NATION

PASSWORD

Ukraine Crisis II: Electric Boogaloo

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31341
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Shofercia » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:19 pm

Lemanrussland wrote:
Shofercia wrote:


Ohh shit. Here we go, ole, ole, ole :P

Which American Bank is going to get hit? Reset 2016? :P

I have no idea what the Russian response will be. Let's see them slap sanctions on JP Morgan Chase or some other global financial firm :P

I doubt the impact on Russia's financial system will be significant, the intent of the sanction is to try to hit important people within the Russian administration, many of whom are prominent shareholders in Bank Rossiya.


All of the politicians, except three or four members of FR, broke all of their contacts with US businesses. So I don't see them as losing much. Zheleznyak bragged on national TV that he transferred all of his assets from the US, and implied that US sanctions against Russian politicians were a tax against idiocy. As for the businessmen, I think they might've also been prepared, but not too sure about that. A bank, on the other hand, is a bank, and it's harder for a bank to conserve assets.
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
The New Lowlands
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12498
Founded: Jun 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Lowlands » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:21 pm

Whatever happened to "Russians out, Germans down?"

User avatar
Lemanrussland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5078
Founded: Dec 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lemanrussland » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:22 pm

The New Lowlands wrote:Whatever happened to "Russians out, Germans down?"

We're not in the Cold War anymore (at least for now).

User avatar
Limborg
Senator
 
Posts: 4331
Founded: Nov 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Limborg » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:24 pm

Avenio wrote:
Limborg wrote:Yes they should. Nobody wants a new world war.


Please. Russia isn't willing to commit to even a regional war. If the West pushes back hard enough with sanctions and the like, Russia will back down.

Limborg wrote:And where is that democracy then? The new gouverment of Ukraine was installed. People never voted for that change.


The sitting government of the Ukraine was formed from elected members of the Ukrainian parliament, and has set dates for elections for later this year. Not to mention that Yanukovitch was ousted via popular movement.


1. Europe can't afford risking anything.. If Russia would cut off the gas Europe is screwed. Europe knows this and keeps quiet. Besides that. The Crimean decission was democraticly made, so why would that be a problem while the Ukrianian gouverment isn't?

2. That doesn't make it democraticly chosen.. At most semi-democraticly chosen. In the end the people did not voted for them. Also a reminder, it has never been proved that the "popular movement" represented the majority of Ukraine.

User avatar
Lemanrussland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5078
Founded: Dec 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lemanrussland » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:26 pm

Limborg wrote:
Avenio wrote:
Please. Russia isn't willing to commit to even a regional war. If the West pushes back hard enough with sanctions and the like, Russia will back down.



The sitting government of the Ukraine was formed from elected members of the Ukrainian parliament, and has set dates for elections for later this year. Not to mention that Yanukovitch was ousted via popular movement.


1. Europe can't afford risking anything.. If Russia would cut off the gas Europe is screwed. Europe knows this and keeps quiet. Besides that. The Crimean decission was democraticly made, so why would that be a problem while the Ukrianian gouverment isn't?

2. That doesn't make it democraticly chosen.. At most semi-democraticly chosen. In the end the people did not voted for them. Also a reminder, it has never been proved that the "popular movement" represented the majority of Ukraine.

Parliament unanimously impeached Yanukovych for his response to the protests, that's pretty clear cut.

User avatar
Madnolia
Envoy
 
Posts: 208
Founded: Mar 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Madnolia » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:26 pm

Putin cant seem to understand that russia aint the soviet union anymore.

The soviet union was a crappy corrupt place that was a world superpower,

The russian federation is the same minus the superpower bit. Putin dosnt have the military strength to invade a country with a defence force stronger than the salvation army. :p
Economic: Left/Right: 0.50
Social: Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.28

PRO: Science,capitalism,pro-choice, LGBT rights,diplomacy,free speech,free press,gay marriage,democracy,freedom,genetic modification/research,E.U,unification,U.N,peace,monkeys and ICE CREAM

ANTI:Communism,monarchy,racism,religion,extremism,animal rights activists,environmentalists,badger lovers,bird watchers,fascism, manchester United,ignorance,holocaust deniers,celebrities, vegetarianism and evolution deniers.

User avatar
Estado Paulista
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5644
Founded: Sep 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Estado Paulista » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:27 pm

Limborg wrote:
Avenio wrote:
Please. Russia isn't willing to commit to even a regional war. If the West pushes back hard enough with sanctions and the like, Russia will back down.



The sitting government of the Ukraine was formed from elected members of the Ukrainian parliament, and has set dates for elections for later this year. Not to mention that Yanukovitch was ousted via popular movement.


1. Europe can't afford risking anything.. If Russia would cut off the gas Europe is screwed. Europe knows this and keeps quiet. Besides that. The Crimean decission was democraticly made, so why would that be a problem while the Ukrianian gouverment isn't?

2. That doesn't make it democraticly chosen.. At most semi-democraticly chosen. In the end the people did not voted for them. Also a reminder, it has never been proved that the "popular movement" represented the majority of Ukraine.


It's amusing how you refuse to acknowledge Yanukovych's impeachment as democratic, yet you recognize the Crimean referendum.
Last edited by Estado Paulista on Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Your nation is like a son. What it does right is your merit, as well as what it does wrong is your fault. When you praise it, be lucid and avoid exaggeration. Praising it too much can make it indolent. On the other hand, when you criticize it, be harsh, but do not ridicule it. Do your best to improve it, not through derision or disdain, but through good examples and dedication.

User avatar
The New Lowlands
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12498
Founded: Jun 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Lowlands » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:27 pm

Lemanrussland wrote:
The New Lowlands wrote:Whatever happened to "Russians out, Germans down?"

We're not in the Cold War anymore (at least for now).

You say that, but...

User avatar
Madnolia
Envoy
 
Posts: 208
Founded: Mar 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Madnolia » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:29 pm

Lemanrussland wrote:
Limborg wrote:
1. Europe can't afford risking anything.. If Russia would cut off the gas Europe is screwed. Europe knows this and keeps quiet. Besides that. The Crimean decission was democraticly made, so why would that be a problem while the Ukrianian gouverment isn't?

2. That doesn't make it democraticly chosen.. At most semi-democraticly chosen. In the end the people did not voted for them. Also a reminder, it has never been proved that the "popular movement" represented the majority of Ukraine.

Parliament unanimously impeached Yanukovych for his response to the protests, that's pretty clear cut.
Britain has used the gibraltar and falklands referendums to claim sovereignty. I suppose it would have been slightly more credible if russia had done the vote BEFORE they sent the tanks in.
Economic: Left/Right: 0.50
Social: Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.28

PRO: Science,capitalism,pro-choice, LGBT rights,diplomacy,free speech,free press,gay marriage,democracy,freedom,genetic modification/research,E.U,unification,U.N,peace,monkeys and ICE CREAM

ANTI:Communism,monarchy,racism,religion,extremism,animal rights activists,environmentalists,badger lovers,bird watchers,fascism, manchester United,ignorance,holocaust deniers,celebrities, vegetarianism and evolution deniers.

User avatar
Limborg
Senator
 
Posts: 4331
Founded: Nov 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Limborg » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:30 pm

Lemanrussland wrote:
Limborg wrote:
1. Europe can't afford risking anything.. If Russia would cut off the gas Europe is screwed. Europe knows this and keeps quiet. Besides that. The Crimean decission was democraticly made, so why would that be a problem while the Ukrianian gouverment isn't?

2. That doesn't make it democraticly chosen.. At most semi-democraticly chosen. In the end the people did not voted for them. Also a reminder, it has never been proved that the "popular movement" represented the majority of Ukraine.

Parliament unanimously impeached Yanukovych for his response to the protests, that's pretty clear cut.


That maybe yes, however its still debatable if it really was unanimous. Anyhow, the whole new parliment thing isn't. Anyhow, the new Ukrainian gouverment already showed that they have no respect for the treaties they sign. So why should we trust them? They are the ones in fact that started this whole mess.
Last edited by Limborg on Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Limborg
Senator
 
Posts: 4331
Founded: Nov 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Limborg » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:31 pm

Estado Paulista wrote:
Limborg wrote:
1. Europe can't afford risking anything.. If Russia would cut off the gas Europe is screwed. Europe knows this and keeps quiet. Besides that. The Crimean decission was democraticly made, so why would that be a problem while the Ukrianian gouverment isn't?

2. That doesn't make it democraticly chosen.. At most semi-democraticly chosen. In the end the people did not voted for them. Also a reminder, it has never been proved that the "popular movement" represented the majority of Ukraine.


It's amusing how you refuse to acknowledge Yanukovych's impeachment as democratic, yet you recognize the Crimean referendum.


Never said that.

User avatar
Natalia Poklonskaya
Secretary
 
Posts: 35
Founded: Mar 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Natalia Poklonskaya » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:37 pm

I bet I could beat every single Bandera Devil in the Ukrainian Government simultaneously in a blinking contest.
ALL HAIL THE BEAUTIFUL RUSSIAN EMPRESS OF CRIMEA, NATALIA POKLONSKAYA I
Creation of Sklavinia!

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:39 pm

Limborg wrote:Anyhow, the new Ukrainian gouverment already showed that they have no respect for the treaties they sign. So why should we trust them?


And the Russian invasion and annexation of the Crimea is a violation of the treaty it signed with the Ukraine in the 90's when they were told to give up their nuclear warheads. I'm amused you think that the Ukrainians somehow brought this on themselves and that the Russians are justified.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Estado Paulista
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5644
Founded: Sep 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Estado Paulista » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:40 pm

Natalia Poklonskaya wrote:I bet I could beat every single Bandera Devil in the Ukrainian Government simultaneously in a blinking contest.


Okay, now it's getting annoying.
Your nation is like a son. What it does right is your merit, as well as what it does wrong is your fault. When you praise it, be lucid and avoid exaggeration. Praising it too much can make it indolent. On the other hand, when you criticize it, be harsh, but do not ridicule it. Do your best to improve it, not through derision or disdain, but through good examples and dedication.

User avatar
Lyttenburgh
Diplomat
 
Posts: 523
Founded: Sep 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lyttenburgh » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:41 pm

Costa Fierro wrote:
Limborg wrote:Anyhow, the new Ukrainian gouverment already showed that they have no respect for the treaties they sign. So why should we trust them?


And the Russian invasion and annexation of the Crimea is a violation of the treaty it signed with the Ukraine in the 90's when they were told to give up their nuclear warheads. I'm amused you think that the Ukrainians somehow brought this on themselves and that the Russians are justified.


Funny fact - Russia did not ratified the 1994 Budapest treaty. Even under West's Good Ol' Pal Boris
“In an hour of Darkness, a blind man is the best guide. In an age of Insanity, look to the madman to show the way.”

Fight for Peace. Live for War. Die for Nothing

I wholeheartedly support the Great Ukraine from Lviv to Ternopil!


User avatar
Limborg
Senator
 
Posts: 4331
Founded: Nov 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Limborg » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:43 pm

Costa Fierro wrote:
Limborg wrote:Anyhow, the new Ukrainian gouverment already showed that they have no respect for the treaties they sign. So why should we trust them?


And the Russian invasion and annexation of the Crimea is a violation of the treaty it signed with the Ukraine in the 90's when they were told to give up their nuclear warheads. I'm amused you think that the Ukrainians somehow brought this on themselves and that the Russians are justified.


What treaty?

Anyhow, i don't say its legally justified, but yes, i do say that its justified and i do support it. In the end its the people who want it, and such thing should Always be supported.. I wonder where the west is with its glorious democracy... Oh that's right, they don't give two shits about it. But hey, i do.

User avatar
Madnolia
Envoy
 
Posts: 208
Founded: Mar 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Madnolia » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:45 pm

Limborg wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:
And the Russian invasion and annexation of the Crimea is a violation of the treaty it signed with the Ukraine in the 90's when they were told to give up their nuclear warheads. I'm amused you think that the Ukrainians somehow brought this on themselves and that the Russians are justified.


What treaty?

Anyhow, i don't say its legally justified, but yes, i do say that its justified and i do support it. In the end its the people who want it, and such thing should Always be supported.. I wonder where the west is with its glorious democracy... Oh that's right, they don't give two shits about it. But hey, i do.


Good point, if the people of crimea want to be russian cant they just be russian and everyone just CTFO.
Economic: Left/Right: 0.50
Social: Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.28

PRO: Science,capitalism,pro-choice, LGBT rights,diplomacy,free speech,free press,gay marriage,democracy,freedom,genetic modification/research,E.U,unification,U.N,peace,monkeys and ICE CREAM

ANTI:Communism,monarchy,racism,religion,extremism,animal rights activists,environmentalists,badger lovers,bird watchers,fascism, manchester United,ignorance,holocaust deniers,celebrities, vegetarianism and evolution deniers.

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:55 pm

Lyttenburgh wrote:Funny fact - Russia did not ratified the 1994 Budapest treaty. Even under West's Good Ol' Pal Boris


It wasn't ratified by the US either. Nevertheless, Russia violated it and it is now paying the price.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Estruia
Minister
 
Posts: 2092
Founded: Mar 29, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Estruia » Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:17 pm

Shofercia wrote:
Mkuki wrote:Can't argue against that. Of course, the EU has more of an ability to accept punishment than Russia.


Does it? Russians survived the 1990s; EU didn't have it that bad since the 1940s. http://atlas.media.mit.edu/profile/country/rus/

Russia can do without EU imports. EU can do without Russian exports, or can it? The average European wouldn't enjoy being hit by higher gas prices over Crimea. The average Russian will take the economic hit, as majority of Russians stated that Russia should take Crimea, even if sanctions follow.


You are REALLY playing up Russia's importance here.
YOUR PRESIDENT IS A PEDOPHILE

33/Non-binary/ENFP Currently living in the US (Michigan).


Pro: Queer Liberation, Socialism, Democratic Socialism, Social Democracy, Entryism, Firearm Ownership, Collectivism, Worker Cooperatives, Intentional Communities, United Ireland, Scottish Independence, Welsh Independence, Cornish Independence, Puerto Rican Independence, Chamorro Liberation, Self-Determination, Anti-Imperialism

User avatar
Madnolia
Envoy
 
Posts: 208
Founded: Mar 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Madnolia » Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:40 pm

Estruia wrote:
Shofercia wrote:
Does it? Russians survived the 1990s; EU didn't have it that bad since the 1940s. http://atlas.media.mit.edu/profile/country/rus/

Russia can do without EU imports. EU can do without Russian exports, or can it? The average European wouldn't enjoy being hit by higher gas prices over Crimea. The average Russian will take the economic hit, as majority of Russians stated that Russia should take Crimea, even if sanctions follow.


You are REALLY playing up Russia's importance here.

russia could turn the gas off, europe will buy
it from a slightly less cheap supplier in exchange for adding an entire country's GDP to the europool.
Economic: Left/Right: 0.50
Social: Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.28

PRO: Science,capitalism,pro-choice, LGBT rights,diplomacy,free speech,free press,gay marriage,democracy,freedom,genetic modification/research,E.U,unification,U.N,peace,monkeys and ICE CREAM

ANTI:Communism,monarchy,racism,religion,extremism,animal rights activists,environmentalists,badger lovers,bird watchers,fascism, manchester United,ignorance,holocaust deniers,celebrities, vegetarianism and evolution deniers.

User avatar
OMGeverynameistaken
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12437
Founded: Jun 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby OMGeverynameistaken » Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:42 pm

Madnolia wrote:Putin cant seem to understand that russia aint the soviet union anymore.

The soviet union was a crappy corrupt place that was a world superpower,

The russian federation is the same minus the superpower bit. Putin dosnt have the military strength to invade a country with a defence force stronger than the salvation army. :p

That crappy, corrupt place is the only country with the launch capability to send manned missions to the ISS. They also run most of the supply missions.
I AM DISAPPOINTED

User avatar
Estruia
Minister
 
Posts: 2092
Founded: Mar 29, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Estruia » Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:43 pm

Madnolia wrote:
Estruia wrote:
You are REALLY playing up Russia's importance here.

russia could turn the gas off, europe will buy
it from a slightly less cheap supplier in exchange for adding an entire country's GDP to the europool.


We're also headed into Spring and Summer, which means demand for Russian gas will be down. That gives the European Union a year to stockpile, set up new trade agreements and prepare. Russian gas isn't invaluable.
YOUR PRESIDENT IS A PEDOPHILE

33/Non-binary/ENFP Currently living in the US (Michigan).


Pro: Queer Liberation, Socialism, Democratic Socialism, Social Democracy, Entryism, Firearm Ownership, Collectivism, Worker Cooperatives, Intentional Communities, United Ireland, Scottish Independence, Welsh Independence, Cornish Independence, Puerto Rican Independence, Chamorro Liberation, Self-Determination, Anti-Imperialism

User avatar
Cascadistan
Secretary
 
Posts: 31
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Cascadistan » Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:43 pm

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:How about Ukraine Crisis II: Electric Boogaloo.


I'd go with Ukraine Crisis II: Crisis Moar n00b!

User avatar
The Fascist American Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 3090
Founded: Oct 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Fascist American Empire » Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:43 pm

Croatia is a largely ethnic Russian area that has stated its desire to be a part of Russia, rather than Ukraine. Is it so wrong to give people what they want?

Americans, hands off Ukraine and let Russia do what they will in their own sphere of influence! You are not the world's police!
You obviously do since you posted a response like the shifty little red velvet pseudo ant you are. Yes I am onto your little tricks you hissing pest you exoskeleton brier patch you. Now crawl back in to that patch of grass you call hell and hiss some more. -Benuty
[quote="Arkandros";p="20014230"]

RIP Eli Waller
Race! It is a feeling, not a reality: ninety-five percent, at least, is a feeling. Nothing will ever make me believe that biologically pure races can be shown to exist today. -Benito Mussolini

User avatar
Estruia
Minister
 
Posts: 2092
Founded: Mar 29, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Estruia » Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:45 pm

The Fascist American Empire wrote:Croatia is a largely ethnic Russian area that has stated its desire to be a part of Russia, rather than Ukraine. Is it so wrong to give people what they want?


Um. Lol. Wat.
YOUR PRESIDENT IS A PEDOPHILE

33/Non-binary/ENFP Currently living in the US (Michigan).


Pro: Queer Liberation, Socialism, Democratic Socialism, Social Democracy, Entryism, Firearm Ownership, Collectivism, Worker Cooperatives, Intentional Communities, United Ireland, Scottish Independence, Welsh Independence, Cornish Independence, Puerto Rican Independence, Chamorro Liberation, Self-Determination, Anti-Imperialism

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bombadil, Giovanniland, Imperializt Russia, Inevitable Poverty, Myrensis, The Champions League, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads