With the current government's attitude towards ATN, no.
I (somewhat begrudgingly) agree with Ainin that ATNRA was/is needed to allow ATN to limp forward until it can be properly restored.
Advertisement

by Oneracon » Fri Feb 21, 2014 3:18 pm
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |

by Macedonian Grand Empire » Fri Feb 21, 2014 6:08 pm

by Zurkerx » Sat Feb 22, 2014 9:23 am
Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:Oneracon wrote:With the current government's attitude towards ATN, no.
I (somewhat begrudgingly) agree with Ainin that ATNRA was/is needed to allow ATN to limp forward until it can be properly restored.
The only way I ever agree with government funding is underwriting. But under the condition that the company that is owned by the government operates on a business model that bring in revenue. Not just sitting there and wanted its entire budget to be granted to it by the government. I am against that.

by Oneracon » Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:42 am
Zurkerx wrote:Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:The only way I ever agree with government funding is underwriting. But under the condition that the company that is owned by the government operates on a business model that bring in revenue. Not just sitting there and wanted its entire budget to be granted to it by the government. I am against that.
Quite honesty, I can see how some didn't like ATNRA. However, what I don't understand is that some (both left and right) didn't like ATNRA on how it would fund ATN, but yet voted for SABA, which bans private advertising. That in affect cuts funds from what ATN was originally getting based on the advertisements. So virtually, those some that want to fund ATN basically would of stop funds through all fronts. It's such a huge contradiction. I am currently working on a couple bills. One is almost done (have to modified it based on the current situation) and the other is a very rough draft.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |

by Zurkerx » Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:46 am
Oneracon wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
Quite honesty, I can see how some didn't like ATNRA. However, what I don't understand is that some (both left and right) didn't like ATNRA on how it would fund ATN, but yet voted for SABA, which bans private advertising. That in affect cuts funds from what ATN was originally getting based on the advertisements. So virtually, those some that want to fund ATN basically would of stop funds through all fronts. It's such a huge contradiction. I am currently working on a couple bills. One is almost done (have to modified it based on the current situation) and the other is a very rough draft.
My replacement for ATNRA is already in the queue.

by The Nihilistic view » Mon Feb 24, 2014 3:24 pm
President Pro-Tempore of the Senate wrote:Domestic Development
To deal with issues pertinent to the Transportation, Agriculture, Education, Research, Telecommunications, and Culture ministries
- Media Rating and Classification Act
-Physical Education and Scholastic Athletics Act

by Haelunor » Mon Feb 24, 2014 5:27 pm

by The Nihilistic view » Mon Feb 24, 2014 6:03 pm
Haelunor wrote:I have a concern regarding the Physical Education and Scholastic Actovites Act. It mandates one physical education class a year, but how do those classes compare with other courses? Must they last the same amount of time and have an equal weight on a student's gpa, or will they occur less frequently or for a shorter amount of time and be worth less in terms of gpa?

by Haelunor » Mon Feb 24, 2014 8:11 pm

by Geilinor » Mon Feb 24, 2014 8:14 pm
Haelunor wrote:There has to be some sort of standardized system used to evaluate students' performances. Otherwise every school could just invent it's own, and the headaches that would cause would be maddening. If we have no such system, then one needs to be created with all deliberate speed.

by The Nihilistic view » Mon Feb 24, 2014 8:18 pm
Geilinor wrote:Haelunor wrote:There has to be some sort of standardized system used to evaluate students' performances. Otherwise every school could just invent it's own, and the headaches that would cause would be maddening. If we have no such system, then one needs to be created with all deliberate speed.
There might be a grading system in the Aurentine Education Act. Or their national exam scores could be used.

by Costa Fierro » Mon Feb 24, 2014 8:19 pm

by Haelunor » Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:32 pm

by Yanalia » Tue Feb 25, 2014 6:19 am
Yanalia wrote:I think this has enough support for the queue, unless the rules changed?First Amendment to the Provisional Republican Executive Act
Drafted by: Yanalia [RG]
Sponsors: Britanno, Haelunor [RG], People Who Say Ni [NDP], Oneracon [RG]
Category: Senate Procedures
The Senate of the Aurentine Commonwealth,
RECOGNISING that votes of no confidence are crucial to keeping the government within the confines of the law and maintaining responsiveness of the government to the popular will as represented by the Senate,
NOTING that the laws governing votes of no confidence currently limit their number to one per term,
BELIEVING that such a provision leaves much room for abuse, as in a potential case in which a government deliberately initiates a vote of no confidence in one of its ministers in order to grant itself a freer hand, among other possible situations,
WISHING to maintain the integrity and purpose of votes of no confidence,
HEREBY enacts the following:
The section of the Provisional Republican Executive Act entitled "Motion of No Confidence" shall be amended as follows: The sentence "Only one vote of no confidence may be held per term" shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
- Code: Select all
[spoiler=First Amendment to the Provisional Republican Executive Act][box][size=150]First Amendment to the Provisional Republican Executive Act[/size]
Drafted by: Yanalia [RG]
Sponsors: Britanno, Haelunor [RG], People Who Say Ni [NDP], Oneracon [RG]
Category: Senate Procedures
The Senate of the Aurentine Commonwealth,
RECOGNISING that votes of no confidence are crucial to keeping the government within the confines of the law and maintaining responsiveness of the government to the popular will as represented by the Senate,
NOTING that the laws governing votes of no confidence currently limit their number to one per term,
BELIEVING that such a provision leaves much room for abuse, as in a potential case in which a government deliberately initiates a vote of no confidence in one of its ministers in order to grant itself a freer hand, among other possible situations,
WISHING to maintain the integrity and purpose of votes of no confidence,
HEREBY enacts the following:
The section of the Provisional Republican Executive Act entitled "Motion of No Confidence" shall be amended as follows: The sentence "Only one vote of no confidence may be held per term" shall be struck out and rendered null and void.[/box][/spoiler]
Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.

by Oneracon » Wed Feb 26, 2014 6:53 pm
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |

by The Nihilistic view » Wed Feb 26, 2014 7:05 pm
Oneracon wrote:If I'm not mistaken, voting is open on the next DD section. We had "24 hours of debate" over 48 hours ago.

by The Nihilistic view » Wed Feb 26, 2014 7:08 pm

by Dendart » Wed Feb 26, 2014 8:05 pm

by Corenea » Wed Feb 26, 2014 8:11 pm


by The Liberated Territories » Wed Feb 26, 2014 8:21 pm

by The State of Czecho-Slovakia » Wed Feb 26, 2014 8:30 pm

by Haelunor » Wed Feb 26, 2014 8:38 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement