Would you explain me why a sovereign country should not have the right to develop its own nuclear program?
Advertisement

by National Socialist Republics of Europe » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:12 am

by Benuty » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:14 am

by Murkwood » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:15 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by National Socialist Republics of Europe » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:16 am
Benuty wrote:National Socialist Republics of Europe wrote:
Yes, I agree.
Given they claim to be run by a deity, and have been embroiled in war since 1950 I doubt they have the domestic resources to develop such a problem. Then again Division 39 has run the Norths criminal empire for decades now so they just might.

by Ainin » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:16 am
Murkwood wrote:Ainin wrote:If Russia wanted to, they could turn the world into a giant sphere of plate glass. If Russia wanted to, they could invade Ontario with a brigade of paratroopers and massacre the entire population of the city of Mississauga. If Russia wanted to, they could melt the entire Greenlandic archipelago.
Obviously Russia is a stellar example of restraint and human rights.
But Russia isn't surrounded by/constantly under attack by people who want to see their country destroyed.

by National Socialist Republics of Europe » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:17 am

by Nature-Spirits » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:18 am
Nature-Spirits wrote:Murkwood wrote:Without cause? You keep believing that.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... ys-UN.html
http://electronicintifada.net/content/s ... forces/356
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/stat/deaths.html

by Murkwood » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:19 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Murkwood » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:20 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Benuty » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:21 am
Murkwood wrote:National Socialist Republics of Europe wrote:
According to what legislation?
Besides, define "insane".
in·sane
inˈsān
adjective
1. in a state of mind that prevents normal perception, behavior, or social interaction; seriously mentally ill.
"certifying patients as clinically insane"
synonyms: mentally ill, mentally disordered, of unsound mind, certifiable;
2. North Korea
"North Korea is fucking insane"
synonyms: Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan;

by National Socialist Republics of Europe » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:21 am
Murkwood wrote:National Socialist Republics of Europe wrote:
According to what legislation?
Besides, define "insane".
in·sane
inˈsān
adjective
1. in a state of mind that prevents normal perception, behavior, or social interaction; seriously mentally ill.
"certifying patients as clinically insane"
synonyms: mentally ill, mentally disordered, of unsound mind, certifiable;
2. North Korea
"North Korea is fucking insane"
synonyms: Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan;

by Karaginsky » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:21 am

by Gauthier » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:22 am
National Socialist Republics of Europe wrote:Murkwood wrote:in·sane
inˈsān
adjective
1. in a state of mind that prevents normal perception, behavior, or social interaction; seriously mentally ill.
"certifying patients as clinically insane"
synonyms: mentally ill, mentally disordered, of unsound mind, certifiable;
2. North Korea
"North Korea is fucking insane"
synonyms: Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan;
So you think there are "insane" countries?
This adjective can be applied only to individuals, not to countries.
And Ahmadinejad wasn't insane, neither Rohani.

by Karaginsky » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:23 am
Murkwood wrote:National Socialist Republics of Europe wrote:
According to what legislation?
Besides, define "insane".
in·sane
inˈsān
adjective
1. in a state of mind that prevents normal perception, behavior, or social interaction; seriously mentally ill.
"certifying patients as clinically insane"
synonyms: mentally ill, mentally disordered, of unsound mind, certifiable;
2. North Korea
"North Korea is fucking insane"
synonyms: Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan;

by Murkwood » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:24 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Murkwood » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:26 am
National Socialist Republics of Europe wrote:Murkwood wrote:in·sane
inˈsān
adjective
1. in a state of mind that prevents normal perception, behavior, or social interaction; seriously mentally ill.
"certifying patients as clinically insane"
synonyms: mentally ill, mentally disordered, of unsound mind, certifiable;
2. North Korea
"North Korea is fucking insane"
synonyms: Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan;
So you think there are "insane" countries?
This adjective can be applied only to individuals, not to countries.
And Ahmadinejad wasn't insane, neither Rohani.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Karaginsky » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:26 am

by Benuty » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:26 am

by National Socialist Republics of Europe » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:26 am

by Nature-Spirits » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:28 am

by Murkwood » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:28 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by National Socialist Republics of Europe » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:29 am
Murkwood wrote:Benuty wrote:Mental illness, and insanity are at the very base of things two completely different concepts one being psychological the other a legal trapping.
I don't mean "insane" in the literal sense. It's a hyperbolic statement meant to convey the perceived and actual disconnect that some leaders/countries have with the truth.

by Greater Istanistan » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:30 am

by Murkwood » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:30 am
Nature-Spirits wrote:Murkwood wrote:The last two are from clearly biased websites, while the first is just Hamas's human shields.
http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/08/04/gaza ... -civilians
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... lians.html
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-28439404
And they just keep on coming.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Blakk Metal » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:31 am
Risottia wrote:Murkwood wrote: Iran is still a tyrannical theocratic hellhole.
Pakistan is a country noted for having it's government hosting terrorists (Osama Bin-Laden included), having military dictators eliminating elected leaders, tribal areas with Sharia law enforced by local militias, enacting genocides in its provinces and starting wars with its neighbours. Also it isn't a member country to the NNPT.
Why don't we see anyone complaining about the Pakistani nuclear arsenal? Double standard, pretty much?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Saiwania-, BergieRvile, Chan Island, Cheblonsk, New haven america, PettyKingdoms, Plandistria, Sycorat, The Galactic Supremacy, USHALLNOTPASS
Advertisement