,000 kilograms (18,000 lb), including including 2,000 kilograms (4,400 lb) internally
• Gun: 1 × 27 mm Mauser BK-27 revolver cannon with 150 rounds
Avionics
• AN/APG-81 AESA Radar
• Electro-Optical Distributed Aperture System (EODAS)
What is more or less a westernized J-31
Is this a doable design?
Looks good. Nice you have your numbers for your jet!
The Blood Ravens wrote: How wonderful. Its like Japan, and 1950''s America had a baby. All the racism of the 50s, and everything else Japanese.
by Autonomous Eastern Ukraine » Tue Jan 24, 2017 6:26 am
by Allanea » Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:28 am
Gallia- wrote:The Technocratic Syndicalists wrote:
It's genius, the attacking Russian hordes will see how pampered the enemy soldiers are and immediately surrender.
Good Sprey impression.
Having minibars and flat screen TVs in the barracks, and child care centers for families, would (if anything) make soldiers fight harder. Incentives like that were common enough in the Soviet Union, where technical troops received special privileges and bonus wages for undertaking advanced training courses, and of course these things exist in the West too.
by Theodosiya » Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:09 am
by Pavelania » Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:11 am
by Austrasien » Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:51 am
Gallia- wrote:Good Sprey impression.
Having minibars and flat screen TVs in the barracks, and child care centers for families, would (if anything) make soldiers fight harder. Incentives like that were common enough in the Soviet Union, where technical troops received special privileges and bonus wages for undertaking advanced training courses, and of course these things exist in the West too.
Unlike teetotaler Americans, Euros at least know the value of alcohol loaded tailgate parties.
But it has been slammed by army commanders. A senior serving officer speaking on condition of anonymity told Germany’s *Focus *magazine they were policies for “sissies and wimps”.
General Harald Kujat, a retired former chief of staff of Germany’s armed forces, told *Focus* Ms Von Der Leyen’s proposals were the ideas of a “good housewife taking care of her children” who has no idea of the military. In another interview he said that the army’s badly out-of-date equipment was a more pressing concern.
by Gallia- » Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:00 am
Austrasien wrote:Gallia- wrote:Good Sprey impression.
Having minibars and flat screen TVs in the barracks, and child care centers for families, would (if anything) make soldiers fight harder. Incentives like that were common enough in the Soviet Union, where technical troops received special privileges and bonus wages for undertaking advanced training courses, and of course these things exist in the West too.
Unlike teetotaler Americans, Euros at least know the value of alcohol loaded tailgate parties.
Men don't really need childcare though. And the German army is desperately short on men. It's a waste of money in an already massively overstretched budget.But it has been slammed by army commanders. A senior serving officer speaking on condition of anonymity told Germany’s *Focus *magazine they were policies for “sissies and wimps”.
General Harald Kujat, a retired former chief of staff of Germany’s armed forces, told *Focus* Ms Von Der Leyen’s proposals were the ideas of a “good housewife taking care of her children” who has no idea of the military. In another interview he said that the army’s badly out-of-date equipment was a more pressing concern.
When you can barely muster enough functional equipment for a mechanized brigade, when soldiers guns literally melt but your military's top priority is child care - the planners are no longer in touch with reality.
by IceBuddha » Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:00 am
Theodosiya wrote:Blasphemy and weakness inducing! Soldiers should live a very harsh and unforgiving lifestyle, not luxurious one (Y/N?)
Pavelania wrote:So you guys all know about the USAF's T-X competition. So whatever T-X wins, what do you guys think of making the T-X a light weight fighter like the F-5? I'm mainly talking about the Boeing and Northrop T-X, since those are clean sheet designs. LM's T-50A already has an armed fighter variant, while Raytheon's T-100 has the M-346 Master which is a trainer/light attack and based on the YAK-130. The T-X and this light fighter would have the same exact relationship as the F-5 and the T-38 had. So what do you guys think of turning the T-X into a light fighter like the F-5?
by Pavelania » Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:20 am
by Pavelania » Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:22 am
by Austrasien » Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:46 am
Gallia- wrote:This is true, but only in Germany's specific case where it's put something akin to VA care above the military itself. That said, I doubt the German budget as is could pay for basic operating costs of the military to begin with, so it'll increase anyway to cover the cost of both ground equipment and whatever family care is needed for German troops. I don't really see the mutual exclusivity implied by Retrotechnicalists.
The basic concept of subsidized childcare for military families is fine and it's probably necessary to ensure they'll breed anyway. The US Army has the same stuff (I'd imagine the German creches are also kindergartens) but they roll it into gyms and libraries for families as well. The obvious priority is new equipment and maintenance, but after that, you still need to pay for support costs for the soldiers themselves. In this case, it's just reversed. Quintuple the Bundeswehr budget, Aktion T4 the pensioners to pay for it, and the problem fixes itself. Then you can subsidize their daycare costs, or pay them enough wages to cover for daycares while wifeu works, but then they might spend the money on beer and TVs anyway.
So all you really need a coup by the Heer?
:millennials: I guess
by Sareva » Tue Jan 24, 2017 2:36 pm
Zanera wrote:Asteroids are terrorists. They support a Anarchist Rock agenda, and will attack any large rock bodies such as planets in order to scare the rest of the solar system, and will sometimes just threaten planets by going close to them as a sign saying," Anarchism rulez."
by Gallia- » Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:57 pm
by Austrasien » Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:51 pm
Sareva wrote:Moving on to another important aspect of operations many modern air forces do, do any of you have dedicated space-borne assets? Not fancy space lasers pointers and Tungsten rod-noobish shite, but dedicated intelligence-gathering, communications, maintenance, and recovery assets in orbit, whether GEO or LEO? My main nation, Ustosio, uses some of its own assets as well as shared assets pooled between NATO, the EU and other partner organisations.
Most of Ustosio's assets involve communications and imaging satellites, but there are a few special-mission systems currently available.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Fishelle
Advertisement