by Elktown » Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:58 pm
by Elktown » Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:59 pm
by Kryozerkia » Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:17 pm
by Flibbleites » Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:23 pm
Elktown wrote:RECOGNIZES a military draft as a forceful conscription of citizens into a military force.
ACKNOWLEDGES that a military draft encroaches on the rights of anyone at any time.
REALIZES that military drafts have been used before and, if not stopped, may be used again.
RECOGNIZES a selective service as a means by which a government may prepare for military conscription
FORBIDS any nation from creating a selective service to prepare for a military draft.
AlSO FORBIDS any nation from creating any type of military draft.
Feel free to add to this.
by Grays Harbor » Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:31 pm
Elktown wrote:RECOGNIZES a military draft as a forceful conscription of citizens into a military force.
ACKNOWLEDGES that a military draft encroaches on the rights of anyone at any time.
REALIZES that military drafts have been used before and, if not stopped, may be used again.
RECOGNIZES a selective service as a means by which a government may prepare for military conscription
FORBIDS any nation from creating a selective service to prepare for a military draft.
AlSO FORBIDS any nation from creating any type of military draft.
Feel free to add to this.
by Lowell Leber » Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:35 pm
by Great Nepal » Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:36 pm
by Hardenburgh » Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:41 pm
by Unibot » Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:50 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Des-Bal » Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:03 pm
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Ainocra » Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:54 pm
by Poree » Thu Feb 18, 2010 7:00 pm
by Skibereen » Thu Feb 18, 2010 8:45 pm
by Charlotte Ryberg » Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:31 pm
by Grays Harbor » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:10 pm
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:The honoured ambassador personally would support this, but is forced to respect the wishes of other member states to retain the draft for many reasons: self-defence, protection against enemies and so on. What about allowing conscientious objection?Yours,
by A mean old man » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:17 pm
by Skibereen » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:28 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:The honoured ambassador personally would support this, but is forced to respect the wishes of other member states to retain the draft for many reasons: self-defence, protection against enemies and so on. What about allowing conscientious objection?
Yours,
by Scripo » Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:56 am
by Sanctaria » Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:46 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:The honoured ambassador personally would support this, but is forced to respect the wishes of other member states to retain the draft for many reasons: self-defence, protection against enemies and so on. What about allowing conscientious objection?
Yours,
by Charlotte Ryberg » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:46 pm
by Cradled Squads » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:54 pm
Elktown wrote:RECOGNIZES a military draft as a forceful conscription of citizens into a military force.
ACKNOWLEDGES that a military draft encroaches on the rights of anyone at any time.
REALIZES that military drafts have been used before and, if not stopped, may be used again.
RECOGNIZES a selective service as a means by which a government may prepare for military conscription
FORBIDS any nation from creating a selective service to prepare for a military draft.
AlSO FORBIDS any nation from creating any type of military draft.
Feel free to add to this.
by Sanctaria » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:58 pm
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:The fact supporting our support for the global abolition for military drafts is the low morale and preparedness it may result, the professional and voluntary service seems to go much further in our opinion. BTW, I tried to draft on conscientious objection to a generally poor response.
by Cinistra » Fri Feb 19, 2010 1:41 pm
by Freeoplis » Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:24 pm
by Des-Bal » Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:26 pm
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:The fact supporting our support for the global abolition for military drafts is the low morale and preparedness it may result, the professional and voluntary service seems to go much further in our opinion. BTW, I tried to draft on conscientious objection to a generally poor response.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bisofeyr
Advertisement