The public demands answers!
Advertisement
by Philjia » Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:53 pm
Souseiseki wrote:Philjia wrote:
Most porn doesn't encourage violence against women. Cinematic porn that glorifies sexual assault is (rightly) straight up banned in the UK.
there is no evidence to suggest that watching videos of legal adults having consensual sex encourages actual violence. throwing people in jail because you don't like their fetishes is not "right".
Nemesis the Warlock wrote:I am the Nemesis, I am the Warlock, I am the shape of things to come, the Lord of the Flies, holder of the Sword Sinister, the Death Bringer, I am the one who waits on the edge of your dreams, I am all these things and many more
by New Axiom » Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:54 pm
Zakuvia wrote:If you aren't imagining a chain gang of adorable old retirees building a wall with Fixodent and using their Hoverounds as tow trucks then you're not the NS I remember.
by Galloism » Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:54 pm
by Philjia » Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:55 pm
Nemesis the Warlock wrote:I am the Nemesis, I am the Warlock, I am the shape of things to come, the Lord of the Flies, holder of the Sword Sinister, the Death Bringer, I am the one who waits on the edge of your dreams, I am all these things and many more
by Freefall11111 » Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:55 pm
Philjia wrote:Souseiseki wrote:
there is no evidence to suggest that watching videos of legal adults having consensual sex encourages actual violence. throwing people in jail because you don't like their fetishes is not "right".
Porn depicting consensual BDSM/rough sex is not illegal. (Although I'm sure the sodding Tories will be on it soon). I'm talking about depictions that appear to represent actual rape being something that people can enjoy.
by Galloism » Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:55 pm
by The first Galactic Republic » Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:55 pm
Freefall11111 wrote:The first Galactic Republic wrote:The money argument might be getting off topic but if you make any money from porn from any source, it counts as you making money from it.
The ones who will make money off of it on paper won't be in the state.The first Galactic Republic wrote:Again I don't think they'll have police make sure every porn video used a condom. They'll probably use other methods to enforce the law, like fines. Also me pointing that out doesn't mean I think it would be impossible to circumvent the law.
I'm not just saying it would not be impossible to circumvent the law. I'm saying it would be absurdly easy. I'm saying this initiative is a complete waste of time, money, and resources. This is an even more pathetic attempt than trying to ban alcohol or marijuana. It's literally unenforceable to any significant degree. The opportunity cost on this is insane.
by Philjia » Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:55 pm
Freefall11111 wrote:Philjia wrote:
Porn depicting consensual BDSM/rough sex is not illegal. (Although I'm sure the sodding Tories will be on it soon). I'm talking about depictions that appear to represent actual rape being something that people can enjoy.
Actually, it's already partially illegal (but unenforceable, as usual). Spanking was banned two years back along with a bunch of other stuff.
Nemesis the Warlock wrote:I am the Nemesis, I am the Warlock, I am the shape of things to come, the Lord of the Flies, holder of the Sword Sinister, the Death Bringer, I am the one who waits on the edge of your dreams, I am all these things and many more
by Shofercia » Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:57 pm
by Great Kauthar » Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:57 pm
by The first Galactic Republic » Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:58 pm
by Freefall11111 » Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:58 pm
The first Galactic Republic wrote:Freefall11111 wrote:The ones who will make money off of it on paper won't be in the state.
I'm not just saying it would not be impossible to circumvent the law. I'm saying it would be absurdly easy. I'm saying this initiative is a complete waste of time, money, and resources. This is an even more pathetic attempt than trying to ban alcohol or marijuana. It's literally unenforceable to any significant degree. The opportunity cost on this is insane.
I agree partially. I still think it would make some difference though. Fines could hit the big producers. Sure they can't possibly enforce it on amateurs, but there might be a significant change with the professional producers.
Or they might just leave.
by WaRtArIa » Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:58 pm
Great Kauthar wrote:Chessmistress wrote:
I fully agree.
But since I'm a very pragmatic person I think that a very little step in the right direction is still better than nothing.The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster wrote:...why?Freefall11111 wrote:Nah.Community Values wrote:
No.
Pornography is being used by the international elites to destroy the family and end the white race. It makes white men sexually weak and when coupled with interracial is trying to enforce a sense of inferiority on white males and making white women think that blacks are superior. Along with that, it increases infidelity and is morally wrong. To preserve the white race and traditional values it must be banned,
by Freefall11111 » Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:59 pm
Great Kauthar wrote:Chessmistress wrote:
I fully agree.
But since I'm a very pragmatic person I think that a very little step in the right direction is still better than nothing.The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster wrote:...why?Freefall11111 wrote:Nah.Community Values wrote:
No.
Pornography is being used by the international elites to destroy the family and end the white race. It makes white men sexually weak and when coupled with interracial is trying to enforce a sense of inferiority on white males and making white women think that blacks are superior. Along with that, it increases infidelity and is morally wrong. To preserve the white race and traditional values it must be banned,
by New Axiom » Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:00 pm
Great Kauthar wrote:Chessmistress wrote:
I fully agree.
But since I'm a very pragmatic person I think that a very little step in the right direction is still better than nothing.The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster wrote:...why?Freefall11111 wrote:Nah.Community Values wrote:
No.
Pornography is being used by the international elites to destroy the family and end the white race. It makes white men sexually weak and when coupled with interracial is trying to enforce a sense of inferiority on white males and making white women think that blacks are superior. Along with that, it increases infidelity and is morally wrong. To preserve the white race and traditional values it must be banned,
Zakuvia wrote:If you aren't imagining a chain gang of adorable old retirees building a wall with Fixodent and using their Hoverounds as tow trucks then you're not the NS I remember.
by Souseiseki » Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:00 pm
Philjia wrote:Souseiseki wrote:
there is no evidence to suggest that watching videos of legal adults having consensual sex encourages actual violence. throwing people in jail because you don't like their fetishes is not "right".
Porn depicting consensual BDSM/rough sex is not illegal. (Although I'm sure the sodding Tories will be on it soon). I'm talking about depictions that appear to represent actual rape being something that people can enjoy.
by Minzerland II » Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:00 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by United Marxist Nations » Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:00 pm
Great Kauthar wrote:Chessmistress wrote:
I fully agree.
But since I'm a very pragmatic person I think that a very little step in the right direction is still better than nothing.The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster wrote:...why?Freefall11111 wrote:Nah.Community Values wrote:
No.
Pornography is being used by the international elites to destroy the family and end the white race. It makes white men sexually weak and when coupled with interracial is trying to enforce a sense of inferiority on white males and making white women think that blacks are superior. Along with that, it increases infidelity and is morally wrong. To preserve the white race and traditional values it must be banned,
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by New Axiom » Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:00 pm
The first Galactic Republic wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:There are things more important in the world than money.
Money exists to buy things, and many people want it to get laid.
Because porn helps with that deep urge, it might be even more important than money itself. Sex is almost as important to people as food and water, so porn is therefore right up there with water fountains and restaurants. Our society would just be worse without these things.
Zakuvia wrote:If you aren't imagining a chain gang of adorable old retirees building a wall with Fixodent and using their Hoverounds as tow trucks then you're not the NS I remember.
by Pope Joan » Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:01 pm
Shofercia wrote:Chessmistress wrote:Okay, I'll try to be extremely neutral regarding the sources, so I'll use a very neutral and also extremely detailed site:
https://ballotpedia.org/California_Prop ... ilms_(2016)
More details in the link
Personally I think that isn't really important, not even closer, but still it's interesting: it's just a very little step, but still this initiative, if passed, will improve public health and public awareness about the use of condoms (though such awareness will be gained through watching pornography, that encourges violence against women ) and, perhaps more important, will give practically to all people the chance to sue the pornographers not properly using the minimum required protections.
Since the vote will be on 8 November, that is also Election Day, it's very likely that there will be a lot of people voting it.
What do you think, NSGs?
Bad idea. The industry will simply move from Hollywood to Vegas. Such laws only work if they're implemented in all states, not just one state.
by Esternial » Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:01 pm
Great Kauthar wrote:Chessmistress wrote:
I fully agree.
But since I'm a very pragmatic person I think that a very little step in the right direction is still better than nothing.
Pornography is being used by the international elites to destroy the family and end the white race. It makes white men sexually weak and when coupled with interracial is trying to enforce a sense of inferiority on white males and making white women think that blacks are superior. Along with that, it increases infidelity and is morally wrong. To preserve the white race and traditional values it must be banned,
by United Marxist Nations » Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:01 pm
The first Galactic Republic wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:There are things more important in the world than money.
Money exists to buy things, and many people want it to get laid.
Because porn helps with that deep urge, it might be even more important than money itself. Sex is almost as important to people as food and water, so porn is therefore right up there with water fountains and restaurants. Our society would just be worse without these things.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by New Axiom » Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:02 pm
United Marxist Nations wrote:Great Kauthar wrote:
Pornography is being used by the international elites to destroy the family and end the white race. It makes white men sexually weak and when coupled with interracial is trying to enforce a sense of inferiority on white males and making white women think that blacks are superior. Along with that, it increases infidelity and is morally wrong. To preserve the white race and traditional values it must be banned,
>Racism
>traditional values
Pick one and only one
Porn should be banned, and I agree that interracial pornography is often racially fetishistic in nature though, but that is mostly the blame on the hypocrisy of the elite classes on racial issues. But it shouldn't be banned to preserve the "white family", but to preserve the family in-general.
Zakuvia wrote:If you aren't imagining a chain gang of adorable old retirees building a wall with Fixodent and using their Hoverounds as tow trucks then you're not the NS I remember.
by Community Values » Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:03 pm
Great Kauthar wrote:Chessmistress wrote:
I fully agree.
But since I'm a very pragmatic person I think that a very little step in the right direction is still better than nothing.The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster wrote:...why?Freefall11111 wrote:Nah.Community Values wrote:
No.
Pornography is being used by the international elites to destroy the family and end the white race. It makes white men sexually weak and when coupled with interracial is trying to enforce a sense of inferiority on white males and making white women think that blacks are superior. Along with that, it increases infidelity and is morally wrong. To preserve the white race and traditional values it must be banned,
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Ayushvandra, Battadia, Castelia, Daphomir, Eahland, El Lazaro, Maximum Imperium Rex, Merriwhether, New Temecula, Norse Inuit Union, Ravemath, Rusozak, San Lumen, Soviet Unionstates, Spirit of Hope, The Jamesian Republic, The Two Jerseys, The Vooperian Union, Tiami, Verkhoyanska, Xind
Advertisement